Published 2003-02-04 · Federal Register document 03-2464
Airworthiness Directives; Hartzell Propeller Inc., Model HC-C2YR-4CF Propellers
Publication summary
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), that is applicable to Hartzell Propeller Inc. model HC-C2YR-4CF propellers. This amendment requires the reduction of the original hub and blades certified service (fatigue) life from unlimited hours to 2,000 hours. This amendment is prompted by a reevaluation by Hartzell Propeller Inc. of the original hub and blades service life certification calculations. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent fatigue failure of the original propeller hub and blades which may result in loss of airplane control.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:10.496508+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2003-b6c0b146601d56c4
- Source row
- results[55]
- Raw source SHA-256
- b6c0b146601d56c4829685d26300140986ff1ab0185264ed2f7f002dc27cf9e7
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2003-03-20
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 2003-03-11
Some source clauses remain unstructured. Read the complete publication for conditions that have not been interpreted here.
Read 2 complete recorded clauses
Applicability wording · Applicability
Applicability: This airworthiness directive (AD) is applicable
to Hartzell Propeller Inc. model HC-C2YR-4CF propellers with
propeller hubs part number (P/N) D-6522-1 or D-2201-16 and propeller
blades P/N FC8477A-4, installed on Sky International Inc. (Pitts) S-
2S and S-2B airplanes with Textron Lycoming model AEIO-540-D4A5
engines.
Note 1: This AD applies to each propeller identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For propellers that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 7045–8138, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 92232f0e0116f5b31ebd73e4dbb672643cffb28b294d15316245524385d3f073
Compliance and requirements
Compliance: Compliance with this AD is required as indicated,
unless already done.
To prevent fatigue failure of Hartzell propeller hubs P/N D-
6522-1 or D-2201-16 and blades P/N FC8477A-4 which may result in
loss of airplane control, do the following:
(a) Remove from service Hartzell propeller hubs P/N D-6522-1 or
D-2201-16 and blades P/N FC8477A-4 before exceeding 2,000 flight
hours and replace with serviceable hubs and blades.
(b) After the effective date of this AD, do not install any
Hartzell propeller hubs P/N D-6522-1 or D-2201-16 and blades P/N
FC8477A-4 that have accumulated 2,000 hours.
(c) A propeller hub or blade from an airplane that is identified
in the applicability section of this AD may not be removed and
reused on an airplane for which this AD is not applicable.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Chicago Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO). Operators must submit their request through an
appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add
comments and then send it to the Manager, Chicago ACO.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this airworthiness directive,
if any, may be obtained from the Chicago ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
Sec. Sec. 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be done.
Effective Date
(f) This amendment becomes effective on March 11, 2003.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 8138–9896, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 2b14b55de1d07c3cde30dd3ba5b388170665fefac927d24869c03c77482c3a67
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2003-03-20 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: b6eec0580f8bbce0a9442aeee9ef912b6b7868e0608653e0e9485dc62972426e. Source manifest: aed2bc4c94ebae7781157861808e834b2aecadf97810218d7b9fe16187e2d04d.
Official source · 2003-02-04
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 68, Number 23 (Tuesday, February 4, 2003)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 5541-5542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 03-2464]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2001-NE-48-AD; Amendment 39-13045; AD 2003-03-20]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Hartzell Propeller Inc., Model HC-C2YR-
4CF Propellers
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), that
is applicable to Hartzell Propeller Inc. model HC-C2YR-4CF propellers.
This amendment requires the reduction of the original hub and blades
certified service (fatigue) life from unlimited hours to 2,000 hours.
This amendment is prompted by a reevaluation by Hartzell Propeller Inc.
of the original hub and blades service life certification calculations.
The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent fatigue
failure of the original propeller hub and blades which may result in
loss of airplane control.
DATES: Effective March 11, 2003.
ADDRESSES: Information regarding this action may be examined, by
appointment, at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), New England
Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tomaso DiPaolo, Aerospace Engineer,
Chicago Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate,
2300 East Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, IL 60018, telephone (847) 294-
7031; fax (847) 294-7834.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an AD that is
applicable to Hartzell Propeller Inc. model HC-C2YR-4CF propellers was
published in the Federal Register on September 19, 2002 (67 FR 59026).
That action proposed to require the reduction of the propeller hubs
part number (P/N) D-6522-1 or D-2201-16 and blades P/N FC8477A-4
certified service (fatigue) life from unlimited hours to 2,000 hours.
