Published 2006-03-17 · Federal Register document 06-2545
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 720 and 720B Series Airplanes
Publication summary
The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Boeing Model 720 and 720B series airplanes. This AD requires repetitive inspections for any crack, corrosion, or sign of damage (e.g., finish scratches, blistering, or signs of fuel leaking) of the front spar upper chords under the fairing web, and repair if necessary. This AD results from a report that inspections required by a previous AD action are inadequate for Boeing Model 720 and 720B series airplanes. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct any crack, corrosion, or sign of damage of the front spar upper chords under the fairing web, which could result in structural failure of the wing.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:20.745856+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2006-8d787f8b35bc8016
- Source row
- results[80]
- Raw source SHA-256
- 8d787f8b35bc80165a417cea66de09cd32a1700face13759db364c607e405963
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2006-06-05
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 2006-04-03
Read 8 complete recorded clauses
Effective Date
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective April 3, 2006.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 11327–11393, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 476d6095e77c87860b0e2d754728ee63b6bc87ff4b37ce19b286b6cc500e71fa
Affected ADs
Affected ADs
(b) Accomplishing the inspections in paragraph (f) of this AD
terminates the repetitive inspection requirements of paragraph (c)
of AD 2004-22-24, amendment 39-13852, for the front spar upper chord
stations 107 through 383 only, for Boeing Model 720 and 720B series
airplanes only.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 11393–11698, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 22e288a25c96fadf6b8e4f3a333370d065014df723797116eb9af0c5ce129277
Applicability wording · Applicability
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all Boeing Model 720 and 720B series
airplanes, certificated in any category.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 11698–11820, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 360b0b00e1880eee2772ff7af93f79b80dfbad44f2d528f70e6e24376b605f92
Unsafe Condition
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report that inspections required by
previous AD action are inadequate for Boeing Model 720 and 720B
series airplanes. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct any
crack, corrosion, or sign of damage (e.g., finish scratches,
blistering, or signs of fuel leaking) of the front spar upper chords
under the fairing web, which could result in structural failure of
the wing.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 11820–12250, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: a4d55d0515d60693e7670f3882bb1f3898daa2f42dd8e80bd911ccaef3850532
Compliance
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 12250–12428, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 64a7a1579f37f56eafecd0aeb3c528e7c89f6292ed0cb53091423917642d5847
Repetitive Inspections
Repetitive Inspections
(f) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD: Do
detailed and high-frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections for any
crack, corrosion, or sign of damage (e.g., finish scratches,
blistering, or signs of fuel leaking) of the front spar upper chords
under the fairing web; and repair if necessary; by accomplishing all
the actions specified in Boeing Multi-Operator Message (MOM) 1-
151636045-1, dated January 17, 2006. If any
[[Page 13749]]
crack, corrosion, or sign of damage is found, do all applicable
repairs before further flight. Repeat the inspections thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 12 months. Where the MOM specifies to
contact Boeing for repair instructions: Before further flight,
repair using a method approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA. For a repair method to be approved
by the Manager, Seattle ACO, as required by this paragraph, the
Manager's approval letter must specifically refer to this AD.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is:
``An intensive examination of a specific item, installation, or
assembly to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available
lighting is normally supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate. Inspection aids such as
mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface cleaning
and elaborate procedures may be required.''
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 12428–13880, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: adfd0fa0994883ce4869d14a1aeffe76ee813a93c617541a93dd4705710d71b8
Instructions for Oversizing Fasteners
Instructions for Oversizing Fasteners
(g) Where Boeing MOM 1-151636045-1, dated January 17, 2006,
specifies to contact Boeing for appropriate action if it is
necessary to oversize fasteners during restoration: Before further
flight, oversize the fasteners using a method approved in accordance
with a method approved by an Authorized Representative for the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option Authorization
Organization who has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to
make those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair
must meet the certification basis of the airplane.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in accordance with Sec.
