Published 2004-02-11 · Federal Register document 04-2953
Airworthiness Directives; Pacific Aerospace Corporation, Ltd. Models FU24-954 and FU24A-954 Airplanes
Publication summary
The FAA adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Pacific Aerospace Corporation, Ltd. Models FU24-954 and FU24A-954 airplanes. This AD requires you to perform repetitive detailed visual inspections of the forward vertical fin base for cracks. If any cracks or discrepancies are found, you must repair the structure before further flight and notify the FAA. This AD is the result of mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the airworthiness authority for New Zealand. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracks in the vertical fin base, which could result in loss of the fin and loss of aircraft control.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:13.905821+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2004-cb1e1f18d61cac01
- Source row
- results[65]
- Raw source SHA-256
- cb1e1f18d61cac01616802134d899b0c8ce1a9f79716b5ee037f78e4cb53a00a
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2004-03-29
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 2004-04-19
Read 7 complete recorded clauses
When Does This AD Become Effective?
When Does This AD Become Effective?
(a) This AD becomes effective on April 19, 2004.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 7683–7774, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: b0b8b11c98ff3829502ad346e0fddc7abc8801d17e1c2f17676d587f5d940b56
What Other ADs Are Affected by This Action?
What Other ADs Are Affected by This Action?
(b) None.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 7774–7834, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 07ddca3e2ddd18af7ec96332163aefb7f30c8d066e5f6fc3b158d5fa460e1365
Applicability wording · What Airplanes Are Affected by This AD?
What Airplanes Are Affected by This AD?
(c) This AD affects Models FU24-954 and FU24A-954 airplanes, all
serial numbers, that are certificated in any category.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 7834–8001, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 4fa3b94de53175436d23a51f0ca0478121868d28fa7d7c4425577440326b3714
What Is the Unsafe Condition Presented in This AD?
What Is the Unsafe Condition Presented in This AD?
(d) This AD is the result of a recent fatal accident where the
aircraft's fin separated in flight. The actions specified in this AD
are intended to detect and correct cracks in the vertical fin base,
which could result in loss of the fin or loss of control of the
aircraft.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 8001–8336, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: d2a0e79034f1dcfb7fa636272cb2db263c25da0d6f9247b6e7f9d0055e5fa3b6
What Must I Do To Address This Problem?
What Must I Do To Address This Problem?
(e) To address this problem, you must do the following:
[[Page 6555]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Actions Compliance Procedures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Perform visual Initially inspect Inspect from the
inspection of the forward within the next 50 bottom of the fin
area at the base of the fin hours time-in- up to the first
for cracks. service (TIS) after external strap,
April 19, 2004 (the paying particular
effective date of attention to the
this AD). skin in the area of
Repetitively the rivets that
inspect every 100 join the fin skin
hours TIS to the bulkhead,
thereafter. part number (P/N)
242305, and aft to
the first vertical
lap joint. To do
this inspection,
remove any rubber
abrasion protection
that is fitted in
this area,
including any
sealant. You must
also remove the fin
leading edge
fairing, P/N
242321.
(2) Repair any cracks that Prior to further Obtain an FAA-
are found during the flight after doing approved repair
inspection. any inspection scheme from Pacific
required in Aerospace
paragraph (e)(1) of Corporation, Ltd.,
this AD. Airport Road,
Hamilton Airport,
Hamilton, New
Zealand and notify
the FAA at the
address and phone
number in paragraph
(f) of this AD.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 8336–11385, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: f9ae743250e9a8c5c3a22b9f75dc95bbaa80ce88f72609df6dac04a6e72a8714
May I Request an Alternative Method of Compliance?
May I Request an Alternative Method of Compliance?
