Published 2001-07-06 · Federal Register document 01-16736
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-102, -103, -106, -201, -202, -301, -311, -314, and -315 Series Airplanes
Publication summary
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to all Bombardier Model DHC-8-102, -103, -106, -201, -202, - 301, -311, -314, and -315 series airplanes, that requires revising the Bombardier maintenance program to incorporate repetitive inspections to detect fatigue cracking in certain structures; and corrective actions, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness information issued by a foreign airworthiness authority. The actions specified by this AD are intended to ensure that fatigue cracking of certain principal structural elements is detected and corrected; such fatigue cracking could adversely affect the structural integrity of these airplanes.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:03.835669+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2001-8d66ddb74aa17366
- Source row
- results[259]
- Raw source SHA-256
- 8d66ddb74aa17366596c5f6ccb4e6d04532df19ae027b6fa003379bdedb52c7e
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2001-13-19
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 2001-08-10
Some source clauses remain unstructured. Read the complete publication for conditions that have not been interpreted here.
Read 2 complete recorded clauses
Applicability wording · Applicability
Applicability: Model DHC-8-102, -103, -106, -201, -202, -301, -
311, -314, and -315 series airplanes, certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 6847–7731, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 9b03aecf50a25363f6a961eb6a34a6122db63a85cc0c27418ba7892ccc202e7b
Compliance and requirements
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To ensure continued structural integrity of these airplanes,
accomplish the following:
(a) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD,
accomplish the actions required by either paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2)
of this AD, as applicable.
Maintenance Program Revisions
(1) Revise the Bombardier maintenance program by incorporating
the threshold and repetitive inspection intervals specified in the
Temporary Revisions (TR's) to the DHC-8 Maintenance Program Manuals,
Airworthiness Limitations List (AWL), Structural Inspection Program
Task No. 5310/31A, into the Bombardier maintenance program. The TR's
for specific airplane models are listed in Table 1, as follows:
Table 1.--List of Temporary Revisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bombardier models TR No. Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DHC-8-102, -103, and -106 series TR AWL-71 September 3, 1999.
airplanes.
DHC-8-102, -103, -106, -201, -202, - TR AWL 2-15 September 3, 1999.
301, -311, -314, and -315 series
airplanes.
DHC-8-301, -311, -314, and -315 series TR AWL 3-78 November 19, 1999.
airplanes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 35540]]
Note 2: When the TR documents listed in Table 1 in paragraph
(a)(1) of this AD are incorporated into the general revisions of the
DHC-8 Maintenance Program Manual, you may insert the general
revisions into the Bombardier maintenance program, provided that the
information contained in the general revisions is identical to that
specified in the TR documents.
Structural Inspections
(2) For airplanes having closing angles that are identified as
principal structural elements: Do the inspections specified by the
applicable TR listed in Table 1 of paragraph (a) of this AD.
Thereafter, repeat the inspection at intervals not to exceed 10,000
flight cycles at the time specified in paragraph (a)(2)(i),
(a)(2)(ii), or (a)(2)(iii) of this AD, as applicable.
(i) For airplanes that have accumulated less than 8,000 flight
cycles as of the effective date of this AD: Do the threshold
inspection prior to the accomplishment of 10,000 flight cycles, or
within 2,000 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later.
(ii) For airplanes that have accumulated 8,000 flight cycles or
more as of the effective date of this AD: Do the threshold
inspection within 2,000 flight cycles after the effective date of
this AD.
(iii) For airplanes on which a 40,000 flight cycle inspection
specified by the applicable TR listed in Table 1 of paragraph (a) of
this AD has been done: Start the 10,000 flight cycle repetitive
inspection at the time specified by paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(A) or
(a)(2)(iii)(B) of this AD, as applicable.
(A) If no cracks were found, start the cycle from the date of
the 40,000 flight cycle inspection.
(B) If cracks have been found and the closing angles have been
replaced as provided in paragraph (b) of this AD, start the cycle
from the date of the replacement.
Corrective Actions
(b) If any crack is detected during any structural inspection
required by paragraph (a)(2) of this AD, before further flight,
repair any such cracking or replace the closing angles per a method
approved by the Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA; or the Transport Canada Civil Aviation (or its delegated
agent). For a repair or replacement method to be approved by the
Manager, New York ACO, as required by this paragraph, the Manager's
approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(c) Except as provided by paragraph (d) of this AD: After the
actions specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this AD have been
accomplished, no alternative inspections or inspection intervals may
be approved for the structural elements specified by the documents
listed in Table 1 of paragraph (a)(1) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, New York ACO. Operators shall
submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal
Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the
Manager, New York ACO.
