Published 2012-02-24 · Federal Register document 2012-4284
Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company (GE) Turbofan Engines
Publication summary
We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for all GE CF6-80C2B series turbofan engines. That AD currently requires installing software version 8.2.Q1 to the engine electronic control unit (ECU), which increases the engine's margin to flameout. This new AD requires the removal of the affected ECUs from service. This AD was prompted by two reports of engine flameout events during flight in inclement weather conditions, eight reports of engine in- flight shutdown (IFSD) events caused by dual-channel central processing unit (CPU) faults in the ECU, and four reports of engine flameout ground events. We are issuing this AD to prevent engine flameout or un- commanded engine IFSD of one or more engines, leading to an emergency or forced landing of the airplane.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:39.502075+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2012-08bffa249ae9a205
- Source row
- results[48]
- Raw source SHA-256
- 08bffa249ae9a2053bbfc0d74663d089914e83fb91f9bc4c8409ea28239f6875
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2012-04-05
- Effective date printed in this edition
- Unknown
No adopted-clause structure was recorded for this source edition. Read the complete text; no applicability conclusion has been inferred.
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2012-04-05 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 7cadf43977b5fd7884844dc2a3ebc521b9d31c3c3b77f7b3735dbe83308ff55a. Source manifest: 33a77cee88d5453a3fa99d4983fc2081ed981664d88e5510a8835481d75fd0bc.
Official source · 2012-02-24
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10950-10952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4284]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2006-25738; Directorate Identifier 2006-NE-27-AD;
Amendment 39-16961; AD 2012-04-05]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company (GE) Turbofan
Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD)
for all GE CF6-80C2B series turbofan engines. That AD currently
requires installing software version 8.2.Q1 to the engine electronic
control unit (ECU), which increases the engine's margin to flameout.
This new AD requires the removal of the affected ECUs from service.
This AD was prompted by two reports of engine flameout events during
flight in inclement weather conditions, eight reports of engine in-
flight shutdown (IFSD) events caused by dual-channel central processing
unit (CPU) faults in the ECU, and four reports of engine flameout
ground events. We are issuing this AD to prevent engine flameout or un-
commanded engine IFSD of one or more engines, leading to an emergency
or forced landing of the airplane.
DATES: This AD is effective March 30, 2012.
ADDRESSES:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tomasz Rakowski, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781-238-7735;
fax: 781-238-7199; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2007-12-07, Amendment 39-15085 (72 FR 31174,
June 6, 2007). That AD applies to the specified products. The NPRM was
published in the Federal Register on November 14, 2011 (76 FR 70382).
That NPRM proposed to remove the affected ECUs from service.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the proposal
and the FAA's response to each comment.
Request To Change Unsafe Condition
Commenter GE stated that in all of the events of flameout the
engines relit and in all dual-channel CPU fault in-flight shutdowns the
engines were capable of restarting. GE stated that these events should
not be considered unsafe conditions.
We do not agree. Although a flameout with a consecutive relight or
an in-flight shutdown with a consecutive restart during cruise flight
is not in itself an unsafe condition, these types of loss of thrust can
be unsafe conditions during takeoff or during approach and landing. We
did not change the AD.
Request To Clarify Engine Flight Cycle and ECU Cycle Count
Commenter All Nippon Airways (ANA) requested that we clarify the
relationship between the engine flight cycles and ECU cycles of
operation in the engine, and whether previous ECU history affects the
flight cycle count.
We do not agree. The flight cycle intervals in paragraph (g) of the
AD refer to the engine start-stop cycles with the affected ECU part
numbers (P/Ns) installed, rather than ECU operational cycles. Engine
flight cycles accrued before the effective date of the AD are not
accounted for in the cycle count. We did not change the AD.
Request To Remove Certain Affected ECU P/Ns From the AD
Commenters Atlas Air, ANA, KLM, and China Airlines requested that
we remove from the list of affected ECU P/Ns in Table 2 of the AD, ECUs
with software version 8.2.Q1 and 8.2.R, a new front panel assembly
(FPA) and an old pressure subsystem (PSS), or an old FPA and a new PSS
generation circuit boards.
We do not agree. Dual-channel CPU faults have not been ruled out
for the new FPA or the new PSS, therefore any ECU with either a new FPA
or a new PSS must be addressed regardless of the version of software
installed. We did not change the AD.
Request To Add ECU P/Ns to the AD
Commenter Atlas Air stated that ECUs P/Ns 1471M63P41, 1519M89P31,
and 1820M33P14 are not listed in the proposed AD, but should be listed.
We do not agree. Those ECUs have the old generation of FPA and PSS
circuit
[[Page 10951]]
boards and, therefore, are not susceptible to dual-channel CPU faults.
The referenced ECUs also have the latest available version of software
installed. We did not change the AD.
Request To Mandate Software Version 8.2.R or Later
Commenter Atlas Air requested to add a requirement to install
software version 8.2.R or later in all affected engines at specified
times, without regard to FPA and PSS circuit board hardware
configuration.
We do not agree. Certain ECU P/Ns that have software version 8.2.R
are susceptible to CPU channel faults. We did not change the AD.
Request To Modify ECUs
Commenter Atlas Air requested to modify ECU P/Ns 1471M63P42,
1519M89P32, and 1820M33P15 to ECU P/Ns 1471M63P41, 1519M89P31, and
1820M33P14, respectively.
