Published 2001-06-11 · Federal Register document 01-14040
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-80 Series Airplanes and Model MD-88 Airplanes
Publication summary
This document corrects information in an existing airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to all McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-80 series airplanes and Model MD-88 airplanes. That AD currently requires revisions to the Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) and installation of inspection aids on the wing upper surfaces. That AD also requires, among other actions, installation of an overwing heater blanket system or primary upper wing ice detection system, and installation of a heater protection panel or an equipment protection device on certain overwing heater blanket systems. This document corrects an incorrect paragraph reference. This correction is necessary to ensure that operators are aware of an incorrect paragraph reference in paragraph (d)(2)(ii)(A) of the existing AD.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:03.835669+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2001-8d66ddb74aa17366
- Source row
- results[209]
- Raw source SHA-256
- 8d66ddb74aa17366596c5f6ccb4e6d04532df19ae027b6fa003379bdedb52c7e
Correction notice · separate source edition
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2001-06-16
- Effective date printed in this edition
- Unknown
This correction is a separate source edition; it is not counted as a new adopted rule.
No adopted-clause structure was recorded for this source edition. Read the complete text; no applicability conclusion has been inferred.
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2001-06-16 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 9b0c74cf10eec617ac0d0ef94af9fa1b89a8c68a065dd4af08a6849946c263c8. Source manifest: f1c1b99cc05bb3e2797f03bf2cdfd43de47f3cb77a9e2d7aa6af8df26da0eb9b.
Official source · 2001-06-11
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 112 (Monday, June 11, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31121-31124]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14040]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 98-NM-326-AD; Amendment 39-12163; AD 2001-06-16]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-80 Series
Airplanes and Model MD-88 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document corrects information in an existing
airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to all McDonnell Douglas
Model DC-9-80 series airplanes and Model MD-88 airplanes. That AD
currently requires revisions to the Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) and
installation of inspection aids on the wing upper surfaces. That AD
also requires, among other actions, installation of an overwing heater
blanket system or primary upper wing ice detection system, and
installation of a heater protection panel or an equipment protection
device on certain overwing heater blanket systems. This document
corrects an incorrect paragraph reference. This correction is necessary
to ensure that operators are aware of an incorrect paragraph reference
in paragraph (d)(2)(ii)(A) of the existing AD.
DATES: Effective May 7, 2001.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations was approved previously by the Director of the Federal
Register as of January 17, 1992 (57 FR 2014, November 12, 1998).
The incorporation by reference of certain other publications listed
in the regulations was approved previously by the Director of the
Federal Register as of May 7, 2001 (66 FR 17499, April 2, 2001).
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Aircraft Group, Long Beach Division,
3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data
and Service Management, Dept. C1-L5A (800-0024). This information may
be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport
Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; or at the FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at the Office of the
Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington,
DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Albert Lam, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California
90712-4137; telephone (562) 627-5346; fax (562) 627-5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 23, 2001, the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) issued AD 2001-06-16, amendment 39-12163 (66 FR
17499, April 2, 2001), which applies to all McDonnell Douglas Model DC-
9-80 series airplanes and Model MD-88 airplanes. That AD supersedes an
existing AD to continue to require revisions to the Airplane Flight
Manual (AFM) and installation of inspection aids on the wing upper
surfaces. That AD also requires, among other actions, installation of
an overwing heater blanket system or primary upper wing ice detection
system, and installation of a heater protection panel or an equipment
protection device on certain overwing heater blanket systems. That AD
was prompted by incidents in which ice accumulation on the wing upper
surfaces shed into the engines during takeoff. The actions required by
that AD are intended to prevent ice accumulation on the wing upper
surfaces, which could result in ingestion of ice into one or both
engines and consequent loss of thrust from one or both engines.
Need for the Correction
As discussed in the preamble of AD 2001-06-16, the FAA deleted
paragraph (f)(1)(iii) and other subparagraphs of the supplemental NPRM
from the final rule. Although we deleted these paragraphs, we
inadvertently did not update an associated paragraph reference in
paragraph (d)(2)(ii)(A) of AD 2001-06-16. As a result, paragraph
(d)(2)(ii)(A) incorrectly references paragraph (f)(1)(iii)(B) for
installation of an equipment protective device (EPD); the correct
reference is paragraph (f)(2)(i).
The FAA has determined that a correction to AD 2001-06-16 is
necessary to revise an incorrect paragraph reference in paragraph
(d)(2)(ii)(A) of AD 2001-06-16.
