Published 2001-07-26 · Federal Register document 01-18019
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-100 and -200 Series Airplanes
Publication summary
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 747-100 and -200 series airplanes, that requires repetitive inspections for cracking of the station 800 frame assembly, and repair, if necessary. The actions specified by this AD are intended to find and fix fatigue cracks that could extend and fully sever the frame, which could result in development of skin cracks that could lead to rapid depressurization of the airplane. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:03.835669+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2001-8d66ddb74aa17366
- Source row
- results[302]
- Raw source SHA-256
- 8d66ddb74aa17366596c5f6ccb4e6d04532df19ae027b6fa003379bdedb52c7e
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2001-14-22
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 2001-08-30
Some source clauses remain unstructured. Read the complete publication for conditions that have not been interpreted here.
Read 2 complete recorded clauses
Applicability wording · Applicability
Applicability: Model 747-100 and -200 series airplanes, as
listed in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2451, including
Appendix A, dated October 5, 2000, certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability
[[Page 38892]]
provision, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or
repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For
airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the
performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/
operator must request approval for an alternative method of
compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) of this AD. The request
should include an assessment of the effect of the modification,
alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD;
and, if the unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request
should include specific proposed actions to address it.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 6448–7405, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 2a8741f05ab75e4f91930f4579817294c3def8721bb597bbe584b78498b75e21
Compliance and requirements
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To find and fix fatigue cracks of the station 800 frame assembly
that could extend and fully sever the frame, which could result in
development of skin cracks that could lead to rapid depressurization
of the airplane, accomplish the following:
Repetitive Inspections
(a) Do detailed visual, surface high frequency eddy current
(HFEC), and open hole HFEC inspections, as applicable, for cracking
of the station 800 frame assembly (including the inner chord strap,
angles, and exposed web) between stringers 14 and 18, according to
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2451, including Appendix A,
dated October 5, 2000. Except as provided by paragraph (b) of this
AD, do the inspection at the applicable time specified in Table 1
below, and repeat the inspections thereafter at least every 3,000
flight cycles: Table 1 is as follows:
Table 1.--Compliance Times
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total flight cycles as of the effective Do the inspection in paragraph
date of this AD (a) at this time
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Fewer than 19,000.................. Before the accumulation of
19,000 total flight cycles, or
within 1,500 flight cycles
after the effective date of
this AD, whichever comes
later.
(2) 19,000 or more but 24,250 or fewer. Within 1,500 flight cycles or
12 months after the effective
date of this AD, whichever
comes first.
(3) 24,251 or more..................... Within 750 flight cycles or 12
months after the effective
date of this AD, whichever
comes first.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed visual
inspection is defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a
specific structural area, system, installation, or assembly to
detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is
normally supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at
intensity deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such
as mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning
and elaborate access procedures may be required.''
Adjustments to Compliance Time: Cabin Differential Pressure
(b) For the purposes of calculating the compliance threshold and
repetitive interval for the actions required by paragraph (a) of
this AD, the number of flight cycles in which cabin differential
pressure is at 2.0 pounds per square inch (psi) or less need not be
counted when determining the number of flight cycles that have
occurred on the airplane, provided that flight cycles with momentary
spikes in cabin differential pressure above 2.0 psi are included as
full pressure cycles. For this provision to apply, all cabin
pressure records must be maintained for each airplane: NO fleet-
averaging of cabin pressure is allowed.
Repair
(c) If any cracking is detected during any inspection required
by paragraph (a) of this AD, before further flight, repair the
cracking according to a method approved by the Manager, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA; or according to data
meeting the type certification basis of the airplane approved by a
Boeing Company Designated Engineering Representative who has been
authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make such findings. For a
repair method to be approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO, as
required by this paragraph, the approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO. Operators shall submit
their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance
Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager,
Seattle ACO.
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Seattle ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(f) Except as provided by paragraphs (b) and (c) of this AD, the
actions shall be done in accordance with Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-53A2451, including Appendix A, dated October 5, 2000.
This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group,
P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. Copies may be
inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(g) This amendment becomes effective on August 30, 2001.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 7405–13091, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 1d4be72d8b349629dfc6cf800fc00ffab5a1111900ba47beaf202b56a2d0f2ca
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2001-14-22 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 346b994c372dcd6939884d8433c215a8e8450bc661a1790b8f03a1498991abb8. Source manifest: 087cbcfa26f8f65705b4fb23850602ca1372b1dca2f648b51810fb0294090c8c.
