Published 2000-01-25 · Federal Register document 00-1368
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes
Publication summary
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 series airplanes, that requires detailed visual and eddy current inspections of the lower wing skin at the 3 outboard fasteners of the stringer 64 end fitting to detect cracks; and corrective actions, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by reports of fatigue cracks found in the lower wing skin initiating from the outboard fasteners of the stringer 64 end fitting. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent such fatigue cracking, which could reduce structural integrity and loss of fail-safe capability of the airplane.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:00.616356+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2000-18aee3630151116d
- Source row
- results[34]
- Raw source SHA-256
- 18aee3630151116d2fb3a6893673332fd0937cde18bc691722f3a802a62279eb
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2000-02-01
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 2000-02-29
Some source clauses remain unstructured. Read the complete publication for conditions that have not been interpreted here.
Read 2 complete recorded clauses
Applicability wording · Applicability
Applicability: Model DC-8 series airplanes, as listed in
McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC8-57-100, Revision 01, dated
August 26, 1998; certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 6010–6935, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 775f100f8f1a53aceda139ba36d53627f745c99cf788ebff3c129c6cb1c123fa
Compliance and requirements
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent fatigue cracking of the lower wing skin, which could
reduce structural integrity and loss of fail-safe capability of the
airplane, accomplish the following:
Note 2: This AD will affect Principal Structural Elements (PSE)
57.08.037, 57.08.038, 57.08.021, and 57.08.022 of the DC-8
Supplemental Inspection Document (SID).
Inspection, Repair, and Modification
(a) Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD,
perform detailed visual and eddy current inspections to detect
cracks in the lower wing skin fastener holes in the area surrounding
3 outboard fasteners of the stringer 64 end fitting, in accordance
with McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC8-57-100, Revision 01,
dated August 26, 1998.
Note 3: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is
defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a specific
structural area, system, installation, or assembly to detect damage,
failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at intensity
deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror,
magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning and elaborate
access procedures may be required.''
(1) If any crack is detected in the skin fastener holes and it
is less than 3.1 inches long, prior to further flight, repair in
accordance with the service bulletin. Within 14,100 landings after
accomplishment of the repair, inspect the lower wing skin to detect
cracks, in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Los
Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate.
(2) If any crack is detected in the skin fastener holes and it
is greater than or equal to 3.1 inches long, prior to further
flight, repair in accordance with a method approved by the Manager,
Los Angeles ACO.
(3) If no crack is found, within 24 months after the effective
date of this AD, accomplish the preventative modification (including
stress or split sleeve coining the three fastener holes in the skin,
and installing new pins), in accordance with the service bulletin.
Accomplishment of this action constitutes terminating action for the
requirements of this AD.
Note 4: This AD does not terminate the inspection requirements
for PSE's 57.08.037, 57.08.038, 57.08.021, and 57.08.022 of the DC-8
SID in accordance with AD 93-01-15, amendment 39-6330.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO. Operators shall
submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal
Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the
Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
[[Page 3796]]
Note 5: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(d) Except as provided by paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this
AD, the actions shall be done in accordance with McDonnell Douglas
Service Bulletin DC8-57-100, Revision 01, dated August 26, 1998.
This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Aircraft Group,
Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California
90846, Attention: Technical Publications Business Administration,
Dept. C1-L51 (2-60). Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood,
California; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North
Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
(e) This amendment becomes effective on February 29, 2000.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 6935–11303, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 8a9838380eee5176dd7b0ae44dcbdf40fed10b54a5d06e5f46f95336304e911e
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2000-02-01 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 3c5ad9a5a834bb9d921c25b81b6bda5510bd43ceb5e5a084cf1f6812c9701792. Source manifest: 2d719b02868293994cb27cbee4cd8369096479b6fbd823db1e2c6d8da48736ff.
Official source · 2000-01-25
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 25, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3794-3796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1368]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 98-NM-309-AD; Amendment 39-11518; AD 2000-02-01]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 series airplanes,
that requires detailed visual and eddy current inspections of the lower
wing skin at the 3 outboard fasteners of the stringer 64 end fitting to
detect cracks; and corrective actions, if necessary. This amendment is
prompted by reports of fatigue cracks found in the lower wing skin
initiating from the outboard fasteners of the stringer 64 end fitting.
