Published 2016-10-11 · Federal Register document 2016-24197
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
Publication summary
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900 and -900ER series airplanes. This AD was prompted by an evaluation by the design approval holder (DAH) indicating that certain fastener locations in the window corner surround structure are subject to widespread fatigue damage (WFD). This AD requires repetitive high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections for cracking in certain fastener locations in the window corner surround structure, and repair if necessary. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking around certain fastener locations that could cause multiple window corner skin cracks, which could result in rapid decompression and consequent loss of structural integrity of the airplane.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:51.853224+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2016-48fe8cb6c57c00b7
- Source row
- results[327]
- Raw source SHA-256
- 48fe8cb6c57c00b74623eb2b71ad0abe73b95a424a8ac83fecd389da4d1e3a81
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2016-20-14
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 2016-11-15
Read 11 complete recorded clauses
Effective Date
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective November 15, 2016.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 12537–12602, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 7036d63a1a40677d41e53dcf2d9e40168e7b5cbefa2acc8b726eebb8b836cdda
Affected ADs
(b) Affected ADs
None.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 12602–12631, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 871a4afc60ceeae06e8010585055188633d616078500c45937092bfe892239c0
Applicability wording · Applicability
(c) Applicability
(1) This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -
700, -700C, -800, -900 and -900ER series airplanes, certificated in
any category.
(2) Installation of Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
ST00830SE (http://
[[Page 70013]]
rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgSTC.nsf/0/
38B606833BBD98B386257FAA00602538?OpenDocument&Highlight=st00830se)
does not affect the ability to accomplish the actions required by
this AD. Therefore, for airplanes on which STC ST00830SE is
installed, a ``change in product'' alternative method of compliance
(AMOC) approval request is not necessary to comply with the
requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 12631–13311, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 721d9a4c9e0b1829db13302bdfdc269e172b7ba30fdd76547afb621d60045e03
Subject
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 13311–13391, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 297e69b8a6e159f28612e8bd82a91daa2fd8fd1d9d38af67161f67738908fa6c
Unsafe Condition
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by an evaluation by the design approval
holder indicating that certain fastener locations in the window
corner surround structure are subject to widespread fatigue damage.
We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking around
certain fastener locations that could cause multiple window corner
skin cracks, which could result in rapid decompression and
consequent loss of structural integrity of the airplane.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 13391–13869, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 278ed8b177db9ca04fdc6cac8e6a78f08a924c18713b2eab2dcbbe82ec31e118
Compliance
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 13869–13971, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 00fbfa31932483f627d0ce0a11cbd2e35e15d9231842b91ac85623ce533912d3
Repetitive Inspections and Repair
(g) Repetitive Inspections and Repair
At the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1351, dated
July 8, 2015: Do an external high frequency eddy current (HFEC)
inspection for cracking of the skin around the fastener locations at
the upper forward and lower aft corners of each window between
station (STA) 360 and STA 540, as applicable, and at the lower
forward and upper aft corners of each window between STA 727 and STA
887, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1351, dated July 8, 2015. Repeat the
inspection thereafter at the applicable times specified in paragraph
1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1351,
dated July 8, 2015. If any crack is found during any inspection,
repair before further flight using a method approved in accordance
with the procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this AD.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 13971–14937, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 7ad77026cf09a6c4fb139ddfc91ab408459e5ccde13e559a6de8ff270a40d142
Exception to the Service Bulletin Specifications
(h) Exception to the Service Bulletin Specifications
Although Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1351, dated July
8, 2015, specifies to contact Boeing for repair instructions, and
specifies that action as ``RC'' (Required for Compliance), this AD
requires repair before further flight using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this
AD.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 14937–15332, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 0e91b2bbb68079f9b21cb8a73c1b2571965ca53cfdbdeeb10ce4a62ec49f4fc6
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. To be approved, the
repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must
meet the certification basis of the airplane and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(4) Except as required by paragraph (h) of this AD: For service
information that contains steps that are labeled as RC, the
provisions of paragraphs (i)(4)(i) and (i)(4)(ii) of this AD apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. If a step or substep is labeled ``RC Exempt,'' then the
RC requirement is removed from that step or substep. An AMOC is
required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and
identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 15332–17512, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: b5c0c29806d88f29b7d788494420fc0f398ce7cbc9e3d659d491f241a462b26e
Related Information
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Gaetano Settineri,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle ACO,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6577;
fax: 425-917-6590; email: [email protected].
