Published 2002-07-09 · Federal Register document 02-16677
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -30, -30F, and -40 Series Airplanes, and Model C-9 Airplanes
Publication summary
This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -30, and - 40 series airplanes and Model C-9 airplanes, that currently requires an inspection to detect chafing of the wiring of the attendants' work light of the aft cabin, and repair of chafed wiring. That AD also requires modification and reidentification of the attendants' work light assemblies of the aft cabin. This amendment revises the applicability of the existing AD. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent chafing of the ground wire against the positive contact of the lamp of the attendants' work light of the aft cabin, and consequent arcing or arcing damage to the wiring of the attendants' work light and transformer of the aft cabin. Such arcing or arcing damage could result in short circuits and consequent smoke and fire in the aft cabin area. The actions of this AD are intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:07.262592+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2002-c8c2ee537a56d16c
- Source row
- results[238]
- Raw source SHA-256
- c8c2ee537a56d16c3d3246bbaa55e183792a136494260623f45827707b4e2a64
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2002-13-12
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 2002-08-13
Some source clauses remain unstructured. Read the complete publication for conditions that have not been interpreted here.
Read 2 complete recorded clauses
Applicability wording · Applicability
Applicability: Model DC-9-10, -30, -30F, and -40 series
airplanes, and Model C-9 airplanes; certificated in any category; as
listed in McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin DC9-33A058,
Revision 03, dated November 21, 2001; and equipped with an
attendants' work light in the aft cabin.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c)(1)
of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect
of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 9402–10449, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 828baf2d6867fe019d21c3733f29031d5cfe0d877ff5d2be52caaf7cecfa689a
Compliance and requirements
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent arcing or arcing damage to the wiring of the
attendants' work light of the aft cabin due to chafing of the ground
wire against the positive contact of the lamp of the attendants'
work light and transformer of the aft cabin, which could result in
short circuits and consequent smoke and fire in the aft cabin area,
accomplish the following:
Note 2: Paragraph (a) of this AD merely restates the
requirements of paragraph (a) of AD 2001-24-15, amendment 39-12532.
As allowed by the phrase, ``unless accomplished previously,'' if
those requirements of AD 2001-24-15 have already been accomplished,
this AD does not require that those actions be repeated.
Restatement of AD 2001-24-15
(a) For airplanes listed in McDonnell Douglas Alert Service
Bulletin DC9-33A058, Revision 02, dated January 27, 2000: Within 1
year after January 16, 2002 (the effective date of AD 2001-24-15),
do the actions specified in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this AD,
per McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin DC9-33A058, Revision
02, dated January 27, 2000.
(1) Do a general visual inspection to detect chafing of the
wiring of the attendants' work light of the aft cabin. If any
chafing is detected, before further flight, repair chafed wiring per
the service bulletin.
Note 3: For the purposes of this AD, a general visual inspection
is defined as: ``A visual examination of an interior or exterior
area, installation, or assembly to detect obvious damage, failure,
or irregularity. This level of inspection is made from within
touching distance unless otherwise specified. A mirror may be
necessary to enhance visual access to all exposed surfaces in the
inspection area. This level of inspection is made under normally
available lighting conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting,
flashlight, or droplight and may require removal or opening of
access panels or doors. Stands, ladders, or platforms may be
required to gain proximity to the area being checked.''
(2) Modify and reidentify the attendants' work light assemblies
of the aft cabin.
New Requirements of This AD
(b) For airplanes listed in McDonnell Douglas Alert Service
Bulletin
DC9-33A058, Revision 03, dated November 21, 2001: Within 1 year
after the effective date of this AD, do the actions specified in
paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this AD, per McDonnell Douglas Alert
Service Bulletin DC9-33A058, Revision 03, dated November 21, 2002.
(1) Do a general visual inspection to detect chafing of the
wiring of the attendants' work light of the aft cabin. If any
chafing is detected, before further flight, repair chafed wiring per
the service bulletin.
(2) Modify and reidentify the attendants' work light assemblies
of the aft cabin.
Note 4: Inspections, repairs, modifications, and
reidentifications done before the effective date of this AD per
McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC9-33-058, dated June 5, 1973;
Revision 1, dated November 26, 1975; or Revision 02, dated January
27, 2000; are considered acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of this AD.
1Alternative Methods of Compliance
(c)(1) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office, FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an
appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add
comments and then send it to the Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
(2) Alternative methods of compliance, approved previously in
accordance with AD 2001-24-15, are approved as alternative methods
of compliance with paragraph (a) of this AD.
Note 5: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(e) The actions shall be done in accordance with McDonnell
Douglas Alert Service Bulletin DC9-33A058, Revision 02, dated
January 27, 2000; and McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin DC9-
33A058, Revision 03, dated November 21, 2001; as applicable.
