Published 2004-02-10 · Federal Register document 04-2583
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-102, -103, -106, -201, -202, -301, -311, and -315 Series Airplanes
Publication summary
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Bombardier Model DHC-8-102, -103, -106, -201, - 202, -301, -311, and -315 series airplanes, that requires repetitive inspections for discrepancies of certain rear spar fittings between the flex shaft of the flap secondary drive and the wing-to-fuselage structure, and corrective action if necessary. This action also provides for an optional modification of the flex shaft installation, which terminates the repetitive inspections. This action is necessary to find and fix damage and prevent subsequent failure of the rear spar fittings, which could result in loss of the wing. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:13.905821+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2004-cb1e1f18d61cac01
- Source row
- results[52]
- Raw source SHA-256
- cb1e1f18d61cac01616802134d899b0c8ce1a9f79716b5ee037f78e4cb53a00a
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2004-03-14
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 2004-03-16
Some source clauses remain unstructured. Read the complete publication for conditions that have not been interpreted here.
Read 2 complete recorded clauses
Applicability wording · Applicability
Applicability: Model DHC-8-102, -103, -106, -201, -202, -301, -311, and -315 series airplanes; certificated in any category; as listed in Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-27-83, Revision ``A'', dated February 8, 2002.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 6692–6914, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 1b034ca587aea60a248caf3c07b1648efa68a157910aacd072df51b528fafbb7
Compliance and requirements
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To find and fix damage and prevent subsequent failure of the
rear spar fittings between the flex shaft of the flap secondary
drive and the wing-to-fuselage structure, which could result in loss
of the wing, accomplish the following:
Repetitive Inspections/Corrective Action
(a) For airplanes with rear spar fittings having part number (P/
N) 85320053, 85322060, or 85334180: Within 12 months after the
effective date of this AD; do a detailed inspection for
discrepancies (chafing, wear damage, cracking) of the rear spar
fittings located between the flex shaft of the flap secondary drive
and the wing-to-fuselage structure. Do the inspection as defined in
Parts III.A., III.B., and III.D. of the Accomplishment Instructions
of Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-27-83, Revision ``A'', dated
February 8, 2002; except where the service bulletin specifies to
report inspection findings, this AD does not require such reporting.
Do the inspection per the service bulletin, and repeat the
inspection thereafter at the applicable time specified in Part I.D.
``Compliance'' of the service bulletin. Any applicable corrective
action (high frequency eddy current inspection for cracking,
blending out wear damage, replacement of rear spar fittings) must be
done at the applicable time specified in Part I.D. ``Compliance'' of
the service bulletin.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is
defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a specific
structural area, system, installation, or assembly to detect damage,
failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at intensity
deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror,
magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning and elaborate
access procedures may be required.''
Optional Terminating Modification
(b) Modification of the flex shaft of the flap secondary drive
per Part III.C. of the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 8-27-83, Revision ``A'', dated February 8, 2002,
terminates the repetitive inspections required by paragraph (a) of
this AD.
Actions Done per Previous Issue of Service Bulletins
(c) Accomplishment of the inspections or the modification before
the effective date of this AD in accordance with Bombardier Service
Bulletin 8-27-83, dated October 19, 2001, is considered acceptable
for compliance with the applicable actions specified in this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(d) In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, the Manager, New York
Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, is authorized to approve
alternative methods of compliance for this AD.
Incorporation by Reference
(e) The actions shall be done in accordance with Bombardier
Service Bulletin 8-27-83, Revision ``A'', dated February 8, 2002.
This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. Copies may be obtained from Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier
Regional Aircraft Division, 123 Garratt Boulevard, Downsview,
Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada. Copies may be inspected at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; or at the FAA, New York Aircraft Certification Office,
1600 Stewart Avenue, Westbury, New York; or at the Office of the
Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
Note 2: The subject of this AD is addressed in Canadian
airworthiness directive CF-2001-42, dated November 23, 2001.
Effective Date
(f) This amendment becomes effective on March 16, 2004.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 6914–10659, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 64f60fec8f3fc746a5d18456ddb403e27c68599d60cec58aad2d82f8ed7995dd
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2004-03-14 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 6c4fcc0b04a51aa5c467a7e809c464a83255391bb46573c99d5ccad91af7192c. Source manifest: 535ce17171c2c6f6644669ff38e67928831b2be60800cb8b8699ca2177caa98b.
Official source · 2004-02-10
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 27 (Tuesday, February 10, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6139-6140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2583]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2003-NM-154-AD; Amendment 39-13458; AD 2004-03-14]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-102, -103, -106,
-201, -202, -301, -311, and -315 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain Bombardier Model DHC-8-102, -103, -106, -201, -
202, -301, -311, and -315 series airplanes, that requires repetitive
inspections for discrepancies of certain rear spar fittings between the
flex shaft of the flap secondary drive and the wing-to-fuselage
structure, and corrective action if necessary. This action also
provides for an optional modification of the flex shaft installation,
which terminates the repetitive inspections. This action is necessary
to find and fix damage and prevent subsequent failure of the rear spar
fittings, which could result in loss of the wing. This action is
intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
DATES: Effective March 16, 2004.
The incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of March 16, 2004.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier Regional Aircraft Division,
123 Garratt Boulevard, Downsview, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada. This
information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue,
SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, New York Aircraft Certification
Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Westbury, New York; or at the Office of
the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jon Hjelm, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Westbury, New York 11581;
telephone (516) 228-7300; fax (516) 794-5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Bombardier Model DHC-8-
102, -103, -106, -201, -202, -301, -311, and -315 series airplanes was
published in the Federal Register on November 28, 2003 (68 FR 66765).
That action proposed to require repetitive inspections for
discrepancies of certain rear spar fittings between the flex shaft of
the flap secondary drive and the wing-to-fuselage structure, and
corrective action if necessary. That action also provides for an
optional modification of the flex shaft installation, which would
terminate the repetitive inspections.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. No comments were submitted in response
to the proposal or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.
Conclusion
The FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest
require the adoption of the rule as proposed.
Cost Impact
The FAA estimates that 218 airplanes of U.S. registry will be
affected by this AD.
It will take about 16 work hours per rear spar fitting (two
fittings per airplane) to accomplish the inspection, at an average
labor rate of $65 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost
impact of the inspection required by this AD on U.S. operators is
estimated to be $453,440, or $2,080 per airplane, per inspection cycle.
The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that
no
[[Page 6140]]
operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD
action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed
in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform
the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures
typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to
gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other
administrative actions.
The optional terminating modification, if done, will take about 16
work hours, at an average labor rate of $65 per work hour. Required
parts will cost about $365 per airplane. Based on these figures, we
estimate the cost of the optional terminating modification to be $1,405
per airplane.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:
2004-03-14 Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly de Havilland, Inc.): Amendment
39-13458. Docket 2003-NM-154-AD.
Applicability: Model DHC-8-102, -103, -106, -201, -202, -301,
-311, and -315 series airplanes; certificated in any category; as
listed in Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-27-83, Revision ``A'', dated
February 8, 2002.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To find and fix damage and prevent subsequent failure of the
rear spar fittings between the flex shaft of the flap secondary
drive and the wing-to-fuselage structure, which could result in loss
of the wing, accomplish the following:
Repetitive Inspections/Corrective Action
(a) For airplanes with rear spar fittings having part number (P/
N) 85320053, 85322060, or 85334180: Within 12 months after the
effective date of this AD; do a detailed inspection for
discrepancies (chafing, wear damage, cracking) of the rear spar
fittings located between the flex shaft of the flap secondary drive
and the wing-to-fuselage structure. Do the inspection as defined in
Parts III.A., III.B., and III.D. of the Accomplishment Instructions
of Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-27-83, Revision ``A'', dated
February 8, 2002; except where the service bulletin specifies to
report inspection findings, this AD does not require such reporting.
Do the inspection per the service bulletin, and repeat the
inspection thereafter at the applicable time specified in Part I.D.
``Compliance'' of the service bulletin. Any applicable corrective
action (high frequency eddy current inspection for cracking,
blending out wear damage, replacement of rear spar fittings) must be
done at the applicable time specified in Part I.D. ``Compliance'' of
the service bulletin.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is
defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a specific
structural area, system, installation, or assembly to detect damage,
failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at intensity
deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror,
magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning and elaborate
access procedures may be required.''
Optional Terminating Modification
(b) Modification of the flex shaft of the flap secondary drive
per Part III.C. of the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 8-27-83, Revision ``A'', dated February 8, 2002,
terminates the repetitive inspections required by paragraph (a) of
this AD.
Actions Done per Previous Issue of Service Bulletins
(c) Accomplishment of the inspections or the modification before
the effective date of this AD in accordance with Bombardier Service
Bulletin 8-27-83, dated October 19, 2001, is considered acceptable
for compliance with the applicable actions specified in this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(d) In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, the Manager, New York
Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, is authorized to approve
alternative methods of compliance for this AD.
Incorporation by Reference
(e) The actions shall be done in accordance with Bombardier
Service Bulletin 8-27-83, Revision ``A'', dated February 8, 2002.
This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. Copies may be obtained from Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier
Regional Aircraft Division, 123 Garratt Boulevard, Downsview,
Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada. Copies may be inspected at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; or at the FAA, New York Aircraft Certification Office,
1600 Stewart Avenue, Westbury, New York; or at the Office of the
Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
Note 2: The subject of this AD is addressed in Canadian
airworthiness directive CF-2001-42, dated November 23, 2001.
Effective Date
(f) This amendment becomes effective on March 16, 2004.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 29, 2004.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 04-2583 Filed 2-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:07:58.280129+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- d1ba1500ee81b2ca4a2c4e1324bc413d7fb4c5f938097bb9e7d8a50a77068842
- Text SHA-256
- 6c4fcc0b04a51aa5c467a7e809c464a83255391bb46573c99d5ccad91af7192c
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.