Published 2001-09-27 · Federal Register document 01-24456
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 Series Airplanes
Publication summary
This amendment rescinds Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2000-17- 09, which is applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 series airplanes. That AD requires an inspection of the upper avionics circuit breaker panel at the main observer's station to detect damage of the wires and to verify the correct routing of the wire bundles; corrective actions, if necessary; and installation of a new clamp, spacer, and sta-straps. The requirements of that AD were intended to prevent chafing in the upper avionics circuit breaker panel of the main observer's station, which could result in arcing and consequent smoke and/or fire in the cockpit. Since the issuance of that AD, the FAA has determined that the improper procedures specified by the service bulletin referenced in that AD could lead to wiring pre-load conditions and consequent wire damage, and arcing in the upper avionics circuit breaker panel. Such conditions could result in arcing and consequent smoke and/or fire in the cockpit.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:03.835669+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2001-8d66ddb74aa17366
- Source row
- results[407]
- Raw source SHA-256
- 8d66ddb74aa17366596c5f6ccb4e6d04532df19ae027b6fa003379bdedb52c7e
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2001-17-09 R1
- Effective date printed in this edition
- Unknown
No adopted-clause structure was recorded for this source edition. Read the complete text; no applicability conclusion has been inferred.
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2001-17-09 R1 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 118d3d6dc4ea6941136d140ff749fa712680e17eed53a9c5f1b3ba9b4d7dd0dd. Source manifest: 120aa5224a6c6f3d411212c6420885cc7aca43e3450732522bc443e077105fd3.
Official source · 2001-09-27
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 188 (Thursday, September 27, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 49510]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-24456]
[[Page 49509]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part V
Department of Transportation
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Aviation Administration
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
14 CFR Part 39
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 Series
Airplanes; Final Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 188 / Thursday, September 27, 2001 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 49510]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2001-NM-299-AD; Amendment 39-12451; AD 2001-17-09 R1]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; rescission.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment rescinds Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2000-17-
09, which is applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 series
airplanes. That AD requires an inspection of the upper avionics circuit
breaker panel at the main observer's station to detect damage of the
wires and to verify the correct routing of the wire bundles; corrective
actions, if necessary; and installation of a new clamp, spacer, and
sta-straps. The requirements of that AD were intended to prevent
chafing in the upper avionics circuit breaker panel of the main
observer's station, which could result in arcing and consequent smoke
and/or fire in the cockpit. Since the issuance of that AD, the FAA has
determined that the improper procedures specified by the service
bulletin referenced in that AD could lead to wiring pre-load conditions
and consequent wire damage, and arcing in the upper avionics circuit
breaker panel. Such conditions could result in arcing and consequent
smoke and/or fire in the cockpit.
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 27, 2001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brett Portwood, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California
90712-4137; telephone (562) 627-5350; fax (562) 627-5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 14, 2001, the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) issued AD 2001-17-09, amendment 39-12400 (66 FR
44041, August 22, 2001), applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model
MD-11 series airplanes. That AD requires an inspection of the upper
avionics circuit breaker panel at the main observer's station to detect
damage of the wires and to verify the correct routing of the wire
bundles; corrective actions, if necessary; and installation of a new
clamp, spacer, and sta-straps. Chafing in the upper avionics circuit
breaker panel of the main observer's station, could result in arcing
and consequent smoke and/or fire in the cockpit.
Background
During the comment period preceding the issuance of AD 2001-17-09,
an operator submitted a letter stating its concern about the validity
of the wiring procedures specified by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
MD11-24A179, Revision 01, dated October 31, 2000, which was cited in
that AD. In response to that concern, the FAA consulted with the
airplane manufacturer and was informed that the wiring procedures in
the service bulletin were workable, and that the specified wire lengths
were adequate. In light of this information, we determined that no
change to the wire routing requirements of paragraph (a)(1)(ii) in the
final rule was necessary.
Actions Since Issuance of Previous AD
Following the issuance of AD 2001-17-09, the same operator
contacted the FAA, informing us that the wiring procedures required by
the AD per the Boeing service bulletin could cause wiring pre-load
conditions. In response, we again consulted with Boeing to re-confirm
their previous assessment. Boeing informed us that it had re-evaluated
the procedures specified in the service bulletin and determined that,
contrary to its original assessment, those procedures could actually
cause wiring pre-load conditions and chafing.
In light of this information, the FAA has determined that the
procedures in the previously referenced Boeing service bulletin could
lead to wiring pre-load conditions and consequent wire damage, and
arcing in the upper avionics circuit breaker panel. Such conditions
could result in arcing and consequent smoke and/or fire in the cockpit.
FAA's Determination
Since accomplishment of the requirements of AD 2001-17-09 could
cause conditions that may contribute to the identified unsafe
condition, the FAA has determined that it is necessary to rescind that
AD to prevent operators from performing the procedures included in the
previously referenced Boeing service bulletin, which was cited in that
AD. The FAA may consider further rulemaking to correct the original
unsafe condition that prompted AD 2001-17-09.
Since this action rescinds a requirement to perform improper
procedures, it has no adverse economic impact and imposes no additional
burden on any person. Therefore, notice and public procedures hereon
are unnecessary and the rescission may be made effective upon
publication in the Federal Register.
The Rescission
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding an AD which removes amendment
39-12400, to read as follows:
2001-17-09 R1 McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39-12451. Docket No.
2001-NM-299-AD. Rescinds AD 2001-17-09, Amendment 39-12400.
Applicability: Model MD-11 series airplanes, as listed in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin MD11-24A179, Revision 01, dated October 31,
2000; certificated in any category.
This rescission is effective September 27, 2001.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 25, 2001.
Vi L. Lipski,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 01-24456 Filed 9-26-01; 11:10 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:25:59.576922+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- 66680ab952f7827ff290f6bcdb6f8bda7c0b6cab17d4ded277138def2ce594f4
- Text SHA-256
- 118d3d6dc4ea6941136d140ff749fa712680e17eed53a9c5f1b3ba9b4d7dd0dd
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.