Published 2001-03-23 · Federal Register document 01-7173
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-600, -700, and -800 Series Airplanes
Publication summary
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Boeing Model 737-600, -700, and -800 series airplanes. This action requires repetitive inspections of certain elevator hinge plates, and corrective action, if necessary. This action also provides for an optional replacement of the elevator hinge plates with new, improved hinge plates, which would end the repetitive inspections. This action is necessary to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the elevator hinge plates, which could lead to the loss of the attachment of the elevator to the horizontal stabilizer, and consequent reduced controllability of the airplane. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:03.835669+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2001-8d66ddb74aa17366
- Source row
- results[99]
- Raw source SHA-256
- 8d66ddb74aa17366596c5f6ccb4e6d04532df19ae027b6fa003379bdedb52c7e
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2001-06-08
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 2001-04-09
Some source clauses remain unstructured. Read the complete publication for conditions that have not been interpreted here.
Read 2 complete recorded clauses
Applicability wording · Applicability
Applicability: Model 737-600, -700, and -800 series airplanes;
line numbers 1 through 84 inclusive; certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 11587–12470, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 21971d352adcceac5f34002518d9b64cfde395e8f6c84aaa49358fdfc5172287
Compliance and requirements
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To detect and correct cracking of the elevator hinge plates,
which could lead to the loss of the attachment of the elevator to
the horizontal stabilizer, and consequent reduced controllability of
the airplane, accomplish the following:
Inspections and Corrective Actions
(a) Prior to the accumulation of 7,000 total flight cycles or
within 90 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later, perform high frequency eddy current and detailed visual
inspections of the hinge plate at elevator hinge 4, and a detailed
visual inspection of the elevator hinge plate lugs (three locations)
at elevator hinges 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8. Do these inspections per Part
I of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-
55-1067, dated October 19, 2000. Repeat the inspections thereafter
no later than every 4,000 flight cycles, per the service bulletin,
until paragraph (b) of this AD has been accomplished. If any
cracking or unusual wear (i.e., elongated holes, loose or missing
nuts or bolts, or missing primer or finish) is found during any
inspection per this paragraph, before further flight, replace the
affected hinge plate with a new, improved hinge plate, and modify
the elevator upper skin, the upper and lower hinge covers, and the
upper and lower closure panels, as applicable, per the service
bulletin, except as provided by paragraph (c) of this AD. Such
replacement and modification ends the repetitive inspections for the
replaced hinge plate.
Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed visual
inspection is defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a
specific structural area, system, installation, or assembly to
detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is
normally supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at
intensity deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such
as mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning
and elaborate access procedures may be required.''
Optional Replacement of Hinge Plates
(b) Replacement of the elevator hinge plates at hinges 3, 4, 5,
6, 7, and 8, with new, improved hinge plates; including modification
of the elevator upper skin, the upper and lower hinge covers, and
the upper and lower closure panels, as applicable; per Part II of
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-55-
1067, dated October 19, 2000, except as provided by paragraph (c) of
this AD; ends the repetitive inspections required by this AD.
Exception to Service Bulletin Instructions: Wear Limits
(c) During the replacement of elevator hinge plates per
paragraph (a) or (b) of this AD, where Boeing Service Bulletin 737-
55-1067, dated October 19, 2000, specifies to contact Boeing for
wear limits, before further flight, contact the Manager, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, or a Boeing Company
Designated Engineering Representative who has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO, to make such findings. For wear limits to be
approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO, as required by this paragraph,
the Manager's approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO. Operators shall submit
their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance
Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager,
Seattle ACO.
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Seattle ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
Secs. 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the
requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(f) Except as provided by paragraph (c) of this AD, the actions
shall be done in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 737-55-
1067, dated October 19, 2000. This incorporation by reference was
approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with
5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from
Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington
98124-2207. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite
700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(g) This amendment becomes effective on April 9, 2001.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 12470–17274, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: b6de4f441e73fc74d6fbd24c5bb00dd3d55b9297b215f0c89ed1879f15eff5c3
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2001-06-08 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 37d819d1502fc902c2bfffef87649c9c5b2729737c24dd9a204c3fe7dd600472. Source manifest: b13bd9a170bbe4a6814b8a70aef9ce69725e338e240bcab34c671e9b5ebd992b.
