Published 2021-08-09 · Federal Register document 2021-16972
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
Publication summary
The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The Boeing Company Model 737-8, 737-9, and 737-8200 (737 MAX) airplanes; and certain Model 737-800 and 737-900ER series airplanes. This AD was prompted by the determination that the aft cargo compartment fire suppression capability is reduced if the airplane is dispatched or released with failed electronic flow control of air conditioning packs, as is currently allowed by these airplane models' master minimum equipment lists (MMELs). This AD prohibits the carriage of cargo in the aft cargo compartment when the airplane is dispatched or released with failed electronic flow control of air conditioning packs. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:24:08.106391+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2021-9c919420683447c6
- Source row
- results[286]
- Raw source SHA-256
- 9c919420683447c683ad0c877cb886e341c11862be32b47c536a001b1d76dcb5
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2021-16-15
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 2021-08-09
Read 11 complete recorded clauses
Effective Date
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective August 9, 2021.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 12503–12591, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: adc4d05d62cbcc05808d99e7bb5c8dd51e96acfe51b3eaa1c4362d7d7ea798e7
Affected ADs
(b) Affected ADs
None.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 12591–12620, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 871a4afc60ceeae06e8010585055188633d616078500c45937092bfe892239c0
Applicability wording · Applicability
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company airplanes, certificated in
any category, as identified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (3) of this
AD.
(1) All Model 737-8, 737-9, and 737-8200 airplanes.
(2) Model 737-800 series airplanes, line numbers 5684 and 5759
and subsequent.
(3) Model 737-900ER series airplanes, line numbers 5768 and
subsequent.
[[Page 43406]]
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 12620–13017, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: fafa405dba63d4dec7574176964244a7d27a8d6da377edbee8e913f6e35fee82
Subject
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 21, Air
conditioning.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 13017–13106, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 4559961ca6107c11a5eacb5b2e5c370f6e8c7d916a39a2ccb50d70924217ec30
Unsafe Condition
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by the determination that the aft cargo
fire suppression capability is reduced if the airplane is dispatched
or released with failed electronic flow control of air conditioning
packs. The FAA is issuing this AD to address this condition, which
can result in an uncontained aft cargo compartment fire due to
insufficient cargo fire suppression capability.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 13106–13514, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 7cb9d19439c868875dd6b579ed4ce9dc4cce779ecb710b4fc7fd07701717c083
Compliance
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 13514–13616, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 00fbfa31932483f627d0ce0a11cbd2e35e15d9231842b91ac85623ce533912d3
Conditions for Prohibited Operation
(g) Conditions for Prohibited Operation
Beginning August 19, 2021, no person may dispatch or release an
airplane with cargo in the aft cargo compartment with failed
electronic flow control of air conditioning packs, unless the aft
cargo compartment remains empty, or is verified by the operator to
contain only non-combustible and/or non-flammable empty cargo
handling equipment, ballast, and/or fly-away kits.
Note 1 to paragraph (g): The operator's existing FAA-approved
minimum equipment list (MEL) defines which items are approved for
inclusion in the fly-away kits, and which materials may be used as
ballast.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 13616–14249, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: caefb97fa87cd367bc353689e74b73afa3a6a9795632b52aba8935ccc52fcb4d
Minimum Equipment List (MEL) Items
(h) Minimum Equipment List (MEL) Items
The master minimum equipment list (MMEL) items specified in
paragraphs (h)(1) and (2) of this AD are affected by the prohibition
specified in paragraph (g) of this AD, and therefore may affect the
operator's existing FAA-approved MEL.
(1) For Model 737-8, 737-9, and 737-8200 airplanes: MMEL System
No. 21, Sequence No. 51-02-01, ``Electronic Flow Control.''
(2) For Model 737-800 and 737-900ER series airplanes: MMEL
System No. 21, Sequence No. 02-03, ``Electronic Flow Control.''
Note 2 to paragraph (h): The MMEL items specified in paragraph
(h) of this AD can be found in the applicable FAA-approved MMEL:
Boeing 737 (B-737-100/200/300/400/500/600/700/800/900/900ER) MMEL,
Revision 61, dated July 8, 2020; and Boeing 737 MAX (B-737-8/-8200/-
9) MMEL, Revision 3, dated April 12, 2021. These MMELs can be found
on the Flight Standards Information Management System (FSIMS)
website, https://fsims.faa.gov/PICResults.aspx?mode=Publication&doctype=MMELByModel.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 14249–15277, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 27442220284974b56cb131787fdd135f53e4b800e0f2094e622fd5edcedd7c9a
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office,
as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of
the certification office, send it to the attention of the person
identified in Related Information. Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by The Boeing Company Organization Designation
Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To be approved, the repair
method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 15277–16499, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 3dd0a5d02c3800cdd23a57b2d083e3c33fca479fb024fd831e687fa11b0469f5
Related Information
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Sam Nalbandian,
Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Section,
FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
phone and fax: 206-231-3993; email: [email protected].