[[Page 45295]]
(1) The incorporation by reference of McDonnell Douglas Alert
Service Bulletin DC9-33A058, Revision 03, dated November 21, 2001,
is approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) The incorporation by reference of McDonnell Douglas Alert
Service Bulletin DC9-33A058, Revision 02, dated January 27, 2000,
was approved previously by the Director of the Federal Register as
of January 16, 2002 (66 FR 64133, December 12, 2001).
(3) Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Aircraft
Group, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach,
California 90846, Attention Data and Service Management, Dept. C1-
L5A (D800-0024). Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood,
California; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North
Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(f) This amendment becomes effective on August 13, 2002.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 10449–16134, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: b7040fdd292d033048bb530598bef773e466fef07b2ebd0271b028cbedeb556f
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2002-13-12 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 90afc1b375fbc7ae2a0808d52c19e346eb5ffd6c5d34d20927e9e8bf7c20efcf. Source manifest: 215283c54df25fd35e494f85d626355a2a0b256ed04599c8ff94a7a35a9ea6e3.
Official source · 2002-07-09
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 131 (Tuesday, July 9, 2002)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45293-45295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 02-16677]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 131 / Tuesday, July 9, 2002 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 45293]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2002-NM-36-AD; Amendment 39-12800; AD 2002-13-12 ]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -30, -
30F, and -40 Series Airplanes, and Model C-9 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive
(AD), applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -30, and -
40 series airplanes and Model C-9 airplanes, that currently requires an
inspection to detect chafing of the wiring of the attendants' work
light of the aft cabin, and repair of chafed wiring. That AD also
requires modification and reidentification of the attendants' work
light assemblies of the aft cabin. This amendment revises the
applicability of the existing AD. The actions specified by this AD are
intended to prevent chafing of the ground wire against the positive
contact of the lamp of the attendants' work light of the aft cabin, and
consequent arcing or arcing damage to the wiring of the attendants'
work light and transformer of the aft cabin. Such arcing or arcing
damage could result in short circuits and consequent smoke and fire in
the aft cabin area. The actions of this AD are intended to address the
identified unsafe condition.
DATES: Effective August 13, 2002.
The incorporation by reference of McDonnell Douglas Alert Service
Bulletin DC9-33A058, Revision 03, dated November 21, 2001, as listed in
the regulations, is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of August 13, 2002.
The incorporation by reference of McDonnell Douglas Alert Service
Bulletin DC9-33A058, Revision 02, dated January 27, 2000, as listed in
the regulations, was approved previously by the Director of the Federal
Register as of January 16, 2002 (66 FR 64133, December 12, 2001).
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Aircraft Group, Long Beach Division,
3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention Data
and Service Management, Dept. C1-L5A (D800-0024). This information may
be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport
Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; or at the FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at the Office of the
Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington,
DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Technical Information: Elvin Wheeler, Aerospace Engineer, Systems
and Equipment Branch, ANM-130L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712-4137;
telephone (562) 627-5344; fax (562) 627-5210.
Other Information: Sandi Carli, Airworthiness Directive Technical
Editor/Writer; telephone (425) 687-4243, fax (425) 227-1232. Questions
or comments may also be sent via the Internet using the following
address: [email protected]. Questions or comments sent via the
Internet as attached electronic files must be formatted in Microsoft
Word 97 for Windows or ASCII text.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) by superseding AD 2001-24-15,
amendment 39-12532 (66 FR 64133, December 12, 2001), which is
applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -30, and -40
series airplanes, and Model C-9 airplanes, was published in the Federal
Register on March 18, 2002 (67 FR 11952). The action proposed to
continue to require an inspection to detect chafing of the wiring of
the attendants' work light of the aft cabin, and repair of chafed
wiring; and modification and reidentification of the attendants' work
light assemblies of the aft cabin; and to revise the applicability of
the existing AD.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. No comments were submitted in response
to the proposal or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.
Changes to the Final Rule
Note 3 in the final rule has been revised to more specifically
define the general visual inspection.
New subparagraph (c)(2) of this AD has been added to explain that
certain alternative methods of compliance that have been approved for
AD 2001-24-15, amendment 39-12532, are approved for the corresponding
requirements of this AD.
The applicability section of this AD has been revised to more
clearly identify the affected airplanes.
The Cost Impact section of the proposed AD incorrectly identified
176 airplanes in the worldwide affected fleet. This figure has been
revised in the final rule.
Conclusion
The FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest
require the adoption of the rule with the changes previously described.
The FAA has determined that these changes will neither increase the
economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 387 Model DC-9-10, -30, and -40 series
airplanes, and Model C-9 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 278 airplanes of U.S. registry
will be affected by this AD.
The actions that are currently required by AD 2001-24-15 take
approximately 1 work hour per airplane to accomplish, at an average
labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost
impact of the currently required actions is estimated to be $60 per
airplane.
This AD adds no new actions or requirements, but only revises the
[[Page 45294]]
applicability of the existing AD. Therefore, the estimated cost impact
for this AD is unchanged.
