Published 1998-09-16 · Federal Register document 98-24658
Airworthiness Directives; Saab Model SAAB 2000 Series Airplanes
Publication summary
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Saab Model SAAB 2000 series airplanes, that requires a one-time inspection to detect discrepancies of the electrical harness of the propeller de-icing system and of the hydraulic pressure pipe from the engine driven pump (EDP); and follow- on corrective actions, if necessary. This action is prompted by the issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness information by a foreign civil airworthiness authority. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent chafing of the hydraulic pressure pipe of the EDP, which could result in charring of the hydraulic tube and consequent engine compartment fire.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:22:53.985165+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_1998-f5c1cf5c93c99179
- Source row
- results[508]
- Raw source SHA-256
- f5c1cf5c93c99179023030016db80652e7593139090148c64a6fd533918aa991
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 98-19-19
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 1998-10-21
Some source clauses remain unstructured. Read the complete publication for conditions that have not been interpreted here.
Read 2 complete recorded clauses
Applicability wording · Applicability
Applicability: Saab Model SAAB 2000 series airplanes, serial
numbers 004 through 053 inclusive; certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 6749–7627, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: e19c61210b62999c73470390d1080e6d53b928e88b7a7297dd6e8b37d1f380fb
Compliance and requirements
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent chafing of the hydraulic pressure pipe of the engine
driven pump (EDP), which could result in charring of the hydraulic
tube and consequent engine compartment fire, accomplish the
following:
(a) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD,
accomplish the actions specified in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of
this AD, in accordance with Saab Service Bulletin SAAB 2000-30-014,
Revision 01, dated January 9, 1998.
(1) Perform a one-time inspection to detect discrepancies
(incorrect routing, insufficient clearance, and chafing) of the
electrical harness of the propeller de-icing system, left and right
sides. If any discrepancy is found, prior to further flight, repair
in accordance with the service bulletin. Repair of any discrepancy
may involve, but is not limited to, the following corrective
actions: Rerouting wires, ensuring adequate clearance between the
pipe and the harness, and repairing the electrical harness if
chafing has occurred through the outer jacket or into the wires.
(2) Perform a one-time visual inspection to detect chafing of
the hydraulic pipe of the EDP, left and right sides. If any chafing
is found, prior to further flight, replace the pipe with a new or
serviceable part.
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their
requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector,
who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the International Branch, ANM-116.
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
Secs. 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the
requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
(d) The actions shall be done in accordance with Saab Service
Bulletin SAAB 2000-30-014, Revision 01, dated January 9, 1998. This
incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. Copies may be obtained from Saab Aircraft AB, SAAB Aircraft
Product Support, S-581.88, Linkoping, Sweden. Copies may be
inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Note 3: The subject of this AD is addressed in Swedish
airworthiness directive SAD No. 1-121, dated January 9, 1998.
(e) This amendment becomes effective on October 21, 1998.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 7627–10579, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 87671197e39d053c64835b3825345853daf865d30624e9519a5112a06c9190ab
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 98-19-19 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 1b898e0c6f65ccb870513eb5897b8045ff8cfd58c282278fbee4ff87a1f15d31. Source manifest: 30290271acd45c54419f54a22d5bc019cdb02ccc5693bff862c212eca766e4a2.
Official source · 1998-09-16
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 179 (Wednesday, September 16, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 49420-49421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-24658]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 98-NM-42-AD; Amendment 39-10760; AD 98-19-19]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Saab Model SAAB 2000 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain Saab Model SAAB 2000 series airplanes, that
requires a one-time inspection to detect discrepancies of the
electrical harness of the propeller de-icing system and of the
hydraulic pressure pipe from the engine driven pump (EDP); and follow-
on corrective actions, if necessary. This action is prompted by the
issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness information by a foreign
civil airworthiness authority. The actions specified by this AD are
intended to prevent chafing of the hydraulic pressure pipe of the EDP,
which could result in charring of the hydraulic tube and consequent
engine compartment fire.
