Published 1998-11-25 · Federal Register document 98-31318
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 Series Airplanes
Publication summary
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain MD-11 series airplanes, that requires a one-time visual inspection to detect discrepancies of the seat tracks and adjacent structure underneath lavatories, and repair, if necessary. This amendment also requires installation of a non-metallic barrier on the bottom of each lavatory foot fitting, and replacement of existing seat track fittings with new seat track fittings. This amendment is prompted by reports of galvanic corrosion found on the seat tracks at attachment points under certain lavatories. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent corrosion of seat tracks and adjacent structure. Corrosion of the seat tracks and adjacent structure could result in shifting of lavatories, which could lead to injury of passengers and crew, as well as damage to aircraft structure and systems.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:22:53.985165+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_1998-f5c1cf5c93c99179
- Source row
- results[666]
- Raw source SHA-256
- f5c1cf5c93c99179023030016db80652e7593139090148c64a6fd533918aa991
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 98-24-24
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 1998-12-30
Some source clauses remain unstructured. Read the complete publication for conditions that have not been interpreted here.
Read 2 complete recorded clauses
Applicability wording · Applicability
Applicability: Model MD-11 series airplanes, as listed in
McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD11-53-043, Revision 02, dated
May 28, 1996; certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 6442–7365, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 4a17eae41ac11653eaee26c068d006b1922727d212c2095bf9e82b00bb7013b2
Compliance and requirements
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To detect and correct corrosion of seat tracks and adjacent
structure, which could result in shifting of lavatories causing
injury to passengers and crew, as well as damage to aircraft
structure and systems, accomplish the following:
(a) Within 15 months after the effective date of this AD,
conduct a visual inspection to detect discrepancies (i.e., corrosion
and breakage) of the seat tracks and adjacent structure at the
lavatory locations defined in JAMCO Service Bulletin MD11-25-1010,
dated July 12, 1994.
(1) If no discrepancy is detected, prior to further flight,
install a non-metallic barrier on the bottom of each lavatory foot
fitting and replace existing seat track fittings with new fittings,
in accordance with McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD-11-53-043,
Revision 02, dated May 28, 1996.
(2) If any discrepancy is detected, prior to further flight,
repair in accordance with the McDonnell Douglas MD-11 Structural
Repair Manual, or in accordance with a method approved by the
Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate. Prior to further flight following
accomplishment of the repair, install a non-metallic barrier on the
bottom of each lavatory foot fitting and replace existing seat track
fittings with new fittings, in accordance with McDonnell Douglas
Service Bulletin MD-11-53-043, Revision 02, dated May 28, 1996.
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO. Operators shall
submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal
Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the
Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
(d) The installation and replacement shall be done in accordance
with McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD11-53-043, Revision 02,
dated May 28, 1996. This incorporation by reference was approved by
the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from The Boeing
Company, Douglas Products Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long
Beach, California 90846, Attention: Technical Publications Business
Administration, Dept. C1-L51 (2-60). Copies may be inspected at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; or at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Los
Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard,
Lakewood, California; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800
North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
(e) This amendment becomes effective on December 30, 1998.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 7365–10560, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 579c48e1254ab5190a9ae513abaf92ad80c59c4c8d1a2a97050bf021685a2561
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 98-24-24 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: b3d4f8b294b8cab1ba96fb013eacc6062f423f46151ed838ab6420cc781acbc5. Source manifest: 59c983eb337d6720dcc5909744db7fba5ac32ddfbcdce3aaf937fe4481de8c32.
Official source · 1998-11-25
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 227 (Wednesday, November 25, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65047-65048]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-31318]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 98-NM-71-AD; Amendment 39-10910; AD 98-24-24]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain MD-11 series airplanes, that requires a one-time
visual inspection to detect discrepancies of the seat tracks and
adjacent structure underneath lavatories, and repair, if necessary.