39.19 on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA Flight Standards
Certificate Holding District Office.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 13880–14924, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 47274306d32a7bdbae5d87e7d5d55c014bc4cea82b71d433c5712abaf3f7c1b1
Material Incorporated by Reference
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Boeing Multi-Operator Message (MOM) 1-
151636045-1, dated January 17, 2006, to perform the actions that are
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The Director
of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of
this document in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207, for a copy of this service information. You
may review copies at the Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., room PL-401, Nassif
Building, Washington, DC; on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov ; or
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at the NARA, call
(202) 741-6030, or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html html .
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 14924–15885, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: c09e122894de9aed05d1ec1162b96fd06c9e9dbbdf68dea53ef8f9376ff39ac4
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2006-06-05 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 9a4b6e855522be8ec980e2aeaa0b086481e9e64df0a62a3fa232e6745475c7a2. Source manifest: aa06432cc1296003672a1e604706d901cdff80c6256cae6ae54cb3e6ee016c9e.
Official source · 2006-03-17
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 52 (Friday, March 17, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13747-13749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-2545]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2006-24162; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-031-AD;
Amendment 39-14513; AD 2006-06-05]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 720 and 720B Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Boeing Model 720 and 720B series airplanes. This AD requires repetitive
inspections for any crack, corrosion, or sign of damage (e.g., finish
scratches, blistering, or signs of fuel leaking) of the front spar
upper chords under the fairing web, and repair if necessary. This AD
results from a report that inspections required by a previous AD action
are inadequate for Boeing Model 720 and 720B series airplanes. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct any crack, corrosion, or sign of
damage of the front spar upper chords under the fairing web, which
could result in structural failure of the wing.
DATES: This AD becomes effective April 3, 2006.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of April 3,
2006.
We must receive comments on this AD by May 16, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this AD.
<bullet> DOT Docket Web site: Go to http://dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
<bullet> Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
<bullet> Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590.
<bullet> Fax: (202) 493-2251.
<bullet> Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207, for service information identified in This AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Candice Gerretsen, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
917-6428; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We previously issued AD 2004-22-24, amendment 39-13852 (69 FR
64835, November 9, 2004), for all Boeing Model 707 and 720 series
airplanes. That AD requires repetitive detailed and high frequency eddy
current inspections for corrosion, signs of corrosion (e.g., blistering
or signs of fuel leaks), and cracking, and certain related follow-on
and investigative actions if necessary. That AD resulted from a report
of a 31-inch crack found during a routine inspection. We issued that AD
to find and fix corrosion and stress corrosion cracking of the upper
and lower chords on the wing front and rear spars, which could result
in reduced structural integrity of the wing.
Since we issued that AD, Boeing has informed us that, for Model 720
and 720B series airplanes, the repetitive inspections required by AD
2004-22-24 do not adequately address the identified unsafe condition.
The wing configuration of Model 720 and 720B series airplanes differs
from that on Model 707 series airplanes. Model 720 series airplanes
have an aerodynamic fairing that extends from the aircraft side of body
to the inboard nacelle. This fairing prevents operators from doing the
repetitive inspections intended by AD 2004-22-24. Cracks, corrosion, or
signs of damage (e.g., finish scratches, blistering or signs of fuel
leaking) of the front spar upper chords under the fairing web, if not
detected and corrected, could result in structural failure of the wing.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Multi-Operator Message (MOM) 1-151636045-1,
dated January 17, 2006. The MOM describes procedures for doing
repetitive detailed and high-frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections
for any crack, corrosion, or scratch of the front spar upper chords
under the fairing web, and repair if necessary. The HFEC inspection is
in the area of the forward face of the vertical flange, from the side
of the body to the inboard nacelle (front spar station 107 through
383), from the upper fastener row to the upper edge of the chord
flange, and the surface in between. The detailed inspection is of the
forward face of the vertical flange from the upper edge of the chord
flange to the lower edge of the chord flange. Accomplishing the actions
specified in the service information is intended to adequately address
the unsafe condition.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This AD
The unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or
develop on other airplanes of the same type design. For this reason, we
are issuing this AD to detect and correct any crack, corrosion, or sign
damage (e.g., finish scratches, blistering, or signs of fuel leaking)
of the front spar upper chords under the fairing web, which could
result in structural failure of the wing. This AD requires
accomplishing the actions specified in the service information
described previously, except as discussed under ``Differences Between
the AD and the MOM.''
