Back to publication catalog

Published 2002-06-20 · Federal Register document 02-15242

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL-215-1A10 and CL-215-6B11 Series Airplanes

Publication summary

This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Bombardier Model CL-215-1A10 and CL-215- 6B11 series airplanes, that currently requires repetitive inspections to detect cracking on certain wing-to-fuselage frame angles; and repair, if necessary. This amendment decreases the compliance time for the initial inspection to detect cracking on certain wing-to-fuselage frame angles and decreases the interval between repetitive inspections. This amendment is prompted by issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness information by a foreign civil airworthiness authority. The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect and correct cracking in the wing-to-fuselage frame angles, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airframe.

Why this record is shown

Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:07.262592+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.

Source revision
federal_register_ad_metadata_2002-c8c2ee537a56d16c
Source row
results[220]
Raw source SHA-256
c8c2ee537a56d16c3d3246bbaa55e183792a136494260623f45827707b4e2a64

Final-rule publication

Recorded publication clauses

AD identifier printed in this edition
2002-12-12
Effective date printed in this edition
2002-07-25

Some source clauses remain unstructured. Read the complete publication for conditions that have not been interpreted here.

Read 2 complete recorded clauses
Applicability wording · Applicability
    Applicability: Model CL-215-1A10 and CL-215-6B11 series 
airplanes, serial numbers 1001 through 1125 inclusive, certificated 
in any category.

    Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (g) of 
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
address it.

Exact source excerpt. Text positions 7250–8145, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 61a645b4f0cb8c669a4d3244e16d962338cb240259ea4878ba9c17cc72306a31

Compliance and requirements
    Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
previously.
    To detect and correct cracking in the wing-to-fuselage frame 
angles, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the 
airframe, accomplish the following:

Restatement of Requirements of AD 99-16-04

    (a) Perform an eddy current inspection to detect cracking of the 
fuselage frame angles at the wing front and rear spar attachment to 
the fuselage at the later of the times specified in paragraphs 
(a)(1) and (a)(2) of this AD, in accordance with Bombardier Alert 
Service Bulletin 215-A476, Revision 3, dated August 21, 1998. 
Thereafter, repeat the inspection at intervals not to exceed 415 
flight hours.
    (1) Prior to the accumulation of 2,300 total flight hours.
    (2) Within 150 flight hours or 4 months after September 7, 1999 
(the effective date of AD 99-16-04, amendment 39-11239), whichever 
occurs first.

    Note 2: Accomplishment of the eddy current inspections of the 
lower surfaces of the frame angles conducted in accordance with 
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 215-A476, Revision 1, dated 
January 14, 1997, or Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 215-A476, 
Revision 2, dated June 15, 1998, prior to the effective date of this 
AD, is considered to be acceptable for compliance with the 
requirements of paragraph (a) of this AD for that area only.

    (b) If the results of any inspection required by paragraph (a) 
of this AD are outside the limits specified in paragraph 2.C.(7) of 
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 215-A476, Revision 3, dated August 
21, 1998, or Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 215-A476, Revision 4, 
dated August 18, 2000: Prior to further flight, repair in accordance 
with a method approved by the Manager, New York Aircraft 
Certification Office (ACO), FAA.

New Actions Required by This AD

Initial Inspection

    (c) Unless paragraph (a) of this AD has been accomplished, 
perform an eddy current inspection to detect cracking of the 
fuselage frame angles at the wing front and rear spar attachment to 
the fuselage at the later of the times specified in paragraphs 
(c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD, in accordance with Bombardier Alert 
Service Bulletin 215-A476, Revision 4, dated August 18, 2000.
    (1) Prior to the accumulation of 2,300 total flight hours or 
7,500 total water drops, whichever occurs first.
    (2) Within 60 days after the effective date of this AD.

Repetitive Inspection

    (d) Perform an eddy current inspection to detect cracking of the 
fuselage frame angles at the wing front and rear spar attachment to 
the fuselage, in accordance with Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 
215-A476, Revision 4, dated August 18, 2000, at intervals not to 
exceed 415 flight hours or 1,500 water drops, whichever occurs 
first.

