Published 1999-06-11 · Federal Register document 99-14821
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-200C Series Airplanes
Publication summary
This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to all Boeing Model 737-200C series airplanes, that currently requires a one-time external detailed visual inspection to detect cracks of the fuselage skin in the lower lobe cargo compartment; repetitive internal detailed visual inspections to detect cracks of the frames in the lower lobe cargo compartment; and repair of cracked parts. That AD also provides for an optional preventative modification that constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspections. This amendment requires accomplishment of the previously optional terminating modification. This amendment is prompted by reports of cracking in the body frames between stringers 19 left and 25 left and at body stations 360 to 500B. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent opening or loss of the cargo door during flight, and consequent rapid decompression of the airplane.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:22:57.343810+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_1999-e9a7378e7e7d30d5
- Source row
- results[232]
- Raw source SHA-256
- e9a7378e7e7d30d51578560dc0677c56bb1fef0a9323224e2a0afe1544919217
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 99-12-08
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 1999-07-16
Some source clauses remain unstructured. Read the complete publication for conditions that have not been interpreted here.
Read 2 complete recorded clauses
Applicability wording · Applicability
Applicability: All Model 737-200C series airplanes, certificated
in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d)(1)
of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect
of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 7072–7910, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: a9cf2d7d4d90b52c4bc4a865457c72c07e386d3e45f9be4c7b4b860164c59e0b
Compliance and requirements
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent opening or loss of the cargo door during flight, and
consequent rapid decompression of the airplane, accomplish the
following:
Restatement of Requirements of AD 93-13-02
(a) Prior to the accumulation of 29,000 flight cycles or within
250 flight cycles after August 9, 1993 (the effective date AD 93-13-
02, amendment 39-8615), whichever occurs later, accomplish an
external detailed visual inspection to detect cracks of the fuselage
skin between stringers 19 left and 25 left and at body stations 360
to 540, in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1160, dated October 24, 1991; or Boeing Service Bulletin 737-
53A1160, Revision 1, dated April 29, 1993. If any crack is found,
prior to further flight, accomplish the requirements of paragraphs
(a)(1) and (a)(2) of this AD.
(1) Perform an internal detailed visual inspection to detect
cracks of the frames between stringers 19 left and 25 left and at
body stations 360 to 500B, in accordance with either service
bulletin.
(2) Repair all cracks in accordance with a method approved by
the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate.
(b) Within 3,000 flight cycles after completing the requirements
of paragraph (a) of this AD, unless accomplished within the last
6,000 flight cycles prior to August 9, 1993, perform an internal
detailed visual inspection to detect cracks of the frames between
stringers 19 left and 25 left and at body stations 360 to 500B, in
accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1160, dated
October 24, 1991; or Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1160, Revision
1, dated April 29, 1993. Thereafter, repeat the internal detailed
visual inspection at intervals not to exceed 9,000 flight cycles. If
any crack is found, prior to further flight, accomplish the
requirements of paragraph (b)(1) or (b)(2) of this AD, as
applicable.
(1) If any crack is found that does not exceed the limits
specified in the Boeing 737 Structural Repair Manual (SRM), repair
the crack in accordance with the Boeing 737 SRM. Repeat the internal
detailed visual inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed
9,000 flight cycles.
(2) If any crack is found that exceeds the limits specified in
the Boeing 737 SRM, repair the crack in accordance with a method
approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO. Repeat the internal detailed
visual inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 9,000 flight
cycles.
New Requirements of This AD
(c) Prior to the accumulation of 75,000 total flight cycles, or
within 3,000 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later, install doublers on the frames located
between stringers 19 left and 25 left and at body stations 360 to
500B, in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1160,
Revision 1, dated April 29, 1993. Accomplishment of this
modification constitutes terminating action for the requirements of
this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(d)(1) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO. Operators shall submit
their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance
Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager,
Seattle ACO.
(d)(2) Alternative methods of compliance approved previously in
accordance with AD 93-13-02, amendment 39-8615, are
[[Page 31490]]
approved as alternative methods of compliance with this AD.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Seattle ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(f) Except as provided by paragraphs (a)(2), (b)(1), and (b)(2)
of this AD, the actions shall be done in accordance with Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1160, dated October 24, 1991; or
Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1160, Revision 1, dated April 29,
1993. The incorporation by reference of these documents was approved
previously by the Director of the Federal Register as of August 9,
1993 (58 FR 36863, July 9, 1993). Copies may be obtained from Boeing
Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-
2207. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite
700, Washington, DC.
(g) This amendment becomes effective on July 16, 1999.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 7910–12849, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: a6518f7008801f7f3badb7c4edb002354433700d48b6f11d706989c4f2d8dcd9
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 99-12-08 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 2949963e5d74f06e1e6f55241fced03afd6865252c1a5dd6e4f04e5231ee7f9c. Source manifest: 7410364ab0df1f2e3f7353623d3a47f3a6da3ff3ba0bb655280b7fe5767a8fcf.
Official source · 1999-06-11
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 112 (Friday, June 11, 1999)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31488-31490]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-14821]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 98-NM-273-AD; Amendment 39-11192; AD 99-12-08]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-200C Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive
(AD), applicable to all Boeing Model 737-200C series airplanes, that
currently requires a one-time external detailed visual inspection to
detect cracks of the fuselage skin in the lower lobe cargo compartment;
repetitive internal detailed visual inspections to detect cracks of the
frames in the lower lobe cargo compartment; and repair of cracked
parts. That AD also provides for an optional preventative modification
that constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspections.
This amendment requires accomplishment of the previously optional
terminating modification. This amendment is prompted by reports of
cracking in the body frames between stringers 19 left and 25 left and
at body stations 360 to 500B. The actions specified by this AD are
intended to prevent opening or loss of the cargo door during flight,
and consequent rapid decompression of the airplane.
