Published 2000-12-29 · Federal Register document 00-33335
Airworthiness Directives; Agusta S.p.A. Model A109E Helicopters
Publication summary
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Agusta S.p.A. (Agusta) Model A109E helicopters. This action requires replacing certain tail rotor blades with airworthy tail rotor blades. This amendment is prompted by a tail rotor blade (blade) failure that caused a high vibration level in the helicopter. Investigation revealed that the failure was due to a change in the manufacturing process for an identified production lot of blades. This condition, if not corrected, could result in a failure of a blade and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:00.616356+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2000-18aee3630151116d
- Source row
- results[594]
- Raw source SHA-256
- 18aee3630151116d2fb3a6893673332fd0937cde18bc691722f3a802a62279eb
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2000-26-11
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 2001-01-16
Some source clauses remain unstructured. Read the complete publication for conditions that have not been interpreted here.
Read 2 complete recorded clauses
Applicability wording · Applicability
Applicability: Model A109E helicopters with tail rotor blade
(blade), part number (P/N) 109-8132-01-109, serial number (S/N) A5-
0130, A5-0131, A5-0224 through A5-0246, or A5-0249 through A5-0253,
installed, certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each helicopter identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For helicopters that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 8321–9326, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 29c301f8683f95d706063c26530955a9aa90c89d004fc613b82588f61525804d
Compliance and requirements
Compliance: Required within 10 hours time-in-service, unless
accomplished previously.
To prevent a blade failure and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter, accomplish the following:
(a) Replace each affected blade with an airworthy blade, P/N
109-8132-01-109 or P/N 109-8132-01-107, with an S/N other than those
listed in the applicability section of this AD.
Note 2: Agusta Bollettino Tecnico No. 109EP-13, dated August 3,
2000, pertains to the subject of this AD.
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Regulations Group, Rotorcraft
Directorate, FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an
FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may concur or comment and
then send it to the Manager, Regulations Group.
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Regulations Group.
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199 to operate the helicopter to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
(d) This amendment becomes effective on January 16, 2001.
Note 4: The subject of this AD is addressed in Ente Nazionale
per l'Aviazione Civile (Italy) AD 2000-393, dated August 8, 2000.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 9326–10751, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 12653d5b0f520db628b2d99c2c5f71fe82eb1613ef416ac0dc8ce396ce306576
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2000-26-11 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 10af69601ed58670d3bc42e932c2fcca219c437c9dfe98ba2f911df5c117fa9b. Source manifest: 77bca4e3bad33c88a6d511445aadc8c8dc206fcdb10fcef0aa4b62ef7d6cc218.
Official source · 2000-12-29
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 251 (Friday, December 29, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 82903-82905]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-33335]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2000-SW-58-AD; Amendment 39-12061; AD 2000-26-11]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Agusta S.p.A. Model A109E Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
[[Page 82904]]
Agusta S.p.A. (Agusta) Model A109E helicopters. This action requires
replacing certain tail rotor blades with airworthy tail rotor blades.
This amendment is prompted by a tail rotor blade (blade) failure that
caused a high vibration level in the helicopter. Investigation revealed
that the failure was due to a change in the manufacturing process for
an identified production lot of blades. This condition, if not
corrected, could result in a failure of a blade and subsequent loss of
control of the helicopter.
DATES: Effective January 16, 2001.
Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or
before February 27, 2001.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 2000-SW-58-AD, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room
663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137. You may also send comments electronically
to the Rules Docket at the following address: [email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Monschke, Aviation Safety
Engineer, FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, Rotorcraft Standards Staff, Fort
Worth, Texas 76193-0110, telephone (817) 222-5116, fax (817) 222-5961.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Ente Nazionale per l'Aviazione Civile
(ENAC), the airworthiness authority for Italy, notified the FAA that an
unsafe condition may exist on Agusta Model A109E helicopters.
Investigation revealed that the blade failure was due to a change in
the skin bonding manufacturing process for an identified production lot
of blades.
