Published 2002-05-23 · Federal Register document 02-12630
Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & Whitney JT9D-59A, -70A, -7Q, and -7Q3 Turbofan Engines
Publication summary
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), that is applicable to Pratt & Whitney (PW) JT9D-59A, -70A, -7Q, and -7Q3 turbofan engines. This amendment requires fluorescent penetrant inspection of the high pressure turbine (HPT) second stage airseal knife edges for cracks, each time the airseal is accessible. This amendment is prompted by reports of cracks found in the knife edges of HPT second stage airseals during HPT disassembly. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent failure of HPT second stage airseals due to cracks in the knife edges, which if not detected could result in uncontained engine failure and damage to the airplane.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:07.262592+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2002-c8c2ee537a56d16c
- Source row
- results[190]
- Raw source SHA-256
- c8c2ee537a56d16c3d3246bbaa55e183792a136494260623f45827707b4e2a64
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2002-10-07
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 2002-06-27
Some source clauses remain unstructured. Read the complete publication for conditions that have not been interpreted here.
Read 2 complete recorded clauses
Applicability wording · Applicability
Applicability: This airworthiness directive (AD) is applicable
to Pratt & Whitney (PW) JT9D-59A, -70A, -7Q, and -7Q3 turbofan
engines. These engines are installed on, but not limited to, Airbus
Indusrie A300 series, Boeing 747 series, and McDonnell Douglas DC-10
series airplanes.
Note 1: This AD applies to each engine identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For engines that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 6830–7863, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 65787c2ac98b353b2fb720a29ea9f7c98235d2a76231761975c8a41c77bebea2
Compliance and requirements
Compliance: Compliance with this AD is required as indicated,
unless already done.
To prevent failure of high pressure turbine (HPT) second stage
airseals due to cracks in the knife edges, which if not detected
could result in uncontained engine failure and damage to the
airplane, do the following:
Inspections
(a) Perform a fluorescent penetrant inspection of the HPT second
stage airseal knife edges for cracks in accordance with procedures
and return to service criteria contained in Accomplishment
Instructions, Paragraphs 1 through 3, of PW Service Bulletin (SB)
JT9D 6409, dated July 27, 2001, each time the HPT stage 1 and stage
2 rotors are separated. Remove from service those airseals that are
determined to be unserviceable.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Engine Certification Office (ECO).
Operators must submit their request through an appropriate FAA
Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send
it to the Manager, ECO.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this airworthiness directive,
if any, may be obtained from the ECO.
Special Flight Permits
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
<l-arrow><l-arrow> 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a
location where the requirements of this AD can be done.
Documents That Have Been Incorporated By Reference
(d) The inspection must be done in accordance with Pratt &
Whitney Service Bulletin JT9D 6409, dated July 27, 2001. This
incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. Copies may be obtained from Pratt & Whitney, 400 Main St., East
Hartford, CT 06108; telephone (860) 565-8770; fax (860) 565-4503.
Copies may be inspected, by appointment, at the FAA, New England
Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 12 New England Executive
Park, Burlington, MA; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800
North Capitol Street, NW, suite 700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(e) This amendment becomes effective on June 27, 2002.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 7863–10246, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 08dd0e747bb2898143c04602a8946005e4278a75b78eb918c0623c0d27211ea2
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2002-10-07 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 6ad9558c8dcc5e6d85c10a95a681626cf48cef2d9fa4443801e6d8083186a893. Source manifest: 9aae6c0714b029eafdb58560dbc6ae4b0e23894d0db4cbcd345378caa3e8364f.
Official source · 2002-05-23
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Literal source encoding markers are preserved as printed strings. They have not been interpreted as symbols or legal requirements.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 100 (Thursday, May 23, 2002)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36092-36093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 02-12630]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2001-NE-27-AD; Amendment 39-12753; AD 2002-10-07]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & Whitney JT9D-59A, -70A, -7Q,
and -7Q3 Turbofan Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), that
is applicable to Pratt & Whitney (PW) JT9D-59A, -70A, -7Q, and -7Q3
turbofan engines. This amendment requires fluorescent penetrant
inspection of the high pressure turbine (HPT) second stage airseal
knife edges for cracks, each time the airseal is accessible. This
amendment is prompted by reports of cracks found in the knife edges of
HPT second stage airseals during HPT disassembly. The actions specified
by this AD are intended to prevent failure of HPT second stage airseals
due to cracks in the knife edges, which if not detected could result in
uncontained engine failure and damage to the airplane.
DATES: Effective June 27, 2002. The incorporation by reference of
certain publications listed in the regulations is approved by the
Director of the Federal Register as of June 27, 2002.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Pratt & Whitney, 400 Main St., East Hartford, CT 06108;
telephone (860) 565-8770; fax (860) 565-4503. This information may be
examined, by appointment, at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA),
New England Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW, suite 700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tara Goodman, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299; telephone (781)
238-7130, fax (781) 238-7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an AD that is
applicable to PW JT9D-59A, -70A, -7Q, and -7Q3 turbofan engines was
published in the Federal Register on November 23, 2001 (66 FR 58691).
