Back to publication catalog

Published 1998-09-14 · Federal Register document 98-24549

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL-215-6B11 (CL-415 Variant) Series Airplanes

Publication summary

This action withdraws a direct final rule with request for comments that adopted a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to all Bombardier Model CL-215-6B11 (CL-415 Variant) series airplanes. That action would have required revising the Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) to provide the flightcrew with procedures to address a temporary loss of battery bus power during engine failure and consequent erroneous indications of hydraulic system pressure, brake pressure, rudder pressure, and rudder and elevator reversion to manual mode. Since the issuance of the direct final rule, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has received a written adverse comment. Accordingly, the direct final rule is withdrawn.

Why this record is shown

Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:22:53.985165+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.

Source revision
federal_register_ad_metadata_1998-f5c1cf5c93c99179
Source row
results[494]
Raw source SHA-256
f5c1cf5c93c99179023030016db80652e7593139090148c64a6fd533918aa991

Publication role unknown

Recorded publication clauses

AD identifier printed in this edition
Unknown
Effective date printed in this edition
Unknown

No adopted-clause structure was recorded for this source edition. Read the complete text; no applicability conclusion has been inferred.

No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.

These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.

Why these observations are shown

They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.

Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: c1505a9b27f0e516073c216b8c53958b7a21825399a8169d64f993eb318a3e17. Source manifest: e8cb8ea43968a34cc7016b7f89acea108990bbda2ba21b6f6dd04fbc8cb8efb5.

Official source · 1998-09-14

Publication text

This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.

Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.

Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 177 (Monday, September 14, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48997-48998]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-24549]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 98-NM-03-AD; Amendment 39-10487]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL-215-6B11 (CL-415 
Variant) Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action withdraws a direct final rule with request for 
comments that adopted a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to 
all Bombardier Model CL-215-6B11 (CL-415 Variant) series airplanes. 
That action would have required revising the Airplane Flight Manual 
(AFM) to provide the flightcrew with procedures to address a temporary 
loss of battery bus power during engine failure and consequent 
erroneous indications of hydraulic system pressure, brake pressure, 
rudder pressure, and rudder and elevator reversion to manual mode. 
Since the issuance of the direct final rule, the Federal Aviation 
Administration (FAA) has received a written adverse comment. 
Accordingly, the direct final rule is withdrawn.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rodrigo J. Huete, Flight Test Pilot, 
Systems and Flight Test Branch, ANE-172, FAA, Engine and Propeller 
Directorate, New York Aircraft Certification Office, 10 Fifth Street, 
Third Floor, Valley Stream, New York 11581; telephone (516) 256-7518; 
fax (516) 568-2716.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published a direct final rule with 
request for comments in the Federal Register on July 9, 1998 (63 FR 
37063). That direct final rule amended part 39 of the Federal Aviation 
Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to add a new airworthiness directive (AD), 
applicable to all Bombardier Model CL-215-6B11 (CL-415 Variant) series 
airplanes, to require revising the Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) to 
provide the flightcrew with procedures to address a temporary loss of 
battery bus power during engine failure and consequent erroneous 
indications of hydraulic system pressure, brake pressure, rudder 
pressure, and rudder and elevator reversion to manual mode. That action 
was prompted by issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness 
information by a foreign civil airworthiness authority. The specified 
actions were intended to ensure that the flightcrew is advised of the 
potential hazard associated with a temporary loss of battery bus power 
during failure of the left engine or the left generator on the left 
engine and of the procedures necessary to address it.

Actions Since the Issuance of the Direct Final Rule

    During the comment period for the direct final rule, the FAA 
received a written adverse comment. Accordingly, the direct final rule 
is hereby withdrawn.
    Withdrawal of this direct final rule constitutes only such action, 
and does

[[Page 48998]]

not preclude the agency from issuing a notice in the future, nor does 
it commit the agency to any course of action in the future.

Regulatory Impact

    Since this action only withdraws a direct final rule, it has no 
adverse economic impact and imposes no additional burden on any person. 
It will have no substantial direct effects on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is 
determined that this action does not have sufficient federalism 
implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Withdrawal

    Accordingly, the direct final rule with request for comments, 
Docket 98-NM-03-AD, published in the Federal Register on July 9, 1998 
(63 FR 37063), is withdrawn.
    Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 4, 1998.
Darrell M. Pederson,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 98-24549 Filed 9-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U


Why this text is shown

The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:58:55.559499+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.

Open the captured official edition

Source SHA-256
da00454030b0722d62eac32bdde11a2dad3f834a9cba89ee7984e85b22d6321b
Text SHA-256
c1505a9b27f0e516073c216b8c53958b7a21825399a8169d64f993eb318a3e17

Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence

Coverage and limits

These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.

The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.