Published 2012-06-18 · Federal Register document 2012-14377
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
Publication summary
We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 737-300, -400, and -500 series airplanes. That AD currently requires repetitive external detailed inspections or non-destructive inspections to detect cracks in the fuselage skin along the chem-mill steps at stringers S-1 and S-2R, between station (STA) 400 and STA 460, and repair if necessary. This new AD adds inspections for cracking in additional fuselage skin locations, and repair if necessary. This new AD also reduces the inspection thresholds and repetitive intervals for certain airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of additional crack findings of the fuselage skin at the chem-mill steps. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the fuselage skin panels at the chem- mill steps, which could result in sudden fracture and failure of the fuselage skin panels, and consequent rapid decompression of the airplane.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:39.502075+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2012-08bffa249ae9a205
- Source row
- results[186]
- Raw source SHA-256
- 08bffa249ae9a2053bbfc0d74663d089914e83fb91f9bc4c8409ea28239f6875
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2012-12-04
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 2012-07-23
Read 14 complete recorded clauses
Effective Date
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective July 23, 2012.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 12103–12190, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: ed3ed616e0c4e947a5d0ee2f7e82eb2087b0f6c0154c48a480a2b1e0481fd806
Affected ADs
(b) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2008-19-03, Amendment 39-15670 (73 FR
56958, October 1, 2008).
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 12190–12299, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 9f9ae49cb74aa5bcdff4f010587f14b6e1822a33588517e0274555b4dbe34bfe
Applicability wording · Applicability
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737-300, -400, and -
500 series airplanes, certificated in any category; as identified in
Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision 2, dated August 10,
2011.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 12299–12531, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: b741385b77952893069cdb2629392f7347abf51841de2500f89d615da6de2522
Subject
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 12531–12651, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 081af3d9c83e50199ea3d915af95e40eb49f717c012a8c46185298558678d959
Unsafe Condition
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of additional crack findings of
the fuselage skin at the chem-mill steps. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct fatigue cracking of the fuselage skin panels at
the chem-mill steps, which could result in sudden fracture and
failure of the fuselage skin panels, and consequent rapid
decompression of the airplane.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 12651–13034, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 44787e71995f29839211e1cea29ee1c64ac4ac1a08121502d2dbdda59b1642bf
Compliance
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 13034–13136, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 00fbfa31932483f627d0ce0a11cbd2e35e15d9231842b91ac85623ce533912d3
Repetitive Inspections
(g) Repetitive Inspections
At the applicable times specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision 2,
dated August 10, 2011, except as provided by paragraphs (j)(1) and
(j)(2) of this AD: Do both a detailed inspection and a
nondestructive inspection (NDI) (medium frequency eddy current,
magneto optical imaging, C-scan, or ultrasonic phased array) to
detect cracks in the fuselage skin along the chem-mill steps at
stringers S-1 and S-2R, between station (STA) 400 and STA 460, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service
Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision 2, dated August 10, 2011. Repeat the
applicable inspections thereafter at intervals not to exceed those
specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Service
Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision 2, dated August 10, 2011.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 13136–14003, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: ca731c3ca4681e35f36856ce5aab04a429428000a578e70b3117ba5c9ed7597f
Repair
(h) Repair
(1) If any crack is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, before further flight, repair in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service
Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision 2, dated August 10, 2011; except as
provided by paragraph (h)(2) of this AD. Installation of a repair
that meets the conditions specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision 2,
dated August 10, 2011, terminates the repetitive inspections
required by paragraph (g) of this AD for the repaired area only.
(2) If any crack is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD and Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1293,
Revision 2, dated August 10, 2011, specifies to contact Boeing for
repair: Before further flight, repair using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (l) of this
AD.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 14003–14932, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 397be2bf30f768afa44fa99a95e6eb4b4b879c5bc47abc95f6e08f0cabd664f4
Optional Modification
(i) Optional Modification
Accomplishing a modification of the chem-milled steps at any
location identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision
2, dated August 10, 2011, using a method approved in accordance with
the procedures specified in paragraph (l)(1) of this AD, terminates
the repetitive inspections required by paragraph (g) of this AD for
the modified area only.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 14932–15328, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 4c636543ddc97077ae2f2becf53dd31cad9f02c3cf68988435ac8d955ce50621
Exceptions to Service Bulletin
(j) Exceptions to Service Bulletin
(1) Where Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision 2, dated
August 10, 2011, specifies a compliance time relative to the date of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision 1, dated July 7,
2010, this AD requires compliance within the specified compliance
time after the effective date of this AD.