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the New York ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(f) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this AD, the actions
shall be done in accordance with de Havilland Temporary Revision TR
AWL-71, dated September 3, 1999; de Havilland Temporary Revision TR
AWL 2-15, dated September 3, 1999; and de Havilland Temporary
Revision TR AWL 3-78, dated November 19, 1999. This incorporation by
reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be
obtained from Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier Regional Aircraft
Division, 123 Garratt Boulevard, Downsview, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada.
Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, New York
ACO, 10 Fifth Street, Third Floor, Valley Stream, New York; or at
the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW.,
suite 700, Washington, DC.
Note 4: The subject of this AD is addressed in Canadian
airworthiness directive CF-2000-07, dated March 3, 2000.
Effective Date
(g) This amendment becomes effective on August 10, 2001.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 7731–14035, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: f36248a49d7bb2b191c67204b3b3765728644b3a784a8b2060082647c236e922
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2001-13-19 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 8785c4b2e84ff542efef277bf134f9812baf061c840232ddcc8e09523308d922. Source manifest: a8057b81d7a34f6566498157753264f7a929e8444e76c758d248e9a159d05142.
Official source · 2001-07-06
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 130 (Friday, July 6, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35538-35540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16736]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2000-NM-45-AD; Amendment 39-12301; AD 2001-13-19]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-102, -103, -106,
-201, -202, -301, -311, -314, and -315 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to all Bombardier Model DHC-8-102, -103, -106, -201, -202, -
301, -311, -314, and -315 series airplanes, that requires revising the
Bombardier maintenance program to incorporate repetitive inspections to
detect fatigue cracking in certain structures; and corrective actions,
if necessary. This amendment is prompted by issuance of mandatory
continuing airworthiness information issued by a foreign airworthiness
authority. The actions specified by this AD are intended to ensure that
fatigue cracking of certain principal structural elements is detected
and corrected; such fatigue cracking could adversely affect the
structural integrity of these airplanes.
DATES: Effective August 10, 2001.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of August 10, 2001.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier Regional Aircraft Division,
123 Garratt Boulevard, Downsview, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada. This
information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue,
SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, New York Aircraft Certification
Office, 10 Fifth Street, Third Floor, Valley Stream, New York; or at
the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW.,
suite 700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Serge Napoleon, Aerospace Engineer,
ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft Certification Office, 10 Fifth Street,
Third Floor, Valley Stream, New York 11581; telephone (516) 256-7512;
fax (516) 568-2716.
[[Page 35539]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to all Bombardier Model DHC-8-102, -
103, -106, -201, -202, -301, -311, -314, and -315 series airplanes was
published in the Federal Register on February 14, 2001 (66 FR 10238).
That action proposed to require revising the Bombardier maintenance
program to incorporate repetitive inspections to detect fatigue
cracking in certain structures; and corrective actions, if necessary.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. No comments were submitted in response
to the proposal or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.
Editorial Change
The language in paragraph (a)(2)(iii) has been slightly revised to
clarify the intervals for certain repetitive inspections.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, the FAA has determined
that air safety and the public interest require the adoption of the
rule as proposed with the clarification described previously. The FAA
has determined that this change will neither increase the economic
burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD.
Cost Impact
The FAA estimates that 195 Model DHC-8-102, -103, -106, -201, -202,
-301, -311, -314, and -315 series airplanes of U.S. registry will be
affected by this AD.
It will take approximately 1 work hour per airplane to revise the
Bombardier maintenance program, at an average labor rate of $60 per
work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the revision on
U.S. operators is estimated to be $11,700, or $60 per airplane.
It will take approximately 5 work hours per airplane to accomplish
the required structural inspections, at an average labor rate of $60
per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the
inspections on U.S. operators is estimated to be $58,500, or $300 per
airplane.
The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions
that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this
AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed
in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform
the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures
typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to
gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other
administrative actions.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
2001-13-19 Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly de Havilland, Inc.):
Amendment 39-12301. Docket 2000-NM-45-AD.