DATES: Effective October 21, 1998.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of October 21, 1998.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Saab Aircraft AB, SAAB Aircraft Product Support, S-
581.88, Linkping, Sweden. This information may be examined at the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate,
Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite
700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norman B. Martenson, Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
227-2110; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Saab Model SAAB 2000
series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on March 26,
1998 (63 FR 14651). That action proposed to require a one-time
inspection to detect discrepancies of the electrical harness of the
propeller de-icing system and of the hydraulic pressure pipe from the
engine driven pump (EDP); and follow-on corrective actions, if
necessary.
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
the comments received.
One commenter supports the proposed rule.
One commenter requests that the FAA change paragraph (a)(1) of the
proposed rule from ``prior to further flight, repair in accordance with
the service bulletin,'' to ``prior to further flight, if the routing is
not correct, it must be rerouted in accordance with Saab Service
Bulletin SAAB 2000-30-14 (the appropriate service information
referenced in the proposed rule); that a minimum clearance between the
pipe and harness has to be assured; and that, if there is chafing
through the outer jacket or into the wires, the electrical harness
should be repaired.'' The commenter provided no justification for the
suggested change to the proposed rule.
The FAA concurs that the actions to correct any discrepancies could
be more specific. Therefore, the FAA has revised paragraph (a)(1) of
the final rule to further define and clarify specific ``repair''
actions as the commenter requests, and as specified in the service
bulletin.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comments
noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public
interest require the adoption of the rule with the change described
previously. The FAA has determined that this change will neither
increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of
the AD.
Cost Impact
The FAA estimates that 3 airplanes of U.S. registry will be
affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 1 work hour per
airplane to accomplish the inspection, and that the average labor rate
is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the
proposed AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $180, or $60 per
airplane.
The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that
no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed requirements of
this AD
[[Page 49421]]
action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final
rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
98-19-19 SAAB AIRCRAFT AB: Amendment 39-10760. Docket 98-NM-42-AD.
Applicability: Saab Model SAAB 2000 series airplanes, serial
numbers 004 through 053 inclusive; certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent chafing of the hydraulic pressure pipe of the engine
driven pump (EDP), which could result in charring of the hydraulic
tube and consequent engine compartment fire, accomplish the
following:
(a) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD,
accomplish the actions specified in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of
this AD, in accordance with Saab Service Bulletin SAAB 2000-30-014,
Revision 01, dated January 9, 1998.
(1) Perform a one-time inspection to detect discrepancies
(incorrect routing, insufficient clearance, and chafing) of the
electrical harness of the propeller de-icing system, left and right
sides. If any discrepancy is found, prior to further flight, repair
in accordance with the service bulletin. Repair of any discrepancy
may involve, but is not limited to, the following corrective
actions: Rerouting wires, ensuring adequate clearance between the
pipe and the harness, and repairing the electrical harness if
chafing has occurred through the outer jacket or into the wires.
(2) Perform a one-time visual inspection to detect chafing of
the hydraulic pipe of the EDP, left and right sides. If any chafing
is found, prior to further flight, replace the pipe with a new or
serviceable part.
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their
requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector,
who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the International Branch, ANM-116.
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
Secs. 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the
requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
(d) The actions shall be done in accordance with Saab Service
Bulletin SAAB 2000-30-014, Revision 01, dated January 9, 1998. This
incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. Copies may be obtained from Saab Aircraft AB, SAAB Aircraft
Product Support, S-581.88, Linkoping, Sweden. Copies may be
inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Note 3: The subject of this AD is addressed in Swedish
airworthiness directive SAD No. 1-121, dated January 9, 1998.
(e) This amendment becomes effective on October 21, 1998.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 9, 1998.
Darrell M. Pederson,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 98-24658 Filed 9-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:58:42.585792+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- bbf1ca7b7913d8a12de067f3932bbcb9b2ec2e23aa559a5aacd13de23e30f679
- Text SHA-256
- 1b898e0c6f65ccb870513eb5897b8045ff8cfd58c282278fbee4ff87a1f15d31
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.