Published 2000-03-27 · Federal Register document 00-7335
Airworthiness Directives; Learjet Model 35, 35A, 36, 36A, 55, 55B, and 55C Airplanes
Publication summary
This amendment rescinds an existing Airworthiness Directive (AD), applicable to certain Learjet Model 35, 35A, 36, 36A, 55, 55B, and 55C airplanes. That AD currently requires installation of a placard on the instrument panel in the cockpit to advise the flightcrew that the Omega navigation system may be inoperative at certain engine speeds. That AD also provides for an optional installation of certain band reject filters, which eliminates the need for the placard. The requirements of that AD were intended to prevent excessive deviation from the intended flight path due to loss of navigation signals, which could result in a potentially low-fuel condition or a traffic conflict. Since the issuance of that AD, use of the Omega navigation system has been permanently discontinued; therefore, the original unsafe condition no longer exists.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:00.616356+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2000-18aee3630151116d
- Source row
- results[164]
- Raw source SHA-256
- 18aee3630151116d2fb3a6893673332fd0937cde18bc691722f3a802a62279eb
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 95-19-04 R1
- Effective date printed in this edition
- Unknown
No adopted-clause structure was recorded for this source edition. Read the complete text; no applicability conclusion has been inferred.
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 95-19-04 R1 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 442fd40b3e0bbd1d4bf3eeaa49095160387501285a517c14dd6abbb75857ae0c. Source manifest: ce57379b30710f63d7cb4db277a0b8c00ba9573b048b681203105443b520b1d6.
Official source · 2000-03-27
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 59 (Monday, March 27, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16129-16130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-7335]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 99-NM-311-AD; Amendment 39-11649; AD 95-19-04 R1]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Learjet Model 35, 35A, 36, 36A, 55,
55B, and 55C Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; rescission.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 16130]]
SUMMARY: This amendment rescinds an existing Airworthiness Directive
(AD), applicable to certain Learjet Model 35, 35A, 36, 36A, 55, 55B,
and 55C airplanes. That AD currently requires installation of a placard
on the instrument panel in the cockpit to advise the flightcrew that
the Omega navigation system may be inoperative at certain engine
speeds. That AD also provides for an optional installation of certain
band reject filters, which eliminates the need for the placard. The
requirements of that AD were intended to prevent excessive deviation
from the intended flight path due to loss of navigation signals, which
could result in a potentially low-fuel condition or a traffic conflict.
Since the issuance of that AD, use of the Omega navigation system has
been permanently discontinued; therefore, the original unsafe condition
no longer exists.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 27, 2000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: C. Dale Bleakney, Aerospace Engineer,
Flight Test Branch, ACE-117W, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, Wichita
Aircraft Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-
Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone (316) 946-4135; fax
(316) 946-4407.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 5, 1995, the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) issued AD 95-19-04, amendment 39-9365 (60 FR
47265, September 12, 1995), applicable to certain Learjet Model 35,
35A, 36, 36A, 55, 55B, and 55C airplanes. That AD requires installation
of a placard on the instrument panel in the cockpit to advise the
flightcrew that the Omega navigation system may be inoperative at
certain engine speeds. That AD also provides for an optional
installation of certain band reject filters, which eliminates the need
for the placard. That action was prompted by reports of loss of certain
navigation signals during extended over-water operation. That
condition, if not corrected, could result in excessive deviation from
the intended flight path due to loss of navigation signals, and
consequent potential low-fuel condition or a traffic conflict.
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. No comments were received in response
to the proposal.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, the FAA has determined
that air safety and the public interest require the rescission of the
rule as proposed.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action: (1) Is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Rescission
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding an airworthiness directive
removing amendment 39-9365 to read as follows:
95-19-04 R1 Learjet: Amendment 39-11649. Docket No. 99-NM-311-AD.
Rescinds AD 95-19-04, Amendment 39-9365.
Applicability: Model 35, 35A, 36, 36A, 55, 55B, and 55C
airplanes; equipped with Global Wulfsburg GNS 500, GNS-1000, and
GNS-X Flight Management Systems; certificated in any category.
This rescission is effective March 27, 2000.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 20, 2000.
Donald L. Riggin,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 00-7335 Filed 3-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:41:13.797860+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- c862a2fd830d168e28cd4a54cc933150e8aeb63ddf6b2229de60915f4302e065
- Text SHA-256
- 442fd40b3e0bbd1d4bf3eeaa49095160387501285a517c14dd6abbb75857ae0c
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.