Published 2001-02-14 · Federal Register document 01-3562
Airworthiness Directives; Agusta S.p.A. Model A109E Helicopters
Publication summary
This document publishes in the Federal Register an amendment adopting Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2000-25-54, which was sent previously to all known U.S. owners and operators of Agusta (Agusta) S.p.A. Model A109E helicopters by individual letters. This AD requires, before each start of the engines, visually checking both sides of each tail rotor blade (blade) for a crack and, at specified intervals, inspecting each blade for a crack using a 5-power or higher magnifying glass. Dye-penetrant inspecting each blade for a crack is also required at specified time intervals. If a crack is found, replacing the blade with an airworthy blade is required before further flight. This amendment is prompted by five reports of cracked tail rotor blades. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent failure of a blade and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:03.835669+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2001-8d66ddb74aa17366
- Source row
- results[50]
- Raw source SHA-256
- 8d66ddb74aa17366596c5f6ccb4e6d04532df19ae027b6fa003379bdedb52c7e
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2000-25-54
- Effective date printed in this edition
- Unknown
Some source clauses remain unstructured. Read the complete publication for conditions that have not been interpreted here.
Read 2 complete recorded clauses
Applicability wording · Applicability
Applicability: Model A109E helicopters, with tail rotor blade
(blade), part number 109-8132-01-109, installed, certificated in any
category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each helicopter identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For helicopters that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 12962–13870, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 75807d458a820b97088a31b6281cad9aa04ca29292999c8affa7945478fc76f2
Compliance and requirements
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent failure of a blade and subsequent loss of control of
the helicopter, accomplish the following:
(a) Before each start of the engines, visually check both sides
of each blade for a crack, in the area shown in Figure 1. An owner/
operator (pilot), holding at least a private pilot certificate, may
perform the visual check required by this paragraph and must enter
compliance into the aircraft maintenance records in accordance with
14 CFR 43.11 and 91.417(a)(2)(v).
[[Page 10187]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14FE01.003
(b) Within 10 hours time-in-service (TIS) and thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 10 hours TIS or before the next flight after
any abnormal tail rotor vibration, inspect each blade for a crack
using a 5-power or higher magnifying glass in accordance with the
Compliance Instructions, Part II, of Agusta S.p.A. Alert Bollettino
Tecnico No. 109EP-14, dated October 11, 2000 (ABT).
(c) Within 25 hours TIS and thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 25 hours TIS, dye-penetrant inspect each blade for a crack in
accordance with the Compliance Instructions, Part III, of the ABT.
(d) If a crack is found, replace the blade with an airworthy
blade before further flight.
(e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Regulations Group, Rotorcraft
Directorate, FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an
FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may concur or comment and
then send it to the Manager, Regulations Group.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Regulations Group.
(f) Special flight permits are prohibited.
(g) The inspections shall be done in accordance with the
Compliance Instructions, Parts II and III, of Agusta S.p.A. Alert
Bollettino Tecnico No. 109EP-14, dated October 11, 2000. This
incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. Copies may be obtained from Agusta, 21017 Cascina Costa di
Samarate (VA) Italy, Via Giovanni Agusta 520, telephone 39 (0331)
229111, fax 39 (0331) 229605-222595. Copies may be inspected at the
FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham
Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
(h) This amendment becomes effective on March 1, 2001, to all
persons except those persons to whom it was made immediately
effective by Emergency AD 2000-25-54, issued December 12, 2000,
which contained the requirements of this amendment.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 13870–16742, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 6394b6fde1f4c4f42b1d1a67c3972b751d7b3a2f8d0c5583fcd76809a19cf97a
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2000-25-54 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 4c8a4381087ac1d93b235e770440a870034831339802a3c6e2cb435790a1e77b. Source manifest: 9f42fb49a7b0bf9f9231c94d374b5152099cd943b4de5ae9e70daccd230825bb.
Official source · 2001-02-14
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 14, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10185-10187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3562]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 14, 2001 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 10185]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2000-SW-65-AD; Amendment 39-12106; AD 2000-25-54]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Agusta S.p.A. Model A109E Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document publishes in the Federal Register an amendment
adopting Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2000-25-54, which was sent
previously to all known U.S. owners and operators of Agusta (Agusta)
S.p.A. Model A109E helicopters by individual letters. This AD requires,
before each start of the engines, visually checking both sides of each
tail rotor blade (blade) for a crack and, at specified intervals,
inspecting each blade for a crack using a 5-power or higher magnifying
glass. Dye-penetrant inspecting each blade for a crack is also required
at specified time intervals. If a crack is found, replacing the blade
with an airworthy blade is required before further flight. This
amendment is prompted by five reports of cracked tail rotor blades. The
actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent failure of a blade
and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
DATES: Effective March 1, 2001, to all persons except those persons to
whom it was made immediately effective by Emergency AD 2000-25-54,
issued on December 12, 2000, which contained the requirements of this
amendment.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of March 1, 2001.
Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or
before April 16, 2001.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 2000-SW-65-AD, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room
663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137. You may also send comments electronically
to the Rules Docket at the following address: [email protected].
The applicable service information may be obtained from Agusta,
21017 Cascina Costa di Samarate (VA) Italy, Via Giovanni Agusta 520,
telephone 39 (0331) 229111, fax 39 (0331) 229605-222595. This
information may be examined at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas; or
at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW.,
suite 700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Monschke, Aviation Safety
Engineer, FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, Rotorcraft Standards Staff, Fort
Worth, Texas 76193-0110, telephone (817) 222-5116, fax (817) 222-5961.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 12, 2000, the FAA issued
Emergency AD 2000-25-54 for Agusta Model A109E helicopters which
requires, before each start of the engines, visually checking both
sides of each blade for a crack and, at specified intervals, inspecting
each blade for a crack using a 5-power or higher magnifying glass. Dye-
penetrant inspecting each blade for a crack is also required at
specified time intervals. If a crack is found, replacing the blade with
an airworthy blade is required before further flight. That action was
prompted by five reports of cracked tail rotor blades. The cracks were
discovered during maintenance and also during flight due to an increase
in tail rotor vibration. The manufacturer is currently investigating
the cause of these cracks. This condition, if not corrected, could
result in failure of a blade and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.
The Ente Nazionale per l'Aviazione Civile (ENAC), which is the
airworthiness authority for Italy, notified the FAA that an unsafe
condition may exist on Agusta Model A109E helicopters. The ENAC advises
inspecting certain blades for a crack in accordance with Agusta Alert
Bollettino Tecnico No. 109EP-14, dated October 11, 2000 (ABT).
The FAA has reviewed the ABT, which specifies checking the upper
and lower sides of each blade, part number (P/N) 109-8132-01-109, for a
crack before each flight. The ABT also specifies visually inspecting
the blades for a crack, using a 5-power magnifying lens, each 10
operating hours or if any abnormal increase of vibratory level occurs.
In addition, the ABT specifies dye-penetrant inspecting the blades for
a crack at each 25 operating hours. The ABT specifies replacing any
cracked blade before further flight. The ENAC classified the ABT as
mandatory and issued AD 2000-468, dated December 10, 2000, to ensure
the continued airworthiness of these helicopters in Italy.
This helicopter model is manufactured in Italy and is typed
certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of
14 CFR 21.29 and the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement.
Pursuant to this bilateral airworthiness agreement, the ENAC has kept
the FAA informed of the situation described above. The FAA has examined
the findings of the ENAC, reviewed all available information, and
determined that AD action is necessary for products of this type design
that are certificated for operation in the United States.
Since the unsafe condition described is likely to exist or develop
on other Agusta Model A109E helicopters of the same type design, the
FAA issued Emergency AD 2000-25-54 to prevent failure of a blade and
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. The AD requires the
following for each blade, part number 109-8132-01-109:
<bullet> Before each start of the engines, visually check both
sides of each blade for a crack.
<bullet> Within 10 hours time-in-service (TIS) and thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 10 hours TIS or before the next flight after
any abnormal tail rotor vibration, inspect each blade for a crack using
a 5-power or higher magnifying glass.
<bullet> Within 25 hours TIS and thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 25 hours TIS, dye-penetrant inspect each blade for a crack.
[[Page 10186]]
<bullet> If a crack is found, replace the blade with an airworthy
blade before further flight.
An owner/operator (pilot) may perform the visual check required by
this AD and must enter compliance with paragraph (a) of this AD into
the aircraft maintenance records in accordance with 14 CFR 43.11 and
91.417(a)(2)(v)). This AD allows a pilot to perform this check because
it involves only a visual check for a crack in the blade and can be
performed equally well by a pilot or a mechanic.
The actions must be accomplished in accordance with the ABT
described previously. The short compliance time involved is required
because the previously described critical unsafe condition can
adversely affect the structural integrity and controllability of the
helicopter. Therefore, the actions previously listed are required at
the specified intervals, and this AD must be issued immediately.
