Published 1998-07-23 · Federal Register document 98-19459
Airworthiness Directives; Stemme GmbH & Co. KG Model S10-V Sailplanes
Publication summary
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to certain Stemme GmbH & Co. KG (Stemme) Model S10-V sailplanes. This AD requires replacing the propeller blade suspension forks with parts of improved design. This AD is the result of mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the airworthiness authority for Germany. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent propeller suspension fork failure caused by design deficiency, which could result in loss of a propeller blade and loss of sailplane controllability.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:22:53.985165+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_1998-f5c1cf5c93c99179
- Source row
- results[419]
- Raw source SHA-256
- f5c1cf5c93c99179023030016db80652e7593139090148c64a6fd533918aa991
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 98-15-24
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 1998-09-15
Some source clauses remain unstructured. Read the complete publication for conditions that have not been interpreted here.
Read 2 complete recorded clauses
Applicability wording · Applicability
Applicability: Model S10-V sailplanes (serial numbers (S/N) 14-
002 through 14-026, and converted sailplanes S/N 14-003M through 14-
063M), certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each sailplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For sailplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 6014–6937, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 60a39660f95f261ac0538fec5dd19a11d719a206b6119a6a11f857d388ce211a
Compliance and requirements
Compliance: Required upon the accumulation of 100 hours total
time-in-service (TIS) on the sailplane propeller or within the next
10 hours TIS after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later, unless already accomplished.
To prevent propeller suspension fork failure caused by design
deficiency, which could result in loss of a propeller blade and loss
of sailplane controllability, accomplish the following:
[[Page 39485]]
(a) Replace the following in accordance with pages 3 and 4 of
Stemme GmbH & Co. KG Service Bulletin No. 31-10-020, Am-index: 02.a,
dated October 7, 1996:
(1) The propeller blade suspension fork, part number (P/N) 0AP-
V08 (or an FAA-approved equivalent P/N), with a new propeller blade
suspension fork, P/N A09-10AP-V08 (or an FAA-approved equivalent P/
N);
(2) The propeller blade suspension fork distance ring, P/N 10AP-
V05 (or an FAA-approved equivalent P/N), with a new propeller fork
distance ring, P/N A09-10AP-V05 (or an FAA-approved equivalent P/N);
and
(3) The propeller blade suspension fork nut, P/N 10AP-V06 (or an
FAA-approved equivalent P/N), with a new propeller blade suspension
fork nut, P/N A09-10AP-V06 (or an FAA-approved equivalent part
number).
(b) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the sailplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
(c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an equivalent level of safety may be
approved by the Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1201
Walnut, suite 900, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. The request shall be
forwarded through an appropriate FAA Maintenance Inspector, who may
add comments and then send it to the Manager, Small Airplane
Directorate.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Small Airplane Directorate.
(d) Questions or technical information related to pages 3 and 4
of Stemme GmbH & Co. KG Service Bulletin No. A31-10-020, Am-index:
02.a, dated October 7, 1996, should be directed to Stemme GmbH & Co.
KG, Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25, D-13355 Berlin, Federal Republic of
Germany. This service information may be examined at the FAA,
Central Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, Room 1558, 601 E.
12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
(e) The replacements required by this AD shall be done in
accordance with pages 3 and 4 of Stemme GmbH & Co. KG Service
Bulletin No. A31-10-020, Am-index: 02.a, dated October 7, 1996. This
incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. Copies may be obtained from Stemme GmbH & Co. KG, Gustav-Meyer-
Allee 25, D-13355 Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany.
Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Central Region, office of
the Regional Counsel, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City,
Missouri, or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North
Capitol Street, NW, suite 700, Washington, DC.
Note 3: The subject of this AD is addressed in German AD 95-177/
2, dated January 30, 1997.
(f) This amendment becomes effective on September 15, 1998.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 6937–10315, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: a7690cea4ceee4cc6fe5a6c320983b060f7840ac7c2344951457595ec4cbd70d
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 98-15-24 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 5995f7881f910d61392d409751451c8724508e7279f59078ac06d7761c7663a6. Source manifest: d77791d0417f915cdfa1c714585a609feef29340b3ecee74e7ead47c4219562e.
Official source · 1998-07-23
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 141 (Thursday, July 23, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39484-39485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19459]
[[Page 39484]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 97-CE-128-AD; Amendment 39-10674; AD 98-15-24]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Stemme GmbH & Co. KG Model S10-V
Sailplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that
applies to certain Stemme GmbH & Co. KG (Stemme) Model S10-V
sailplanes. This AD requires replacing the propeller blade suspension
forks with parts of improved design. This AD is the result of mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the airworthiness
authority for Germany. The actions specified by this AD are intended to
prevent propeller suspension fork failure caused by design deficiency,
which could result in loss of a propeller blade and loss of sailplane
controllability.
DATES: Effective September 15, 1998.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of September 15, 1998.