Correction of Publication
This document corrects the error and correctly adds the AD as an
amendment to Sec. 39.13 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
39.13).
The AD is reprinted in its entirety for the convenience of affected
operators. The effective date of the AD remains May 7, 2001.
[[Page 31122]]
Since this action only corrects an incorrect paragraph reference,
it has no adverse economic impact and imposes no additional burden on
any person. Therefore, the FAA has determined that notice and public
procedures are unnecessary.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Correction
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Corrected]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by correctly adding the following
airworthiness directive (AD):
2001-06-16 McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39-12163. Docket 98-NM-326-
AD. Supersedes AD 92-03-02, Amendment 39-8156.
Applicability: All Model DC-9-81, -82, -83, and -87 series
airplanes; and Model MD-88 airplanes; certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (i)(1)
of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect
of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent ice accumulation on the wing upper surfaces, which
could result in ingestion of ice into one or both engines and
consequent loss of thrust from one or both engines, accomplish the
following:
Restatement of Requirements of AD 92-03-02
Airplane Flight Manual Revision
(a) Within 10 days after January 17, 1992 (the effective date of
AD 92-03-02, amendment 39-8156), revise the Limitations Section of
the FAA-approved Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) to include the
following. This may be accomplished by inserting a copy of this AD
in the AFM.
``Ice on Wing Upper Surfaces
CAUTION
Ice shedding from the wing upper surface during takeoff can
cause severe damage to one or both engines, leading to surge,
vibration, and complete thrust loss. The formation of ice can occur
on wing surfaces during exposure of the airplane to normal icing
conditions. Clear ice can also occur on the wing upper surfaces when
cold-soaked fuel is in the main wing fuel tanks, and the airplane is
exposed to conditions of high humidity, rain, drizzle, or fog at
ambient temperatures well above freezing. Often, the ice
accumulation is clear and difficult to detect visually. The ice
forms most frequently on the inboard, aft corner of the main wing
tanks. [END OF CAUTIONARY NOTE]
The wing upper surfaces must be physically checked for ice when
the airplane has been exposed to conditions conducive to ice
formation. Takeoff may not be initiated unless the flight crew
verifies that a visual check and a physical (hands-on) check of the
wing upper surfaces have been accomplished, and that the wing is
clear of ice accumulation when any of the following conditions
occur:
(1) When the ambient temperature is less than 50 degrees F and
high humidity or visible moisture (rain, drizzle, sleet, snow, fog,
etc.) is present;
(2) When frost or ice is present on the lower surface of either
wing;
(3) After completion of de-icing.
When inspection aids (i.e. tufts, decals, mount pads, painted
symbols, and paint stripes) are installed in accordance with
McDonnell Douglas MD-80 Service Bulletin 30-59, the physical check
may be made by assuring that all installed tufts move freely.
NOTE
This limitation does not relieve the requirement that aircraft
surfaces are free of frost, snow, and ice accumulation, as required
by Federal Aviation Regulations Secs. 91.527 and 121.629. [END OF
NOTE]''
AFM Configuration Deviation List Revision
(b) Within 10 days after January 17, 1992, revise the
Configuration Deviation List (CDL) Appendix of the FAA-approved AFM
to include the following. This may be accomplished by inserting a
copy of this AD in the AFM.
``30-80-01 Triangular Decal and Tuft Assemblies
Up to two (2) decals or tufts per side may be missing, provided:
(a) At least one decal and tuft on each side is located along
the aft spar line; and
(b) The tufts are used for performing the physical check to
determine that the upper wing is free of ice by observing that the
tufts move freely.
Up to eight (8) decals and/or tufts may be missing, provided:
(a) Takeoff may not be initiated unless the flight crew verifies
that a physical (hands-on) check is made of the upper wing in the
location of the missing decals and/or tufts to assure that there is
no ice on the wing when icing conditions exist;
OR
(b) When the ambient temperature is more than 50 degrees F.''
Installation of Inspection Aids
(c) Within 30 days after January 17, 1992, install inspection
aids (i.e., tufts, decals, mount pads, painted symbols, and paint
stripes) on the inboard side of the wings' upper surfaces, in
accordance with McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin 30-59, dated
September 18, 1989; Revision 1, dated January 5, 1990; or Revision
2, dated August 15, 1990.