(2) Where the Condition column of paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision 2,
dated August 10, 2011, specifies a condition based on whether an
airplane has or has not been inspected, this AD bases the condition
on whether an airplane has or has not been inspected as of the
effective date of this AD.
(3) The post-repair inspection specified in Tables 4 and 6 of
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-
53A1293, Revision 2, August 10, 2011, is not required by this AD.
Note 1 to paragraph (j)(3) of this AD: The damage tolerance
inspections specified in Tables 4 and 6 of paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision 2,
August 10, 2011, may be used in support of compliance with section
121.1109(c)(2) or 129.109(c)(2) of the Federal Aviation Regulations
(14 CFR 121.1109(c)(2) or 14 CFR 129.109(c)(2)).
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 15328–16612, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 5a33628a30563e2f964b001a2490e4a0bebf6d4d31c6b28d0016e423cff89f10
Credit for Previous Actions
(k) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by
paragraphs (g), (h), and (i) of this AD, if those actions were
performed before the effective date of this AD using Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision 1, dated July 7, 2010.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 16612–16903, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: d1adc33ddc9894b87ee26c88f9c7a06a0caf5a18eaff8fd682eb190d3ac345cd
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
ACO, send it to the attention of the person identified in the
Related Information section of this AD. Information may be emailed
to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes ODA that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair method to
be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) AMOCs approved for AD 2008-19-03, Amendment 39-15670 (73 FR
56958, October 1, 2008), are approved as AMOCs for the corresponding
requirements in this AD.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 16903–18225, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 8c0b8b4c2c625d0f54d3c1256cfb111d13a96a2910f830184ec35bbd8036fa7f
Related Information
(m) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Wayne Lockett,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington
98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6447; fax: 425-917-6590; email:
[email protected].
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 18225–18528, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 7231fc8f013ecd5f98f2330020b70ae70316223a8f212a19b3b48263d9ce5f34
Material Incorporated by Reference
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) You must use the following service information to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The
Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference (IBR) of the following service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51:
(i) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision 2, dated
August 10, 2011.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone
206-544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(3) You may review copies of the referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by
[[Page 36137]]
reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr_locations.html.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 18528–19803, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 713943e8045254a222eefdcad317071fa1abd1dc13cf1a8fd3f7267775b100f8
Explicit historical replacement wording
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2012-12-04 · 1 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: d8f9069d5d869f20e93285952210a5cff53efdc8e79d68a4a4184763aa4dbdfc. Source manifest: 7a1cbed8420f819b9b844ece77606be272e6d863aa81237df83bb798910c0c3b.
Official source · 2012-06-18
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36134-36137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14377]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2011-1254; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-178-AD;
Amendment 39-17083; AD 2012-12-04]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain The Boeing Company Model 737-300, -400, and -500 series
airplanes. That AD currently requires repetitive external detailed
inspections or non-destructive inspections to detect cracks in the
fuselage skin along the chem-mill steps at stringers S-1 and S-2R,
between station (STA) 400 and STA 460, and repair if necessary. This
new AD adds inspections for cracking in additional fuselage skin
locations, and repair if necessary. This new AD also reduces the
inspection thresholds and repetitive intervals for certain airplanes.
This AD was prompted by reports of additional crack findings of the
fuselage skin at the chem-mill steps. We are issuing this AD to detect
and correct fatigue cracking of the fuselage skin panels at the chem-
mill steps, which could result in sudden fracture and failure of the
fuselage skin panels, and consequent rapid decompression of the
airplane.
