Published 2004-03-05 · Federal Register document 04-4660
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 767 Series Airplanes
Publication summary
This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 767 series airplanes, that currently requires repetitive detailed visual inspections of the aft pressure bulkhead for damage and cracking, and repair if necessary. That AD also requires additional eddy current inspections prior to the airplane accumulating 25,000 flight cycles. This amendment requires a reduction of the interval for the detailed and repetitive eddy current inspections. The actions specified in this AD are intended to prevent fatigue cracking of the aft pressure bulkhead, which could result in rapid depressurization of the airplane and possible damage or interference with the airplane control systems that penetrate the bulkhead, and consequent loss of controllability of the airplane. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:13.905821+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2004-cb1e1f18d61cac01
- Source row
- results[98]
- Raw source SHA-256
- cb1e1f18d61cac01616802134d899b0c8ce1a9f79716b5ee037f78e4cb53a00a
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2004-05-10
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 2004-03-22
Some source clauses remain unstructured. Read the complete publication for conditions that have not been interpreted here.
Read 2 complete recorded clauses
Applicability wording · Applicability
Applicability: Model 767 series airplanes, line number 001 through 175 inclusive; certificated in any category.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 12690–12807, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 872436606e5491896bdd6c2957bf8af2f67d0439c6b87cb50d839fd37bbd8e07
Compliance and requirements
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent fatigue cracking of the aft pressure bulkhead, which
could result in rapid depressurization of the airplane and possible
damage or interference with the airplane control systems that
penetrate the bulkhead, and consequent loss of controllability of
the airplane; accomplish the following:
Restatement of AD 88-09-03 R1
(a) Prior to the accumulation of 6,000 flight cycles or within
the next 1,000 flight cycles after September 26, 1988 (effective
date of AD 88-09-03 R1, amendment 39-6001), whichever occurs later,
unless accomplished within the last 5,000 flight cycles, and
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 6,000 flight cycles, perform a
detailed inspection of the aft side of the entire body station 1582
pressure bulkhead for damage (as defined in the Structural Repair
Manual) and cracking, in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin
767-53-0026, dated November 19, 1987; or Revision 1, dated March 16,
1989.
(b) Prior to the accumulation of 25,000 flight cycles, and
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 6,000 flight cycles, perform
an eddy current inspection of the body station 1582 pressure
bulkhead, in accordance with paragraph C. of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 767-53-0026, Revision 1,
dated March 16, 1989.
(c) For the purpose of complying with the requirements of
paragraphs (a) and (b) of this AD, the number of flight cycles may
be determined to equal the number of pressurization cycles where the
cabin pressure differential was equal to or greater than 2.0 PSI.
The pressurization allowance does not apply to the requirements of
paragraph (e) of this AD.
(d) Repair all damage and cracking detected during the
inspections specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this AD, prior to
further flight in accordance with Note 4 in the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 767-53-0026, Revision 1,
dated March 16, 1989. After the effective date of this AD, repair
must be accomplished per Boeing Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) 767-
53A0026, Revision 5, dated January 29, 2004.
New Requirements of this AD
Detailed Inspection
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is
defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a specific
structural area, system, installation, or assembly to detect damage,
failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at intensity
deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror,
magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning and elaborate
access procedures may be required.''
Detailed Inspections and Eddy Current Inspections
(e) Perform a detailed inspection for damage and cracking of the
aft side of the aft pressure bulkhead and perform high frequency and
low frequency eddy current inspections for cracking of the aft
pressure bulkhead, per the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing ASB
767-53A0026, Revision 5, dated January 29, 2004, at the later of the
times specified in paragraph (e)(1) or (e)(2) of this AD.
Thereafter, repeat these inspections at intervals not to exceed
1,800 flight cycles. Accomplishment of the initial inspections
required by this paragraph, terminate the inspection requirements of
paragraphs (a) and (b) of this AD.
(1) Prior to the accumulation of 25,000 total flight cycles, or
within 1,800 flight cycles after the most recent inspection done per
AD 88-19-03 R1, whichever occurs later; or
(2) Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD.
Repair Requirements
(f) If any damage or cracking is detected during any inspections
required by paragraph (e) of this AD: Before further flight
accomplish the requirements of paragraph (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this
AD, as applicable:
(1) For repairs within the limits of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing ASB 767-53A0026, Revision 5, dated January
29, 2004, repair per the ASB.