New Requirements of This AD
Repetitive Tests and One-Time Inspection
(d) For airplanes on which an overwing heater blanket system was
installed without installation of a heater protection panel (HPP) or
an equipment protection device (EPD) prior to the effective date of
this AD: Within 60 days after the effective date of this AD,
accomplish the actions specified in paragraph (d)(1) or (d)(2) of
this AD, as applicable.
(1) For airplanes on which the overwing heater blanket system
was installed in accordance with McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin
MD80-30-071, Revision 02, dated February 6, 1996; or McDonnell
Douglas Service Bulletin MD80-30-078, Revision 01, dated April 8,
1997: Accomplish paragraphs (d)(1)(i) and (d)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Remove secondary access covers, and perform a one-time
detailed visual inspection to detect discrepancies (mechanical
damage or punctures in the upper skin of the blanket, prying damage
on the panel, and fuel leakage) of the overwing heater blanket, in
accordance with McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin MD80-
30A087, dated September 22, 1997. And,
(ii) Accomplish paragraph (d)(1)(ii)(A) or (d)(1)(ii)(B) of this
AD.
(A) Perform dielectric withstanding voltage and resistance tests
in accordance with McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin MD80-
30A087, dated September 22, 1997. Repeat the tests thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 150 days, until installation of an HPP in
accordance with paragraph (f)(1)(i) or (f)(1)(ii) of this AD, as
applicable.
(B) Deactivate the overwing heater blanket system until
accomplishment of dielectric withstanding voltage and resistance
tests specified in paragraph (d)(1)(ii)(A). If the overwing heater
blanket system is deactivated as provided by this paragraph,
continue to accomplish the requirements of paragraphs (a), (b), and
(c) of this AD.
Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed visual
inspection is defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a
specific structural area, system, installation, or assembly to
detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is
normally supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at
intensity deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such
as mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface
[[Page 31123]]
cleaning and elaborate access procedures may be required.''
(2) For airplanes on which the overwing heater blanket system
was installed in accordance with TDG Aerospace, Inc., STC SA6042NM:
Accomplish paragraphs (d)(2)(i) and (d)(2)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Remove secondary access covers, and perform a one-time
detailed visual inspection to detect discrepancies (mechanical
damage or punctures in the upper skin of the blanket, prying damage
on the panel, and fuel leakage) of the overwing heater blanket, in
accordance with McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin MD80-
30A087, dated September 22, 1997. And,
(ii) Accomplish paragraph (d)(2)(ii)(A) or (d)(2)(ii)(B) of this
AD.
(A) Perform dielectric withstanding voltage and resistance tests
in accordance with McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin MD80-
30A087, dated September 22, 1997. Repeat the tests thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 150 days, until installation of an EPD in
accordance with paragraph (f)(2)(i) of this AD.
(B) Deactivate overwing heater blanket system until
accomplishment of dielectric withstanding voltage and resistance
tests specified in paragraph (d)(2)(ii)(A). If the overwing heater
blanket system is deactivated as provided by this paragraph,
continue to accomplish the requirements of paragraphs (a), (b), and
(c) of this AD.
Corrective Action
(e) If any discrepancy is detected during any inspection or test
performed in accordance with paragraph (d) of this AD, prior to
further flight, repair or replace the affected heater blanket, in
accordance with McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin MD80-
30A087, dated September 22, 1997; except as provided in paragraph
(h) of this AD.
Note 3: McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin MD80-30A087,
dated September 22, 1997, references TDG Aerospace Document E95-451,
Revision B, dated January 31, 1996, as an additional source of
service information for accomplishment of repair or replacement of
the overwing heater blanket.
Installation of Overwing Heater Blanket or Primary Upper Wing Ice
Detection System
(f) Within 3 years after the effective date of this AD, do the
requirements of either paragraph (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this AD.
(1) Do the actions specified in paragraph (f)(1)(i) or
(f)(1)(ii) of this AD, as applicable.
(i) For airplanes listed in Group 1 in McDonnell Douglas
ServiceBulletin MD80-30-090, dated October 19, 1999: Install an
overwing heater blanket system in accordance with McDonnell Douglas
Service Bulletin MD80-30-071, Revision 02, dated February 6, 1996;
and modify and reidentify the existing HPP in accordance with
McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD80-30-090. Modification of the
existing HPP in accordance with this paragraph constitutes
terminating action for the repetitive inspections required by
(d)(1)(ii)(A) of this AD.