Since it was found that immediate corrective action was required,
notice and opportunity for prior public comment thereon were
impracticable and contrary to the public interest, and good cause
existed to make the AD effective immediately by individual letters
issued on December 12, 2000, to all known U.S. owners and operators of
Agusta Model A109E helicopters. These conditions still exist, and the
AD is hereby published in the Federal Register as an amendment to
Sec. 39.13 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 39.13) to make
it effective to all persons. Paragraph (a) of the emergency AD
contained a typographical error in that it referenced 91.147(a)(2)(v)
(a non-existent regulation). The correct reference should have been
91.417(a)(2)(v). This document corrects that error.
The FAA estimates that 21 helicopters of U.S. registry will be
affected by this AD. It will take approximately \1/2\ work hour per
helicopter to inspect each blade using a magnifying glass; 2 work hours
to dye-penetrant inspect each blade; and 1 work hour to replace each
blade, if necessary. The average labor rate is $60 per work hour.
Required parts will cost approximately $5,000 per blade. Based on these
figures, the total cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated
to be $122,640 ($5,840 per helicopter, assuming that each helicopter
blade is inspected 4 times, dye-penetrant inspected twice, and both
blades are replaced on all helicopters).
Comments Invited
Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves
requirements affecting flight safety and, thus, was not preceded by
notice and an opportunity for public comment, comments are invited on
this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by
submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire.
Communications should identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted
in triplicate to the address specified under the caption ADDRESSES. All
communications received on or before the closing date for comments will
be considered, and this rule may be amended in light of the comments
received. Factual information that supports the commenter's ideas and
suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the
AD action and determining whether additional rulemaking action would be
needed.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might
suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be
available in the Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A
report that summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the
substance of this AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their mailed
comments submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-
addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made:
``Comments to Docket No. 2000-SW-65-AD.'' The postcard will be date
stamped and returned to the commenter.
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency
regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe
condition in aircraft, and that it is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further
that this action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory
Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is
determined that this emergency regulation otherwise would be
significant under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final
regulatory evaluation will be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket.
A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the
location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive
to read as follows:
2000-25-54 Agusta S.p.A.: Amendment 39-12106. Docket No. 2000-SW-
65-AD.
Applicability: Model A109E helicopters, with tail rotor blade
(blade), part number 109-8132-01-109, installed, certificated in any
category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each helicopter identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For helicopters that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent failure of a blade and subsequent loss of control of
the helicopter, accomplish the following:
(a) Before each start of the engines, visually check both sides
of each blade for a crack, in the area shown in Figure 1. An owner/
operator (pilot), holding at least a private pilot certificate, may
perform the visual check required by this paragraph and must enter
compliance into the aircraft maintenance records in accordance with
14 CFR 43.11 and 91.417(a)(2)(v).
[[Page 10187]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14FE01.003
(b) Within 10 hours time-in-service (TIS) and thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 10 hours TIS or before the next flight after
any abnormal tail rotor vibration, inspect each blade for a crack
using a 5-power or higher magnifying glass in accordance with the
Compliance Instructions, Part II, of Agusta S.p.A. Alert Bollettino
Tecnico No. 109EP-14, dated October 11, 2000 (ABT).
(c) Within 25 hours TIS and thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 25 hours TIS, dye-penetrant inspect each blade for a crack in
accordance with the Compliance Instructions, Part III, of the ABT.
(d) If a crack is found, replace the blade with an airworthy
blade before further flight.
(e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Regulations Group, Rotorcraft
Directorate, FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an
FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may concur or comment and
then send it to the Manager, Regulations Group.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Regulations Group.
(f) Special flight permits are prohibited.
(g) The inspections shall be done in accordance with the
Compliance Instructions, Parts II and III, of Agusta S.p.A. Alert
Bollettino Tecnico No. 109EP-14, dated October 11, 2000. This
incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. Copies may be obtained from Agusta, 21017 Cascina Costa di
Samarate (VA) Italy, Via Giovanni Agusta 520, telephone 39 (0331)
229111, fax 39 (0331) 229605-222595. Copies may be inspected at the
FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham
Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
(h) This amendment becomes effective on March 1, 2001, to all
persons except those persons to whom it was made immediately
effective by Emergency AD 2000-25-54, issued December 12, 2000,
which contained the requirements of this amendment.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on February 2, 2001.
Eric Bries,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 01-3562 Filed 2-13-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:31:50.722614+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- a332351852c9888ad0d24822d0cac911aac16dbfba073366b44b297d784bdf13
- Text SHA-256
- 4c8a4381087ac1d93b235e770440a870034831339802a3c6e2cb435790a1e77b
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.