We do not agree. No approved procedure exists to downgrade the
ECUs. Engine owners and operators may propose such a procedure for
approval, and request an alternative method of compliance to the AD, as
specified in paragraph (i) of the AD. We did not change the AD.
Request To Add ECU Rework Procedures
Commenter ANA requested that we add rework procedures to the AD to
modify affected ECUs into serviceable configurations of ECUs.
We do not agree. The AD is written to only remove affected ECU P/Ns
from service. Refer to the manufacturer's service information for
upgrading affected ECUs. We did not change the AD.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD as proposed.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 697 GE CF6-80C2B series
turbofan engines installed on airplanes of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it will take about 4 work-hours per engine to perform a
removal and replacement of the ECU, and that the average labor rate is
$85 per work-hour. A replacement ECU costs about $4,600. Based on these
figures, we estimate the total cost of the AD to U.S. operators to be
$3,443,180.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2007-12-07, Amendment 39-15085 (72 FR 31174, June 6, 2007), and adding
the following new AD:
2012-04-05 General Electric Company (GE): Amendment 39-16961; Docket
No. FAA-2006-25738; Directorate Identifier 2006-NE-27-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective March 30, 2012.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2007-12-07, Amendment 39-15085 (72 FR
31174, June 6, 2007).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to GE CF6-80C2B1F, CF6-80C2B1F1, CF6-80C2B1F2,
CF6-80C2B2F, CF6-80C2B3F, CF6-80C2B4F, CF6-80C2B5F, CF6-80C2B6F,
CF6-80C2B6FA, CF6-80C2B7F, and CF6-80C2B8F turbofan engines,
including engines marked on the engine data plate as CF6-80C2B7F1.
(d) Unsafe Condition
This AD results from:
(1) Two reports of engine flameout events during flight in
inclement weather conditions; and
(2) Eight reports of engine in-flight shutdown (IFSD) events
caused by dual-channel central processing unit (CPU) faults in the
electronic control unit (ECU); and
(3) Four reports of engine flameout ground events.
(e) We are issuing this AD to prevent engine flameout or un-
commanded engine IFSD of one or more engines, leading to an
emergency or forced landing of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) ECU Removal
(1) Remove from service ECUs with part numbers (P/Ns) listed in
Table 1 of this AD within 6 months or 450 engine flight cycles after
the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first.
Table 1--Affected ECU P/Ns
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1471M63P01 1471M63P02 1471M63P03 1471M63P04 1471M63P05
1471M63P06 1471M63P07 1471M63P08 1471M63P09 1471M63P10
1471M63P11 1471M63P12 1471M63P13 1471M63P14 1471M63P15
1471M63P16 1471M63P17 1471M63P18 1471M63P23 1471M63P24
[[Page 10952]]
1471M63P25 1471M63P26 1471M63P27 1471M63P28 1471M63P29
1471M63P30 1471M63P31 1471M63P32 1471M63P33 1471M63P34
1471M63P35 1471M63P36 1519M89P01 1519M89P02 1519M89P03
1519M89P04 1519M89P05 1519M89P06 1519M89P07 1519M89P08
1519M89P09 1519M89P10 1519M89P13 1519M89P14 1519M89P15
1519M89P16 1519M89P17 1519M89P18 1519M89P19 1519M89P20
1519M89P21 1519M89P22 1519M89P23 1519M89P24 1519M89P25
1519M89P26 1820M33P01 1820M33P02 1820M33P03 1820M33P04
1820M33P05 1820M33P06 1820M33P07 1820M33P08 1820M33P09
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Remove from service ECUs with P/Ns 2121M37P01, 2121M37P02,
2121M38P01, 2121M38P02, 2121M41P01 and 2121M41P02 within 14 months
or 1,050 engine flight cycles after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs first.
(3) Remove from service ECUs with P/Ns listed in Table 2 of this
AD within 60 months or 4,500 engine flight cycles after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first.
Table 2--Affected ECU P/Ns
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1471M63P37 1471M63P38 1471M63P39 1471M63P40 1471M63P42
1519M89P27 1519M89P28 1519M89P29 1519M89P30 1519M89P32
1820M33P10 1820M33P11 1820M33P12 1820M33P13 1820M33P15
2121M25P01 2121M25P02 2121M26P01 2121M26P02 2121M29P01
2121M29P02 2121M37P03 2121M38P03 2121M41P03
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(h) Installation Prohibition
(1) After the effective date of this AD, do not install any ECU
P/N listed in Table 1 of this AD onto any airplane.
(2) After the effective date of this AD, do not operate any
airplane with more than one ECU P/N 2121M37P02, 2121M38P02, or
2121M41P02 installed.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
The Manager, Engine Certification Office, FAA, may approve AMOCs
for this AD. Use the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19 to make your
request.
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Tomasz Rakowski,
Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; phone: 781-238-7735; fax: 781-238-7199; email:
[email protected].
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
None.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on February 17, 2012.
Peter A. White,
Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-4284 Filed 2-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T03:04:31.466103+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- c83eaa3f13f5a42ab4b51891de773d74d10fa1f65db09a00b8c6e1e0d296b08f
- Text SHA-256
- 7cadf43977b5fd7884844dc2a3ebc521b9d31c3c3b77f7b3735dbe83308ff55a
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.