DATES: This AD is effective July 23, 2012.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of July 23,
2012.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 206-
544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wayne Lockett, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-
6447; fax: 425-917-6590; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2008-19-03, Amendment 39-15670 (73 FR 56958,
October 1, 2008). That AD applies to the specified products. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on November 28, 2011 (76 FR 72853).
That NPRM proposed to continue to require repetitive external detailed
inspections or non-destructive inspections to detect cracks in the
fuselage skin along the chem-mill steps at stringers S-1 and S-2R,
between station (STA) 400 and STA 460, and repair if necessary. That
NPRM also proposed to add inspections for cracking in additional
fuselage skin locations, and repair if necessary. That NPRM also
proposed to reduce the inspection thresholds and repetitive intervals
for certain airplanes.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the proposal
(76 FR 72853, November 28, 2011) and the FAA's response to each
comment.
Support for the NPRM (76 FR 72853, November 28, 2011)
The National Transportation Board supports the NPRM (76 FR 72853,
November 28, 2011).
Request To Revise Paragraph (j) of the NPRM (76 FR 72853, November 28,
2011)
Boeing asked that we include Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1293, Revision 1, dated July 7, 2010, in the exception to the
service bulletin
[[Page 36135]]
specified in paragraph (j) of the NPRM (76 FR 72853, November 28,
2011). (Paragraph (j) of the NPRM is identified as paragraph (j)(1) in
this final rule.) Boeing stated that the compliance times in paragraph
1.E. ``Compliance'' of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision 2,
dated August 10, 2011, are based on the release date of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision 1, dated July 7, 2010. Boeing
added that paragraph (j) of the NPRM should be changed to reference
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision 1, dated July 7,
2010.
We agree with the commenter's request for the reason provided. We
have changed paragraph (j)(1) of this AD accordingly.
Request To Clarify the Language in Paragraph (k) of the NPRM (76 FR
72853, November 28, 2011)
Boeing asked that the language specified in paragraph (k) of the
NPRM (76 FR 72853, November 28, 2011) be clarified. (Paragraph (k) of
the NPRM is identified as paragraph (j)(2) in this final rule.) Boeing
stated that the intent of paragraph (k) of the NPRM is ``to specify an
exception to the compliance time for accomplishing the next service
bulletin inspection, being the effective date of the AD, for the
condition addressed by the paragraph.'' Boeing added that the language
does not clearly describe that it is an exception to the compliance
time; rather, it could be interpreted as an exception to the condition.
We agree to provide clarification. Paragraph (j)(2) of this AD is
an exception to the conditions, and is provided to establish a date
from which to determine if an inspection has been previously
accomplished. Therefore, we have made no change to the AD in this
regard.
Change to Final Rule
This final rule has been changed to include an optional
modification of the chem-milled steps at any location identified in
Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision 2, dated August 10, 2011,
which would eliminate the need for the repetitive inspections required
by paragraph (g) of this AD. We have determined that we can better
ensure long-term continued operational safety by including this
modification. Therefore, we have added a new paragraph (i) to this AD
to include this modification, and reidentified subsequent paragraphs
accordingly. In addition, we have indicated in the Costs of Compliance
section of this AD that we do not have data regarding the cost of the
optional terminating action.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously--and minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
<bullet> Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (76 FR 72853, November 28, 2011) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
<bullet> Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (76 FR 72853, November 28, 2011).
Interim Action
We consider this AD interim action. If final action is identified
later, we might consider further rulemaking then.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 596 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspections (required actions in 5 work-hours x $85 N/A $425 per inspection $253,300 per
AD 2008-19-03, Amendment 39- per hour = $425 per cycle. inspection cycle.
15670 (73 FR 56958, October 1, inspection cycle.
2008).