Official source · 2001-07-26
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 144 (Thursday, July 26, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38891-38892]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-18019]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 144 / Thursday, July 26, 2001 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 38891]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2000-NM-346-AD; Amendment 39-12333; AD 2001-14-22]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-100 and -200 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain Boeing Model 747-100 and -200 series airplanes,
that requires repetitive inspections for cracking of the station 800
frame assembly, and repair, if necessary. The actions specified by this
AD are intended to find and fix fatigue cracks that could extend and
fully sever the frame, which could result in development of skin cracks
that could lead to rapid depressurization of the airplane. This action
is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
DATES: Effective August 30, 2001.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of August 30, 2001.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207. This information may be examined at the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules
Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of
the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Kawaguchi, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
227-1153; fax (425) 227-1181.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Boeing Model 747-100 and -
200 series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on April 19,
2001 (66 FR 20114). That action proposed to require repetitive
inspections for cracking of the station 800 frame assembly, and repair,
if necessary.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. No comments were submitted in response
to the proposal or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.
Conclusion
The FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest
require the adoption of the rule as proposed.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 258 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 139 airplanes of U.S. registry
will be affected by this AD, that it will take up to 14 work hours per
airplane to accomplish the required inspection, and that the average
labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost
impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be as much as
$116,760, or $840 per airplane, per inspection cycle.
The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that
no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD
action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed
in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform
the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures
typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to
gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other
administrative actions.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
2001-14-22 Boeing: Amendment 39-12333. Docket 2000-NM-346-AD.
Applicability: Model 747-100 and -200 series airplanes, as
listed in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2451, including
Appendix A, dated October 5, 2000, certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability
[[Page 38892]]
provision, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or
repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For
airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the
performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/
operator must request approval for an alternative method of
compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) of this AD. The request
should include an assessment of the effect of the modification,
alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD;
and, if the unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request
should include specific proposed actions to address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To find and fix fatigue cracks of the station 800 frame assembly
that could extend and fully sever the frame, which could result in
development of skin cracks that could lead to rapid depressurization
of the airplane, accomplish the following:
Repetitive Inspections
(a) Do detailed visual, surface high frequency eddy current
(HFEC), and open hole HFEC inspections, as applicable, for cracking
of the station 800 frame assembly (including the inner chord strap,
angles, and exposed web) between stringers 14 and 18, according to
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2451, including Appendix A,
dated October 5, 2000. Except as provided by paragraph (b) of this
AD, do the inspection at the applicable time specified in Table 1
below, and repeat the inspections thereafter at least every 3,000
flight cycles: Table 1 is as follows:
Table 1.--Compliance Times
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total flight cycles as of the effective Do the inspection in paragraph
date of this AD (a) at this time
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Fewer than 19,000.................. Before the accumulation of
19,000 total flight cycles, or
within 1,500 flight cycles
after the effective date of
this AD, whichever comes
later.
(2) 19,000 or more but 24,250 or fewer. Within 1,500 flight cycles or
12 months after the effective
date of this AD, whichever
comes first.
(3) 24,251 or more..................... Within 750 flight cycles or 12
months after the effective
date of this AD, whichever
comes first.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed visual
inspection is defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a
specific structural area, system, installation, or assembly to
detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is
normally supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at
intensity deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such
as mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning
and elaborate access procedures may be required.''
Adjustments to Compliance Time: Cabin Differential Pressure
(b) For the purposes of calculating the compliance threshold and
repetitive interval for the actions required by paragraph (a) of
this AD, the number of flight cycles in which cabin differential
pressure is at 2.0 pounds per square inch (psi) or less need not be
counted when determining the number of flight cycles that have
occurred on the airplane, provided that flight cycles with momentary
spikes in cabin differential pressure above 2.0 psi are included as
full pressure cycles. For this provision to apply, all cabin
pressure records must be maintained for each airplane: NO fleet-
averaging of cabin pressure is allowed.
Repair
(c) If any cracking is detected during any inspection required
by paragraph (a) of this AD, before further flight, repair the
cracking according to a method approved by the Manager, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA; or according to data
meeting the type certification basis of the airplane approved by a
Boeing Company Designated Engineering Representative who has been
authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make such findings. For a
repair method to be approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO, as
required by this paragraph, the approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO. Operators shall submit
their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance
Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager,
Seattle ACO.
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Seattle ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(f) Except as provided by paragraphs (b) and (c) of this AD, the
actions shall be done in accordance with Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-53A2451, including Appendix A, dated October 5, 2000.
This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group,
P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. Copies may be
inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(g) This amendment becomes effective on August 30, 2001.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 12, 2001.
Vi L. Lipski,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 01-18019 Filed 7-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:27:44.525014+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- 797f8d92ba7b6ea59bb488a453f77254a98e2cdb27709b5ba51db076f9d8c8a2
- Text SHA-256
- 346b994c372dcd6939884d8433c215a8e8450bc661a1790b8f03a1498991abb8
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.