Published 2003-03-04 · Federal Register document 03-4589
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-200B and -200F Series Airplanes Powered by Pratt & Whitney JT9D-70 Series Engines
Publication summary
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 747-200B and -200F series airplanes powered by Pratt & Whitney JT9D-70 series engines, that requires repetitive detailed inspections of the pylon skin and internal structure of the nacelle struts adjacent to and aft of the precooler exhaust vent for heat damage (discoloration), wrinkling, and cracking; and corrective action, if necessary. The actions specified by this AD are intended to find and fix such damage, which could result in cracking or fracture of the nacelle struts, and consequent reduced structural integrity and possible separation of the strut and engine from the airplane. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:10.496508+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2003-b6c0b146601d56c4
- Source row
- results[87]
- Raw source SHA-256
- b6c0b146601d56c4829685d26300140986ff1ab0185264ed2f7f002dc27cf9e7
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2003-04-11
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 2003-04-08
Some source clauses remain unstructured. Read the complete publication for conditions that have not been interpreted here.
Read 2 complete recorded clauses
Applicability wording · Applicability
Applicability: Model 747-200B and -200F series airplanes powered
by Pratt & Whitney JT9D-70 series engines, certificated in any
category; as listed in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
747-54-2210, dated December 19, 2001.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 6671–7657, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: dec29a3db04c4b9c0a352f18f24f19bb8df0ac58e4e4c91a8f49a5f260147f20
Compliance and requirements
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To find and fix heat damage of the pylon skin and internal
structure of the nacelle struts, which could result in cracking or
fracture of the struts, and consequent reduced structural integrity
and possible separation of the strut and engine from the airplane;
accomplish the following:
Repetitive Inspections/Corrective Action
(a) Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD: Do a
detailed inspection of the pylon skin and internal structure of the
nacelle struts adjacent to and aft of the precooler exhaust vent for
heat discoloration, wrinkling, and cracking, per the Work
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 747-54-
2210, dated December 19, 2001, excluding Evaluation Form. Repeat the
inspection at least every 18 months.
Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is
defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a specific
structural area, system, installation, or assembly to detect damage,
failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at intensity
deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror,
magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning and elaborate
access procedures may be required.''
(1) If any sign of heat discoloration is found, but there is no
wrinkling: Before further flight, do a conductivity test of the
discolored area(s) per the service bulletin. If the conductivity
test is within the limits specified in Figures 3 and 4, as
applicable, of the Work Instructions of the service bulletin, and no
cracking is found, before further flight, do a penetrant or high
frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection for cracking.
(2) If any sign of wrinkling is found: Before further flight, do
a penetrant or HFEC inspection of the wrinkled area(s) for cracking,
per the service bulletin.
(3) If any sign of cracking is found: Before further flight, do
the corrective action required by paragraph (b) of this AD.
(b) If, during any inspection or test done by this AD, any
wrinkling or cracking is found, or the conductivity limits exceed
the limits specified in Figures 3 and 4, as applicable, of the Work
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 747-54-
2210, dated December 19, 2001, excluding Evaluation Form: Before
further flight, repair per a method approved by the Manager, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA; or per data meeting the
type certification basis of the airplane approved by a Boeing
Company Designated Engineering Representative who has been
authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make such findings. For a
repair method to be approved, the approval must specifically
reference this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO. Operators shall submit
their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance
Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager,
Seattle ACO.
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Seattle ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(e) Except as provided by paragraph (b) of this AD, the actions
shall be done in accordance with Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 747-54-2210, dated December 19, 2001, excluding Evaluation
Form. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director
of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane
Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. Copies may be
inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(f) This amendment becomes effective on April 8, 2003.
[[Page 10149]]
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 7657–12109, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: b1ba695c3c59c89b2bcc907027cf5401ca245551570880ff3661ccaf9654896c
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2003-04-11 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 3df3c514f90febf51bfe1cda2ff06d637431e43b2823e3847d5ec5c18c1bd125. Source manifest: fa9b7e2141fa7e462834cd3c4288209f9c8e2eacd846123a769088e3fe76fb66.
Official source · 2003-03-04
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 68, Number 42 (Tuesday, March 4, 2003)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10147-10149]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 03-4589]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2002-NM-23-AD; Amendment 39-13059; AD 2003-04-11]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-200B and -200F Series
Airplanes Powered by Pratt & Whitney JT9D-70 Series Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain Boeing Model 747-200B and -200F series airplanes
powered by Pratt & Whitney JT9D-70 series engines, that requires
repetitive detailed inspections of the pylon skin and internal
structure of the nacelle struts adjacent to and aft of the precooler
exhaust vent for heat damage (discoloration), wrinkling, and cracking;
and corrective action, if necessary. The actions specified by this AD
are intended to find and fix such damage, which could result in
cracking or fracture of the nacelle struts, and consequent reduced
structural integrity and possible separation of the strut and engine
from the airplane. This action is intended to address the identified
unsafe condition.
