Back to publication catalog

Published 1997-08-21 · Federal Register document 97-22146

Airworthiness Directives; Raytheon Aircraft Company Model 1900D Airplanes (Formerly Known as Beech Aircraft Corporation Model 1900D Airplanes)

Publication summary

This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to Raytheon Aircraft Company (Raytheon) Model 1900D airplanes (formerly known as Beech Aircraft Corporation Model 1900D airplanes) that have not had the propeller removed and re-installed since factory installation. This action requires inspecting the propeller mounting bolts for the proper torque and replacing or re- torquing any propeller bolt with the wrong torque level. The manufacturer discovered some under-torqued propeller mounting bolts during factory installation of the propeller. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent fatigue cracking and failure of the propeller mounting bolts, which if not detected and corrected, could result in loss of the propeller.

Why this record is shown

Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:22:50.512496+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.

Source revision
federal_register_ad_metadata_1997-4a95ddfbb930f223
Source row
results[174]
Raw source SHA-256
4a95ddfbb930f2233fe4761cd510a4d543aa97184cc49c0aa329cb16e563cf78

Final-rule publication

Recorded publication clauses

AD identifier printed in this edition
97-17-08
Effective date printed in this edition
Unknown

No adopted-clause structure was recorded for this source edition. Read the complete text; no applicability conclusion has been inferred.

No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.

Find all recorded historical references to AD 97-17-08 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.

These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.

Why these observations are shown

They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.

Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: a844b5d9f81598d0456e84d37e8b4f2b4490ddaee368589a24f9d48a801be496. Source manifest: 70dd00382b0a892fea332c6e8578c8b52b953b745d1d4412a04aafe7723cc7f8.

Official source · 1997-08-21

Publication text

This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.

Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.

Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 162 (Thursday, August 21, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44404-44406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22146]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 97-CE-73-AD; Amendment 39-10111; AD 97-17-08]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Raytheon Aircraft Company Model 1900D 
Airplanes (Formerly Known as Beech Aircraft Corporation Model 1900D 
Airplanes)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that 
is applicable to Raytheon Aircraft Company (Raytheon) Model 1900D 
airplanes (formerly known as Beech Aircraft Corporation Model 1900D 
airplanes) that have not had the propeller removed and re-installed 
since factory installation. This action requires inspecting the 
propeller mounting bolts for the proper torque and replacing or re-
torquing any propeller bolt with the wrong torque level. The 
manufacturer discovered some under-torqued propeller mounting bolts 
during factory installation of the propeller. The actions specified by 
this AD are intended to prevent fatigue cracking and failure of the 
propeller mounting bolts, which if not detected and corrected, could 
result in loss of the propeller.

DATES: Effective September 24, 1997.
    Comments for inclusion in the rules docket must be received on or 
before October 30, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief 
Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket 97-CE-73-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th 
Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
    Service information that applies to this AD may be obtained from 
Raytheon Aircraft Company, 9709 E. Central, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, 
Kansas 67201-0085. This information may also be examined at the Federal 
Aviation Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Assistant 
Chief Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket 97-CE-73-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 
12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Randy Griffith, Aerospace 
Engineer, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, Room 100, 1801 Airport 
Rd., Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone (316) 946-4145; facsimile (316) 
946-4407.

[[Page 44405]]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The FAA has received three reports from operators and has recently 
been notified by Raytheon Aircraft Company (Raytheon) (formerly known 
as Beech Aircraft Corporation) that certain Raytheon Model 1900D 
airplane propellers were inadvertently installed with under-torqued 
propeller mounting bolts at factory installation. The bolts were not 
being torqued to the end torque requirement of 100 to 105 ft-lbs. These 
bolts have a three stage, wet torque requirement ending at a value of 
100 to 105 ft-lbs. Originally it was believed that the bolts were being 
torqued to at least 80 ft-lbs (the second stage of the torque 
procedure), but three cases of bolts with less than 60 ft-lbs have been 
reported. The manufacturer of the propeller and Raytheon notified the 
owners/operators of the affected Model 1900D airplanes (serial numbers 
(S/N) UE-176 through UE-280, UE-282 and UE-284) by ``urgent action'' 
letter. If the propeller bolts are not torqued to the right level, 
fatigue cracking could result.

Relevant Service Information

    Raytheon has issued an urgent action Letter No. 52-0092, dated July 
22, 1997, which references the propeller bolt torque problem and the 
recommended action to fix the torque levels.

