Published 2014-10-01 · Federal Register document 2014-22979
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
Publication summary
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 767-200, -300, -300F, and -400ER airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports indicating that a standard access door was located where an impact-resistant access door was required, and stencils were missing from some impact-resistant access doors. This AD requires an inspection of the wing fuel tank access doors to determine whether impact-resistant access doors are installed in the correct locations, and to replace incorrectly installed doors with impact- resistant access doors. This AD also requires an inspection for stencils and index markers on impact-resistant access doors, and application of new stencils or index markers if necessary. In addition, this AD requires revising the maintenance program to incorporate changes to the airworthiness limitations section. We are issuing this AD to correct the unsafe condition on these products.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:45.694519+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2014-642efe379108139d
- Source row
- results[271]
- Raw source SHA-256
- 642efe379108139d70cbf0492188bfdaee07f4da1173b6bc01335f4de404a707
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2014-20-02
- Effective date printed in this edition
- Unknown
No adopted-clause structure was recorded for this source edition. Read the complete text; no applicability conclusion has been inferred.
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2014-20-02 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 4ed897668efcbc1fef742c939bad9bff537c9a24eb8be143278de1d11ad54958. Source manifest: dfb2d29b326e593564508d8f860c068195e60bee478ca87e46fd6f5c161a108a.
Official source · 2014-10-01
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 190 (Wednesday, October 1, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59102-59104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22979]
[[Page 59102]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2013-0672; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-058-AD;
Amendment 39-17975; AD 2014-20-02]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 767-200, -300, -300F, and -400ER airplanes.
This AD was prompted by reports indicating that a standard access door
was located where an impact-resistant access door was required, and
stencils were missing from some impact-resistant access doors. This AD
requires an inspection of the wing fuel tank access doors to determine
whether impact-resistant access doors are installed in the correct
locations, and to replace incorrectly installed doors with impact-
resistant access doors. This AD also requires an inspection for
stencils and index markers on impact-resistant access doors, and
application of new stencils or index markers if necessary. In addition,
this AD requires revising the maintenance program to incorporate
changes to the airworthiness limitations section. We are issuing this
AD to correct the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective November 5, 2014.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of November 5,
2014.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2013-
0672; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suzanne Lucier, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-
6438; fax: 425-917-6590; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) to
amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain The
Boeing Company Model 767-200, -300, -300F, and -400ER airplanes. The
SNPRM published in the Federal Register on July 2, 2014 (79 FR 37681).
We preceded the SNPRM with a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that
published in the Federal Register on August 12, 2013 (78 FR 48826). The
NPRM proposed to require an inspection of the left-and right-hand wing
fuel tank access doors to determine whether impact-resistant access
doors are installed in the correct locations, and to replace
incorrectly installed doors with impact-resistant access doors. The
NPRM also proposed to require an inspection for stencils and index
markers on impact-resistant access doors, and application of new
stencils or index markers if necessary. In addition, the NPRM proposed
to require revising the maintenance program to incorporate changes to
the airworthiness limitations section. The NPRM was prompted by reports
indicating that a standard access door was located where an impact-
resistant access door was required, and stencils were missing from some
impact-resistant access doors. The SNPRM proposed to revise the NPRM by
adding airplanes to the applicability. We are issuing this AD to
prevent foreign object penetration of the fuel tank from uncontained
engine failure or tire debris, which could cause a fuel leak near an
ignition source (e.g., hot brakes or engine exhaust nozzle),
consequently leading to a fuel-fed fire.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We have considered the comments received. Boeing and FedEx
Express supported the SNPRM (79 FR 37681, July 2, 2014).
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD as proposed, except for minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these minor changes:
<bullet> Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
SNPRM (79 FR 37681, July 2, 2014) for correcting the unsafe condition;
and
<bullet> Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the SNPRM (79 FR 37681, July 2, 2014).
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 436 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection............................ Up to 7 work-hours x $85 $0 $595 $259,420
per hour = $595.