Corrective Action

    (e) If the results of any inspection required by paragraph (c) 
or (d) of this AD are outside the limits specified in paragraph 
2.C.(7) of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 215-A476, Revision 4, 
dated August 18, 2000: Prior to further flight, repair in accordance 
with a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO, FAA.

Reporting

    (f) Within 10 days after performing any inspection required by 
paragraph (a), (c), or (d) of this AD: Report the findings, positive 
or negative, to Bombardier Inc., Amphibious Aircraft Division, 
Customer Support, Department 645, Attention: Manager of Technical 
Support, Fax Number (514) 855-7602. Information collection 
requirements contained in this AD have been approved by the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) under the provisions of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and have been 
assigned OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

Alternative Methods of Compliance

    (g) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
used if approved by the Manager, New York ACO. Operators shall 
submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal 
Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
Manager, New York ACO.

    Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
obtained from the New York ACO.

Special Flight Permits

    (h) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
Secs. 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 
21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the 
requirements of this AD can be accomplished.

Incorporation by Reference

    (i) Except as provided by paragraphs (b) and (e) of this AD, the 
actions shall be done in accordance with Bombardier Alert Service 
Bulletin 215-A476, Revision 3, dated August 21, 1998; and Bombardier 
Alert Service Bulletin 215-A476, Revision 4, dated August 18, 2000; 
as applicable.
    (1) The incorporation by reference of Bombardier Alert Service 
Bulletin 215-A476, Revision 4, dated August 18, 2000, is approved by 
the Director of the Federal Register, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) The incorporation by reference of Bombardier Alert Service 
Bulletin 215-A476, Revision 3, dated August 21, 1998, was approved 
previously by the Director of the Federal Register as of September 
7, 1999 (64 FR 41775, August 2, 1999).
    (3) Copies may be obtained from Bombardier, Inc., Canadair, 
Aerospace Group, P.O. Box 6087, Station Centre-ville, Montreal, 
Quebec H3C 3G9, Canada. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, 
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North 
Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.

    Note 4: The subject of this AD is addressed in Canadian 
airworthiness directive CF-1997-07R2, dated August 17, 2000.

Effective Date

    (j) This amendment becomes effective on July 25, 2002.

Exact source excerpt. Text positions 8145–14042, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: fed1ca95197b8991a38b7e815de3a3830c26ea0bac4cd5f0d98e6ecb779b4569

No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.

Find all recorded historical references to AD 2002-12-12 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.

These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.

Why these observations are shown

They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.

Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: c370bf5bf51a83e9ea08de1e4da77a1422cd7db5d839c5b681aac766b6e4cac4. Source manifest: 21d9597c10bd144a16484634a99ea0a6fc39ea6d553f6a6da80ced086d5bf0e3.

Official source · 2002-06-20

Publication text

This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.

Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.

Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 119 (Thursday, June 20, 2002)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41818-41819]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 02-15242]



[[Page 41818]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 2000-NM-398-AD; Amendment 39-12784; AD 2002-12-12]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL-215-1A10 and CL-
215-6B11 Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive 
(AD), applicable to certain Bombardier Model CL-215-1A10 and CL-215-
6B11 series airplanes, that currently requires repetitive inspections 
to detect cracking on certain wing-to-fuselage frame angles; and 
repair, if necessary. This amendment decreases the compliance time for 
the initial inspection to detect cracking on certain wing-to-fuselage 
frame angles and decreases the interval between repetitive inspections. 
This amendment is prompted by issuance of mandatory continuing 
airworthiness information by a foreign civil airworthiness authority. 
The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect and correct 
cracking in the wing-to-fuselage frame angles, which could result in 
reduced structural integrity of the airframe.