The FAA's Determination

    After examining the circumstances and reviewing all available 
information related to the incidents described above, including the 
relevant service information, the FAA has determined that AD action 
should be taken to prevent fatigue cracking and failure of the 
propeller mounting bolts, which if not detected and corrected, could 
result in loss of the propeller.

Explanation of the Provisions of the AD

    Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
exist or develop in certain Raytheon Model 1900D airplanes of the same 
type design that have not had the propeller removed and re-installed, 
this AD requires inspecting the propeller mounting bolts for correct 
torque level, and re-torquing or replacing the bolts as necessary.

Determination of the Effective Date of the AD

    Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of 
this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for public 
prior comment hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for 
making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.

Comments Invited

    Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves 
requirements affecting immediate flight safety and, thus, was not 
preceded by notice and opportunity to comment, comments are invited on 
this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by 
submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire. 
Communications should identify the rules docket number and be submitted 
in triplicate to the address specified above. All communications 
received on or before the closing date for comments will be considered, 
and this rule may be amended in light of the comments received. Factual 
information that supports the commenter's ideas and suggestions is 
extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the AD action and 
determining whether additional rulemaking action would be needed.
    Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might 
suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be 
available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the 
rules docket for examination by interested persons. A report that 
summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this 
AD will be filed in the rules docket.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-addressed, 
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
to Docket No. 97-CE-73-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
returned to the commenter.

Regulatory Impact

    The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency 
regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe 
condition in aircraft, and is not a significant regulatory action under 
Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further that this action 
involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is determined that 
this emergency regulation otherwise would be significant under DOT 
Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final regulatory evaluation will 
be prepared and placed in the rules docket (otherwise, an evaluation is 
not required). A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the rules 
docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec. 39.13  [Amended]

    2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive 
(AD) to read as follows:

97-17-08. Raytheon Aircraft Company: Amendment 39-10111; Docket No. 
97-CE-73-AD.

    Applicability: Model 1900D airplanes (serial numbers UE-176 
through UE-280, UE-282 and UE-284) certificated in any category, 
that have not had the propeller removed and re-installed since 
factory installation, or have not had the attaching bolts re-
torqued.

    Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of 
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
address it.

    Compliance: Required within the next 50 hours time-in-service 
(TIS), unless already accomplished (accomplished according to 
Raytheon Aircraft Company Letter No. 52-0092, dated July 22, 1997).
    To prevent fatigue cracking and failure of the propeller 
mounting bolts, which if not detected and corrected, could result in 
loss of the propeller, accomplish the following:

[[Page 44406]]

    (a) Accomplish the following if the airplane records indicate 
that the propeller has not been removed and re-installed since the 
factory installation.
    (1) Remove spinner dome, cowling, and hardware as required to 
access propeller attachment bolts.
    (2) Reposition the beta system, using beta positioning tool, and 
remove the safety wire from the propeller mounting bolts (part 
number (P/N) B3347).
    (3) Check the torque level of the P/N B3347 propeller bolts.
    (i) If the torque is less than 60 ft-lbs, prior to further 
flight, replace the bolts with another FAA-approved propeller bolt 
using the installation procedures and torque sequence detailed in 
the Model 1900D Maintenance Manual (61-10-00) (A/Steps 1, 2, and B/
Step 3).
    (ii) If torque is 60 ft-lbs or greater, torque the bolts to a 
value of 100-105 ft-lbs using the torque sequence detailed in the 
Model 1900D Maintenance Manual (61-10-00) (B/Step 3).
    (4) Re-safety wire the propeller bolts and remove the beta 
system positioning tool.
    (5) Re-install the hardware, the spinner, and the cowlings.
    (b) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    (c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
compliance time that provides an equivalent level of safety may be 
approved by the Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, Room 
100, 1801 Airport Rd., Wichita, Kansas 67209. The request shall be 
forwarded through an appropriate FAA Maintenance Inspector, who may 
add comments and then send it to the Manager, Wichita Aircraft 
Certification Office.

    Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
obtained from Wichita Aircraft Certification Office.

    (d) Information related to this AD may be inspected at the FAA, 
Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, Room 1558, 
601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
    (e) This amendment (39-10111) becomes effective on September 24, 
1997.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on August 14, 1997.
Michael Gallagher,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 97-22146 Filed 8-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U


Why this text is shown

The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T05:10:30.888827+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.

Open the captured official edition

Source SHA-256
816c5121c3478929c83b54c36af333a435af1e72c69ffc472ac4aba12bdc3894
Text SHA-256
a844b5d9f81598d0456e84d37e8b4f2b4490ddaee368589a24f9d48a801be496

Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence

Coverage and limits

These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.

The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.