Published 1995-03-07 · Federal Register document 95-4367
Airworthiness Directives; Beech Aircraft Corporation Models 34C, T-34C, and T-34C-1 Airplanes
Publication summary
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to certain Beech Aircraft Corporation (Beech) Models 34C, T- 34C, and T-34C-1 airplanes. This action requires replacing the eight wing attachment steel bolts and hardware with Inconel bolts and hardware. A report of the right lower aft wing attachment nut assembly separating in two pieces on a Model T-34C-1 airplane prompted this action. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent the wing from separating from the fuselage because of failure of this assembly.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:22:45.181447+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_1995-d388da652c36fb86
- Source row
- results[21]
- Raw source SHA-256
- d388da652c36fb862a990338aa93565a36590a27a9a9051dd7d67a85eb7db2e9
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 95-04-10
- Effective date printed in this edition
- Unknown
Some source clauses remain unstructured. Read the complete publication for conditions that have not been interpreted here.
Read 2 complete recorded clauses
Applicability wording · Applicability
Applicability: The following model and serial number airplanes,
certificated in any [[Page 12407]] category, that have steel wing
attachment assembly bolts and hardware:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Model Serial numbers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
34C.............................. GP-1 through GP-50.
T-34C............................ GL-2 through GL-353.
T-34C-1.......................... GM-1 through GM-71 and GM-78 through
GM-98.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 6704–7466, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 8bab7576206618e0544fe8b91b1759691cb85afd0aef59b0b98159cac5eea8fa
Compliance and requirements
Compliance: Within whichever of the following occurs later,
unless already accomplished:
<bullet> Four years after airplane manufacture;
<bullet> Four years after installing a new wing attachment
assembly; or
<bullet> Within the next 30 calendar days after the effective
date of this AD.
To prevent the wing from separating from the fuselage because of
failure of the wing attachment nut assembly, accomplish the following:
(a) Replace all eight steel wing attach bolts and hardware with
Inconel bolts and hardware in accordance with the ACCOMPLISHMENT
INSTRUCTIONS section in Beech Service Bulletin No. 2487, dated August
19 1993.
Note 1: Replacing all eight steel wing attach bolts and hardware
with Inconel bolts and hardware as required by this AD eliminates
the repetitive inspection requirements of AD 85-22-05, Amendment 39-
5146, for the affected airplanes.
(b) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
(c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an equivalent level of safety may be
approved by the Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita,
Kansas 67209. The request shall be forwarded through an appropriate
FAA Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to
the Manager, Wichita ACO.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Wichita ACO.
(d) The replacements required by this AD shall be done in
accordance with Beech Service Bulletin No. 2487, dated August 1993.
This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. Copies may be obtained from the Beech Aircraft Corporation, P.O.
Box 85, Wichita, Kansas 67201-0085. Copies may be inspected at the
FAA, Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, Room
1558, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri, or at the Office of
the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
(e) This amendment (39-9162) becomes effective on April 7, 1995.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 7466–9905, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: af25552b0040b9cc50510f4823311a0deb0c82ae2fc8e64fadfabd31bf79445a
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 95-04-10 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: f791d306ae3b7a242b0f9d279d1d669cc1243eedcea25e57cb014d57ecbe9b9e. Source manifest: aa80fbf0786627fdad998b92a0b848e877e3d16a42082c51b1acb28f2ffb24f2.
Official source · 1995-03-07
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12406-12407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4367]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 94-CE-07-AD; Amendment 39-9162; AD 95-04-10]
Airworthiness Directives; Beech Aircraft Corporation Models 34C,
T-34C, and T-34C-1 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that
applies to certain Beech Aircraft Corporation (Beech) Models 34C, T-
34C, and T-34C-1 airplanes. This action requires replacing the eight
wing attachment steel bolts and hardware with Inconel bolts and
hardware. A report of the right lower aft wing attachment nut assembly
separating in two pieces on a Model T-34C-1 airplane prompted this
action. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent the
wing from separating from the fuselage because of failure of this
assembly.
DATES: Effective April 7, 1995.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of April 7, 1995.
ADDRESSES: Service information that applies to this AD may be obtained
from the Beech Aircraft Corporation, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas
67201-0085. This information may also be examined at the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Assistant
Chief Counsel, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol
Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Larry Engler, Aerospace Engineer,
Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, 1801 Airport Road, Mid-
Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone (316) 946-4122;
facsimile (316) 946-4407.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an AD that would apply
to certain Beech Models 34-C, T-34C, and T-34C-1 airplanes was
published in the Federal Register on October 25, 1994 (59 FR 53613).