DATES: Effective July 25, 2002.
    The incorporation by reference of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 
215-A476, Revision 4, dated August 18, 2000, as listed in the 
regulations, is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of 
July 25, 2002.
    The incorporation by reference of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 
215-A476, Revision 3, dated August 21, 1998, as listed in the 
regulations, was approved previously by the Director of the Federal 
Register as September 7, 1999 (64 FR 41775, August 2, 1999).

ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
obtained from Bombardier, Inc., Canadair, Aerospace Group, P.O. Box 
6087, Station Centre-ville, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3G9, Canada. This 
information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration 
(FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, 
SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, New York Aircraft Certification 
Office, 10 Fifth Street, Third Floor, Valley Stream, New York 11581; or 
at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., 
suite 700, Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Serge Napoleon, Aerospace Engineer, 
Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft 
Certification Office, 10 Fifth Street, Third Floor, Valley Stream, New 
York 11581; telephone (516) 256-7512; fax (516) 568-2716.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) by superseding AD 99-16-04, 
amendment 39-11239 (64 FR 41775, August 2, 1999), which is applicable 
to certain Bombardier Model CL-215-1A10 and CL-215-6B11 series 
airplanes, was published in the Federal Register on February 8, 2002 
(67 FR 5958). The action proposed to continue to require repetitive 
inspections to detect cracking on certain wing-to-fuselage frame 
angles, and repair, if necessary. The action also proposed to decrease 
the compliance time for the initial inspection to detect cracking on 
certain wing-to-fuselage frame angles and to decrease the interval 
between repetitive inspections.

Comments

    Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
in the making of this amendment. No comments were submitted in response 
to the proposal or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    The FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest 
require the adoption of the rule as proposed.

Cost Impact

    There is one airplane of U.S. registry that will be affected by 
this AD.
    The inspections that are currently required by AD 99-16-04 take 
approximately 2 work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an average 
labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost 
impact of the previously required actions on U.S. operators is 
estimated to be $120 per airplane, per inspection cycle.
    The new inspections that are required by this new AD will take 
approximately 3 work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an average 
labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost 
impact of the new requirements of this AD on U.S. operators is 
estimated to be $180 per airplane, per inspection cycle.
    The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions 
that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this 
AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the 
future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed 
in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform 
the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures 
typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to 
gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other 
administrative actions.

Regulatory Impact

    The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct 
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national 
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it 
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism 
implications under Executive Order 13132.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec. 39.13  [Amended]

    2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-11239 (64 FR 
41775, August 2, 1999), and by adding a new airworthiness directive 
(AD), amendment 39-12784, to read as follows:


[[Page 41819]]


2002-12-12  Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39-12784. Docket 2000-NM-
398-AD. Supersedes AD 99-16-04, Amendment 39-11239.
    Applicability: Model CL-215-1A10 and CL-215-6B11 series 
airplanes, serial numbers 1001 through 1125 inclusive, certificated 
in any category.

    Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (g) of 
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
address it.

    Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
previously.
    To detect and correct cracking in the wing-to-fuselage frame 
angles, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the 
airframe, accomplish the following:

Restatement of Requirements of AD 99-16-04

    (a) Perform an eddy current inspection to detect cracking of the 
fuselage frame angles at the wing front and rear spar attachment to 
the fuselage at the later of the times specified in paragraphs 
(a)(1) and (a)(2) of this AD, in accordance with Bombardier Alert 
Service Bulletin 215-A476, Revision 3, dated August 21, 1998. 
Thereafter, repeat the inspection at intervals not to exceed 415 
flight hours.
    (1) Prior to the accumulation of 2,300 total flight hours.
    (2) Within 150 flight hours or 4 months after September 7, 1999 
(the effective date of AD 99-16-04, amendment 39-11239), whichever 
occurs first.

    Note 2: Accomplishment of the eddy current inspections of the 
lower surfaces of the frame angles conducted in accordance with 
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 215-A476, Revision 1, dated 
January 14, 1997, or Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 215-A476, 
Revision 2, dated June 15, 1998, prior to the effective date of this 
AD, is considered to be acceptable for compliance with the 
requirements of paragraph (a) of this AD for that area only.