Official source · 2001-03-23
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 57 (Friday, March 23, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16116-16118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-7173]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2001-NM-19-AD; Amendment 39-12155; AD 2001-06-08]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-600, -700, and -800
Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that
is applicable to certain Boeing Model 737-600, -700, and -800 series
airplanes. This action requires repetitive inspections of certain
elevator hinge plates, and corrective action, if necessary. This action
also provides for an optional replacement of the elevator hinge plates
with new, improved hinge plates, which would end the repetitive
inspections. This action is necessary to detect and correct fatigue
cracking of the elevator hinge plates, which could lead to the loss of
the attachment of the elevator to the horizontal stabilizer, and
consequent reduced controllability of the airplane. This action is
intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
DATES: Effective April 9, 2001.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of April 9, 2001.
Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or
before May 22, 2001.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 2001-NM-19-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this
location between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. Comments may be submitted via fax to (425) 227-1232.
Comments may also be sent via the Internet using the following address:
[email protected]. Comments sent via fax or the Internet must
contain ``Docket No. 2001-NM-19-AD'' in the subject line and need not
be submitted in triplicate. Comments sent via the Internet as attached
electronic files must be formatted in Microsoft Word 97 for Windows or
ASCII text.
The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from
Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington
98124-2207. This information may be examined at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at
the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW.,
suite 700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Marsh, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
227-2028; fax (425) 227-1181.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA has received a report that, during
flight testing of Boeing Model 737-600, -700,
[[Page 16117]]
and -800 series airplanes, the elevator hinge plates at elevator hinges
3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 experienced higher-than-expected loads due to
buffeting by the spoiler. The higher loads reduce the service life of
the elevator hinge plates. Reduced service life of the elevator hinge
plates could lead to fatigue cracking of the elevator hinge plates in
service. Such cracking could lead to the loss of the attachment of the
elevator to the horizontal stabilizer, and consequent reduced
controllability of the airplane.
Explanation of Relevant Service Information
The FAA has reviewed and approved Boeing Service Bulletin 737-55-
1067, dated October 19, 2000, which describes instructions for the
following:
<bullet> Repetitive detailed visual inspections of the elevator
hinge plate lugs (three locations) at elevator hinges 3, 5, 6, 7, and
8.
<bullet> Repetitive high frequency eddy current (HFEC) and detailed
visual inspections of the hinge plate at elevator hinge 4. (Analysis
has shown that the hinge plate at elevator hinge 4 is most critical;
therefore, in addition to the detailed visual inspection, an HFEC
inspection is necessary for elevator hinge 4.)
<bullet> Corrective actions, which entail replacement of the hinge
plate with a new part, if any crack or unusual wear is found on a hinge
plate. (For the purposes of this AD, unusual wear is defined as
elongated holes, loose or missing nuts or bolts, or missing primer or
finish.)
<bullet> Replacement of the elevator hinge plates at hinges 3, 4,
5, 6, 7, and 8, with new, improved hinge plates, and modification of
the elevator upper skin, the upper and lower hinge covers, and the
upper and lower closure panels, as applicable. Doing these actions
eliminates the need to do the repetitive inspections.
Explanation of the Requirements of the Rule
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or develop on other airplanes of the same type design, this AD is
being issued to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the elevator
hinge plates, which could lead to the loss of the attachment of the
elevator to the horizontal stabilizer, and consequent reduced
controllability of the airplane. This AD requires accomplishment of the
actions specified in the service bulletin described previously, except
as discussed below.
Difference Between This AD and the Service Bulletin
Operators should note that the service bulletin recommends doing
the inspections prior to the accumulation of 7,000 total flight cycles
on the airplane. The FAA finds that such a compliance time could put
some airplanes out of compliance as of the effective date of this AD if
the airplane already has accumulated more than 7,000 total flight
cycles before the effective date of the AD. Therefore, this AD provides
a grace period of 90 days after the effective date of this AD for the
inspection for airplanes that are close to or over the threshold of
7,000 total flight cycles.
Operators also should note that, although the service bulletin
specifies to contact Boeing for wear limits during replacement of
elevator hinge plates, this AD requires that such wear limits be
obtained from the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, or a Boeing Company Designated Engineering Representative who has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make such findings.
Interim Action
This is considered to be interim action. The service bulletin
recommends the replacement of elevator hinge plates prior to the
accumulation of 15,000 total flight cycles, or within 5 years since
date of delivery of the airplane, whichever occurs first. This AD
provides for the replacement as optional. The FAA is currently
considering requiring the replacement of the elevator hinge plates with
new parts, which is described in the service bulletin and which would
constitute terminating action for the repetitive inspections required
by this AD action. However, the planned compliance time for the
replacement is sufficiently long so that notice and opportunity for
prior public comment will be practicable.
