Published 2015-12-24 · Federal Register document 2015-31715
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
Publication summary
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The Boeing Company Model 777 airplanes. This AD was prompted by an evaluation by the design approval holder (DAH) indicating that the lap splices of the aft pressure bulkhead webs are subject to widespread fatigue damage (WFD) on aging Model 777 airplanes that have accumulated at least 38,000 total flight cycles. This AD requires repetitive inspections for any crack in the aft webs of the radial lap splices of the aft pressure bulkhead, and, if necessary, corrective actions. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking in the aft webs of the radial lap splices of the aft pressure bulkhead; such cracking could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane, decompression of the cabin, and collapse of the floor structure.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:48.517946+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2015-3bb842c840a7e6e6
- Source row
- results[303]
- Raw source SHA-256
- 3bb842c840a7e6e6e43779ca68008e1e63ad8287ad840c3a981d1f66a934b14b
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2015-25-08
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 2016-01-28
Read 11 complete recorded clauses
Effective Date
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective January 28, 2016.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 14679–14743, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 04483ffc30ea0c8bbcc75c7a75f05f758161c07e135477a465029a14c06bc452
Affected ADs
(b) Affected ADs
None.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 14743–14772, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 871a4afc60ceeae06e8010585055188633d616078500c45937092bfe892239c0
Applicability wording · Applicability
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 777-200, -200LR,
-300, -300ER, and 777F series airplanes, certificated in any
category.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 14772–14934, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: b674a34c84fdfddce70ab734ab1f39e41fcee3f5a6af63aac598dbc5d608819d
Subject
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 14934–15014, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 297e69b8a6e159f28612e8bd82a91daa2fd8fd1d9d38af67161f67738908fa6c
Unsafe Condition
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by an evaluation by the design approval
holder indicating that the lap splices of the aft pressure bulkhead
webs are subject to widespread fatigue damage on aging Model 777
airplanes that have accumulated at least 38,000 total flight cycles.
We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking in the
aft webs of the radial lap splices of the aft pressure bulkhead;
such cracking could result in reduced structural integrity of the
airplane, decompression of the cabin, and collapse of the floor
structure.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 15014–15587, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: ff2a8787b8a09953692d27ade8bdd22211b2d8845b7ef01f087574e64b581a45
Compliance
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 15587–15689, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 00fbfa31932483f627d0ce0a11cbd2e35e15d9231842b91ac85623ce533912d3
Inspection of Lap Splice in the Web of the Aft Pressure Bulkhead
(g) Inspection of Lap Splice in the Web of the Aft Pressure Bulkhead
Except as required by paragraph (h) of this AD: At the times
specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 777-53A0078, dated December 5, 2014, do a medium frequency
eddy current inspection for any cracking in the aft webs of the
radial lap splices of the aft pressure bulkhead, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
777-53A0078, dated December 5, 2014. Repeat the inspection
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 8,400 flight cycles from the
previous inspection. If any crack is found during any inspection
required by this AD, do the applicable corrective actions, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 777-53A0078, dated December 5, 2014. If a
corrective action described in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-
53A0078, dated December 5, 2014, specifies to contact Boeing for
appropriate action: Before further flight, repair using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph
(i) of this AD.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 15689–16828, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: cc9c51124fa5b480ee8b3d1beb83110e31885fbca100736911cb03c68b100bc0
Exception to Service Information Specifications
(h) Exception to Service Information Specifications
Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-53A0078, dated December
5, 2014, specifies a compliance time ``after the original issue date
of this service bulletin,'' this AD requires compliance within the
specified compliance time after the effective date of this AD.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 16828–17152, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 15b79f2c2479eb9fe79d5233356362b6c6a7d5c1fe8f147c3970964039b084aa
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. To be approved, the
repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must
meet the certification basis of the airplane and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(4) For service information that contains steps that are labeled
as Required for Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs
(i)(4)(i) and (1)(4)(ii) of this AD apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. An AMOC is required for any deviations to RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 17152–19199, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 3cd4aceecde9b5076c83860e438478a1d7c06480b6b1532224ebae93680d4527
Related Information
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Eric Lin, Aerospace
Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6412; fax: 425-
917-6590; email: [email protected].
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 19199–19462, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 24be08e3bae639a963505d45517ce0b82298b1571dfbac33905b1fb0d74ba2e1
Material Incorporated by Reference
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-53A0078, dated December 5,
2014.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax 206 766 5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information at FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 19462–20703, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: b843bcb610d28fc941c2837b98496b671a1f6be37d50fbbccf5cde6a272c4011
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2015-25-08 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: ce613a194425e91831f6620e8f4fa0841066d1e1fe0276e4f5d0c8422ba43750. Source manifest: 2bcd46289c99a0ca3c2c552d78f32b032f079d38e2df550e6a3244730358fd7f.
