Published 2000-01-19 · Federal Register document 00-950
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model MD-90 Series Airplanes
Publication summary
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model MD-90 series airplanes, that requires a one-time detailed visual inspection to detect fatigue cracking of certain longerons and the attaching frames of the lower left nose; and repair, if necessary. This amendment also requires installation of a preventive modification. This amendment is prompted by several reports of fatigue cracking of certain longerons and the attaching frames. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent such fatigue cracking, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the fuselage, and consequent loss of pressurization of the airplane.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:00.616356+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2000-18aee3630151116d
- Source row
- results[30]
- Raw source SHA-256
- 18aee3630151116d2fb3a6893673332fd0937cde18bc691722f3a802a62279eb
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2000-01-17
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 2000-02-23
Some source clauses remain unstructured. Read the complete publication for conditions that have not been interpreted here.
Read 2 complete recorded clauses
Applicability wording · Applicability
Applicability: Model MD-90 series airplanes, as listed in
McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD90-53-004, dated August 20,
1998, certificated in any category.
Note 1:
This AD applies to each airplane identified in the preceding
applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been modified,
altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this
AD. For airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that
the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/
operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance
in accordance with paragraph (b) of this AD. The request should include
an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair
on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe
condition has not been eliminated, the request should include specific
proposed actions to address it.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 6357–7275, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: c88d8646ae585e2040c7d552ded01612ccb7a42c8020a36e5d8dbe23f299144f
Compliance and requirements
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent fatigue cracking of longerons 22 through 26 and the
attaching frames, which could result in reduced structural integrity
of the fuselage, and consequent loss of pressurization of the
airplane, accomplish the following:
Inspection and Modification
(a) Prior to the accumulation of 40,000 total landings, or
within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later: Perform a detailed visual inspection to detect
cracking of longerons 22 through 26 (inclusive) and the respective
attaching frames at station frames Y=160.000 and Y=200.000 of the
left lower nose, in accordance with McDonnell Douglas Service
Bulletin MD90-53-004, dated August 20, 1998.
Note 2:
For the purposes of this AD, a detailed visual inspection is
defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a specific structural
area, system, installation, or assembly to detect damage, failure, or
irregularity. Available lighting is normally supplemented with a direct
source of good lighting at intensity deemed appropriate by the
inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may
be used. Surface cleaning and elaborate access procedures may be
required.''
(1) If no cracking is detected: Prior to further flight, install
clips and doublers under the longeron flanges and shim the longerons
in accordance with the service bulletin.
(2) If any cracking is detected: Prior to further flight, repair
the cracks and install clips and doublers under the longeron flanges
and shim the longerons in accordance with the service bulletin.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall
submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal
Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the
Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
Note 3:
Information concerning the existence of approved alternative
methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the
Los Angeles ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(d) The actions shall be done in accordance with McDonnell
Douglas Service
Bulletin MD90-53-004, dated August 20, 1998. This incorporation
by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Aircraft Group, Long Beach Division,
3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention:
Technical Publications Business Administration, Dept. C1-L51 (2-60).
Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at the Office of
the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
(e) This amendment becomes effective on February 23, 2000.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 7275–10787, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 68bf621c83f820e93b4f05e3d8896d3501d8731383dd50780bbba3789134c4c7
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2000-01-17 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: b952ce94a038bcd1a775adb98485bcbc6dc3c17f1989ef8bc3d6aa540c04675c. Source manifest: 1cc7e18f278983f507d5a5b4896018a191f7e4109c6ae99b4d7d8573dab2cade.
Official source · 2000-01-19
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2861-2862]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-950]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 99-NM-209-AD; Amendment 39-11515; AD 2000-01-17]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model MD-90 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model MD-90 series airplanes,
that requires a one-time detailed visual inspection to detect fatigue
cracking of certain longerons and the attaching frames of the lower
left nose; and repair, if necessary. This amendment also requires
installation of a preventive modification. This amendment is prompted
by several reports of fatigue cracking of certain longerons and the
attaching frames. The actions specified by this AD are intended to
prevent such fatigue cracking, which could result in reduced structural
integrity of the fuselage, and consequent loss of pressurization of the
airplane.