DATES: Effective April 8, 2003.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of April 8, 2003.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207. This information may be examined at the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules
Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of
the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tamara L. Anderson, Aerospace
Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-
4056; telephone (425) 917-6421; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to Boeing Model 747-200B and -200F
series airplanes powered by Pratt & Whitney JT9D-70 series engines was
published in the Federal Register on November 27, 2002 (67 FR 70875).
That action proposed to require repetitive detailed inspections of the
pylon skin and internal structure of the nacelle struts adjacent to and
aft of the precooler exhaust vent for heat damage (discoloration),
wrinkling, and cracking; and corrective action, if necessary.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. No comments were submitted in response
to the proposal or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.
Explanation of Editorial Change
We have changed the service bulletin citation throughout this final
rule to exclude the Evaluation Form. The form is intended to be
completed by operators and submitted to the manufacturer to provide
input on the quality of the service bulletin; however, this AD does not
include such a requirement.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, the FAA has determined
that air safety and the public interest require the adoption of the
rule with the change previously described. The FAA has determined that
this change will neither increase the economic burden on any operator
nor increase the scope of the AD.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 7 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 6 airplanes of U.S. registry
will be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 8 work
hours per airplane to accomplish the inspection, and that the average
labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost
impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $2,880, or $480
per airplane, per inspection cycle.
[[Page 10148]]
The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that
no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD
action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed
in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform
the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures
typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to
gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other
administrative actions.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
2003-04-11 Boeing: Amendment 39-13059. Docket 2002-NM-23-AD.
Applicability: Model 747-200B and -200F series airplanes powered
by Pratt & Whitney JT9D-70 series engines, certificated in any
category; as listed in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
747-54-2210, dated December 19, 2001.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To find and fix heat damage of the pylon skin and internal
structure of the nacelle struts, which could result in cracking or
fracture of the struts, and consequent reduced structural integrity
and possible separation of the strut and engine from the airplane;
accomplish the following:
Repetitive Inspections/Corrective Action
(a) Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD: Do a
detailed inspection of the pylon skin and internal structure of the
nacelle struts adjacent to and aft of the precooler exhaust vent for
heat discoloration, wrinkling, and cracking, per the Work
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 747-54-
2210, dated December 19, 2001, excluding Evaluation Form. Repeat the
inspection at least every 18 months.
Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is
defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a specific
structural area, system, installation, or assembly to detect damage,
failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at intensity
deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror,
magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning and elaborate
access procedures may be required.''
(1) If any sign of heat discoloration is found, but there is no
wrinkling: Before further flight, do a conductivity test of the
discolored area(s) per the service bulletin. If the conductivity
test is within the limits specified in Figures 3 and 4, as
applicable, of the Work Instructions of the service bulletin, and no
cracking is found, before further flight, do a penetrant or high
frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection for cracking.
(2) If any sign of wrinkling is found: Before further flight, do
a penetrant or HFEC inspection of the wrinkled area(s) for cracking,
per the service bulletin.
(3) If any sign of cracking is found: Before further flight, do
the corrective action required by paragraph (b) of this AD.
(b) If, during any inspection or test done by this AD, any
wrinkling or cracking is found, or the conductivity limits exceed
the limits specified in Figures 3 and 4, as applicable, of the Work
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 747-54-
2210, dated December 19, 2001, excluding Evaluation Form: Before
further flight, repair per a method approved by the Manager, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA; or per data meeting the
type certification basis of the airplane approved by a Boeing
Company Designated Engineering Representative who has been
authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make such findings. For a
repair method to be approved, the approval must specifically
reference this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO. Operators shall submit
their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance
Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager,
Seattle ACO.
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Seattle ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(e) Except as provided by paragraph (b) of this AD, the actions
shall be done in accordance with Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 747-54-2210, dated December 19, 2001, excluding Evaluation
Form. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director
of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane
Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. Copies may be
inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(f) This amendment becomes effective on April 8, 2003.
[[Page 10149]]
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 20, 2003.
Ali Bahrami,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 03-4589 Filed 3-3-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:14:53.418244+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- 1fc9323c72aea98099d3942c17f374c48d2dfe5e00bc392b0a9186f6abf347b9
- Text SHA-256
- 3df3c514f90febf51bfe1cda2ff06d637431e43b2823e3847d5ec5c18c1bd125
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.