Determination of Rule's Effective Date
Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for prior
public comment hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for
making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
Comments Invited
Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves
requirements affecting flight safety and, thus, was not preceded by
notice and an opportunity for public comment, comments are invited on
this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by
submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire.
Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted
in triplicate to the address specified under the caption ADDRESSES. All
communications received on or before the closing date for comments will
be considered, and this rule may be amended in light of the comments
received. Factual information that supports the commenter's ideas and
suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the
AD action and determining whether additional rulemaking action would be
needed.
Submit comments using the following format:
<bullet> Organize comments issue-by-issue. For example, discuss a
request to change the compliance time and a request to change the
service bulletin reference as two separate issues.
<bullet> For each issue, state what specific change to the AD is
being requested.
<bullet> Include justification (e.g., reasons or data) for each
request.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might
suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be
available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the
Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that
summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this
AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket Number 2001-NM-19-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and
returned to the commenter.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency
regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe
condition in aircraft, and that it is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further
that this action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory
Policies and Procedures (44
[[Page 16118]]
FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is determined that this emergency
regulation otherwise would be significant under DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures, a final regulatory evaluation will be prepared and
placed in the Rules Docket. A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
2001-06-08 Boeing: Amendment 39-12155. Docket 2001-NM-19-AD.
Applicability: Model 737-600, -700, and -800 series airplanes;
line numbers 1 through 84 inclusive; certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To detect and correct cracking of the elevator hinge plates,
which could lead to the loss of the attachment of the elevator to
the horizontal stabilizer, and consequent reduced controllability of
the airplane, accomplish the following:
Inspections and Corrective Actions
(a) Prior to the accumulation of 7,000 total flight cycles or
within 90 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later, perform high frequency eddy current and detailed visual
inspections of the hinge plate at elevator hinge 4, and a detailed
visual inspection of the elevator hinge plate lugs (three locations)
at elevator hinges 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8. Do these inspections per Part
I of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-
55-1067, dated October 19, 2000. Repeat the inspections thereafter
no later than every 4,000 flight cycles, per the service bulletin,
until paragraph (b) of this AD has been accomplished. If any
cracking or unusual wear (i.e., elongated holes, loose or missing
nuts or bolts, or missing primer or finish) is found during any
inspection per this paragraph, before further flight, replace the
affected hinge plate with a new, improved hinge plate, and modify
the elevator upper skin, the upper and lower hinge covers, and the
upper and lower closure panels, as applicable, per the service
bulletin, except as provided by paragraph (c) of this AD. Such
replacement and modification ends the repetitive inspections for the
replaced hinge plate.
Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed visual
inspection is defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a
specific structural area, system, installation, or assembly to
detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is
normally supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at
intensity deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such
as mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning
and elaborate access procedures may be required.''
Optional Replacement of Hinge Plates
(b) Replacement of the elevator hinge plates at hinges 3, 4, 5,
6, 7, and 8, with new, improved hinge plates; including modification
of the elevator upper skin, the upper and lower hinge covers, and
the upper and lower closure panels, as applicable; per Part II of
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-55-
1067, dated October 19, 2000, except as provided by paragraph (c) of
this AD; ends the repetitive inspections required by this AD.
Exception to Service Bulletin Instructions: Wear Limits
(c) During the replacement of elevator hinge plates per
paragraph (a) or (b) of this AD, where Boeing Service Bulletin 737-
55-1067, dated October 19, 2000, specifies to contact Boeing for
wear limits, before further flight, contact the Manager, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, or a Boeing Company
Designated Engineering Representative who has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO, to make such findings. For wear limits to be
approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO, as required by this paragraph,
the Manager's approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO. Operators shall submit
their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance
Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager,
Seattle ACO.
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Seattle ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
Secs. 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the
requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(f) Except as provided by paragraph (c) of this AD, the actions
shall be done in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 737-55-
1067, dated October 19, 2000. This incorporation by reference was
approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with
5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from
Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington
98124-2207. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite
700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(g) This amendment becomes effective on April 9, 2001.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 15, 2001.
Donald L. Riggin,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 01-7173 Filed 3-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:31:00.947296+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- 9dc5028091d4317b7609cfa0dbbdbf900309ee05d8755304aca9798a634886c8
- Text SHA-256
- 37d819d1502fc902c2bfffef87649c9c5b2729737c24dd9a204c3fe7dd600472
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.