The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent such fatigue
cracking, which could reduce structural integrity and loss of fail-safe
capability of the airplane.
DATES: Effective February 29, 2000.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of February 29, 2000.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Aircraft Group, Long Beach Division,
3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention:
Technical Publications Business Administration, Dept. C1-L51 (2-60).
This information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue,
SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
[[Page 3795]]
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at the Office of the
Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington,
DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg DiLibero, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Los
Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard,
Lakewood, California 90712-4137; telephone (562) 627-5231; fax (562)
627-5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model
DC-8 series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on October
27, 1999 (64 FR 57806). That action proposed to require detailed visual
and eddy current inspections of the lower wing skin at the 3 outboard
fasteners of the stringer 64 end fitting to detect cracks; and
corrective actions, if necessary.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
the single comment received.
The commenter supports the proposed rule.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comment
noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public
interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 294 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 251 airplanes of U.S. registry
will be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 4 work
hours per airplane to accomplish the required inspection, and that the
average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the
cost impact of the inspection required by this AD on U.S. operators is
estimated to be $60,240, or $240 per airplane.
The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that
no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD
action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
2000-02-01 McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39-11518. Docket 98-NM-309-
AD.
Applicability: Model DC-8 series airplanes, as listed in
McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC8-57-100, Revision 01, dated
August 26, 1998; certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent fatigue cracking of the lower wing skin, which could
reduce structural integrity and loss of fail-safe capability of the
airplane, accomplish the following:
Note 2: This AD will affect Principal Structural Elements (PSE)
57.08.037, 57.08.038, 57.08.021, and 57.08.022 of the DC-8
Supplemental Inspection Document (SID).
Inspection, Repair, and Modification
(a) Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD,
perform detailed visual and eddy current inspections to detect
cracks in the lower wing skin fastener holes in the area surrounding
3 outboard fasteners of the stringer 64 end fitting, in accordance
with McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC8-57-100, Revision 01,
dated August 26, 1998.
Note 3: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is
defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a specific
structural area, system, installation, or assembly to detect damage,
failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at intensity
deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror,
magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning and elaborate
access procedures may be required.''
(1) If any crack is detected in the skin fastener holes and it
is less than 3.1 inches long, prior to further flight, repair in
accordance with the service bulletin. Within 14,100 landings after
accomplishment of the repair, inspect the lower wing skin to detect
cracks, in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Los
Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate.
(2) If any crack is detected in the skin fastener holes and it
is greater than or equal to 3.1 inches long, prior to further
flight, repair in accordance with a method approved by the Manager,
Los Angeles ACO.
(3) If no crack is found, within 24 months after the effective
date of this AD, accomplish the preventative modification (including
stress or split sleeve coining the three fastener holes in the skin,
and installing new pins), in accordance with the service bulletin.
Accomplishment of this action constitutes terminating action for the
requirements of this AD.
Note 4: This AD does not terminate the inspection requirements
for PSE's 57.08.037, 57.08.038, 57.08.021, and 57.08.022 of the DC-8
SID in accordance with AD 93-01-15, amendment 39-6330.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO. Operators shall
submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal
Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the
Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
[[Page 3796]]
Note 5: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(d) Except as provided by paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this
AD, the actions shall be done in accordance with McDonnell Douglas
Service Bulletin DC8-57-100, Revision 01, dated August 26, 1998.
This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Aircraft Group,
Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California
90846, Attention: Technical Publications Business Administration,
Dept. C1-L51 (2-60). Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood,
California; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North
Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
(e) This amendment becomes effective on February 29, 2000.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 13, 2000.
Donald L. Riggin,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 00-1368 Filed 1-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:43:32.843520+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- 006953c18057c5751dabf6eec840c4bfbea0310f2ff2a8f41e4ab2afaa8771c8
- Text SHA-256
- 3c5ad9a5a834bb9d921c25b81b6bda5510bd43ceb5e5a084cf1f6812c9701792
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.