(ii) For airplanes listed in Group 2 in McDonnell Douglas
Service Bulletin MD80-30-090, dated October 19, 1999: Install an
overwing heater blanket system in accordance with McDonnell Douglas
Service Bulletin MD80-30-078, Revision 01, dated April 8, 1997; and
install an HPP and associated wiring in accordance with McDonnell
Douglas Service Bulletin MD80-30-090. Installation of an HPP and
associated wiring in accordance with this paragraph constitutes
terminating action for the repetitive inspections required by
(d)(1)(ii)(A) of this AD.
Note 4: For other airplanes, accomplishment of the requirements
of paragraph (f)(1)(i) or (f)(1)(ii) of this AD may be acceptable
per paragraph (i)(1) of this AD.
(2) Accomplish the actions specified in either paragraph
(f)(2)(i), (f)(2)(ii), or (f)(2)(iii) of this AD.
(i) Install an overwing heater blanket system, and install an
EPD that provides a circuit protection function to the overwing
heater blanket, in accordance with a method approved by the Manager,
Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA. Installation
of an EPD in accordance with this paragraph constitutes terminating
action for the repetitive inspections required by (d)(2)(ii)(A) of
this AD.
Note 5: Installation of an overwing heater blanket system and
installation of an EPD that provides a circuit protection function
to the overwing heater blanket, in accordance with TDG Aerospace,
Inc., SA6042NM, or TDG Master Drawing List (MDL) E93-104, Revision
R, dated October 25, 2000; is an approved means of compliance with
the requirements of paragraph (f)(2)(i) of this AD
(ii) Install an overwing heater blanket system in accordance
with a method approved by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
Note 6: Installation of an overwing heater blanket system in
accordance with AlliedSignal STC SA6061NM, is an approved means of
compliance with the requirements of paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this AD.
(iii) Install an FAA-approved primary upper wing ice detection
system in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Los
Angeles ACO.
Note 7: Boeing (McDonnell Douglas) has received FAA approval of
an acceptable primary upper wing ice detection system. This
modification has been assigned a Boeing (McDonnell Douglas) service
bulletin number but, at this time, no service bulletin is available.
AFM Revision
(g) Except as provided by paragraph (h) of this AD, prior to
further flight after accomplishment of the installation required by
paragraph (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this AD, revise the Limitations
Section of the FAA-approved AFM to include the following. This may
be accomplished by inserting a copy of this AD in the AFM. After
accomplishment of the installation required by paragraph (f)(1) or
(f)(2) of this AD and this AFM revision, the AFM revisions required
by paragraphs (a) and (b) of this AD may be removed from the AFM,
and the inspection aids required by paragraph (c) of this AD may be
removed from the airplane.
``Ice on Wing Upper Surfaces
CAUTION
Ice shedding from the wing upper surface during takeoff can
cause severe damage to one or both engines, leading to surge,
vibration, and complete thrust loss. The formation of ice can occur
on wing surfaces during exposure of the airplane to normal icing
conditions. Clear ice can also occur on the wing upper surfaces when
cold-soaked fuel is in the main wing fuel tanks, and the airplane is
exposed to conditions of high humidity, rain, drizzle, or fog at
ambient temperatures well above freezing. Often, the ice
accumulation is clear and difficult to detect visually. The ice
forms most frequently on the inboard, aft corner of the main wing
tanks. [END OF CAUTIONARY NOTE]''
(h) An airplane may be operated with an inoperative overwing
heater blanket or primary upper wing ice detection system for 10
days per the Master Minimum Equipment List (MMEL), provided that the
actions specified in paragraphs (h)(1), (h)(2), and (h)(3) of this
AD are done before further flight.
(1) Revise the Limitations Section of the FAA-approved AFM to
include the following. This may be accomplished by inserting a copy
of this AD in the AFM.
``Ice on Wing Upper Surfaces
CAUTION
The wing upper surfaces must be physically checked for ice when
the airplane has been exposed to conditions conducive to ice
formation. Takeoff may not be initiated unless the flight crew
verifies that a visual check and a physical (hands-on) check of the
wing upper surfaces have been accomplished, and that the wing is
clear of ice accumulation when any of the following conditions
occur:
(1) When the ambient temperature is less than 50 degrees F and
high humidity or visible moisture (rain, drizzle, sleet, snow, fog,
etc.) is present;
(2) When frost or ice is present on the lower surface of either
wing;
(3) After completion of de-icing.