(f) You may request a different method of compliance or a
different compliance time for this AD by following the procedures in
14 CFR 39.19. Unless FAA authorizes otherwise, send your request to
your principal inspector. The principal inspector may add comments
and will send your request to the Manager, Standards Office, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate. For information on any already approved
alternative methods of compliance, contact Karl Schletzbaum,
Aerospace Engineer, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room
301, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4146; facsimile:
(816) 329-4090.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 11385–12055, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 3ede0bd224e403603336000de9d2612241164f11dca5d9cd13aed5c5ca1d54e5
Is There Other Information That Relates to This Subject?
Is There Other Information That Relates to This Subject?
(g) CAA airworthiness directive DCA/FU24/173, dated April 23,
2002, also addresses the subject of this AD.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 12055–12225, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 5af157d5e2139e829f4cd35af1a413f9c1ec238baaa90536636be803b39a3786
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2004-03-29 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 61f82fe9ae8280e203ee8b2b7adbf4d32cf9fa5ef2111a6f09a058c9f61d4fe4. Source manifest: 65cf2cdd48d49f120beed0275b1c62356a0cf9a8f8feafd95d1a1e7ba1366ea9.
Official source · 2004-02-11
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 28 (Wednesday, February 11, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6553-6555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2953]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2003-CE-38-AD; Amendment 39-13473; AD 2004-03-29]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pacific Aerospace Corporation, Ltd.
Models FU24-954 and FU24A-954 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Pacific Aerospace Corporation, Ltd. Models FU24-954 and FU24A-954
airplanes. This AD requires you to perform repetitive detailed visual
inspections of the forward vertical fin base for cracks. If any cracks
or discrepancies are found, you must repair the structure before
further flight and notify the FAA. This AD is the result of mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the airworthiness
authority for New Zealand. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct
cracks in the vertical fin base, which could result in loss of the fin
and loss of aircraft control.
DATES: This AD becomes effective on April 19, 2004.
ADDRESSES: You may view the AD docket at FAA, Central Region, Office of
the Regional Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 2003-CE-38-AD, 901
Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. Office hours are 8 a.m.
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 302, Kansas City, MO
64106; telephone: 816-329-4146; facsimile: 816-329-4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
What events have caused this AD? The Civil Aviation Authority
(CAA), which is the airworthiness authority for New Zealand, notified
the FAA of an unsafe condition that may exist on all
[[Page 6554]]
Pacific Aerospace Corporation, Ltd. Models FU24-954 and FU24A-954
airplanes. The CAA reports a recent fatal accident where the aircraft's
fin separated in flight. Initial investigation of this accident
indicates that the forward fin structure failed from fatigue cracks
that were concealed beneath the rubber abrasion protection fitted to
the fin.
What is the potential impact if FAA took no action? Failure to
detect cracks in the vertical fin base could result in loss of the fin
and loss of aircraft control.
Has FAA taken any action to this point? We issued a proposal to
amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to
include an AD that would apply to all Pacific Aerospace Corporation,
Ltd. Models FU24-954 and FU24A-954 airplanes. This proposal was
published in the Federal Register as a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) on October 30, 2003 (68 FR 61766). The NPRM proposed to require
you to perform repetitive detailed visual inspections of the forward
vertical fin base for cracks. If any cracks or discrepancies are found,
you must repair the structure before further flight and notify the FAA.
Comments
Was the public invited to comment? We provided the public the
opportunity to participate in the development of this AD. We received
no comments on the proposal or on the determination of the cost to the
public.
Conclusion
What is FAA's final determination on this issue? We have carefully
reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD as proposed except for the
changes discussed above and minor editorial corrections. We have
determined that these changes and minor corrections:
--are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the NPRM for
correcting the unsafe condition; and
--do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM.
Changes to 14 CFR Part 39--Effect on the AD
How does the revision to 14 CFR part 39 affect this AD? On July 10,
2002, the FAA published a new version of 14 CFR part 39 (67 FR 47997,
July 22, 2002), which governs the FAA's AD system. This regulation now
includes material that relates to altered products, special flight
permits, and alternative methods of compliance. This material
previously was included in each individual AD. Since this material is
included in 14 CFR part 39, we will not include it in future AD
actions.
