Published 2001-07-11 · Federal Register document 01-17154
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10-30 Series Airplanes Modified by Supplemental Type Certificate ST00054SE
Publication summary
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to all McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10-30 series airplanes modified by Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) ST00054SE, that requires removal of the in-flight entertainment (IFE) system installed by that STC. This action is necessary to prevent inability of the flight crew to remove power from the IFE system when necessary. Inability to remove power from the IFE system during a non-normal or emergency situation could result in inability to control smoke or fumes in the airplane flight deck or cabin. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:03.835669+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2001-8d66ddb74aa17366
- Source row
- results[268]
- Raw source SHA-256
- 8d66ddb74aa17366596c5f6ccb4e6d04532df19ae027b6fa003379bdedb52c7e
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2001-13-03
- Effective date printed in this edition
- Unknown
No adopted-clause structure was recorded for this source edition. Read the complete text; no applicability conclusion has been inferred.
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2001-13-03 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: a87a565312a5261581be3799108802cfcccaf4cd36a2c3041b7f0e983c8dd45a. Source manifest: e2a615924f359187b83505c289376aaf3df033d4ae2ee0f89893343cc399f873.
Official source · 2001-07-11
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 11, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36150-36152]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-17154]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2000-NM-231-AD; Amendment 39-12313; AD 2001-13-03]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10-30 Series
Airplanes Modified by Supplemental Type Certificate ST00054SE
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to all McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10-30 series airplanes
modified by Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) ST00054SE, that
requires removal of the in-flight entertainment (IFE) system installed
by that STC. This action is necessary to prevent inability of the
flight crew to remove power from the IFE system when necessary.
Inability to remove
[[Page 36151]]
power from the IFE system during a non-normal or emergency situation
could result in inability to control smoke or fumes in the airplane
flight deck or cabin. This action is intended to address the identified
unsafe condition.
DATES: Effective August 15, 2001.
ADDRESSES: The information referenced in this AD may be examined at the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate,
Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen S. Oshiro, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-
4056; telephone (425) 227-2793; fax (425) 227-1181.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to all McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10-
30 series airplanes modified by Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
ST00054SE was published in the Federal Register on March 2, 2001 (66 FR
13189). That action proposed to require removal of the in-flight
entertainment (IFE) system installed by that STC.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. No comments were submitted in response
to the proposal or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, the FAA has determined
that air safety and the public interest require the adoption of the
rule as proposed.
Cost Impact
As explained in the proposed rule, the STC holder has informed the
FAA that the subject IFE system has been removed from all affected
McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10-30 series airplanes modified by STC
ST00054SE. Therefore, the FAA expects that there will be no future cost
impact on U.S. operators as a result of the adoption of this rule.
However, if an airplane subject to this AD is identified, the FAA
estimates that removal of the IFE system will take approximately 12
work hours per airplane, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour.
Based on these figures, the cost impact of this AD on an affected
airplane is estimated to be $720 per airplane.
The cost impact figure discussed above is based on information that
the subject IFE system has been removed from all affected airplanes.
The cost impact figures discussed in most AD actions are based on
assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the
requirements, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in
the future if the AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures
discussed in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to
perform the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures
typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to
gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other
administrative actions.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
2001-14-03 McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39-12313. Docket 2000-NM-
231-AD.
Applicability: Model DC-10-30 series airplanes modified by
Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) ST00054SE, certificated in any
category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent the inability of flight crew to remove power from the
in-flight entertainment (IFE) system when necessary; which, during a
non-normal or emergency situation, could result in inability to
control smoke or fumes in the airplane flight deck or cabin;
accomplish the following:
Removal of IFE System
(a) Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD, remove
the IFE system installed by STC ST00054SE by a method approved by
the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA. For a
removal method to be approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO, as
required by this paragraph, the Manager's approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
Spares
(b) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install
an IFE system by STC ST00054SE on any airplane.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO. Operators shall submit
their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance
Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager,
Seattle ACO.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Seattle ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
Secs. 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a
[[Page 36152]]
location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Effective Date
(e) This amendment becomes effective on August 15, 2001.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 29, 2001.
Vi L. Lipski,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 01-17154 Filed 7-10-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:28:16.433906+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- 8b99733b442a082b2167d00bac8f7e633f41bbd1c8bdf37a154b9739482ac38e
- Text SHA-256
- a87a565312a5261581be3799108802cfcccaf4cd36a2c3041b7f0e983c8dd45a
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.