Published 2001-12-12 · Federal Register document 01-30191
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -30, and -40 Series Airplanes and C-9 Airplanes
Publication summary
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -30, and -40 series airplanes and C-9 airplanes, that requires an inspection to detect chafing of the wiring of the attendants' work light of the aft cabin, and repair of chafed wiring. This AD also requires modification and reidentification of the attendants' work light assemblies of the aft cabin. This action is necessary to prevent chafing of the ground wire against the positive contact of the lamp of the attendants' work light of the aft cabin, and consequent arcing or arcing damage to the wiring of the attendants' work light and transformer of the aft cabin. Such arcing or arcing damage could result in short circuits and consequent smoke and fire in the aft cabin area. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:03.835669+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2001-8d66ddb74aa17366
- Source row
- results[502]
- Raw source SHA-256
- 8d66ddb74aa17366596c5f6ccb4e6d04532df19ae027b6fa003379bdedb52c7e
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2001-24-15
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 2002-01-16
Some source clauses remain unstructured. Read the complete publication for conditions that have not been interpreted here.
Read 2 complete recorded clauses
Applicability wording · Applicability
Applicability: Model DC-9-10, -30, and -40 series airplanes and
C-9 airplanes, equipped with an attendants' work light in the aft
cabin; certificated in any category; as listed in McDonnell Douglas
Alert Service Bulletin DC9-33A058, Revision 02, dated January 27,
2000.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or
[[Page 64135]]
repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is
affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 8467–9510, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: c5baeb0def490fd885e910b36203e831fe1217a9e11e2e4605dfbdb9141718a3
Compliance and requirements
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent arcing or arcing damage to the wiring of the
attendants' work light of the aft cabin due to chafing of the ground
wire against the positive contact of the lamp of the attendants'
work light and transformer of the aft cabin, which could result in
short circuits and consequent smoke and fire in the aft cabin area,
accomplish the following:
Inspection; Corrective Actions, if Necessary; Modification; and
Reidentification
(a) Within 1 year after the effective date of this AD, do the
actions specified in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this AD, per
McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin DC9-33A058, Revision 02,
dated January 27, 2000.
(1) Do a general visual inspection to detect chafing of the
wiring of the attendants' work light of the aft cabin. If any
chafing is detected, before further flight, repair chafed wiring per
the service bulletin.
Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a general visual inspection
is defined as ``A visual examination of an interior or exterior
area, installation, or assembly to detect obvious damage, failure,
or irregularity. This level of inspection is made under normally
available lighting conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting,
flashlight, or drop-light, and may require removal or opening of
access panels or doors. Stands, ladders, or platforms may be
required to gain proximity to the area being checked.''
(2) Modify and reidentify the attendants' work light assemblies
of the aft cabin.
Note 3: Inspections, repairs, modifications, and
reidentifications done before the effective date of this AD per
McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC9-33-058, dated June 5, 1973,
or Revision 1, dated November 26, 1975, are considered acceptable
for compliance with the requirements of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an
appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add
comments and then send it to the Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
Note 4: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(d) The actions shall be done in accordance with McDonnell
Douglas Alert Service Bulletin DC9-33A058, Revision 02, dated
January 27, 2000. This incorporation by reference was approved by
the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing
Commercial Aircraft Group, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood
Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data and Service
Management, Dept. C1-L5A (D800-0024). Copies may be inspected at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; or at the FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at the
Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite
700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(e) This amendment becomes effective on January 16, 2002.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 9510–13172, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 82c1a7fdaf6446398ce2bb16acb87018d37c59f98195339daae9b88be72aaee3
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2001-24-15 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: e96a649f28364407027fb5797f2f640bf2f6563fbdc218b71384901dd4d3dce7. Source manifest: 50bfeb8dc55378fd3568db751143dc7b2c700399ae4c8c5f80a4fcc18caa9b84.
Official source · 2001-12-12
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 12, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64133-64135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-30191]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 99-NM-292-AD; Amendment 39-12532; AD 2001-24-15]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -30,
and -40 Series Airplanes and C-9 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -30, and -40
series airplanes and C-9 airplanes, that requires an inspection to
detect chafing of the wiring of the attendants' work light of the aft
cabin, and repair of chafed wiring. This AD also requires modification
and reidentification of the attendants' work light assemblies of the
aft cabin. This action is necessary to prevent chafing of the ground
wire against the positive contact of the lamp of the attendants' work
light of the aft cabin, and consequent arcing or arcing damage to the
wiring of the attendants' work light and transformer of the aft cabin.
Such arcing or arcing damage could result in short circuits and
consequent smoke and fire in the aft cabin area. This action is
intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
DATES: Effective January 16, 2002.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of January 16, 2002.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Aircraft Group, Long Beach Division,
3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data
and Service Management, Dept. C1-L5A
[[Page 64134]]
(D800-0024). This information may be examined at the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Los Angeles
Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood,
California; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol
Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elvin Wheeler, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California
90712-4137; telephone (562) 627-5344; fax (562) 627-5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model
DC-9-10, -30, and -40 series airplanes and C-9 airplanes was published
in the Federal Register on July 23, 2001 (66 FR 38173). That action
proposed to require an inspection to detect chafing of the wiring of
the attendants' work light of the aft cabin, and repair of chafed
wiring. That action also proposed to require modification and
reidentification of the attendants' work light assemblies of the aft
cabin.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
the comments received.