(2) For any repairs outside the limits, repair per a method
approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA; or per data meeting the type certification basis of the
airplane approved by a Boeing Company Designated Engineering
Representative (DER) who has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make such findings. For a repair method to be approved, as
required by this paragraph, the approval must specifically reference
this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOC)
(g)(1) In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, the Manager, Seattle
ACO, FAA, is authorized to approve AMOCs for this AD.
(2) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by a
Boeing Company DER who has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make such findings.
(3) AMOCs approved previously for paragraph (c) of AD 88-19-03
R1, amendment 39-6532, are approved as AMOCs with paragraph (f) of
this AD.
Incorporation by Reference
(h) Unless otherwise specified in this AD, the actions shall be
done in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 767-53-0026, dated
November 19, 1987; Boeing Service Bulletin 767-53-0026, Revision 1,
dated March 16, 1989; and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-53A0026,
Revision 5, dated January 29, 2004; as applicable. This
incorporation by reference is approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O.
Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. Copies may be inspected at
the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800
North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(i) This amendment becomes effective on March 22, 2004.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 12807–18763, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 55cee926183858c8174fd91af95efb6f92be1609d61db34468229607b4becddb
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2004-05-10 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 10171eee27f549274748579afc1fb5173b9490eab1fab99dc2157a2c6516183b. Source manifest: eb494bf44261b4dafc3f19db21e8d3b83d49ba1e03b9fed7ba92101e261e7597.
Official source · 2004-03-05
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Literal source encoding markers are preserved as printed strings. They have not been interpreted as symbols or legal requirements.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 44 (Friday, March 5, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10321-10323]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-4660]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2004-NM-17-AD; Amendment 39-13505; AD 2004-05-10]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 767 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive
(AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 767 series airplanes, that
currently requires repetitive detailed visual inspections of the aft
pressure bulkhead for damage and cracking, and repair if necessary.
That AD also requires additional eddy current inspections prior to the
airplane accumulating 25,000 flight cycles. This amendment requires a
reduction of the interval for the detailed and repetitive eddy current
inspections. The actions specified in this AD are intended to prevent
fatigue cracking of the aft pressure bulkhead, which could result in
rapid depressurization of the airplane and possible damage or
interference with the airplane control systems that penetrate the
bulkhead, and consequent loss of controllability of the airplane. This
action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
DATES: Effective March 22, 2004.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of March 22, 2004.
Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or
before May 4, 2004.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 2004-NM-17-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this
location between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. Comments may be submitted via fax to (425) 227-1232.
Comments may also be sent via the Internet using the following address:
[email protected]. Comments sent via fax or the Internet must
contain ``Docket No. 2004-NM-17-AD'' in the subject line and need not
be submitted in triplicate. Comments sent via the Internet as attached
electronic files must be formatted in Microsoft Word 97 or 2000 or
ASCII text.
The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-
2207. This information may be examined at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite
700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suzanne Masterson, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
917-6441; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 27, 1990, the FAA issued AD 88-
19-03 R1, amendment 39-6532 (55 FR 8118, March 7, 1990), applicable to
certain Boeing Model 767 series airplanes, to require repetitive
detailed visual inspections of the aft pressure bulkhead for damage and
cracking, and repair if necessary. That AD also requires additional
eddy current inspections prior to the airplane accumulating 25,000
flight cycles. That action was prompted by reports of cracking detected
during fatigue testing
[[Page 10322]]
of the aft pressure bulkhead. The actions required by that AD are
intended to prevent failure of the aft pressure bulkhead and
depressurization of the airplane.
Actions Since Issuance of Previous Rule
Since the issuance of that AD, we have received a report of
multiple-site fatigue cracking in two lap splices on the aft pressure
bulkhead of one airplane. The airplane had accumulated approximately
32,000 total flight cycles. The repetitive inspection intervals
required by AD 88-19-03 R1 are based on the damage tolerance capability
of the structure with a single crack rather than multiple-site crack
pattern. Such fatigue cracking of the aft pressure bulkhead could
result in rapid depressurization of the airplane and possible damage or
interference with the airplane control systems that penetrate the
bulkhead, and consequent loss of controllability of the airplane.
New Service Information
We have approved Boeing Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) 767-53A0026,
Revision 5, dated January 29, 2004. (The original and Revision 1 of
this ASB were the appropriate service information referenced in AD 88-
19-03 R1.) Revision 5 of the ASB describes procedures for repetitive
detailed inspections for damage (e.g., nicks, tears, scratches, dents,
and corrosion) of the aft pressure bulkhead, and repair if necessary.
