Published 1999-11-12 · Federal Register document 99-29327
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330 and A340 Series Airplanes
Publication summary
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Airbus Model A330 and A340 series airplanes, that requires repetitive detailed visual inspections to detect cracking of the vertical flange of the inboard Z-stiffeners of the centerline panel of the fuselage belly fairing; and corrective actions, if necessary. This amendment also provides for optional terminating action for the repetitive inspections. This amendment is prompted by issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness information by a foreign civil airworthiness authority. The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the vertical flange of the inboard Z-stiffeners of the centerline panel of the fuselage belly fairing, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the belly fairing.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:22:57.343810+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_1999-e9a7378e7e7d30d5
- Source row
- results[427]
- Raw source SHA-256
- e9a7378e7e7d30d51578560dc0677c56bb1fef0a9323224e2a0afe1544919217
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 99-23-16
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 1999-12-17
Some source clauses remain unstructured. Read the complete publication for conditions that have not been interpreted here.
Read 2 complete recorded clauses
Applicability wording · Applicability
Applicability: Model A330 and A340 series airplanes; except
those airplanes on which Airbus Modification 42605, or Airbus
Service Bulletin A330-53-3019 (for Model A330 series airplanes) or
A340-53-4028 (for Model A340 series airplanes) has been
accomplished; certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 6591–7646, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: ca66a8b961355bf02b0b41708905faaa3c09e685e67228dbcdfacca02b188ce6
Compliance and requirements
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To detect and correct fatigue cracking of the vertical flange of
the inboard Z-stiffeners of the centerline panel of the fuselage
belly fairing, which could result in reduced structural integrity of
the belly fairing, accomplish the following:
Repetitive Detailed Visual Inspections
(a) Prior to the accumulation of 5,500 total flight cycles, or
within 500 flight hours after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later, perform a detailed visual inspection to
detect cracking of the vertical flange of the inboard Z-stiffeners
of the centerline panel of the fuselage belly fairing, in accordance
with Airbus Service Bulletin A330-53-3020 (for Model A330 series
airplanes) or A340-53-4029 (for Model A340 series airplanes); each
dated November 30, 1995; as applicable.
Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed visual
inspection is defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a
specific structural area, system, installation, or assembly to
detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is
normally supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at
intensity deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such
as mirror, magnifying lenses, etc. may be used. Surface cleaning and
elaborate access procedures may be required.''
(1) If no cracking is detected, repeat the inspection thereafter
at intervals not to exceed 5,500 flight cycles, until the
requirements of paragraph (b) of this AD are accomplished.
Corrective Actions
(2) If any cracking is detected during any inspection required
by this AD, prior to further flight, modify the vertical flange of
both inboard Z-stiffeners of the centerline panel of the fuselage
belly fairing and re-inspect the modified area to determine if
cracking has been eliminated, in accordance with Airbus Service
Bulletin A330-53-3019 (for Model A330 series airplanes) or A340-53-
4028 (for Model A340 series airplanes); each dated November 30,
1995; as applicable.
(i) If all cracking is not eliminated after accomplishment of
the modification, prior to further flight, repair in accordance with
a method approved by either the Manager, International Branch, ANM-
116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate; or the Direction Generale
de l'Aviation Civile (DGAC) (or its delegated agent). For a repair
method to be approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116,
as required by this paragraph, the Manager's approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
(ii) If all cracking is eliminated after the accomplishment of
the modification, no further action is required by this AD.
Optional Terminating Action
(b) Modification of the vertical flange of both inboard Z-
stiffeners of the centerline panel of the fuselage belly fairing in
accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A330-53-3019 (for Model A330
series airplanes) or A340-53-4028 (for Model A340 series airplanes);
each dated November 30, 1995; as applicable; constitutes terminating
action for the requirements of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116.
Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA
Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send
it to the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116.
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the International Branch, ANM-116.
Special Flight Permits
(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199
[[Page 61487]]
of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to
operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD
can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(e) The inspections and modification shall be done in accordance
with Airbus Service Bulletin A330-53-3020, dated November 30, 1995;
Airbus Service Bulletin A340-53-4029, dated November 30, 1995;
Airbus Service Bulletin A330-53-3019, dated November 30, 1995; and
Airbus Service Bulletin A340-53-4028, dated November 30, 1995; as
applicable. This incorporation by reference was approved by the
Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)
and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1
Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. Copies may
be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Note 4: The subject of this AD is addressed in French
airworthiness directives 96-056-029 (B) and 96-057-042 (B); each
dated March 13, 1996.
(f) This amendment becomes effective on December 17, 1999.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 7646–12710, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 48073c6afc6ae9c26e05d50587d7a4a48608c2aaf040b059ce4c82c436bb4c2f
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 99-23-16 · 1 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: a8c88231f6c3f2eed86ff4de8f97a7867966bf96657d60b3e395c4fced9395b7. Source manifest: cf4b40605321a208590c89d1abbe150c6fc90f0c47598f6e11f0fe926f23766a.
Official source · 1999-11-12
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 218 (Friday, November 12, 1999)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61485-61487]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-29327]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 99-NM-184-AD; Amendment 39-11412; AD 99-23-16]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330 and A340 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain Airbus Model A330 and A340 series airplanes, that
requires repetitive detailed visual inspections to detect cracking of
the vertical flange of the inboard Z-stiffeners of the centerline panel
of the fuselage belly fairing; and corrective actions, if necessary.
This amendment also provides for optional terminating action for the
repetitive inspections. This amendment is prompted by issuance of
mandatory continuing airworthiness information by a foreign civil
airworthiness authority. The actions specified by this AD are intended
to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the vertical flange of the
inboard Z-stiffeners of the centerline panel of the fuselage belly
fairing, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the
belly fairing.