Maintenance program revision.......... 1 work-hour x $85 per 0 85 37,060
hour = $85.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacements
that would be required based on the results of the inspection. We have
no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need these
replacements:
[[Page 59103]]
On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Action Labor cost Parts cost product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement per door.......................... 3 work-hours x $85 per hour = $8,000 $8,255
$255.
Stencil and index marker...................... 9 work-hours x $85 per hour = 0 765
$765.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2014-20-02 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-17975; Docket No. FAA-
2013-0672; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-058-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective November 5, 2014.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 767-200, -300, -
300F, and -400ER series airplanes; certificated in any category; as
identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28-0105, Revision 1, dated
February 6, 2013.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28, Fuel.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports indicating that a standard
access door was located where an impact-resistant access door was
required, and stencils were missing from some impact-resistant
access doors. We are issuing this AD to prevent foreign object
penetration of the fuel tank from uncontained engine failure or tire
debris, which could cause a fuel leak near an ignition source (e.g.,
hot brakes or engine nozzle), consequently leading to a fuel-fed
fire.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Inspections
Within 72 months after the effective date of this AD, do the
actions specified in paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service
Bulletin 767-28-0105, Revision 1, dated February 6, 2013.
(1) Do either a general visual inspection or ultrasonic non-
destructive test of the left- and right-hand wing fuel tank access
doors to determine whether impact-resistant access doors are
installed in the correct locations. If any standard access door is
found, before further flight, replace with an impact-resistant
access door.
(2) Do a general visual inspection of the left- and right-hand
wing fuel tank impact-resistant access doors to verify stencils and
index markers are applied. If a stencil or index marker is missing,
before further flight, apply a stencil or index marker, as
applicable.
(h) Maintenance or Inspection Program Revision
Within 60 days after the effective date of this AD, revise the
maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate
critical design configuration control limitation (CDCCL) Task 57-
AWL-01, ``Impact-Resistant Fuel Tank Access Door,'' of Section 9,
Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and Certification Maintenance
Requirements (CMRs) of Boeing 767 Maintenance Planning Data Document
D622T001-9, Revision January 2013.
(i) No Alternative Actions, Intervals, and/or CDCCLs
After accomplishing the revision required by paragraph (h) of
this AD, no alternative actions (e.g., inspections), intervals, and/
or CDCCLs may be used unless the actions, intervals, and/or CDCCLs
are approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this
AD.
(j) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28-0105,
dated January 12, 2012, which is not incorporated by reference in
this AD.
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (l)(1) of this AD.
Information may
[[Page 59104]]
be emailed to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(4) AMOCs for ADs 2008-11-01 R1, Amendment 39-16145 (74 FR
68515, December 28, 2009); 2010-06-10, Amendment 39-16234 (75 FR
15322, March 29, 2010); or 2011-25-05, Amendment 39-16881 (77 FR
2442, January 18, 2012); that meet the conditions specified in
paragraphs (k)(4)(i) and (k)(4)(ii) of this AD are approved as AMOCs
for the corresponding provisions of paragraph (h) of this AD.
(i) AMOCs that are approved after November 2, 2012.
(ii) AMOCS that include incorporation of CDCCL Task 57-AWL-01,
``Impact-Resistant Fuel Tank Access Door.''
(l) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Suzanne Lucier,
Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6438; fax: 425-917-6590; email:
[email protected].
(2) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (m)(3) and (m)(4) of this AD.
(m) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28-0105, Revision 1, dated
February 6, 2013.
(ii) Task 57-AWL-01, ``Impact-Resistant Fuel Tank Access Door,''
of Section 9, Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and Certification
Maintenance Requirements (CMRs) of Boeing 767 Maintenance Planning
Data Document D622T001-9, Revision January 2013.
(3) For Boeing service information identified in this AD,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207;
telephone 206-544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 19, 2014.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-22979 Filed 9-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T02:37:23.383995+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- 089aa88ffecd6dabac32c42e0f9ae80680eed1143fecbf371ffb967e02b3568d
- Text SHA-256
- 4ed897668efcbc1fef742c939bad9bff537c9a24eb8be143278de1d11ad54958
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.