Costs of Compliance
How many airplanes does this AD impact? We estimate that this AD
affects 2 airplanes in the U.S. registry.
What is the cost impact of this AD on owners/operators of the
affected airplanes? We estimate the following costs to accomplish the
inspection:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total cost per Total cost on
Labor cost Parts cost airplane U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 workhours est. $60 per hour = $480......... No parts needed for inspection. $480 $960
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA has no method of determining the number of repairs each
owner/operator will incur over the life of each of the affected
airplanes based on the results of the inspections. We have no way of
determining the number of airplanes that may need such repair. The
extent of damage may vary on each airplane.
Regulatory Findings
Will this AD impact various entities? We have determined that this
AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.
Will this AD involve a significant rule or regulatory action? For
the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a summary of the costs to comply with this AD and
placed it in the AD Docket. You may get a copy of this summary by
sending a request to us at the address listed under ADDRESSES. Include
``AD Docket No. 2003-CE-38-AD'' in your request.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding a new AD to read as follows:
2004-03-29 Pacific Aerospace Corporation, Ltd.: Amendment 39-13473;
Docket No. 2003-CE-38-AD.
When Does This AD Become Effective?
(a) This AD becomes effective on April 19, 2004.
What Other ADs Are Affected by This Action?
(b) None.
What Airplanes Are Affected by This AD?
(c) This AD affects Models FU24-954 and FU24A-954 airplanes, all
serial numbers, that are certificated in any category.
What Is the Unsafe Condition Presented in This AD?
(d) This AD is the result of a recent fatal accident where the
aircraft's fin separated in flight. The actions specified in this AD
are intended to detect and correct cracks in the vertical fin base,
which could result in loss of the fin or loss of control of the
aircraft.
What Must I Do To Address This Problem?
(e) To address this problem, you must do the following:
[[Page 6555]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Actions Compliance Procedures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Perform visual Initially inspect Inspect from the
inspection of the forward within the next 50 bottom of the fin
area at the base of the fin hours time-in- up to the first
for cracks. service (TIS) after external strap,
April 19, 2004 (the paying particular
effective date of attention to the
this AD). skin in the area of
Repetitively the rivets that
inspect every 100 join the fin skin
hours TIS to the bulkhead,
thereafter. part number (P/N)
242305, and aft to
the first vertical
lap joint. To do
this inspection,
remove any rubber
abrasion protection
that is fitted in
this area,
including any
sealant. You must
also remove the fin
leading edge
fairing, P/N
242321.
(2) Repair any cracks that Prior to further Obtain an FAA-
are found during the flight after doing approved repair
inspection. any inspection scheme from Pacific
required in Aerospace
paragraph (e)(1) of Corporation, Ltd.,
this AD. Airport Road,
Hamilton Airport,
Hamilton, New
Zealand and notify
the FAA at the
address and phone
number in paragraph
(f) of this AD.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
May I Request an Alternative Method of Compliance?
(f) You may request a different method of compliance or a
different compliance time for this AD by following the procedures in
14 CFR 39.19. Unless FAA authorizes otherwise, send your request to
your principal inspector. The principal inspector may add comments
and will send your request to the Manager, Standards Office, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate. For information on any already approved
alternative methods of compliance, contact Karl Schletzbaum,
Aerospace Engineer, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room
301, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4146; facsimile:
(816) 329-4090.
Is There Other Information That Relates to This Subject?
(g) CAA airworthiness directive DCA/FU24/173, dated April 23,
2002, also addresses the subject of this AD.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on February 4, 2004.
Dorenda D. Baker,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 04-2953 Filed 2-10-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:07:45.243172+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- 59cfc8baca257871855cb385192b117efed0e67153f3df649516926f267bcfca
- Text SHA-256
- 61f82fe9ae8280e203ee8b2b7adbf4d32cf9fa5ef2111a6f09a058c9f61d4fe4
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.