Published 2001-12-12 · Federal Register document 01-30209
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-100, -200, and -200C Series Airplanes
Publication summary
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 737-100, -200, and -200C series airplanes, that requires a one-time inspection for damage (i.e., chafing) of the power feeder wire bundle for the auxiliary power unit (APU) generator and the first officer's elevator down control cable and for proper separation between that wire bundle and control cable, and corrective action, if necessary. For certain airplanes, this amendment also requires attaching the power feeder wire bundle to adjacent wire bundles. This action is necessary to prevent a short circuit and resultant arcing between the wire bundle and control cable, which could sever the control cable. Failure of the first officer's elevator down control cable, if combined with a subsequent failure of the captain's elevator down control cable, could result in loss of elevator control of the airplane. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:03.835669+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2001-8d66ddb74aa17366
- Source row
- results[520]
- Raw source SHA-256
- 8d66ddb74aa17366596c5f6ccb4e6d04532df19ae027b6fa003379bdedb52c7e
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2001-24-33
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 2002-01-16
Some source clauses remain unstructured. Read the complete publication for conditions that have not been interpreted here.
Read 2 complete recorded clauses
Applicability wording · Applicability
Applicability: Model 737-100, -200, and -200C series airplanes;
as listed in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-24-1144,
Revision 1, dated June 21, 2001; certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 6452–7401, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 951f1b85d16df26a59dd0b13c44367b5af9d3c365c8498a61b79535a585c014b
Compliance and requirements
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent a short circuit and resultant arcing between the
power feeder wire bundle for the auxiliary power unit (APU)
generator and the first officer's elevator down control cable, which
could sever the control cable, and, if combined with a subsequent
failure of the captain's elevator down control cable, result in loss
of elevator control of the airplane, accomplish the following:
Inspection and Corrective Actions
(a) Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD,
perform a one-time detailed visual inspection for damage (i.e.,
chafing) of the power feeder wire bundle for the APU generator (wire
bundle W146) and the first officer's elevator down control cable and
for proper separation between that control cable and wire bundle,
and attach wire bundle W146 to adjacent wire bundles, as applicable.
Do these actions according to Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-24-1144, Revision 1, dated June 21, 2001.
Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed visual
inspection is defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a
specific structural area, system, installation, or assembly to
detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is
normally supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at
intensity deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such
as mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning
and elaborate access procedures may be required.''
(1) If no damage to the control cable or wire bundle is found,
and if the distance between the control cable and wire bundle is
equal to or greater than the minimum separation distance specified
in the service bulletin: No further action is required.
(2) If any damage to the first officer's elevator down cable is
found: Before further flight, replace the elevator down control
cable with a new cable according to the service bulletin, and do
paragraph (a)(4) of this AD.
(3) If any damage to the power feeder wire bundle for the APU
generator (wire bundle W146) is found: Before further flight, repair
the wire bundle according to the service bulletin, and do paragraph
(a)(4) of this AD.
(4) If the distance between the control cable and wire bundle is
less than the minimum separation distance specified in the service
bulletin: Before further flight, reroute the wire bundle by turning
wire bundle clamps to a position that provides minimum separation
between the wire bundle and control cable, according to the service
bulletin.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an
appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add
comments and then send it to the Manager, Seattle ACO.
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Seattle ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(d) The actions shall be done in accordance with Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737-24-1144, Revision 1, dated June 21,
2001. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director
of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane
Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. Copies may be
inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(e) This amendment becomes effective on January 16, 2002.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 7401–11571, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: ffca5d45c36400ad9f5f6fe5d0bf6580fa34d79d8326a66ad231c699faf37361
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2001-24-33 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 3af82ce03982f3751104b6e56b17c405f011687d8c37c45bdc149fe9528a33c6. Source manifest: b98a50c9d2edfa5c74f9f7f9a64f8dbf34c30edfd1f4c96a89f7298525bf9195.