Official source · 2015-12-24
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 247 (Thursday, December 24, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 80234-80236]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-31715]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2015-1281; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-241-AD;
Amendment 39-18346; AD 2015-25-08]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The
Boeing Company Model 777 airplanes. This AD was prompted by an
evaluation by the design approval holder (DAH) indicating that the lap
splices of the aft pressure bulkhead webs are subject to widespread
fatigue damage (WFD) on aging Model 777 airplanes that have accumulated
at least 38,000 total flight cycles. This AD requires repetitive
inspections for any crack in the aft webs of the radial lap splices of
the aft pressure bulkhead, and, if necessary, corrective actions. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking in the aft
webs of the radial lap splices of the aft pressure bulkhead; such
cracking could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane,
decompression of the cabin, and collapse of the floor structure.
DATES: This AD is effective January 28, 2016.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of January 28,
2016.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone
206-544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425-227-1221. It is also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
1281.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
1281; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Lin, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6412; fax:
425-917-6590; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all The Boeing Company
Model 777 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on May
12, 2015 (80 FR 27116). The NPRM was prompted by an evaluation by the
DAH indicating that the lap splices of the aft pressure bulkhead webs
are subject to WFD on aging Model 777 airplanes that have accumulated
at least 38,000 total flight cycles. The NPRM proposed to require
repetitive inspections for any crack in the aft webs of the radial lap
splices of the aft pressure bulkhead, and, if necessary, corrective
actions. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking
in the aft webs of the radial lap splices of the aft pressure bulkhead;
such cracking could result in reduced structural integrity of the
airplane, decompression of the cabin, and collapse of the floor
structure.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM (80
FR 27116, May 12, 2015) and the FAA's response to each comment.
FedEx Express stated:
<bullet> All of its Boeing Model 777s would be affected.
<bullet> The proposed inspection threshold and intervals would fit
into its maintenance schedule.
<bullet> The number of man-hours and elapsed time to accomplish the
inspections would not impact the overall span-time of its maintenance
schedule.
<bullet> The proposed inspections do not require any special
inspection techniques, training, or tooling.
Request To Clarify Unsafe Condition
Boeing requested that the unsafe condition statement in the NPRM
(80 FR 27116, May 12, 2015) be revised to specify that the unsafe
condition exists on aging airplanes, rather than new airplanes. Boeing
stated that its analysis concluded that airplanes would have to
accumulate at least 38,000 total flight cycles before the lap splices
of the aft pressure bulkhead webs would be subject to WFD.
We agree with Boeing's request and have revised the unsafe
condition statement in the preamble and regulatory text of this final
rule accordingly.
Request To Exclude a Service Information Action
American Airlines (AA) requested that the first action specified in
step 3.B.5. of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 777-53A0078, dated December 5, 2014, be omitted from the
requirements of the proposed AD (80 FR 27116, May 12, 2015). The action
is to put the airplane back into a serviceable condition. AA stated
that this action does not address the unsafe condition addressed by the
proposed rule and that most operators would accomplish the proposed AD
requirements during a maintenance visit. AA stated that in the context
of a maintenance visit, returning the airplane to a serviceable
condition immediately after completion of the inspections and any
associated corrective actions would not be possible. AA indicated that
an operator would wait until all of the maintenance items scheduled for
that visit would have been completed before putting the airplane back
into a serviceable condition.
We agree with the commenter's statement that this action does not
need to be required by this final rule; several other FAA regulations
require restoring the airplane to a serviceable condition before
further flight. However, the step of returning the airplane to a
serviceable condition is not marked required for compliance (``RC'') in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-53A0078, dated December 5, 2014;
therefore, as noted in
[[Page 80235]]
paragraph (i)(4)(ii) of this AD, this step may be delayed using an
accepted method in accordance with the operator's maintenance or
inspection program without obtaining approval of an alternative method
of compliance (AMOC). We have not changed this AD in this regard.
Request for Clarification of Relationship Between the NPRM (80 FR
27116, May 12, 2015) and AD 2012-07-06, Amendment 39-17012 (77 FR
21429)
Air New Zealand requested clarification regarding the relationship
between the NPRM (80 FR 27116, May 12, 2015) and AD 2012-07-06,
Amendment 39-17012 (77 FR 21429, April 10, 2012). Specifically, the
commenter asked if the NPRM would supersede AD 2012-07-06; if the AMOC
approval included in AD 2012-07-06 would be included in the NPRM; and
if the proposed inspections in the NPRM should be done in lieu of or in
addition to the existing inspections required by AD 2012-07-06.