The ASB also describes procedures for repetitive high frequency and low
frequency eddy current inspections for cracking of body station (BS)
1582 bulkhead, web lap splices, and tearstrap splices, and repair if
necessary. Revision 5 of the ASB also recommends a reduction of the
repetitive intervals for those inspections from 6,000 flight cycles to
1,800 flight cycles. Additionally, the ASB describes procedures for a
one-time detailed inspection and a high frequency eddy current
inspection of the web to determine if any ``oil cans'' are present, and
repair if necessary.
Explanation of Requirements of Rule
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or develop on other airplanes of this same type design, this AD
supersedes AD 88-19-03 R1 to require the actions specified in the ASB
described previously, except as described below.
Differences Between the ASB and the AD
Although Boeing ASB 767-53A0026, Revision 5, dated January 29,
2004, contains procedures for a one-time detailed inspection and a high
frequency eddy current inspection of the web to determine if any ``oil
cans'' are present, and repair if necessary, this AD does not require
those actions. We have determined that those actions do not represent
the urgency of the other procedures specified in the ASB. Therefore, we
are considering separate rulemaking to propose those actions.
The Boeing ASB also provides the following information in Note 6 of
the Accomplishment Instructions: ``For the purposes of this service
bulletin, do not count flight-cycles with a cabin pressure differential
of 2.0 [pounds per square inch (psi)] or less. However, any flight-
cycle with momentary spikes in cabin pressure differential above 2.0
psi must be included as a full-pressure flight-cycle. Cabin pressure
records must be maintained for each airplane. Fleet averaging of cabin
pressure is not allowed.'' This AD, however, does not permit such
allowances for the new requirements of this AD. We consider that
numerous factors, such as total number of low pressure cycles, amount
of thrust, number of gross weight flight cycles, etc., affect the
calculation of flight cycles. We find that these mitigating factors can
be best evaluated through requests for alternative methods of
compliance, as provided for in paragraph (g)(1) of this AD. Operators
should note that, although AD 88-19-03 R1 provides for such allowance,
we have removed such provision in this AD for the reasons stated
previously.
Additionally, the Accomplishment Instructions of the ASB specify
that operators may contact the manufacturer for disposition of certain
repair instructions. This AD requires that, if repair requirements
exceed allowable repair criteria, operators must repair per a method
approved by the FAA or per data meeting the type certification basis of
the airplane approved by a Boeing Company Designated Engineering
Representative who has been authorized by the FAA to make such
findings.
Editorial Changes to the AD
Paragraphs referenced in the ``Restatement of the Requirements of
AD 88-19-03 R1'' section of this AD have been renumbered to conform to
the current AD formatting style.
Determination of Rule's Effective Date
Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for prior
public comment hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for
making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
Comments Invited
Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves
requirements affecting flight safety and, thus, was not preceded by
notice and an opportunity for public comment, comments are invited on
this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by
submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire.
Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted
in triplicate to the address specified under the caption ADDRESSES. All
communications received on or before the closing date for comments will
be considered, and this rule may be amended in light of the comments
received. Factual information that supports the commenter's ideas and
suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the
AD action and determining whether additional rulemaking action would be
needed.
Submit comments using the following format:
<bullet<ls-thn-eq> Organize comments issue-by-issue. For example,
discuss a request to change the compliance time and a request to change
the service bulletin reference as two separate issues.
<bullet<ls-thn-eq> For each issue, state what specific change to
the AD is being requested.
<bullet<ls-thn-eq> Include justification (e.g., reasons or data)
for each request.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might
suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be
available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the
Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that
summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this
AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket Number 2004-NM-17-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and
returned to the commenter.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
[[Page 10323]]
The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency
regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe
condition in aircraft, and that it is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further
that this action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory
Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is
determined that this emergency regulation otherwise would be
significant under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final
regulatory evaluation will be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket.
A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the
location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-6532 (55 FR 8118,
March 7, 1990), and by adding a new airworthiness directive (AD),
amendment 39-13505, to read as follows:
2004-05-10 Boeing: Amendment 39-13505. Docket 2004-NM-17-AD.
Supersedes AD 88-19-03 R1, Amendment 39-6532.