[[Page 13748]]
Differences Between the AD and the MOM
Although the MOM specifies to contact the manufacturer for repair
instructions, this proposed AD would require operators to do the repair
using a method we approve.
The MOM also specifies to contact the manufacturer for instructions
on oversizing fasteners during restoration, but this proposed AD would
require oversizing the fasteners in one of the following ways:
<bullet> Using a method that we approve; or
<bullet> Using data that meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and that have been approved by an Authorized Representative
for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option Authorization
Organization whom we have authorized to make those findings.
FAA's Determination of the Effective Date
Since an unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate
adoption of this AD, we have found that notice and opportunity for
public comment before issuing this AD are impracticable, and that good
cause exists to make this AD effective in less than 30 days.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves requirements that affect
flight safety and was not preceded by notice and an opportunity for
public comment; however, we invite you to submit any relevant written
data, views, or arguments regarding this AD. Send your comments to an
address listed in the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2006-
24162; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-031-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the AD that might
suggest a need to modify it.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this AD. Using the search function of that web
site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or signed
the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you may visit
http://dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov
, or in person at the Docket Management Facility office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket
Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647-5227) is located on the
plaza level of the Nassif Building at the DOT street address stated in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after the Docket Management System receives them.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES
section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
2006-06-05 Boeing: Amendment 39-14513. Docket No. FAA-2006-24162;
Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-031-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective April 3, 2006.
Affected ADs
(b) Accomplishing the inspections in paragraph (f) of this AD
terminates the repetitive inspection requirements of paragraph (c)
of AD 2004-22-24, amendment 39-13852, for the front spar upper chord
stations 107 through 383 only, for Boeing Model 720 and 720B series
airplanes only.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all Boeing Model 720 and 720B series
airplanes, certificated in any category.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report that inspections required by
previous AD action are inadequate for Boeing Model 720 and 720B
series airplanes. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct any
crack, corrosion, or sign of damage (e.g., finish scratches,
blistering, or signs of fuel leaking) of the front spar upper chords
under the fairing web, which could result in structural failure of
the wing.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Repetitive Inspections
(f) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD: Do
detailed and high-frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections for any
crack, corrosion, or sign of damage (e.g., finish scratches,
blistering, or signs of fuel leaking) of the front spar upper chords
under the fairing web; and repair if necessary; by accomplishing all
the actions specified in Boeing Multi-Operator Message (MOM) 1-
151636045-1, dated January 17, 2006. If any
[[Page 13749]]
crack, corrosion, or sign of damage is found, do all applicable
repairs before further flight. Repeat the inspections thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 12 months. Where the MOM specifies to
contact Boeing for repair instructions: Before further flight,
repair using a method approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA. For a repair method to be approved
by the Manager, Seattle ACO, as required by this paragraph, the
Manager's approval letter must specifically refer to this AD.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is:
``An intensive examination of a specific item, installation, or
assembly to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available
lighting is normally supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate. Inspection aids such as
mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface cleaning
and elaborate procedures may be required.''
Instructions for Oversizing Fasteners
(g) Where Boeing MOM 1-151636045-1, dated January 17, 2006,
specifies to contact Boeing for appropriate action if it is
necessary to oversize fasteners during restoration: Before further
flight, oversize the fasteners using a method approved in accordance
with a method approved by an Authorized Representative for the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option Authorization
Organization who has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to
make those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair
must meet the certification basis of the airplane.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in accordance with Sec.
39.19 on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA Flight Standards
Certificate Holding District Office.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Boeing Multi-Operator Message (MOM) 1-
151636045-1, dated January 17, 2006, to perform the actions that are
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The Director
of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of
this document in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207, for a copy of this service information. You
may review copies at the Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., room PL-401, Nassif
Building, Washington, DC; on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov ; or
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at the NARA, call
(202) 741-6030, or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html html .
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 7, 2006.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 06-2545 Filed 3-16-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T03:48:06.214006+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- 3ebc36505b0e3e4f6a1b6eac6962103ef4c6452164fdc53e44f34b35458126cb
- Text SHA-256
- 9a4b6e855522be8ec980e2aeaa0b086481e9e64df0a62a3fa232e6745475c7a2
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.