    (b) If the results of any inspection required by paragraph (a) 
of this AD are outside the limits specified in paragraph 2.C.(7) of 
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 215-A476, Revision 3, dated August 
21, 1998, or Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 215-A476, Revision 4, 
dated August 18, 2000: Prior to further flight, repair in accordance 
with a method approved by the Manager, New York Aircraft 
Certification Office (ACO), FAA.

New Actions Required by This AD

Initial Inspection

    (c) Unless paragraph (a) of this AD has been accomplished, 
perform an eddy current inspection to detect cracking of the 
fuselage frame angles at the wing front and rear spar attachment to 
the fuselage at the later of the times specified in paragraphs 
(c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD, in accordance with Bombardier Alert 
Service Bulletin 215-A476, Revision 4, dated August 18, 2000.
    (1) Prior to the accumulation of 2,300 total flight hours or 
7,500 total water drops, whichever occurs first.
    (2) Within 60 days after the effective date of this AD.

Repetitive Inspection

    (d) Perform an eddy current inspection to detect cracking of the 
fuselage frame angles at the wing front and rear spar attachment to 
the fuselage, in accordance with Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 
215-A476, Revision 4, dated August 18, 2000, at intervals not to 
exceed 415 flight hours or 1,500 water drops, whichever occurs 
first.

Corrective Action

    (e) If the results of any inspection required by paragraph (c) 
or (d) of this AD are outside the limits specified in paragraph 
2.C.(7) of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 215-A476, Revision 4, 
dated August 18, 2000: Prior to further flight, repair in accordance 
with a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO, FAA.

Reporting

    (f) Within 10 days after performing any inspection required by 
paragraph (a), (c), or (d) of this AD: Report the findings, positive 
or negative, to Bombardier Inc., Amphibious Aircraft Division, 
Customer Support, Department 645, Attention: Manager of Technical 
Support, Fax Number (514) 855-7602. Information collection 
requirements contained in this AD have been approved by the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) under the provisions of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and have been 
assigned OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

Alternative Methods of Compliance

    (g) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
used if approved by the Manager, New York ACO. Operators shall 
submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal 
Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
Manager, New York ACO.

    Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
obtained from the New York ACO.

Special Flight Permits

    (h) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
Secs. 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 
21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the 
requirements of this AD can be accomplished.

Incorporation by Reference

    (i) Except as provided by paragraphs (b) and (e) of this AD, the 
actions shall be done in accordance with Bombardier Alert Service 
Bulletin 215-A476, Revision 3, dated August 21, 1998; and Bombardier 
Alert Service Bulletin 215-A476, Revision 4, dated August 18, 2000; 
as applicable.
    (1) The incorporation by reference of Bombardier Alert Service 
Bulletin 215-A476, Revision 4, dated August 18, 2000, is approved by 
the Director of the Federal Register, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) The incorporation by reference of Bombardier Alert Service 
Bulletin 215-A476, Revision 3, dated August 21, 1998, was approved 
previously by the Director of the Federal Register as of September 
7, 1999 (64 FR 41775, August 2, 1999).
    (3) Copies may be obtained from Bombardier, Inc., Canadair, 
Aerospace Group, P.O. Box 6087, Station Centre-ville, Montreal, 
Quebec H3C 3G9, Canada. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, 
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North 
Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.

    Note 4: The subject of this AD is addressed in Canadian 
airworthiness directive CF-1997-07R2, dated August 17, 2000.

Effective Date

    (j) This amendment becomes effective on July 25, 2002.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 11, 2002.
Ali Bahrami,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 02-15242 Filed 6-19-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Why this text is shown

The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:20:04.862058+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.

Open the captured official edition

Source SHA-256
4a1e52a87d292cf8a5861d93f4e346f58372606c924e193267fa256d64324ba0
Text SHA-256
c370bf5bf51a83e9ea08de1e4da77a1422cd7db5d839c5b681aac766b6e4cac4

Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence

Coverage and limits

These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.

The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.