The FAA and Hartzell Propeller Inc. have received reports of several
engine crankshaft failures on Sky International Inc. (Pitts) S-2S and
S-2B airplanes, which are manufactured by Aviat Aircraft Inc. of Afton,
WY. Hartzell Propeller Inc. reevaluated the service (fatigue) life of
the original propeller hubs P/N D-6522-1 or D-2201-16 and blades P/N
FC8477A-4 installed in the model HC-C2YR-4CF propellers. Hartzell has
reduced the certified service (fatigue) life of these original
propeller hubs and blades from unlimited hours to 2,000 hours.
Exceeding these life limits could result in fatigue failure of the hubs
or blades which may result in loss of airplane control. The 2,000-hour
life limit is documented in the Airworthiness Limitations section of
Hartzell Manual 113B.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
the comment received.
Risk if Life of a Component Is Not Known
One commenter states that the proposal introduces a life limit
where there was none previously required. The commenter also states
that there is a risk that operators or maintenance organizations may
not know the current life of the applicable parts, and that the NPRM
does not include any proposal to estimate usage or factoring where the
life of a component is not known.
The FAA does not agree. Under 14 CFR 91.417(a)(2)(i), each
registered owner or operator must keep records of the total time in
service of each propeller. The propellers affected by this AD are flown
on aircraft used in part 91 operations. Moreover, 14 CFR 91.417(b)(2)
requires that the records must denote the total time, must be retained
for an unlimited time, and must be transferred with the aircraft.
Therefore, if a propeller's total time is unknown, then the propeller
and the registered owner or operator are not in compliance with the
regulations. Presently, the FAA will not pursue policy to approve a
general formula for calculating total time on propellers with unknown
total times. Please note that the final rule allows for the submittal
of data to request and to justify an alternate method of compliance to
the AD or an adjustment of the compliance time in the AD.
After careful review of the available data, including the comment
noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public
interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed.
Economic Analysis
There are approximately 377 propellers of the affected design in
the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 300 propellers installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry would be affected by this AD, that it would
take approximately 6 work hours per propeller to do the actions, and
that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. The approximate cost
of a new hub and blades is $9,000. Based on these figures, the total
cost of the AD to U.S. operators is estimated to be $2,808,000.
Regulatory Analysis
This final rule does not have federalism implications, as defined
in Executive Order 13132, because it would not have a substantial
direct
[[Page 5542]]
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Accordingly,
the FAA has not consulted with state authorities prior to publication
of this final rule.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) Is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
by contacting the Rules Docket at the location provided under the
caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive
to read as follows:
2003-03-20 Hartzell Propeller Inc.: Amendment 39-13045. Docket No.
2001-NE-48-AD.
Applicability: This airworthiness directive (AD) is applicable
to Hartzell Propeller Inc. model HC-C2YR-4CF propellers with
propeller hubs part number (P/N) D-6522-1 or D-2201-16 and propeller
blades P/N FC8477A-4, installed on Sky International Inc. (Pitts) S-
2S and S-2B airplanes with Textron Lycoming model AEIO-540-D4A5
engines.
Note 1: This AD applies to each propeller identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For propellers that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Compliance with this AD is required as indicated,
unless already done.
To prevent fatigue failure of Hartzell propeller hubs P/N D-
6522-1 or D-2201-16 and blades P/N FC8477A-4 which may result in
loss of airplane control, do the following:
(a) Remove from service Hartzell propeller hubs P/N D-6522-1 or
D-2201-16 and blades P/N FC8477A-4 before exceeding 2,000 flight
hours and replace with serviceable hubs and blades.
(b) After the effective date of this AD, do not install any
Hartzell propeller hubs P/N D-6522-1 or D-2201-16 and blades P/N
FC8477A-4 that have accumulated 2,000 hours.
(c) A propeller hub or blade from an airplane that is identified
in the applicability section of this AD may not be removed and
reused on an airplane for which this AD is not applicable.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Chicago Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO). Operators must submit their request through an
appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add
comments and then send it to the Manager, Chicago ACO.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this airworthiness directive,
if any, may be obtained from the Chicago ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
Sec. Sec. 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be done.
Effective Date
(f) This amendment becomes effective on March 11, 2003.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on January 28, 2003.
Jay J. Pardee,
Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 03-2464 Filed 2-3-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:15:25.718063+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- 9c7c2871ee58efd7193286c884222eda36ffc9b347857593ce08b013f162b7d2
- Text SHA-256
- b6eec0580f8bbce0a9442aeee9ef912b6b7868e0608653e0e9485dc62972426e
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.