Published 2004-03-15 · Federal Register document 04-5431
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-14, DC-9-15, and DC-9-15F Airplanes; Model DC-9-20, -30, -40, and -50 Series Airplanes; and Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), DC-9-87 (MD-87), MD-88, and MD-90-30 Airplanes
Publication summary
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas airplane models, that requires inspection of the captain's and first officer's seat locking pins for minimum engagement with the detent holes in the seat tracks; inspection of the seat lockpins for excessive wear; and corrective actions, if necessary. This action is necessary to prevent uncommanded seat movement during takeoff and/or landing, which could result in interference with the operation of the airplane and consequent temporary loss of control of the airplane. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:13.905821+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2004-cb1e1f18d61cac01
- Source row
- results[119]
- Raw source SHA-256
- cb1e1f18d61cac01616802134d899b0c8ce1a9f79716b5ee037f78e4cb53a00a
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2004-05-25
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 2004-04-19
Some source clauses remain unstructured. Read the complete publication for conditions that have not been interpreted here.
Read 2 complete recorded clauses
Applicability wording · Applicability
Applicability: This AD applies to the airplanes listed in Table
1 of this AD, certificated in any category:
Table 1.--Applicability
------------------------------------------------------------------------
McDonnell Douglas model As listed in
------------------------------------------------------------------------
DC-9-14, DC-9-15, DC-9-15F, DC-9-21, DC-9-31, DC- Boeing Alert Service
9-32, DC-9-32 (VC-9C), DC-9-32F, DC-9-33F, DC-9- Bulletin DC9-25A350,
34, DC-9-34F, DC-9-32F (C-9A, C-9B), DC-9-41, Revision 01, dated
DC-9-51, DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9- June 14, 2002.
83 (MD-83), DC-9-87 (MD-87), and MD-88
airplanes.
MD-90-30 airplanes.............................. Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin MD90-25A009,
Revision 01, dated
July 1, 2002.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 12063]]
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 6705–7783, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: a7713cdb3212ae4876c006d811fc63fb1b788cc7c6019838e3fb958e60dd9faf
Compliance and requirements
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent uncommanded seat movement during takeoff and/or
landing, which could result in interference with the operation of
the airplane and consequent temporary loss of control of the
airplane, accomplish the following:
Service Bulletin References
(a) The term ``service bulletin,'' as used in this AD, means the
Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service bulletins
listed in Table 1 of this AD.
Inspection for Engagement and Excessive Wear of the Seat Locking Pins
(b) Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD, do the
actions specified in paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this AD, per
the service bulletin.
(1) Do a detailed inspection of the seat locking pin for minimum
engagement with the detent holes in the seat track of the captain's
and first officer's seat assemblies.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is
defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a specific
structural area, system, installation, or assembly to detect damage,
failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at intensity
deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror,
magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning and elaborate
access procedures may be required.''
(2) Do a detailed inspection of the seat lock pins for excessive
wear.
Corrective Actions
(c) If any discrepancy is detected during the inspections
required by paragraph (b) of this AD, before further flight, do the
corrective action(s), as applicable, per the service bulletin. Those
corrective actions include adjusting/replacing the seat locking pin
with a new pin and/or adjusting/repairing/replacing the seat track
with a new track.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(d) In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, the Manager, Los Angeles
Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, is authorized to approve
alternative methods of compliance for this AD.
Incorporation by Reference
(e) The actions shall be done in accordance with Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin DC9-25A350, Revision 01, dated June 14, 2002; or
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD90-25A009, Revision 01, dated July
1, 2002; as applicable. This incorporation by reference was approved
by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard,
Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data and Service
Management, Dept. C1-L5A (D800-0024). Copies may be inspected at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; or at the FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at the
Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite
700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(f) This amendment becomes effective on April 19, 2004.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 7783–10849, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: a3c12f77743bee85500c82e1da03015ad89d85fbf0749ac98e6bff2fa7f003eb
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2004-05-25 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: c32b92cc98a73c31c49933775016222c6e768ee12d6b881a273315c35ebd62fc. Source manifest: cdcd9596b9673cde47da0a484528f65c5309853e389e2288c7cb28d6dc9ada2e.
Official source · 2004-03-15
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 50 (Monday, March 15, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12061-12063]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-5431]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2003-16647; Directorate Docket No. 2002-NM-203-AD;
Amendment 39-13520; AD 2004-05-25]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-14, DC-9-
15, and DC-9-15F Airplanes; Model DC-9-20, -30, -40, and -50 Series
Airplanes; and Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83),
DC-9-87 (MD-87), MD-88, and MD-90-30 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas airplane models, that requires
inspection of the captain's and first officer's seat locking pins for
minimum engagement with the detent holes in the seat tracks; inspection
of the seat lockpins for excessive wear; and corrective actions, if
necessary. This action is necessary to prevent uncommanded seat
movement during takeoff and/or landing, which could result in
interference with the operation
[[Page 12062]]
of the airplane and consequent temporary loss of control of the
airplane. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe
condition.