DATES: Effective July 16, 1999.
The incorporation by reference of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737-53A1160, dated October 24, 1991; and Boeing Service Bulletin 737-
53A1160, Revision 1, dated April 29, 1993; as listed in the
regulations, was approved previously by the Director of the Federal
Register as of August 9, 1993 (58 FR 36863, July 9, 1993).
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207. This information may be examined at the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules
Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of
the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nenita Odesa, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-2557; fax (425) 227-1181.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) by superseding AD 93-13-02,
amendment 39-8615 (58 FR 36863, July 9, 1993), which is applicable to
all Boeing Model 737-200C series airplanes, was published in the
Federal Register on February 1, 1999 (64 FR 4791). The action proposed
to continue to require a one-time external detailed visual inspection
to detect cracks of the fuselage skin in the lower lobe cargo
compartment; repetitive internal detailed visual inspections to detect
cracks of the frames in the lower lobe cargo compartment; and repair of
cracked parts. The action also proposed to require accomplishment of
the previously optional terminating modification.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due
[[Page 31489]]
consideration has been given to the single comment received.
The commenter supports the proposed rule.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comment
noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public
interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 90 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 18 airplanes of U.S. registry
will be affected by this AD.
The inspections that are currently required by AD 93-13-02, and
retained in this AD, take approximately 12 work hours per airplane to
accomplish, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on
these figures, the cost impact of the currently required inspections on
U.S. operators is estimated to be $12,960, or $720 per airplane, per
inspection cycle.
The new modification that is required by this new AD will take
approximately 160 work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an average
labor rate of $60 per work hour. Required parts will cost approximately
$5,500 per airplane. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the
modification required by this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be
$271,800, or $15,100 per airplane.
The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions
that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this
AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final
rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-8615 (58 FR
36863, July 9, 1993), and by adding a new airworthiness directive (AD),
amendment 39-11192, to read as follows:
99-12-08 Boeing: Amendment 39-11192. Docket 98-NM-273-AD.
Supersedes AD 93-13-02, Amendment 39-8615.
Applicability: All Model 737-200C series airplanes, certificated
in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d)(1)
of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect
of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent opening or loss of the cargo door during flight, and
consequent rapid decompression of the airplane, accomplish the
following:
Restatement of Requirements of AD 93-13-02
(a) Prior to the accumulation of 29,000 flight cycles or within
250 flight cycles after August 9, 1993 (the effective date AD 93-13-
02, amendment 39-8615), whichever occurs later, accomplish an
external detailed visual inspection to detect cracks of the fuselage
skin between stringers 19 left and 25 left and at body stations 360
to 540, in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1160, dated October 24, 1991; or Boeing Service Bulletin 737-
53A1160, Revision 1, dated April 29, 1993. If any crack is found,
prior to further flight, accomplish the requirements of paragraphs
(a)(1) and (a)(2) of this AD.
(1) Perform an internal detailed visual inspection to detect
cracks of the frames between stringers 19 left and 25 left and at
body stations 360 to 500B, in accordance with either service
bulletin.
(2) Repair all cracks in accordance with a method approved by
the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate.
(b) Within 3,000 flight cycles after completing the requirements
of paragraph (a) of this AD, unless accomplished within the last
6,000 flight cycles prior to August 9, 1993, perform an internal
detailed visual inspection to detect cracks of the frames between
stringers 19 left and 25 left and at body stations 360 to 500B, in
accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1160, dated
October 24, 1991; or Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1160, Revision
1, dated April 29, 1993. Thereafter, repeat the internal detailed
visual inspection at intervals not to exceed 9,000 flight cycles. If
any crack is found, prior to further flight, accomplish the
requirements of paragraph (b)(1) or (b)(2) of this AD, as
applicable.
(1) If any crack is found that does not exceed the limits
specified in the Boeing 737 Structural Repair Manual (SRM), repair
the crack in accordance with the Boeing 737 SRM. Repeat the internal
detailed visual inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed
9,000 flight cycles.
(2) If any crack is found that exceeds the limits specified in
the Boeing 737 SRM, repair the crack in accordance with a method
approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO. Repeat the internal detailed
visual inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 9,000 flight
cycles.
New Requirements of This AD
(c) Prior to the accumulation of 75,000 total flight cycles, or
within 3,000 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later, install doublers on the frames located
between stringers 19 left and 25 left and at body stations 360 to
500B, in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1160,
Revision 1, dated April 29, 1993. Accomplishment of this
modification constitutes terminating action for the requirements of
this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(d)(1) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO. Operators shall submit
their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance
Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager,
Seattle ACO.
(d)(2) Alternative methods of compliance approved previously in
accordance with AD 93-13-02, amendment 39-8615, are
[[Page 31490]]
approved as alternative methods of compliance with this AD.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Seattle ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(f) Except as provided by paragraphs (a)(2), (b)(1), and (b)(2)
of this AD, the actions shall be done in accordance with Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1160, dated October 24, 1991; or
Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1160, Revision 1, dated April 29,
1993. The incorporation by reference of these documents was approved
previously by the Director of the Federal Register as of August 9,
1993 (58 FR 36863, July 9, 1993). Copies may be obtained from Boeing
Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-
2207. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite
700, Washington, DC.
(g) This amendment becomes effective on July 16, 1999.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 4, 1999.
Vi L. Lipski,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 99-14821 Filed 6-10-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:49:43.065239+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- ef945b306567292d7c2f7be7fee427c076d8eb9e9eeb10f38c116f2631eda48f
- Text SHA-256
- 2949963e5d74f06e1e6f55241fced03afd6865252c1a5dd6e4f04e5231ee7f9c
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.