Requests To Revise the Applicability of the Proposed AD
One commenter requests that the applicability of the proposed AD be
revised to ``Model DC-9-10, -30, and -40 series airplanes and C-9
airplanes, equipped with an attendants' work light in the aft cabin;
certificated in any category; as listed in McDonnell Douglas Alert
Service Bulletin DC9-33A058, Revision 02, dated January 27, 2000.'' The
commenter states that airplanes without an attendants' work light are
not susceptible to the identified unsafe condition of the proposed AD.
The commenter also states that such a change would reduce requests for
alternative methods of compliance (AMOC).
The FAA agrees with the commenter and has revised the final rule
accordingly.
One commenter requests that the applicability of the proposed AD be
revised to apply only to those airplanes on which the affected light
assembly, part number L19020-1 or L19145-1, has been installed. The
commenter notes that it no longer uses the referenced part number
affected by the proposed AD, and that it uses a different lamp
assembly, which is not susceptible to identified unsafe condition of
the proposed AD.
The FAA does not concur. The commenter did not provide any specific
data with regard to its ``Interior 2000'' modification. Therefore, we
are unable to determine whether such a configuration is not subject to
the identified unsafe condition. However, under the provisions of
paragraph (b) of this AD, the FAA may consider requests for approval of
an alternative method of compliance if sufficient data are submitted to
substantiate that such a design change would provide an acceptable
level of safety. No change to the final rule has been made is this
regard.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comments
noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public
interest require the adoption of the rule with the change previously
described. The FAA has determined that this change will neither
increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of
the AD.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 176 Model DC-9-10, -30, and -40 series
airplanes and C-9 airplanes of the affected design in the worldwide
fleet. The FAA estimates that 111 airplanes of U.S. registry will be
affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 1 work hour per
airplane to accomplish the required inspection and modification, and
that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these
figures, the cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be
$6,660, or $60 per airplane.
The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that
no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD
action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed
in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform
the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures
typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to
gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other
administrative actions.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended].
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
2001-24-15 McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39-12532. Docket 99-NM-292-
AD.
Applicability: Model DC-9-10, -30, and -40 series airplanes and
C-9 airplanes, equipped with an attendants' work light in the aft
cabin; certificated in any category; as listed in McDonnell Douglas
Alert Service Bulletin DC9-33A058, Revision 02, dated January 27,
2000.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or
[[Page 64135]]
repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is
affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent arcing or arcing damage to the wiring of the
attendants' work light of the aft cabin due to chafing of the ground
wire against the positive contact of the lamp of the attendants'
work light and transformer of the aft cabin, which could result in
short circuits and consequent smoke and fire in the aft cabin area,
accomplish the following:
Inspection; Corrective Actions, if Necessary; Modification; and
Reidentification
(a) Within 1 year after the effective date of this AD, do the
actions specified in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this AD, per
McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin DC9-33A058, Revision 02,
dated January 27, 2000.
(1) Do a general visual inspection to detect chafing of the
wiring of the attendants' work light of the aft cabin. If any
chafing is detected, before further flight, repair chafed wiring per
the service bulletin.
Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a general visual inspection
is defined as ``A visual examination of an interior or exterior
area, installation, or assembly to detect obvious damage, failure,
or irregularity. This level of inspection is made under normally
available lighting conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting,
flashlight, or drop-light, and may require removal or opening of
access panels or doors. Stands, ladders, or platforms may be
required to gain proximity to the area being checked.''
(2) Modify and reidentify the attendants' work light assemblies
of the aft cabin.
Note 3: Inspections, repairs, modifications, and
reidentifications done before the effective date of this AD per
McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC9-33-058, dated June 5, 1973,
or Revision 1, dated November 26, 1975, are considered acceptable
for compliance with the requirements of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an
appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add
comments and then send it to the Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
Note 4: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(d) The actions shall be done in accordance with McDonnell
Douglas Alert Service Bulletin DC9-33A058, Revision 02, dated
January 27, 2000. This incorporation by reference was approved by
the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing
Commercial Aircraft Group, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood
Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data and Service
Management, Dept. C1-L5A (D800-0024). Copies may be inspected at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; or at the FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at the
Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite
700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(e) This amendment becomes effective on January 16, 2002.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 28, 2001.
Vi L. Lipski,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 01-30191 Filed 12-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:24:24.739707+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- 3edadcb6b7d474581abba01a15141abb906bc8f8277ec179bc5ad15b2d49a449
- Text SHA-256
- e96a649f28364407027fb5797f2f640bf2f6563fbdc218b71384901dd4d3dce7
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.