When inspection aids (i.e. tufts, decals, mount pads, painted
symbols, and paint stripes) are installed in accordance with
McDonnell Douglas MD-80 Service Bulletin 30-59, the physical check
may be made by assuring that all installed tufts move freely.
NOTE
This limitation does not relieve the requirement that aircraft
surfaces are free of frost, snow, and ice accumulation, as required
by Federal Aviation Regulations Secs. 91.527 and 121.629. [END OF
NOTE]''
(2) Revise the CDL Appendix of the FAA-approved AFM to include
the following. This may be accomplished by inserting a copy of this
AD in the AFM.
``30-80-01 Triangular Decal and Tuft Assemblies
Up to two (2) decals or tufts per side may be missing, provided:
(a) At least one decal and tuft on each side is located along
the aft spar line; and
[[Page 31124]]
(b) The tufts are used for performing the physical check to
determine that the upper wing is free of ice by observing that the
tufts move freely.
Up to eight (8) decals and/or tufts may be missing, provided:
(a) Takeoff may not be initiated unless the flight crew verifies
that a physical (hands-on) check is made of the upper wing in the
location of the missing decals and/or tufts to assure that there is
no ice on the wing when icing conditions exist;
OR
(b) When the ambient temperature is more than 50 degrees F.''
(3) Install inspection aids (i.e., tufts, decals, mount pads,
painted symbols, and paint stripes) on the inboard side of the
wings' upper surfaces, in accordance with McDonnell Douglas Service
Bulletin 30-59, dated September 18, 1989; Revision 1, dated January
5, 1990; or Revision 2, dated August 15, 1990.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(i)(1) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO, FAA. Operators
shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal
Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the
Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
(2) The following alternative methods of compliance (AMOC) were
approved previously per AD 92-03-02, amendment 39-8156, and are
approved as AMOC's with the indicated paragraphs of this AD:
(i) Installation of a non-skid, striped triangular symbol per
Option 5 of McDonnell Douglas Service bulletin MD80-30-059, Revision
4 though Revision 7, is approved as an AMOC with paragraph (b) of
this AD.
(ii) Revision of the Configuration Deviation List (CDL) Appendix
of the AFM by inserting a copy of CDL Appendix, Section I, Page 2A,
dated March 10, 1993, into the AFM, is approved as an AMOC with
paragraph (c) of this AD.
Note 8: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(j) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
Secs. 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the
requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(k) The actions required by paragraphs (c), (d), (e), (f)(1),
and (h)(3) of this AD shall be done in accordance with the
applicable service document identified in Table 1 of this AD.
Table 1.--Referenced Service Documents
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service document Revision level Date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
McDonnell Douglas Service Original.......... Sept. 18, 1989.
Bulletin 30-59.
McDonnell Douglas Service 1................. Jan. 5, 1990.
Bulletin 30-59.
McDonnell Douglas Service 2................. Aug. 15, 1990.
Bulletin 30-59.
McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Original.......... Sept. 22, 1997.
Bulletin MD80-30A087.
McDonnell Douglas Service Original.......... Oct. 19, 1999.
Bulletin MD80-30-090.
McDonnell Douglas Service 01................ Apr. 8, 1997.
Bulletin MD80-30-078.
McDonnell Douglas Service 02................ Feb. 6, 1996
Bulletin MD80-30-071.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) The incorporation by reference of McDonnell Douglas Service
Bulletin 30-59, dated September 18, 1989; McDonnell Douglas Service
Bulletin 30-59, Revision 1, dated January 5, 1990; and McDonnell
Douglas Service Bulletin 30-59, Revision 2, dated August 15, 1990;
was approved previously by the Director of the Federal Register as
of January 17, 1992 (57 FR 2014, January 17, 1992).
(2) The incorporation by reference of the remaining service
bulletins listed in Table 1 of this AD, was approved previously by
the Director of the Federal Register as of May 7, 2001 (66 FR 17499,
April 2, 2001).
(3) Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Aircraft
Group, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach,
California 90846, Attention: Data and Service Management, Dept. C1-
L5A (D800-0024). Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or
at the FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960
Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at the Office of the
Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(1) The effective date of this amendment remains May 7, 2001.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 30, 2001.
Vi L. Lipski,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 01-14040 Filed 6-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:29:14.712087+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- 7d4c3e9004b87914f167f7e5d69da38e23830082c8a48a230082bac9384bbedf
- Text SHA-256
- 9b0c74cf10eec617ac0d0ef94af9fa1b89a8c68a065dd4af08a6849946c263c8
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.