DATES: Effective December 17, 1999.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of December 17, 1999.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France. This information may be examined at the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules
Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of
the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norman B. Martenson, Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
227-2110; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Airbus Model A330 and A340
series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on September 10,
1999 (64 FR 49110). That action proposed to require repetitive detailed
visual inspections to detect cracking of the vertical flange of the
inboard Z-stiffeners of the centerline panel of the fuselage belly
fairing; and corrective actions, if necessary. That action also
proposed to provide for optional terminating action for the repetitive
inspections.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
the comment received.
One commenter, an operator, states that it will have the
terminating modification incorporated prior to delivery of its
airplanes.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comment
noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public
interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed.
[[Page 61486]]
Cost Impact
None of the airplanes affected by this action are on the U.S.
Register. All airplanes included in the applicability of this rule
currently are operated by non-U.S. operators under foreign registry;
therefore, they are not directly affected by this AD action. However,
the FAA considers that this rule is necessary to ensure that the unsafe
condition is addressed in the event that any of these subject airplanes
are imported and placed on the U.S. Register in the future.
Should an affected airplane be imported and placed on the U.S.
Register in the future, it would require approximately 1 work hour to
accomplish the required inspection, at an average labor rate of $60 per
work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of this AD would be
$60 per airplane, per inspection cycle.
Should an operator elect to accomplish the optional terminating
action provided by this AD, it would require approximately 7 work hours
to accomplish the optional terminating action, at an average labor rate
of $60 per work hour. Required parts would cost approximately $2,350
per airplane. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the optional
terminating action is estimated to be $2,770 per airplane.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final
rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
99-23-16 Airbus Industrie: Amendment 39-11412. Docket 99-NM-184-AD.
Applicability: Model A330 and A340 series airplanes; except
those airplanes on which Airbus Modification 42605, or Airbus
Service Bulletin A330-53-3019 (for Model A330 series airplanes) or
A340-53-4028 (for Model A340 series airplanes) has been
accomplished; certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To detect and correct fatigue cracking of the vertical flange of
the inboard Z-stiffeners of the centerline panel of the fuselage
belly fairing, which could result in reduced structural integrity of
the belly fairing, accomplish the following:
Repetitive Detailed Visual Inspections
(a) Prior to the accumulation of 5,500 total flight cycles, or
within 500 flight hours after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later, perform a detailed visual inspection to
detect cracking of the vertical flange of the inboard Z-stiffeners
of the centerline panel of the fuselage belly fairing, in accordance
with Airbus Service Bulletin A330-53-3020 (for Model A330 series
airplanes) or A340-53-4029 (for Model A340 series airplanes); each
dated November 30, 1995; as applicable.
Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed visual
inspection is defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a
specific structural area, system, installation, or assembly to
detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is
normally supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at
intensity deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such
as mirror, magnifying lenses, etc. may be used. Surface cleaning and
elaborate access procedures may be required.''
(1) If no cracking is detected, repeat the inspection thereafter
at intervals not to exceed 5,500 flight cycles, until the
requirements of paragraph (b) of this AD are accomplished.
Corrective Actions
(2) If any cracking is detected during any inspection required
by this AD, prior to further flight, modify the vertical flange of
both inboard Z-stiffeners of the centerline panel of the fuselage
belly fairing and re-inspect the modified area to determine if
cracking has been eliminated, in accordance with Airbus Service
Bulletin A330-53-3019 (for Model A330 series airplanes) or A340-53-
4028 (for Model A340 series airplanes); each dated November 30,
1995; as applicable.
(i) If all cracking is not eliminated after accomplishment of
the modification, prior to further flight, repair in accordance with
a method approved by either the Manager, International Branch, ANM-
116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate; or the Direction Generale
de l'Aviation Civile (DGAC) (or its delegated agent). For a repair
method to be approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116,
as required by this paragraph, the Manager's approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
(ii) If all cracking is eliminated after the accomplishment of
the modification, no further action is required by this AD.
Optional Terminating Action
(b) Modification of the vertical flange of both inboard Z-
stiffeners of the centerline panel of the fuselage belly fairing in
accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A330-53-3019 (for Model A330
series airplanes) or A340-53-4028 (for Model A340 series airplanes);
each dated November 30, 1995; as applicable; constitutes terminating
action for the requirements of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116.
Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA
Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send
it to the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116.
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the International Branch, ANM-116.
Special Flight Permits
(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199
[[Page 61487]]
of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to
operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD
can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(e) The inspections and modification shall be done in accordance
with Airbus Service Bulletin A330-53-3020, dated November 30, 1995;
Airbus Service Bulletin A340-53-4029, dated November 30, 1995;
Airbus Service Bulletin A330-53-3019, dated November 30, 1995; and
Airbus Service Bulletin A340-53-4028, dated November 30, 1995; as
applicable. This incorporation by reference was approved by the
Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)
and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1
Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. Copies may
be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Note 4: The subject of this AD is addressed in French
airworthiness directives 96-056-029 (B) and 96-057-042 (B); each
dated March 13, 1996.
(f) This amendment becomes effective on December 17, 1999.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 3, 1999.
D.L. Riggin,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 99-29327 Filed 11-10-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:45:56.590771+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- 53b35e77e01527d0e13e896138c13bd81b70580933ecdb38b1280e03d77dacac
- Text SHA-256
- a8c88231f6c3f2eed86ff4de8f97a7867966bf96657d60b3e395c4fced9395b7
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.