DATES: Effective April 19, 2004.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of April 19, 2004.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Long Beach Division, 3855
Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data and
Service Management, Dept. C1-L5A (D800-0024). This information may be
examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport
Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; or at the FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at the Office of the
Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street NW., suite 700, Washington,
DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cheyenne Del Carmen, Aerospace
Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130L, FAA, Los Angeles
Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood,
California 90712-4137; telephone (562) 627-5338; fax (562) 627-5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas airplane
models was published in the Federal Register on December 11, 2003 (68
FR 69501). That action proposed to require inspection of the captain's
and first officer's seat locking pins for minimum engagement with the
detent holes in the seat tracks; inspection of the seat lockpins for
excessive wear; and corrective actions, if necessary.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. No comments were submitted in response
to the proposal or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.
Conclusion
The FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest
require the adoption of the rule as proposed.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 2,166 airplanes of the affected design in
the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 1,355 airplanes of U.S.
registry will be affected by this AD. It will take approximately
between 1 and 3 work hours per seat (depending on airplane
configuration) to accomplish the required inspection. Each airplane has
2 seats (the captain and first officer seats); therefore, it will take
approximately between 2 and 6 work hours per airplane (depending on
airplane configuration) to accomplish the required inspection, at the
average labor rate of $65 per work hour. Based on these figures, the
cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be between
$176,150 and $528,450, or between $130 and $390 per airplane, depending
on airplane configuration.
The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions
that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this
AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed
in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform
the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures
typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to
gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other
administrative actions.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:
2004-05-25 McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39-13520. Docket FAA-2003-
16647, Directorate Docket No. 2002-NM-203-AD.
Applicability: This AD applies to the airplanes listed in Table
1 of this AD, certificated in any category:
Table 1.--Applicability
------------------------------------------------------------------------
McDonnell Douglas model As listed in
------------------------------------------------------------------------
DC-9-14, DC-9-15, DC-9-15F, DC-9-21, DC-9-31, DC- Boeing Alert Service
9-32, DC-9-32 (VC-9C), DC-9-32F, DC-9-33F, DC-9- Bulletin DC9-25A350,
34, DC-9-34F, DC-9-32F (C-9A, C-9B), DC-9-41, Revision 01, dated
DC-9-51, DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9- June 14, 2002.
83 (MD-83), DC-9-87 (MD-87), and MD-88
airplanes.
MD-90-30 airplanes.............................. Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin MD90-25A009,
Revision 01, dated
July 1, 2002.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 12063]]
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent uncommanded seat movement during takeoff and/or
landing, which could result in interference with the operation of
the airplane and consequent temporary loss of control of the
airplane, accomplish the following:
Service Bulletin References
(a) The term ``service bulletin,'' as used in this AD, means the
Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service bulletins
listed in Table 1 of this AD.
Inspection for Engagement and Excessive Wear of the Seat Locking Pins
(b) Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD, do the
actions specified in paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this AD, per
the service bulletin.
(1) Do a detailed inspection of the seat locking pin for minimum
engagement with the detent holes in the seat track of the captain's
and first officer's seat assemblies.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is
defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a specific
structural area, system, installation, or assembly to detect damage,
failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at intensity
deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror,
magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning and elaborate
access procedures may be required.''
(2) Do a detailed inspection of the seat lock pins for excessive
wear.
Corrective Actions
(c) If any discrepancy is detected during the inspections
required by paragraph (b) of this AD, before further flight, do the
corrective action(s), as applicable, per the service bulletin. Those
corrective actions include adjusting/replacing the seat locking pin
with a new pin and/or adjusting/repairing/replacing the seat track
with a new track.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(d) In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, the Manager, Los Angeles
Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, is authorized to approve
alternative methods of compliance for this AD.
Incorporation by Reference
(e) The actions shall be done in accordance with Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin DC9-25A350, Revision 01, dated June 14, 2002; or
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD90-25A009, Revision 01, dated July
1, 2002; as applicable. This incorporation by reference was approved
by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard,
Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data and Service
Management, Dept. C1-L5A (D800-0024). Copies may be inspected at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; or at the FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at the
Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite
700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(f) This amendment becomes effective on April 19, 2004.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 3, 2004.
Ali Bahrami,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 04-5431 Filed 3-12-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:06:51.189315+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- 1484fc621fd55abbb80a8653b59e0f9f472f3de57e4522038b64fc8cd04c8a0e
- Text SHA-256
- c32b92cc98a73c31c49933775016222c6e768ee12d6b881a273315c35ebd62fc
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.