That action proposed to require fluorescent penetrant inspection of the
HPT second stage airseal knife edges for cracks, in accordance with PW
service bulletin (SB) JT9D 6409, dated July 27, 2001, each time the
airseal is accessible.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
the comments received.
Make Removal Wording More Specific
One commenter suggests changing proposed paragraph (a) to be
consistent with SB JT9D 6409, dated July 27, 2001. Paragraph (a)
proposed that airseals found cracked must be removed from service. The
commenter suggests that paragraph (a) should state that airseals that
are found cracked must be removed only if the crack is beyond the limit
defined in the engine manual inspection section. Another commenter
points out that SB JT9D 6409, dated July 27, 2001, refers to the engine
manual (EM), but the proposal does not. The EM allows blend repair of
cracks that are not located in the pedestal area of the airseal, but
the proposal requires removal from service of airseals with any cracks.
The FAA agrees that the wording describing the circumstances that
airseals are to be removed from service needs to be more specific.
Therefore, the FAA has changed paragraph (a) to reference the return to
service criteria as well as the procedures for performing the
inspection contained in the Accomplishment Instructions of PW SB JT9D
6409, dated July 27, 2001.
After careful review of the available data, including the comments
noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public
interest require the adoption of the rule with the changes described
previously. The FAA has determined that these changes will neither
increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of
the AD.
Economic Analysis
There are approximately 564 engines of the affected design PW JT9D-
59A, -70A, -7Q, and -7Q3 turbofan engines in the worldwide fleet. The
FAA estimates that 176 engines installed on airplanes of U.S. registry
would be affected by this AD. The FAA also estimates that it would take
approximately 1 work hour per engine to perform the fluorescent
penetrant inspection, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work
hour. Based on these figures, the total labor cost annually of the AD
on U.S. operators is estimated to be $10,560.
Regulatory Analysis
This final rule does not have federalism implications, as defined
in Executive Order 13132, because it would not have a substantial
direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Accordingly,
the FAA has not consulted with state authorities prior to publication
of this final rule.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has
[[Page 36093]]
been prepared for this action and it is contained in the Rules Docket.
A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules Docket at the
location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
<l-arrow> 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive
to read as follows:
2002-10-07 Pratt & Whitney: Amendment 39-12753. Docket No. 2001-NE-
27-AD.
Applicability: This airworthiness directive (AD) is applicable
to Pratt & Whitney (PW) JT9D-59A, -70A, -7Q, and -7Q3 turbofan
engines. These engines are installed on, but not limited to, Airbus
Indusrie A300 series, Boeing 747 series, and McDonnell Douglas DC-10
series airplanes.
Note 1: This AD applies to each engine identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For engines that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Compliance with this AD is required as indicated,
unless already done.
To prevent failure of high pressure turbine (HPT) second stage
airseals due to cracks in the knife edges, which if not detected
could result in uncontained engine failure and damage to the
airplane, do the following:
Inspections
(a) Perform a fluorescent penetrant inspection of the HPT second
stage airseal knife edges for cracks in accordance with procedures
and return to service criteria contained in Accomplishment
Instructions, Paragraphs 1 through 3, of PW Service Bulletin (SB)
JT9D 6409, dated July 27, 2001, each time the HPT stage 1 and stage
2 rotors are separated. Remove from service those airseals that are
determined to be unserviceable.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Engine Certification Office (ECO).
Operators must submit their request through an appropriate FAA
Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send
it to the Manager, ECO.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this airworthiness directive,
if any, may be obtained from the ECO.
Special Flight Permits
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
<l-arrow><l-arrow> 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a
location where the requirements of this AD can be done.
Documents That Have Been Incorporated By Reference
(d) The inspection must be done in accordance with Pratt &
Whitney Service Bulletin JT9D 6409, dated July 27, 2001. This
incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. Copies may be obtained from Pratt & Whitney, 400 Main St., East
Hartford, CT 06108; telephone (860) 565-8770; fax (860) 565-4503.
Copies may be inspected, by appointment, at the FAA, New England
Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 12 New England Executive
Park, Burlington, MA; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800
North Capitol Street, NW, suite 700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(e) This amendment becomes effective on June 27, 2002.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on May 10, 2002.
Francis A. Favara,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 02-12630 Filed 5-22-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:20:35.050650+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- 61d7a2fbd494d60400e30cc096043d584ea23d0ffbc4baeebd0d710801aec3ff
- Text SHA-256
- 6ad9558c8dcc5e6d85c10a95a681626cf48cef2d9fa4443801e6d8083186a893
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.