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 17512–17784, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 6cbd90ee9fb5124a093e51246640300948845baba369d75ff5981b6d17344fc9
Material Incorporated by Reference
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1351, dated July 8,
2015.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone: 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax: 206-766-5680; Internet: https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information at FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 17784–19024, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 5f481a471224be95e06c64ec901d27e154418e994ac8886b8a3b771d2aabb02b
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2016-20-14 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 9a96f658af74be63b0a9d3b111a8dad6391f0676483ca7b89fa24fd2db8a5d05. Source manifest: fe8ec2e0cca28e78ac43baac331bc043ec9f7415867ffd646e5cdaf42459c648.
Official source · 2016-10-11
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 11, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70011-70013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-24197]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2016-5042; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-140-AD;
Amendment 39-18680; AD 2016-20-14]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The
Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900 and -900ER series
airplanes. This AD was prompted by an evaluation by the design approval
holder (DAH) indicating that certain fastener locations in the window
corner surround structure are subject to widespread fatigue damage
(WFD). This AD requires repetitive high frequency eddy current (HFEC)
inspections for cracking in certain fastener locations in the window
corner surround structure, and repair if necessary. We are issuing this
AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking around certain fastener
locations that could cause multiple window corner skin cracks, which
could result in rapid decompression and consequent loss of structural
integrity of the airplane.
DATES: This AD is effective November 15, 2016.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of November 15,
2016.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone:
206-544-5000, extension 1; fax: 206-766-5680; Internet: https://www.myboeingfleet.com.You may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425-227-1221. It is also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
5042.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
5042; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gaetano Settineri, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-
6577; fax: 425-917-6590; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all The Boeing Company
Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900 and -900ER series airplanes. The
NPRM published in the Federal Register on April 5, 2016 (81 FR 19512)
(``the NPRM''). The NPRM was prompted by an evaluation by the DAH
indicating that certain fastener locations in the window corner
surround structure are subject to WFD. The NPRM proposed to require
repetitive HFEC inspections for cracking in certain fastener locations
in the window corner surround structure, and repair if necessary. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking around
certain fastener locations that could cause multiple window corner skin
cracks, which could result in rapid decompression and consequent loss
of structural integrity of the airplane.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and
the FAA's response to each comment.
Support for the NPRM
Boeing and the Airline Pilots Association, International supported
the content of the NPRM.
Effect of Winglets on Accomplishment of the Proposed Actions
Aviation Partners Boeing stated that accomplishing the supplemental
type certificate (STC) ST00830SE does not affect compliance with the
actions specified in the NPRM.
We agree with the commenter. We have redesignated paragraph (c) as
(c)(1) and added a new paragraph (c)(2) to this AD to state that
installation of STC ST00830SE does not affect the ability to accomplish
the actions required by this final rule. Therefore, for airplanes on
which STC ST00830SE is installed, a ``change in product'' alternative
method of compliance (AMOC) approval request is not necessary to comply
with the requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.
Request for Clarification of Extent of Boeing Organization Designation
Authority (ODA)
Southwest Airlines (SWA) asked for clarification that the Boeing
ODA identified in paragraph (i)(3) of the proposed AD can provide an
AMOC for any ``repair, modification, or alteration'' that includes the
authority to approve existing repairs in the inspection area that
inhibit accomplishment of the AD requirements as terminating action to
paragraph (g) of the proposed AD. SWA also asked if the ODA has the
authority to provide alternative inspection procedures for repaired
areas where the inspection in paragraph (g) of the proposed AD cannot
be accomplished. Additionally, SWA asked that we clarify that the
Boeing ODA identified in paragraph (i)(3) of the proposed AD is able to
issue an AMOC to the proposed AD for an existing repair at the S-14 lap
joint (where the location of the repair inhibits accomplishing the
initial inspection), provided the repair was approved by any FAA
designation authority, and there is a minimum of three fastener rows
above and below the lap joint. SWA stated that neither Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1351, dated July 8, 2015, nor the NPRM clearly
state how to address existing repairs that prevent
[[Page 70012]]
accomplishment of the inspections specified in paragraph (g) of the
proposed AD.