DATES: Effective February 23, 2000.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of February 23, 2000.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Aircraft Group, Long Beach Division,
3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention:
Technical Publications Business Administration, Dept. C1-L51 (2-60).
This information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue,
SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard,
Lakewood, California; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800
North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl Fountain, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120L; FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712; telephone
(562) 627-5222; fax (562) 627-5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model
MD-90 series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on October
27, 1999 (64 FR 57789). That action proposed to require a one-time
detailed visual inspection to detect fatigue cracking of certain
longerons and the attaching frames of the lower left nose; and repair,
if necessary. That action also proposed to require installation of a
preventive modification.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
single the comments received.
The commenter states that it has no objection to the proposed rule.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comment
noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public
interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 7 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 6 airplanes of U.S. registry
will be affected by this AD.
It will take approximately 1 work hour per airplane to accomplish
the required inspection, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour.
Based on these figures, the cost impact of the inspection required by
this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $360, or $60 per airplane.
It will take approximately 6 work hours per airplane to accomplish
the required modification, at an average labor rate of $60 per work
hour. Parts will cost approximately $312 per airplane. Based on these
figures, the cost impact of the modification required by this AD on
U.S. operators is estimated to be $4,032, or $672 per airplane.
The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions
that no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed requirements
of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions
in the future if this AD were not adopted.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) Is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
[[Page 2862]]
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES I111. The authority citation for
part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended] I112. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the
following new airworthiness directive:
2000-01-17 McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39-11515. Docket 99-NM-209-
AD.
Applicability: Model MD-90 series airplanes, as listed in
McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD90-53-004, dated August 20,
1998, certificated in any category.
Note 1:
This AD applies to each airplane identified in the preceding
applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been modified,
altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this
AD. For airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that
the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/
operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance
in accordance with paragraph (b) of this AD. The request should include
an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair
on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe
condition has not been eliminated, the request should include specific
proposed actions to address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent fatigue cracking of longerons 22 through 26 and the
attaching frames, which could result in reduced structural integrity
of the fuselage, and consequent loss of pressurization of the
airplane, accomplish the following:
Inspection and Modification
(a) Prior to the accumulation of 40,000 total landings, or
within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later: Perform a detailed visual inspection to detect
cracking of longerons 22 through 26 (inclusive) and the respective
attaching frames at station frames Y=160.000 and Y=200.000 of the
left lower nose, in accordance with McDonnell Douglas Service
Bulletin MD90-53-004, dated August 20, 1998.
Note 2:
For the purposes of this AD, a detailed visual inspection is
defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a specific structural
area, system, installation, or assembly to detect damage, failure, or
irregularity. Available lighting is normally supplemented with a direct
source of good lighting at intensity deemed appropriate by the
inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may
be used. Surface cleaning and elaborate access procedures may be
required.''
(1) If no cracking is detected: Prior to further flight, install
clips and doublers under the longeron flanges and shim the longerons
in accordance with the service bulletin.
(2) If any cracking is detected: Prior to further flight, repair
the cracks and install clips and doublers under the longeron flanges
and shim the longerons in accordance with the service bulletin.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall
submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal
Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the
Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
Note 3:
Information concerning the existence of approved alternative
methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the
Los Angeles ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(d) The actions shall be done in accordance with McDonnell
Douglas Service
Bulletin MD90-53-004, dated August 20, 1998. This incorporation
by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Aircraft Group, Long Beach Division,
3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention:
Technical Publications Business Administration, Dept. C1-L51 (2-60).
Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at the Office of
the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
(e) This amendment becomes effective on February 23, 2000.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 10, 2000.
Donald L. Riggin,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 00-950 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:43:37.237528+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- cb779d6342b5bc7f66ef8b54aa6ef7ea880f8fc887f7c6876b8453429439b522
- Text SHA-256
- b952ce94a038bcd1a775adb98485bcbc6dc3c17f1989ef8bc3d6aa540c04675c
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.