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 16499–16784, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 5464db9e0f5103e377d9691027902d5a224f25d532a1ef0bed60c876a2fd1342
Material Incorporated by Reference
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
None.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 16784–16835, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 3cd458e4139c18aa2b217c588b225868252e2c1201e03a6c776e06e2cf7b2987
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2021-16-15 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 6fd368b8e1f987baa787c66996190c37155b1a1b3d71972376de6404a59af56e. Source manifest: 98d3870487d08cabbe98f714c1fd629b5d24b7f3b9bccf2e5febd4758d2b2e23.
Official source · 2021-08-09
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 150 (Monday, August 9, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43404-43406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16972]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2021-0614; Project Identifier AD-2021-00831-T;
Amendment 39-21677; AD 2021-16-15]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
The Boeing Company Model 737-8, 737-9, and 737-8200 (737 MAX)
airplanes; and certain Model 737-800 and 737-900ER series airplanes.
This AD was prompted by the determination that the aft cargo
compartment fire suppression capability is reduced if the airplane is
dispatched or released with failed electronic flow control of air
conditioning packs, as is currently allowed by these airplane models'
master minimum equipment lists (MMELs). This AD prohibits the carriage
of cargo in the aft cargo compartment when the airplane is dispatched
or released with failed electronic flow control of air conditioning
packs. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on
these products.
DATES: This AD is effective August 9, 2021.
The FAA must receive comments on this AD by September 23, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
<bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
<bullet> Fax: 202-493-2251.
<bullet> Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
<bullet> Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0614; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, any
comments received, and other information. The street address for Docket
Operations is listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sam Nalbandian, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206-
231-3993; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The FAA was notified by Boeing in March 2021 of a potential concern
that the aft cargo compartment fire suppression capability is reduced
on affected airplanes if the airplane is dispatched or released with
failed electronic flow control of air conditioning packs, as is
currently allowed by the existing FAA-approved MMEL of the affected
airplane models. This MMEL allowance can result in the inability to
contain a fire in the aft cargo compartment due to increased air
leakage that degrades the fire suppression performance. A failed
electronic flow control of air conditioning packs would significantly
increase the pack airflow and cargo compartment air leakage. In April
2021, Boeing advised the FAA that such increased leakage could result
in insufficient concentration of Halon fire suppressant in the aft
cargo compartment, which can result in the inability to contain a fire
for the time necessary to divert to a suitable airport.
The FAA is issuing this AD to address failed electronic flow
control of air conditioning packs, which can result in an uncontained
aft cargo compartment fire due to insufficient cargo fire suppression
capability. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition
on these products.
FAA's Determination
The FAA is issuing this AD because the agency has determined the
unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop in
other products of the same type design.
AD Requirements
This AD prohibits dispatch or release of an airplane with cargo in
the aft cargo compartment with failed electronic flow control of air
conditioning packs. The AD specifically allows non-combustible and/or
non-flammable empty cargo handling equipment, ballast, and/or fly-away
kits in the aft cargo compartment.
MMEL Revisions
This AD refers to items in ATA System No. 21, Air Conditioning, of
Boeing 737 (B-737-100/200/300/400/500/600/700/800/900/900ER) MMEL,
Revision 61, dated July 8, 2020; and Boeing 737 MAX (B-737-8/-8200/-9)
MMEL, Revision 3, dated April 12, 2021; \1\ those items may also be
included in an operator's FAA-approved minimum equipment list (MEL).
This AD prohibits dispatch or release of the airplane under conditions
currently allowed by those items in the MMEL. The FAA plans to revise
the MMELs to modify those items; operators would then be required to
also revise their applicable existing FAA-approved MEL accordingly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The MMEL items can be found in the applicable FAA-approved
MMEL, which can be found on the Flight Standards Information
Management System (FSIMS) website, https://fsims.faa.gov/PICResults.aspx?mode=Publication&doctype=MMELByModel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Justification for Immediate Adoption and Determination of the Effective
Date
Section 553(b)(3)(B) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 551 et seq.) authorizes agencies to dispense with notice and
comment procedures for rules when the agency, for ``good cause,'' finds
that those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to
the public interest.'' Under this section, an agency, upon finding good
cause, may issue a
[[Page 43405]]
final rule without providing notice and seeking comment prior to
issuance. Further, section 553(d) of the APA authorizes agencies to
make rules effective in less than thirty days, upon a finding of good
cause.
