Published 2001-09-24 · Federal Register document 01-23730
Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce Corporation (Formerly Allison Engine Company) Model AE 3007A and AE 3007C Turbofan Engines
Publication summary
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), that is applicable to Rolls-Royce Corporation (formerly Allison Engine Company) Model AE 3007A and AE 3007C turbofan engines with a certain part number high pressure turbine (HPT) 1st to 2nd stage turbine spacer installed. This amendment requires removal and replacement of that HPT 1st to 2nd stage turbine spacer before it reaches its new reduced engine cycle life limit.This amendment is prompted by the results of a detailed component analysis that indicates that the HPT 1st to 2nd stage turbine spacer stresses are higher than predicted.The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent HPT 1st to 2nd stage turbine spacer failure which could result in an uncontained engine failure and damage to the airplane.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:03.835669+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2001-8d66ddb74aa17366
- Source row
- results[405]
- Raw source SHA-256
- 8d66ddb74aa17366596c5f6ccb4e6d04532df19ae027b6fa003379bdedb52c7e
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2001-19-03
- Effective date printed in this edition
- Unknown
Read 3 complete recorded clauses
New Reduced Engine Cycle Life Limit
New Reduced Engine Cycle Life Limit
(a) For all Rolls-Royce Corporation Model AE 3007A and AE 3007C
turbofan engines with HPT 1st to 2nd stage turbine spacer, P/N
23058369 installed, remove spacer before reaching the new reduced
engine cycle life limit of 9,400 cycles and replace with a
serviceable part.
(b) Revise the airworthiness limitations section of the
Instruction for Continued Airworthiness, as follows: P/N
23058369=9,400 cycles.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 6988–7446, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: fa037e02544205ab2a881c4bb0faecded154f7b20e50f2e841e7ddf5fca3d33f
Alternative Methods of Compliance
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Chicago Aircraft Certification
Office. Operators must submit their request through an appropriate
FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then
send it to the Manager, Chicago Aircraft Certification Office (ACO).
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this airworthiness directive,
if any, may be obtained from the Chicago ACO.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 7446–8065, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 3f4a3872b61ba0acde32d461737651ffb3d93d4e636e77ef0645fa52a5128478
Special Flight Permits
Special Flight Permits
(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the aircraft to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
(e) This amendment becomes effective on October 29, 2001.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 8065–8401, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: b35d78e2fe48e04b866637e822ed01ab119c934ea6fe4dda7c11163dbe7808a9
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2001-19-03 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: c181c99279a2386922eba0c17feac20453f26fdad8ca7b9db33d6e118d5210be. Source manifest: 0c2bc96c8d1b1c4a9848f4d9d4b2b918d131bf4b775315e94854ff3092d9ed61.
Official source · 2001-09-24
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 185 (Monday, September 24, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48791-48792]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-23730]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2000-NE-41-AD; Amendment 39-12442; AD 2001-19-03]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce Corporation (Formerly
Allison Engine Company) Model AE 3007A and AE 3007C Turbofan Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), that
is applicable to Rolls-Royce Corporation (formerly Allison Engine
Company) Model AE 3007A and AE 3007C turbofan engines with a certain
part number high pressure turbine (HPT) 1st to 2nd stage turbine spacer
installed. This amendment requires removal and replacement of that HPT
1st to 2nd stage turbine spacer before it reaches its new reduced
engine cycle life limit.This amendment is prompted by the results of a
detailed component analysis that indicates that the HPT 1st to 2nd
stage turbine spacer stresses are higher than predicted.The actions
specified by this AD are intended to prevent HPT 1st to 2nd stage
turbine spacer failure which could result in an uncontained engine
failure and damage to the airplane.
DATES: Effective date October 29, 2001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Downs, Aerospace Engineer,
Chicago Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate,
2300 E. Devon Ave., Des Plaines, IL 60018; telephone (847) 294-7870,
fax (847) 294-7834.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an AD that is
applicable to Rolls-Royce Corporation (formerly Allison Engine Company)
Model AE 3007A and AE 3007C turbofan engines with HPT 1st to 2nd stage
turbine spacer part number (P/N) 23058369 installed was published in
the Federal Register on February 22, 2001 (66 FR 11126). That action
proposed to require removal and replacement of the HPT 1st to 2nd stage
turbine spacer P/N 23058369 before it reaches its new reduced engine
cycle life limit.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. No comments were received on the
proposal or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public. The FAA
has determined that air safety and the public interest require the
adoption of the rule as proposed.
Economic Impact
There are approximately 378 engines of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 300 engines installed on 150
airplanes of U.S. registry would be affected by this proposed AD. It
will take approximately 13 work hours per engine to accomplish the
removal and replacement of the affected HPT 1st to 2nd stage spacer.
The 13 work hours cited include teardown and reassembly from the module
level, but not engine removal. Engines are rarely scheduled off-wing
solely for the purpose of replacement of time-expired components.The
average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Required parts will cost
approximately $10,012 per engine. Based on these figures, the FAA
estimates the total cost impact of the proposed AD on U.S. operators,
to be $3,237,600. Because most of the fleet field parts are below the
new value, special scheduling should not be required.
Regulatory Impact
This final rule does not have federalism implications, as defined
in Executive Order 13132, because it would not have a substantial
direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Accordingly,
the FAA has not consulted with state authorities prior to publication
of this final rule.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if promulgated,
will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for
this action and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may
be obtained by contacting the Rules Docket at the location provided
under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended adding a new airworthiness directive to
read as follows:
2001-19-03 Rolls-Royce Corporation (formerly Allison Engine
Company) Model AE 3007A and AE 3007C turbofan engines with high
pressure turbine (HPT) 1st to 2nd stage turbine spacer part number
(P/N) 23058369 installed.
[[Page 48792]]
Amendment 39-12442. Docket 2000-NE-41-AD.
Applicability
This airworthiness directive (AD) is applicable to Rolls-Royce
Corporation (formerly Allison Engine Company) Model AE 3007A and AE
3007C turbofan engines with HPT 1st to 2nd stage turbine spacer P/N
23058369 installed. These engines are installed on, but not limited
to Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) EMB-145, and
Cessna 750 series airplanes.
Note 1: This AD applies to each engine identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For engines that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance
Compliance with this AD is required as indicated, unless already
done.
To prevent HPT 1st to 2nd stage turbine spacer failure, which
could result in an uncontained engine failure and damage to the
airplane, do the following:
New Reduced Engine Cycle Life Limit
(a) For all Rolls-Royce Corporation Model AE 3007A and AE 3007C
turbofan engines with HPT 1st to 2nd stage turbine spacer, P/N
23058369 installed, remove spacer before reaching the new reduced
engine cycle life limit of 9,400 cycles and replace with a
serviceable part.
(b) Revise the airworthiness limitations section of the
Instruction for Continued Airworthiness, as follows: P/N
23058369=9,400 cycles.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Chicago Aircraft Certification
Office. Operators must submit their request through an appropriate
FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then
send it to the Manager, Chicago Aircraft Certification Office (ACO).
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this airworthiness directive,
if any, may be obtained from the Chicago ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the aircraft to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
(e) This amendment becomes effective on October 29, 2001.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on September 17, 2001.
Jay J. Pardee,
Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 01-23730 Filed 9-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:26:01.581824+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- 0343898537f82ac71c7250d405abbd363ee884b8d8535642b0021fbdb9e98b8b
- Text SHA-256
- c181c99279a2386922eba0c17feac20453f26fdad8ca7b9db33d6e118d5210be
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.