The action proposed to require replacing the eight wing attachment
steel bolts and hardware with Inconel bolts and hardware.
Accomplishment of the proposed replacements would be in accordance with
Beech Service Bulletin No. 2487, dated August 1993.
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. No comments were received on the
proposed rule or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.
After careful review of all information related to the subject
discussed above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public
interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed except for minor
editorial corrections. The FAA has determined that these minor
corrections will not change the meaning of the AD or add any additional
burden upon the public than was already proposed.
The compliance time of this AD is presented in calendar time
instead of hours time-in-service (TIS). The FAA has determined that a
calendar time compliance is the most desirable method because the
unsafe condition described by this AD is caused by stress corrosion.
Stress corrosion initiates as a result of airplane operation, but can
continue to develop regardless of whether the airplane is in service or
in storage. Therefore, to ensure that the above-referenced condition is
detected and corrected on all airplanes within a reasonable period of
time without inadvertently grounding any airplanes, a compliance
schedule based upon calendar time instead of hours TIS is required.
The FAA estimates that 494 airplanes in the U.S. registry will be
affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 8 workhours per
airplane to accomplish the required action, and that the average labor
rate is approximately $60 an hour. Parts cost approximately $800 per
airplane. Based on these figures, the total cost impact of the AD on
U.S. operators is estimated to be $632,320. This figure is based on the
assumption that no affected airplane owner/operator has accomplished
the required replacement.
The Beech Aircraft Company has informed the FAA that 89 wing
attachment assembly kits have been sold. Assuming that each of these
kits is installed on an affected airplane, this would reduce the cost
impact of the required AD upon U.S. operators of the affected airplanes
by $113,920 from $632,320 to $518,400.
The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final
rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A copy of the final evaluation prepared for this
action is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
by contacting the Rules Docket at the location provided under the
caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421 and 1423; 49 U.S.C.
106(g); and 14 CFR 11.89.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive
to read as follows:
95-04-10 Beech Aircraft Corporation: Amendment 39-9162; Docket No.
94-CE-07-AD.
Applicability: The following model and serial number airplanes,
certificated in any [[Page 12407]] category, that have steel wing
attachment assembly bolts and hardware:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Model Serial numbers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
34C.............................. GP-1 through GP-50.
T-34C............................ GL-2 through GL-353.
T-34C-1.......................... GM-1 through GM-71 and GM-78 through
GM-98.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compliance: Within whichever of the following occurs later,
unless already accomplished:
<bullet> Four years after airplane manufacture;
<bullet> Four years after installing a new wing attachment
assembly; or
<bullet> Within the next 30 calendar days after the effective
date of this AD.
To prevent the wing from separating from the fuselage because of
failure of the wing attachment nut assembly, accomplish the following:
(a) Replace all eight steel wing attach bolts and hardware with
Inconel bolts and hardware in accordance with the ACCOMPLISHMENT
INSTRUCTIONS section in Beech Service Bulletin No. 2487, dated August
19 1993.
Note 1: Replacing all eight steel wing attach bolts and hardware
with Inconel bolts and hardware as required by this AD eliminates
the repetitive inspection requirements of AD 85-22-05, Amendment 39-
5146, for the affected airplanes.
(b) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
(c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an equivalent level of safety may be
approved by the Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita,
Kansas 67209. The request shall be forwarded through an appropriate
FAA Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to
the Manager, Wichita ACO.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Wichita ACO.
(d) The replacements required by this AD shall be done in
accordance with Beech Service Bulletin No. 2487, dated August 1993.
This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. Copies may be obtained from the Beech Aircraft Corporation, P.O.
Box 85, Wichita, Kansas 67201-0085. Copies may be inspected at the
FAA, Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, Room
1558, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri, or at the Office of
the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
(e) This amendment (39-9162) becomes effective on April 7, 1995.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on February 14, 1995.
Barry D. Clements,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 95-4367 Filed 3-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T05:17:10.522250+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- 5af5d093fc1fabfe8bb2163ddca641375f36e3e019394c8478629c374d6300ca
- Text SHA-256
- f791d306ae3b7a242b0f9d279d1d669cc1243eedcea25e57cb014d57ecbe9b9e
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.