We agree with the commenter's request for clarification. This is a
new AD applicable to all The Boeing Company Model 777 airplanes and
requires repetitive inspections for cracking in the aft webs of the
radial lap splices of the aft pressure bulkhead, and corrective actions
if necessary. AD 2012-07-06, Amendment 39-17012 (77 FR 21429, April 10,
2012), is applicable to certain Model 777 airplanes and requires
revising the maintenance program to update inspection requirements to
detect fatigue cracking of principal structural elements throughout the
airplane.
An AMOC for AD 2012-07-06, Amendment 39-17012 (77 FR 21429, April
10, 2012), was issued so operators could use the corresponding
compliance times and inspections specified in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 777-53A0078, dated December 5, 2014, for the inspection
requirements for the corresponding locations specified in Boeing Model
777 Structural Significant Item 53-80-I13A and paragraphs (g) and (h)
of AD 2012-07-06. The information regarding this AMOC is included in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-53A0078, dated December 5, 2014.
Operators are required to accomplish the requirements in this new AD in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 777-53A0078, dated December 5, 2014. If the actions of this
new AD are done, the requirements of AD 2012-07-06 are met only for
areas inspected in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-
53A0078, dated December 5, 2014.
Regarding the question about whether the AMOC approval included in
AD 2012-07-06, Amendment 39-17012 (77 FR 21429, April 10, 2012), would
be included in this AD, paragraph (i) of this AD contains the AMOC
approval procedures for this AD. However, because the existing
inspections required by AD 2012-07-06 are not sufficient to preclude
WFD in this area, we have not included previous AMOCs issued for AD
2012-07-06 as AMOCs for this AD. We have not changed this AD in this
regard.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
<bullet> Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (80 FR 27116, May 12, 2015) for correcting the unsafe condition;
and
<bullet> Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (80 FR 27116, May 12, 2015).
We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-53A0078, dated
December 5, 2014. This service information describes procedures for
inspections of the lap splices in the web of the aft pressure bulkhead
for cracking, and corrective actions. This service information is
reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business or by the means identified in
the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 193 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection...................... 9 work-hours x $85 $0 $765 per inspection $147,645 per
per hour = $765 cycle. inspection cycle
per inspection
cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD.
Authority for this Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
[[Page 80236]]
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2015-25-08 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-18346; Docket No. FAA-
2015-1281; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-241-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective January 28, 2016.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 777-200, -200LR,
-300, -300ER, and 777F series airplanes, certificated in any
category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by an evaluation by the design approval
holder indicating that the lap splices of the aft pressure bulkhead
webs are subject to widespread fatigue damage on aging Model 777
airplanes that have accumulated at least 38,000 total flight cycles.
We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking in the
aft webs of the radial lap splices of the aft pressure bulkhead;
such cracking could result in reduced structural integrity of the
airplane, decompression of the cabin, and collapse of the floor
structure.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Inspection of Lap Splice in the Web of the Aft Pressure Bulkhead
Except as required by paragraph (h) of this AD: At the times
specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 777-53A0078, dated December 5, 2014, do a medium frequency
eddy current inspection for any cracking in the aft webs of the
radial lap splices of the aft pressure bulkhead, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
777-53A0078, dated December 5, 2014. Repeat the inspection
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 8,400 flight cycles from the
previous inspection. If any crack is found during any inspection
required by this AD, do the applicable corrective actions, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 777-53A0078, dated December 5, 2014. If a
corrective action described in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-
53A0078, dated December 5, 2014, specifies to contact Boeing for
appropriate action: Before further flight, repair using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph
(i) of this AD.
(h) Exception to Service Information Specifications
Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-53A0078, dated December
5, 2014, specifies a compliance time ``after the original issue date
of this service bulletin,'' this AD requires compliance within the
specified compliance time after the effective date of this AD.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. To be approved, the
repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must
meet the certification basis of the airplane and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(4) For service information that contains steps that are labeled
as Required for Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs
(i)(4)(i) and (1)(4)(ii) of this AD apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. An AMOC is required for any deviations to RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Eric Lin, Aerospace
Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6412; fax: 425-
917-6590; email: [email protected].
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-53A0078, dated December 5,
2014.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax 206 766 5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information at FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 10, 2015.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-31715 Filed 12-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T02:30:43.997825+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- a73ebd9681fcbcfb36986014756fc00128eaeee5491289e194343f2c24140687
- Text SHA-256
- ce613a194425e91831f6620e8f4fa0841066d1e1fe0276e4f5d0c8422ba43750
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.