Applicability: Model DHC-8-102, -103, -106, -201, -202, -301, -
311, -314, and -315 series airplanes, certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To ensure continued structural integrity of these airplanes,
accomplish the following:
(a) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD,
accomplish the actions required by either paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2)
of this AD, as applicable.
Maintenance Program Revisions
(1) Revise the Bombardier maintenance program by incorporating
the threshold and repetitive inspection intervals specified in the
Temporary Revisions (TR's) to the DHC-8 Maintenance Program Manuals,
Airworthiness Limitations List (AWL), Structural Inspection Program
Task No. 5310/31A, into the Bombardier maintenance program. The TR's
for specific airplane models are listed in Table 1, as follows:
Table 1.--List of Temporary Revisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bombardier models TR No. Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DHC-8-102, -103, and -106 series TR AWL-71 September 3, 1999.
airplanes.
DHC-8-102, -103, -106, -201, -202, - TR AWL 2-15 September 3, 1999.
301, -311, -314, and -315 series
airplanes.
DHC-8-301, -311, -314, and -315 series TR AWL 3-78 November 19, 1999.
airplanes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 35540]]
Note 2: When the TR documents listed in Table 1 in paragraph
(a)(1) of this AD are incorporated into the general revisions of the
DHC-8 Maintenance Program Manual, you may insert the general
revisions into the Bombardier maintenance program, provided that the
information contained in the general revisions is identical to that
specified in the TR documents.
Structural Inspections
(2) For airplanes having closing angles that are identified as
principal structural elements: Do the inspections specified by the
applicable TR listed in Table 1 of paragraph (a) of this AD.
Thereafter, repeat the inspection at intervals not to exceed 10,000
flight cycles at the time specified in paragraph (a)(2)(i),
(a)(2)(ii), or (a)(2)(iii) of this AD, as applicable.
(i) For airplanes that have accumulated less than 8,000 flight
cycles as of the effective date of this AD: Do the threshold
inspection prior to the accomplishment of 10,000 flight cycles, or
within 2,000 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later.
(ii) For airplanes that have accumulated 8,000 flight cycles or
more as of the effective date of this AD: Do the threshold
inspection within 2,000 flight cycles after the effective date of
this AD.
(iii) For airplanes on which a 40,000 flight cycle inspection
specified by the applicable TR listed in Table 1 of paragraph (a) of
this AD has been done: Start the 10,000 flight cycle repetitive
inspection at the time specified by paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(A) or
(a)(2)(iii)(B) of this AD, as applicable.
(A) If no cracks were found, start the cycle from the date of
the 40,000 flight cycle inspection.
(B) If cracks have been found and the closing angles have been
replaced as provided in paragraph (b) of this AD, start the cycle
from the date of the replacement.
Corrective Actions
(b) If any crack is detected during any structural inspection
required by paragraph (a)(2) of this AD, before further flight,
repair any such cracking or replace the closing angles per a method
approved by the Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA; or the Transport Canada Civil Aviation (or its delegated
agent). For a repair or replacement method to be approved by the
Manager, New York ACO, as required by this paragraph, the Manager's
approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(c) Except as provided by paragraph (d) of this AD: After the
actions specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this AD have been
accomplished, no alternative inspections or inspection intervals may
be approved for the structural elements specified by the documents
listed in Table 1 of paragraph (a)(1) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, New York ACO. Operators shall
submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal
Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the
Manager, New York ACO.
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the New York ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(f) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this AD, the actions
shall be done in accordance with de Havilland Temporary Revision TR
AWL-71, dated September 3, 1999; de Havilland Temporary Revision TR
AWL 2-15, dated September 3, 1999; and de Havilland Temporary
Revision TR AWL 3-78, dated November 19, 1999. This incorporation by
reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be
obtained from Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier Regional Aircraft
Division, 123 Garratt Boulevard, Downsview, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada.
Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, New York
ACO, 10 Fifth Street, Third Floor, Valley Stream, New York; or at
the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW.,
suite 700, Washington, DC.
Note 4: The subject of this AD is addressed in Canadian
airworthiness directive CF-2000-07, dated March 3, 2000.
Effective Date
(g) This amendment becomes effective on August 10, 2001.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 26, 2001.
Vi L. Lipski,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 01-16736 Filed 7-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:28:25.426444+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- fc4face35af8fe9c6356255928af59f6959d01f47699f99de5fee2508e18934b
- Text SHA-256
- 8785c4b2e84ff542efef277bf134f9812baf061c840232ddcc8e09523308d922
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.