New inspections.................. Between 7 and 15 N/A Between $595 and Between $354,620 and
work-hours, $1,275 per $759,900 per
depending on inspection cycle. inspection cycle.
airplane
configuration =
between $595 and
$1,275 per
inspection cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
a cost estimate for the on-condition actions or the optional
terminating action specified in this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
[[Page 36136]]
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2008-19-03, Amendment 39-15670 (73 FR 56958, October 1, 2008), and
adding the following new AD:
2012-12-04 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-17083; Docket No. FAA-
2011-1254; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-178-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective July 23, 2012.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2008-19-03, Amendment 39-15670 (73 FR
56958, October 1, 2008).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737-300, -400, and -
500 series airplanes, certificated in any category; as identified in
Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision 2, dated August 10,
2011.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of additional crack findings of
the fuselage skin at the chem-mill steps. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct fatigue cracking of the fuselage skin panels at
the chem-mill steps, which could result in sudden fracture and
failure of the fuselage skin panels, and consequent rapid
decompression of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Repetitive Inspections
At the applicable times specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision 2,
dated August 10, 2011, except as provided by paragraphs (j)(1) and
(j)(2) of this AD: Do both a detailed inspection and a
nondestructive inspection (NDI) (medium frequency eddy current,
magneto optical imaging, C-scan, or ultrasonic phased array) to
detect cracks in the fuselage skin along the chem-mill steps at
stringers S-1 and S-2R, between station (STA) 400 and STA 460, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service
Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision 2, dated August 10, 2011. Repeat the
applicable inspections thereafter at intervals not to exceed those
specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Service
Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision 2, dated August 10, 2011.
(h) Repair
(1) If any crack is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, before further flight, repair in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service
Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision 2, dated August 10, 2011; except as
provided by paragraph (h)(2) of this AD. Installation of a repair
that meets the conditions specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision 2,
dated August 10, 2011, terminates the repetitive inspections
required by paragraph (g) of this AD for the repaired area only.
(2) If any crack is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD and Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1293,
Revision 2, dated August 10, 2011, specifies to contact Boeing for
repair: Before further flight, repair using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (l) of this
AD.
(i) Optional Modification
Accomplishing a modification of the chem-milled steps at any
location identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision
2, dated August 10, 2011, using a method approved in accordance with
the procedures specified in paragraph (l)(1) of this AD, terminates
the repetitive inspections required by paragraph (g) of this AD for
the modified area only.
(j) Exceptions to Service Bulletin
(1) Where Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision 2, dated
August 10, 2011, specifies a compliance time relative to the date of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision 1, dated July 7,
2010, this AD requires compliance within the specified compliance
time after the effective date of this AD.
(2) Where the Condition column of paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision 2,
dated August 10, 2011, specifies a condition based on whether an
airplane has or has not been inspected, this AD bases the condition
on whether an airplane has or has not been inspected as of the
effective date of this AD.
(3) The post-repair inspection specified in Tables 4 and 6 of
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-
53A1293, Revision 2, August 10, 2011, is not required by this AD.
Note 1 to paragraph (j)(3) of this AD: The damage tolerance
inspections specified in Tables 4 and 6 of paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision 2,
August 10, 2011, may be used in support of compliance with section
121.1109(c)(2) or 129.109(c)(2) of the Federal Aviation Regulations
(14 CFR 121.1109(c)(2) or 14 CFR 129.109(c)(2)).
(k) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by
paragraphs (g), (h), and (i) of this AD, if those actions were
performed before the effective date of this AD using Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision 1, dated July 7, 2010.
(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
ACO, send it to the attention of the person identified in the
Related Information section of this AD. Information may be emailed
to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes ODA that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair method to
be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) AMOCs approved for AD 2008-19-03, Amendment 39-15670 (73 FR
56958, October 1, 2008), are approved as AMOCs for the corresponding
requirements in this AD.
(m) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Wayne Lockett,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington
98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6447; fax: 425-917-6590; email:
[email protected].
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) You must use the following service information to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The
Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference (IBR) of the following service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51:
(i) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1293, Revision 2, dated
August 10, 2011.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone
206-544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(3) You may review copies of the referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by
[[Page 36137]]
reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 31, 2012.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-14377 Filed 6-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T03:02:01.577597+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- a3290d242c15f1ad873fbcb3d62e2985fb53c9a3e5dd2303d6e3ad4764603c8a
- Text SHA-256
- d8f9069d5d869f20e93285952210a5cff53efdc8e79d68a4a4184763aa4dbdfc
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.