Agusta issued Alert Bollettino Tecnico No. 109EP-13, dated August
3, 2000, which specifies, within 10 hours time-in-service (TIS) or with
any abnormal increase in vibratory level, replacing blades, part number
(P/N) 109-8132-01-109, serial number (S/N) A5-0130, A5-0131, A5-0224 to
A5-0253, excluding A5-0247 and A5-0248, with blades, P/N 109-8132-01-
109 or 109-8132-01-107, to ensure the continued airworthiness of these
helicopters in Italy. ENAC classified this service bulletin as
mandatory and issued AD 2000-393, dated August 8, 2000, to ensure the
continued airworthiness of these helicopters in Italy.
This helicopter model is manufactured in Italy and is type
certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of
14 CFR 21.29 and the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement.
Pursuant to this bilateral airworthiness agreement, ENAC has kept the
FAA informed of the situation described above. The FAA has examined the
findings of ENAC, reviewed all available information, and determined
that AD action is necessary for products of this type design that are
certificated for operation in the United States.
Since we have identified an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on other Agusta Model A109E helicopters of the same
type design registered in the United States, this AD is being issued to
prevent failure of a blade. This AD requires replacing certain blades.
The short compliance time involved is required because the previously
described critical unsafe condition can adversely affect the
controllability and structural integrity of the helicopter. Therefore,
replacing each blade, P/N 109-8132-01-109, S/N A5-0130, A5-0131, A5-
0224 through A5-0246, and A5-0249 through A5-0253, with a blade P/N
109-8132-01-109 or P/N 109-8132-01-107, is required within 10 hours
time-in-service, and this AD must be issued immediately.
Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for prior
public comment hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for
making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
The FAA estimates that 20 helicopters will be affected by this AD,
that it will take approximately 4 work hours to replace the blades, and
that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Required parts will
cost approximately $10,000 per helicopter. Based on these figures, the
total cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be
$204,800 based on replacing both blades on all 20 helicopters.
Comments Invited
Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves
requirements affecting flight safety and, thus, was not preceded by
notice and an opportunity for public comment, comments are invited on
this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by
submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire.
Communications should identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted
in triplicate to the address specified under the caption ADDRESSES. All
communications received on or before the closing date for comments will
be considered, and this rule may be amended in light of the comments
received. Factual information that supports the commenter's ideas and
suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the
AD action and determining whether additional rulemaking action would be
needed.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might
suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be
available in the Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A
report that summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the
substance of this AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their mailed
comments submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-
addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made:
``Comments to Docket No. 2000-SW-58-AD.'' The postcard will be date
stamped and returned to the commenter.
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency
regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe
condition in aircraft, and that it is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further
that this action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory
Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is
determined that this emergency regulation otherwise would be
significant under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final
regulatory evaluation will be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket.
A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the
location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
[[Page 82905]]
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive
to read as follows:
2000-26-11 Agusta S.p.A.: Amendment 39-12061. Docket No. 2000-SW-
58-AD.
Applicability: Model A109E helicopters with tail rotor blade
(blade), part number (P/N) 109-8132-01-109, serial number (S/N) A5-
0130, A5-0131, A5-0224 through A5-0246, or A5-0249 through A5-0253,
installed, certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each helicopter identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For helicopters that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required within 10 hours time-in-service, unless
accomplished previously.
To prevent a blade failure and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter, accomplish the following:
(a) Replace each affected blade with an airworthy blade, P/N
109-8132-01-109 or P/N 109-8132-01-107, with an S/N other than those
listed in the applicability section of this AD.
Note 2: Agusta Bollettino Tecnico No. 109EP-13, dated August 3,
2000, pertains to the subject of this AD.
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Regulations Group, Rotorcraft
Directorate, FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an
FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may concur or comment and
then send it to the Manager, Regulations Group.
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Regulations Group.
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199 to operate the helicopter to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
(d) This amendment becomes effective on January 16, 2001.
Note 4: The subject of this AD is addressed in Ente Nazionale
per l'Aviazione Civile (Italy) AD 2000-393, dated August 8, 2000.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on December 21, 2000.
Henry A. Armstrong,
Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 00-33335 Filed 12-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:33:27.859951+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- 83f93edd7b733c981f620bfcbbba2da09691700bfaa654deb10005f18c56fdcf
- Text SHA-256
- 10af69601ed58670d3bc42e932c2fcca219c437c9dfe98ba2f911df5c117fa9b
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.