Applicability: Model 767 series airplanes, line number 001
through 175 inclusive; certificated in any category.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent fatigue cracking of the aft pressure bulkhead, which
could result in rapid depressurization of the airplane and possible
damage or interference with the airplane control systems that
penetrate the bulkhead, and consequent loss of controllability of
the airplane; accomplish the following:
Restatement of AD 88-09-03 R1
(a) Prior to the accumulation of 6,000 flight cycles or within
the next 1,000 flight cycles after September 26, 1988 (effective
date of AD 88-09-03 R1, amendment 39-6001), whichever occurs later,
unless accomplished within the last 5,000 flight cycles, and
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 6,000 flight cycles, perform a
detailed inspection of the aft side of the entire body station 1582
pressure bulkhead for damage (as defined in the Structural Repair
Manual) and cracking, in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin
767-53-0026, dated November 19, 1987; or Revision 1, dated March 16,
1989.
(b) Prior to the accumulation of 25,000 flight cycles, and
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 6,000 flight cycles, perform
an eddy current inspection of the body station 1582 pressure
bulkhead, in accordance with paragraph C. of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 767-53-0026, Revision 1,
dated March 16, 1989.
(c) For the purpose of complying with the requirements of
paragraphs (a) and (b) of this AD, the number of flight cycles may
be determined to equal the number of pressurization cycles where the
cabin pressure differential was equal to or greater than 2.0 PSI.
The pressurization allowance does not apply to the requirements of
paragraph (e) of this AD.
(d) Repair all damage and cracking detected during the
inspections specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this AD, prior to
further flight in accordance with Note 4 in the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 767-53-0026, Revision 1,
dated March 16, 1989. After the effective date of this AD, repair
must be accomplished per Boeing Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) 767-
53A0026, Revision 5, dated January 29, 2004.
New Requirements of this AD
Detailed Inspection
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is
defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a specific
structural area, system, installation, or assembly to detect damage,
failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at intensity
deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror,
magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning and elaborate
access procedures may be required.''
Detailed Inspections and Eddy Current Inspections
(e) Perform a detailed inspection for damage and cracking of the
aft side of the aft pressure bulkhead and perform high frequency and
low frequency eddy current inspections for cracking of the aft
pressure bulkhead, per the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing ASB
767-53A0026, Revision 5, dated January 29, 2004, at the later of the
times specified in paragraph (e)(1) or (e)(2) of this AD.
Thereafter, repeat these inspections at intervals not to exceed
1,800 flight cycles. Accomplishment of the initial inspections
required by this paragraph, terminate the inspection requirements of
paragraphs (a) and (b) of this AD.
(1) Prior to the accumulation of 25,000 total flight cycles, or
within 1,800 flight cycles after the most recent inspection done per
AD 88-19-03 R1, whichever occurs later; or
(2) Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD.
Repair Requirements
(f) If any damage or cracking is detected during any inspections
required by paragraph (e) of this AD: Before further flight
accomplish the requirements of paragraph (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this
AD, as applicable:
(1) For repairs within the limits of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing ASB 767-53A0026, Revision 5, dated January
29, 2004, repair per the ASB.
(2) For any repairs outside the limits, repair per a method
approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA; or per data meeting the type certification basis of the
airplane approved by a Boeing Company Designated Engineering
Representative (DER) who has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make such findings. For a repair method to be approved, as
required by this paragraph, the approval must specifically reference
this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOC)
(g)(1) In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, the Manager, Seattle
ACO, FAA, is authorized to approve AMOCs for this AD.
(2) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by a
Boeing Company DER who has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make such findings.
(3) AMOCs approved previously for paragraph (c) of AD 88-19-03
R1, amendment 39-6532, are approved as AMOCs with paragraph (f) of
this AD.
Incorporation by Reference
(h) Unless otherwise specified in this AD, the actions shall be
done in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 767-53-0026, dated
November 19, 1987; Boeing Service Bulletin 767-53-0026, Revision 1,
dated March 16, 1989; and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-53A0026,
Revision 5, dated January 29, 2004; as applicable. This
incorporation by reference is approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O.
Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. Copies may be inspected at
the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800
North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(i) This amendment becomes effective on March 22, 2004.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 24, 2004.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 04-4660 Filed 3-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:07:12.181242+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- b9eeb789b37e4360de2f2eec24f3aa86587fae936f1f7c41f634e2f7df319ea3
- Text SHA-256
- 10171eee27f549274748579afc1fb5173b9490eab1fab99dc2157a2c6516183b
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.