An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD without providing an opportunity for public comments prior to
adoption. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public
justifies forgoing notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule
because failed electronic flow control of air conditioning packs can
result in an uncontained aft cargo compartment fire due to insufficient
cargo fire suppression capability. Accordingly, notice and opportunity
for prior public comment are impracticable and contrary to the public
interest pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).
In addition, the FAA finds that good cause exists pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(d) for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days,
for the same reasons the FAA found good cause to forgo notice and
comment.
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any written data, views, or arguments
about this final rule. Send your comments to an address listed under
ADDRESSES. Include Docket No. FAA-2021-0614 and Project Identifier AD-
2021-00831-T at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the final rule, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this final rule because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this final rule.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this AD contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this AD, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this AD. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Sam
Nalbandian, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems
Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA
98198; phone and fax: 206-231-3993; email: [email protected].
Any commentary that the FAA receives that is not specifically
designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket for this
rulemaking.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) do not
apply when an agency finds good cause pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 to adopt
a rule without prior notice and comment. Because the FAA has determined
that it has good cause to adopt this rule without notice and comment,
RFA analysis is not required.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD affects 663 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
The FAA has determined that revising the operator's existing FAA-
approved MEL, if accomplished in association with compliance for the
requirements of this AD, would take an average of 90 work-hours per
operator, although the agency recognizes that this number may vary from
operator to operator. Since operators typically incorporate MEL changes
for their affected fleets, the FAA has determined that a per-operator
estimate is more accurate than a per-airplane estimate. Therefore, the
FAA estimates the average total cost per operator to be $7,650 (90
work-hours x $85 per work-hour).
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866, and
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:
2021-16-15 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-21677; Docket No. FAA-
2021-0614; Project Identifier AD-2021-00831-T.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective August 9, 2021.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company airplanes, certificated in
any category, as identified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (3) of this
AD.
(1) All Model 737-8, 737-9, and 737-8200 airplanes.
(2) Model 737-800 series airplanes, line numbers 5684 and 5759
and subsequent.
(3) Model 737-900ER series airplanes, line numbers 5768 and
subsequent.
[[Page 43406]]
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 21, Air
conditioning.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by the determination that the aft cargo
fire suppression capability is reduced if the airplane is dispatched
or released with failed electronic flow control of air conditioning
packs. The FAA is issuing this AD to address this condition, which
can result in an uncontained aft cargo compartment fire due to
insufficient cargo fire suppression capability.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Conditions for Prohibited Operation
Beginning August 19, 2021, no person may dispatch or release an
airplane with cargo in the aft cargo compartment with failed
electronic flow control of air conditioning packs, unless the aft
cargo compartment remains empty, or is verified by the operator to
contain only non-combustible and/or non-flammable empty cargo
handling equipment, ballast, and/or fly-away kits.
Note 1 to paragraph (g): The operator's existing FAA-approved
minimum equipment list (MEL) defines which items are approved for
inclusion in the fly-away kits, and which materials may be used as
ballast.
(h) Minimum Equipment List (MEL) Items
The master minimum equipment list (MMEL) items specified in
paragraphs (h)(1) and (2) of this AD are affected by the prohibition
specified in paragraph (g) of this AD, and therefore may affect the
operator's existing FAA-approved MEL.
(1) For Model 737-8, 737-9, and 737-8200 airplanes: MMEL System
No. 21, Sequence No. 51-02-01, ``Electronic Flow Control.''
(2) For Model 737-800 and 737-900ER series airplanes: MMEL
System No. 21, Sequence No. 02-03, ``Electronic Flow Control.''
Note 2 to paragraph (h): The MMEL items specified in paragraph
(h) of this AD can be found in the applicable FAA-approved MMEL:
Boeing 737 (B-737-100/200/300/400/500/600/700/800/900/900ER) MMEL,
Revision 61, dated July 8, 2020; and Boeing 737 MAX (B-737-8/-8200/-
9) MMEL, Revision 3, dated April 12, 2021. These MMELs can be found
on the Flight Standards Information Management System (FSIMS)
website, https://fsims.faa.gov/PICResults.aspx?mode=Publication&doctype=MMELByModel.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office,
as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of
the certification office, send it to the attention of the person
identified in Related Information. Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by The Boeing Company Organization Designation
Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To be approved, the repair
method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Sam Nalbandian,
Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Section,
FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
phone and fax: 206-231-3993; email: [email protected].
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
None.
Issued on July 29, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-16972 Filed 8-5-21; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T01:49:10.399212+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- 17133efb30ace51285856688798ba1b38b905bc2a0ef7b8e755580cddf0ea76c
- Text SHA-256
- 6fd368b8e1f987baa787c66996190c37155b1a1b3d71972376de6404a59af56e
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.