This amendment also requires installation of a non-metallic barrier on
the bottom of each lavatory foot fitting, and replacement of existing
seat track fittings with new seat track fittings. This amendment is
prompted by reports of galvanic corrosion found on the seat tracks at
attachment points under certain lavatories. The actions specified by
this AD are intended to prevent corrosion of seat tracks and adjacent
structure. Corrosion of the seat tracks and adjacent structure could
result in shifting of lavatories, which could lead to injury of
passengers and crew, as well as damage to aircraft structure and
systems.
DATES: Effective December 30, 1998.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of December 30, 1998.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from The Boeing Company, Douglas Products Division, 3855
Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Technical
Publications Business Administration, Dept. C1-L51 (2-60). This
information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue,
SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard,
Lakewood, California; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800
North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Hsu, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Los
Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard,
Lakewood, California 90712-4137; telephone (562) 627-5323; fax (562)
627-5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain MD-11 series airplanes was
published in the Federal Register on September 3, 1998 (63 FR 46934).
That action proposed to require a one-time visual inspection to detect
discrepancies of the seat tracks and adjacent structure underneath
lavatories, and repair, if necessary. The action also proposed to
require installation of a non-metallic barrier on the bottom of each
lavatory foot fitting, and replacement of existing seat track fittings
with new seat track fittings.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
the single comment received.
The commenter supports the proposed rule.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comment
noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public
interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 143 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 46 airplanes of U.S. registry
will be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 40 work
hours per airplane to accomplish the required inspection, installation,
and replacement, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour.
Required parts will cost less than $1,000 per airplane. Based on these
figures, the cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be
$156,400, or $3,400 per airplane.
The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that
no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD
action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final
rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
[[Page 65048]]
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
98-24-24 McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39-10910. Docket 98-NM-71-AD.
Applicability: Model MD-11 series airplanes, as listed in
McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD11-53-043, Revision 02, dated
May 28, 1996; certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To detect and correct corrosion of seat tracks and adjacent
structure, which could result in shifting of lavatories causing
injury to passengers and crew, as well as damage to aircraft
structure and systems, accomplish the following:
(a) Within 15 months after the effective date of this AD,
conduct a visual inspection to detect discrepancies (i.e., corrosion
and breakage) of the seat tracks and adjacent structure at the
lavatory locations defined in JAMCO Service Bulletin MD11-25-1010,
dated July 12, 1994.
(1) If no discrepancy is detected, prior to further flight,
install a non-metallic barrier on the bottom of each lavatory foot
fitting and replace existing seat track fittings with new fittings,
in accordance with McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD-11-53-043,
Revision 02, dated May 28, 1996.
(2) If any discrepancy is detected, prior to further flight,
repair in accordance with the McDonnell Douglas MD-11 Structural
Repair Manual, or in accordance with a method approved by the
Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate. Prior to further flight following
accomplishment of the repair, install a non-metallic barrier on the
bottom of each lavatory foot fitting and replace existing seat track
fittings with new fittings, in accordance with McDonnell Douglas
Service Bulletin MD-11-53-043, Revision 02, dated May 28, 1996.
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO. Operators shall
submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal
Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the
Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
(d) The installation and replacement shall be done in accordance
with McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD11-53-043, Revision 02,
dated May 28, 1996. This incorporation by reference was approved by
the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from The Boeing
Company, Douglas Products Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long
Beach, California 90846, Attention: Technical Publications Business
Administration, Dept. C1-L51 (2-60). Copies may be inspected at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; or at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Los
Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard,
Lakewood, California; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800
North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
(e) This amendment becomes effective on December 30, 1998.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 17, 1998.
Darrell M. Pederson,
Acting Manager,
Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 98-31318 Filed 11-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:55:51.983864+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- 167d351c2050646e9147c43f27f4a1faff12c09f77d301daf485cf38c31713fd
- Text SHA-256
- b3d4f8b294b8cab1ba96fb013eacc6062f423f46151ed838ab6420cc781acbc5
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.