Official source · 2001-12-12
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 12, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64099-64100]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-30209]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2001-NM-221-AD; Amendment 39-12550; AD 2001-24-33]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-100, -200, and -200C
Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain Boeing Model 737-100, -200, and -200C series
airplanes, that requires a one-time inspection for damage (i.e.,
chafing) of the power feeder wire bundle for the auxiliary power unit
(APU) generator and the first officer's elevator down control cable and
for proper separation between that wire bundle and control cable, and
corrective action, if necessary. For certain airplanes, this amendment
also requires attaching the power feeder wire bundle to adjacent wire
bundles. This action is necessary to prevent a short circuit and
resultant arcing between the wire bundle and control cable, which could
sever the control cable. Failure of the first officer's elevator down
control cable, if combined with a subsequent failure of the captain's
elevator down control cable, could result in loss of elevator control
of the airplane. This action is intended to address the identified
unsafe condition.
DATES: Effective January 16, 2002.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of January 16, 2002.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207. This information may be examined at the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules
Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of
the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Oshiro, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-
4056; telephone (425) 227-2793; fax (425) 227-1181.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Boeing Model 737-100, -
200, and -200C series airplanes was published in the Federal Register
on July 23, 2001 (66 FR 38217). That action proposed to require a one-
time inspection for damage (i.e., chafing) of the power feeder wire
bundle for the auxiliary power unit (APU) generator and the first
officer's elevator down control cable and for proper separation between
that wire bundle and control cable, and corrective action, if
necessary. For certain airplanes, that action also proposed to require
attaching the power feeder wire bundle to adjacent wire bundles.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. No comments were submitted in response
to the proposal or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.
Conclusion
The FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest
require the adoption of the rule as proposed.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 136 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 47 airplanes of U.S. registry
will be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 1 work
hour per airplane to accomplish the required inspection, and that the
average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the
cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $2,820, or
$60 per airplane.
The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that
no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD
action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed
in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform
the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures
typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to
gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other
administrative actions.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
[[Page 64100]]
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
2001-24-33 Boeing: Amendment 39-12550. Docket 2001-NM-221-AD.
Applicability: Model 737-100, -200, and -200C series airplanes;
as listed in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-24-1144,
Revision 1, dated June 21, 2001; certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent a short circuit and resultant arcing between the
power feeder wire bundle for the auxiliary power unit (APU)
generator and the first officer's elevator down control cable, which
could sever the control cable, and, if combined with a subsequent
failure of the captain's elevator down control cable, result in loss
of elevator control of the airplane, accomplish the following:
Inspection and Corrective Actions
(a) Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD,
perform a one-time detailed visual inspection for damage (i.e.,
chafing) of the power feeder wire bundle for the APU generator (wire
bundle W146) and the first officer's elevator down control cable and
for proper separation between that control cable and wire bundle,
and attach wire bundle W146 to adjacent wire bundles, as applicable.
Do these actions according to Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-24-1144, Revision 1, dated June 21, 2001.
Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed visual
inspection is defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a
specific structural area, system, installation, or assembly to
detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is
normally supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at
intensity deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such
as mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning
and elaborate access procedures may be required.''
(1) If no damage to the control cable or wire bundle is found,
and if the distance between the control cable and wire bundle is
equal to or greater than the minimum separation distance specified
in the service bulletin: No further action is required.
(2) If any damage to the first officer's elevator down cable is
found: Before further flight, replace the elevator down control
cable with a new cable according to the service bulletin, and do
paragraph (a)(4) of this AD.
(3) If any damage to the power feeder wire bundle for the APU
generator (wire bundle W146) is found: Before further flight, repair
the wire bundle according to the service bulletin, and do paragraph
(a)(4) of this AD.
(4) If the distance between the control cable and wire bundle is
less than the minimum separation distance specified in the service
bulletin: Before further flight, reroute the wire bundle by turning
wire bundle clamps to a position that provides minimum separation
between the wire bundle and control cable, according to the service
bulletin.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an
appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add
comments and then send it to the Manager, Seattle ACO.
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Seattle ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(d) The actions shall be done in accordance with Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737-24-1144, Revision 1, dated June 21,
2001. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director
of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane
Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. Copies may be
inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(e) This amendment becomes effective on January 16, 2002.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 28, 2001.
Vi L. Lipski,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 01-30209 Filed 12-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:24:06.428870+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- ba8d746167b3dd2f2b130aa891db33696433818f0b1f7c5e172afb0b0beee063
- Text SHA-256
- 3af82ce03982f3751104b6e56b17c405f011687d8c37c45bdc149fe9528a33c6
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.