ADDRESSES: Service information that applies to this AD may be obtained
from Stemme GmbH & Co. KG, Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25, D-13355 Berlin,
Federal Republic of Germany. This information may also be examined at
the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of
the Regional Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 97-CE-128-AD, Room
1558, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; or at the Office
of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Mike Kiesov, Aerospace Engineer,
Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, FAA, 1201
Walnut, suite 900, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 426-
6934; facsimile: (816) 426-2169.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Events Leading to the Issuance of This AD
A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR part 39) to include an AD that would apply to on certain Stemme
Model S10-V sailplanes was published in the Federal Register as a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on May 11, 1998 (63 FR 25787). The
NPRM proposed to require replacing the propeller blade suspension fork,
distance ring, and nut with parts of improved design. Accomplishment of
the proposed action as specified in the NPRM would be in accordance
with pages 3 and 4 of Stemme GmbH & Co. KG Service Bulletin No. A31-10-
020, Am-index: 02.a, dated October 7, 1996.
The NPRM was the result of mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) issued by the airworthiness authority for Germany.
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. No comments were received on the
proposed rule or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.
The FAA's Determination
After careful review of all available information related to the
subject presented above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the
public interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed except for
minor editorial corrections. The FAA has determined that these minor
corrections will not change the meaning of the AD and will not add any
additional burden upon the public than was already proposed.
Cost Impact
The FAA estimates that 7 sailplanes in the U.S. registry will be
affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 6 workhours per
sailplane to accomplish this action, and that the average labor rate is
approximately $60 an hour. Parts cost approximately $930 per sailplane.
Based on these figures, the total cost impact of this AD on U.S.
operators is estimated to be $9,030, or $1,290 per sailplane.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final
rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A copy of the final evaluation prepared for this
action is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
by contacting the Rules Docket at the location provided under the
caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive
(AD) to read as follows:
98-15-24 STEMME GMBH & CO. KG: Amendment 39-10674; Docket No. 97-
CE-128-AD.
Applicability: Model S10-V sailplanes (serial numbers (S/N) 14-
002 through 14-026, and converted sailplanes S/N 14-003M through 14-
063M), certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each sailplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For sailplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required upon the accumulation of 100 hours total
time-in-service (TIS) on the sailplane propeller or within the next
10 hours TIS after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later, unless already accomplished.
To prevent propeller suspension fork failure caused by design
deficiency, which could result in loss of a propeller blade and loss
of sailplane controllability, accomplish the following:
[[Page 39485]]
(a) Replace the following in accordance with pages 3 and 4 of
Stemme GmbH & Co. KG Service Bulletin No. 31-10-020, Am-index: 02.a,
dated October 7, 1996:
(1) The propeller blade suspension fork, part number (P/N) 0AP-
V08 (or an FAA-approved equivalent P/N), with a new propeller blade
suspension fork, P/N A09-10AP-V08 (or an FAA-approved equivalent P/
N);
(2) The propeller blade suspension fork distance ring, P/N 10AP-
V05 (or an FAA-approved equivalent P/N), with a new propeller fork
distance ring, P/N A09-10AP-V05 (or an FAA-approved equivalent P/N);
and
(3) The propeller blade suspension fork nut, P/N 10AP-V06 (or an
FAA-approved equivalent P/N), with a new propeller blade suspension
fork nut, P/N A09-10AP-V06 (or an FAA-approved equivalent part
number).
(b) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the sailplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
(c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an equivalent level of safety may be
approved by the Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1201
Walnut, suite 900, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. The request shall be
forwarded through an appropriate FAA Maintenance Inspector, who may
add comments and then send it to the Manager, Small Airplane
Directorate.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Small Airplane Directorate.
(d) Questions or technical information related to pages 3 and 4
of Stemme GmbH & Co. KG Service Bulletin No. A31-10-020, Am-index:
02.a, dated October 7, 1996, should be directed to Stemme GmbH & Co.
KG, Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25, D-13355 Berlin, Federal Republic of
Germany. This service information may be examined at the FAA,
Central Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, Room 1558, 601 E.
12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
(e) The replacements required by this AD shall be done in
accordance with pages 3 and 4 of Stemme GmbH & Co. KG Service
Bulletin No. A31-10-020, Am-index: 02.a, dated October 7, 1996. This
incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. Copies may be obtained from Stemme GmbH & Co. KG, Gustav-Meyer-
Allee 25, D-13355 Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany.
Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Central Region, office of
the Regional Counsel, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City,
Missouri, or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North
Capitol Street, NW, suite 700, Washington, DC.
Note 3: The subject of this AD is addressed in German AD 95-177/
2, dated January 30, 1997.
(f) This amendment becomes effective on September 15, 1998.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on July 15, 1998.
James E. Jackson,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 98-19459 Filed 7-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T05:00:10.808178+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- 1463fff4c0eb3ec92a9c6790829cf61e4e2b3548a732723f53386059fc5a30ff
- Text SHA-256
- 5995f7881f910d61392d409751451c8724508e7279f59078ac06d7761c7663a6
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.