We agree with the commenter that clarification of the extent of the
authority of the Boeing ODA is necessary. The Boeing ODA has the
authority to evaluate existing repairs and provide alternative
inspection programs in the repaired area, including authority to
approve alternative inspections as AMOCs if needed.
We infer that SWA is also asking if the Boeing ODA can issue a
global AMOC for the referenced repair at the S-14 lap joint. The Boeing
ODA does not have the authority to approve global AMOCs. In addition,
we have not received any information from Boeing that defines such a
repair that would be considered for a global AMOC. If Boeing provides
supporting data, we will evaluate the data to determine if that repair
and any associated inspections provide an acceptable level of safety
for such an AMOC. We have not changed this AD in this regard.
Change to This AD
We have determined that the end level effect of the unsafe
condition in the NPRM should be changed to more closely match the
service information. Therefore, we have changed ``. . . reduced
structural integrity'' to ``. . . loss of structural integrity'' in the
SUMMARY and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION sections and in paragraph (e) of
this AD accordingly.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
<bullet> Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
<bullet> Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1351, dated July
8, 2015. The service information describes procedures for HFEC
inspections and repair for cracking in certain fastener locations in
the window corner surround structure. This service information is
reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business or by the means identified in
the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 1,528 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection....................... 38 work-hours x $85 $0 $3,230 per $4,935,440 per
per hour = $3,230 inspection cycle. inspection cycle
per inspection
cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have received no definitive data that will enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2016-20-14 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-18680; FAA-2016-5042;
Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-140-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective November 15, 2016.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
(1) This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -
700, -700C, -800, -900 and -900ER series airplanes, certificated in
any category.
(2) Installation of Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
ST00830SE (http://
[[Page 70013]]
rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgSTC.nsf/0/
38B606833BBD98B386257FAA00602538?OpenDocument&Highlight=st00830se)
does not affect the ability to accomplish the actions required by
this AD. Therefore, for airplanes on which STC ST00830SE is
installed, a ``change in product'' alternative method of compliance
(AMOC) approval request is not necessary to comply with the
requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by an evaluation by the design approval
holder indicating that certain fastener locations in the window
corner surround structure are subject to widespread fatigue damage.
We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking around
certain fastener locations that could cause multiple window corner
skin cracks, which could result in rapid decompression and
consequent loss of structural integrity of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Repetitive Inspections and Repair
At the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1351, dated
July 8, 2015: Do an external high frequency eddy current (HFEC)
inspection for cracking of the skin around the fastener locations at
the upper forward and lower aft corners of each window between
station (STA) 360 and STA 540, as applicable, and at the lower
forward and upper aft corners of each window between STA 727 and STA
887, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1351, dated July 8, 2015. Repeat the
inspection thereafter at the applicable times specified in paragraph
1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1351,
dated July 8, 2015. If any crack is found during any inspection,
repair before further flight using a method approved in accordance
with the procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this AD.
(h) Exception to the Service Bulletin Specifications
Although Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1351, dated July
8, 2015, specifies to contact Boeing for repair instructions, and
specifies that action as ``RC'' (Required for Compliance), this AD
requires repair before further flight using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this
AD.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. To be approved, the
repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must
meet the certification basis of the airplane and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(4) Except as required by paragraph (h) of this AD: For service
information that contains steps that are labeled as RC, the
provisions of paragraphs (i)(4)(i) and (i)(4)(ii) of this AD apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. If a step or substep is labeled ``RC Exempt,'' then the
RC requirement is removed from that step or substep. An AMOC is
required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and
identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Gaetano Settineri,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle ACO,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6577;
fax: 425-917-6590; email: [email protected].
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1351, dated July 8,
2015.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone: 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax: 206-766-5680; Internet: https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information at FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 28, 2016.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-24197 Filed 10-7-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T02:25:14.054551+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- 122120245b0005caa5cb90e063790983483c82d7c21e2086dc0b9a7241c1952a
- Text SHA-256
- 9a96f658af74be63b0a9d3b111a8dad6391f0676483ca7b89fa24fd2db8a5d05
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.