The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that
no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD
action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed
in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform
the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures
typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to
gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other
administrative actions.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-12532 (66 FR
64133, December 12, 2001), and by adding a new airworthiness directive
(AD), amendment 39-12800, to read as follows:
2002-13-12 McDonnnel Douglas: Amendment 39-12800. Docket 2002-NM-
36-AD. Supersedes AD 2001-24-15, Amendment 39-12532.
Applicability: Model DC-9-10, -30, -30F, and -40 series
airplanes, and Model C-9 airplanes; certificated in any category; as
listed in McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin DC9-33A058,
Revision 03, dated November 21, 2001; and equipped with an
attendants' work light in the aft cabin.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c)(1)
of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect
of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent arcing or arcing damage to the wiring of the
attendants' work light of the aft cabin due to chafing of the ground
wire against the positive contact of the lamp of the attendants'
work light and transformer of the aft cabin, which could result in
short circuits and consequent smoke and fire in the aft cabin area,
accomplish the following:
Note 2: Paragraph (a) of this AD merely restates the
requirements of paragraph (a) of AD 2001-24-15, amendment 39-12532.
As allowed by the phrase, ``unless accomplished previously,'' if
those requirements of AD 2001-24-15 have already been accomplished,
this AD does not require that those actions be repeated.
Restatement of AD 2001-24-15
(a) For airplanes listed in McDonnell Douglas Alert Service
Bulletin DC9-33A058, Revision 02, dated January 27, 2000: Within 1
year after January 16, 2002 (the effective date of AD 2001-24-15),
do the actions specified in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this AD,
per McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin DC9-33A058, Revision
02, dated January 27, 2000.
(1) Do a general visual inspection to detect chafing of the
wiring of the attendants' work light of the aft cabin. If any
chafing is detected, before further flight, repair chafed wiring per
the service bulletin.
Note 3: For the purposes of this AD, a general visual inspection
is defined as: ``A visual examination of an interior or exterior
area, installation, or assembly to detect obvious damage, failure,
or irregularity. This level of inspection is made from within
touching distance unless otherwise specified. A mirror may be
necessary to enhance visual access to all exposed surfaces in the
inspection area. This level of inspection is made under normally
available lighting conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting,
flashlight, or droplight and may require removal or opening of
access panels or doors. Stands, ladders, or platforms may be
required to gain proximity to the area being checked.''
(2) Modify and reidentify the attendants' work light assemblies
of the aft cabin.
New Requirements of This AD
(b) For airplanes listed in McDonnell Douglas Alert Service
Bulletin
DC9-33A058, Revision 03, dated November 21, 2001: Within 1 year
after the effective date of this AD, do the actions specified in
paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this AD, per McDonnell Douglas Alert
Service Bulletin DC9-33A058, Revision 03, dated November 21, 2002.
(1) Do a general visual inspection to detect chafing of the
wiring of the attendants' work light of the aft cabin. If any
chafing is detected, before further flight, repair chafed wiring per
the service bulletin.
(2) Modify and reidentify the attendants' work light assemblies
of the aft cabin.
Note 4: Inspections, repairs, modifications, and
reidentifications done before the effective date of this AD per
McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC9-33-058, dated June 5, 1973;
Revision 1, dated November 26, 1975; or Revision 02, dated January
27, 2000; are considered acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of this AD.
1Alternative Methods of Compliance
(c)(1) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office, FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an
appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add
comments and then send it to the Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
(2) Alternative methods of compliance, approved previously in
accordance with AD 2001-24-15, are approved as alternative methods
of compliance with paragraph (a) of this AD.
Note 5: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(e) The actions shall be done in accordance with McDonnell
Douglas Alert Service Bulletin DC9-33A058, Revision 02, dated
January 27, 2000; and McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin DC9-
33A058, Revision 03, dated November 21, 2001; as applicable.
[[Page 45295]]
(1) The incorporation by reference of McDonnell Douglas Alert
Service Bulletin DC9-33A058, Revision 03, dated November 21, 2001,
is approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) The incorporation by reference of McDonnell Douglas Alert
Service Bulletin DC9-33A058, Revision 02, dated January 27, 2000,
was approved previously by the Director of the Federal Register as
of January 16, 2002 (66 FR 64133, December 12, 2001).
(3) Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Aircraft
Group, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach,
California 90846, Attention Data and Service Management, Dept. C1-
L5A (D800-0024). Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood,
California; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North
Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(f) This amendment becomes effective on August 13, 2002.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 26, 2002.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 02-16677 Filed 7-8-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:19:46.733590+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- 68652dfa569796405af02d131d15d25bc1349d504b0d9cede8de10ebe14f9ede
- Text SHA-256
- 90afc1b375fbc7ae2a0808d52c19e346eb5ffd6c5d34d20927e9e8bf7c20efcf
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.