Back to publication catalog

Published 1999-01-11 · Federal Register document 99-480

Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 Series Airplanes

Publication summary

This amendment corrects and clarifies information in an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to all McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 series airplanes, that currently requires a one- time inspection to detect discrepancies at certain areas around the entry light connector of the sliding ceiling panel above the forward passenger doors, and repair, if necessary. The actions specified in that AD are intended to prevent chafing of the electrical wire assemblies, which could result in an electrical fire in the passenger compartment. This amendment corrects and clarifies the requirements of the current AD by specifying the specific area in which the subject inspection must be conducted and by correcting the part number of the ramp deflector assembly. This amendment is prompted by communication received from the manufacturer that the current requirements of the AD are unclear.

Why this record is shown

Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:22:57.343810+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.

Source revision
federal_register_ad_metadata_1999-e9a7378e7e7d30d5
Source row
results[16]
Raw source SHA-256
e9a7378e7e7d30d51578560dc0677c56bb1fef0a9323224e2a0afe1544919217

Correction notice · separate source edition

Recorded publication clauses

AD identifier printed in this edition
98-25-11 R1
Effective date printed in this edition
Unknown

This correction is a separate source edition; it is not counted as a new adopted rule.

No adopted-clause structure was recorded for this source edition. Read the complete text; no applicability conclusion has been inferred.

No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.

Find all recorded historical references to AD 98-25-11 R1 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.

These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.

Why these observations are shown

They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.

Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 64aa9d4c125e5227c34dbd6d45a76c09707c3da6be9b9cdcff6e1cd1e71c802c. Source manifest: 9116b3ec610ef0971fe20aadc577d565bd5c15dd38caf9da5110e482c37e8917.

Official source · 1999-01-11

Publication text

This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.

Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.

Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 6 (Monday, January 11, 1999)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1502-1503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-480]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 98-NM-348-AD; Amendment 39-10988; AD 98-25-11 R1]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 Series 
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This amendment corrects and clarifies information in an 
existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to all McDonnell 
Douglas Model MD-11 series airplanes, that currently requires a one-
time inspection to detect discrepancies at certain areas around the 
entry light connector of the sliding ceiling panel above the forward 
passenger doors, and repair, if necessary. The actions specified in 
that AD are intended to prevent chafing of the electrical wire 
assemblies, which could result in an electrical fire in the passenger 
compartment. This amendment corrects and clarifies the requirements of 
the current AD by specifying the specific area in which the subject 
inspection must be conducted and by correcting the part number of the 
ramp deflector assembly. This amendment is prompted by communication 
received from the manufacturer that the current requirements of the AD 
are unclear.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 28, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brett Portwood, Aerospace Engineer, 
ANM-130L, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Los Angeles Aircraft 
Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 
90712; telephone (562) 627-5350; fax (562) 627-5210.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 3, 1998, the FAA issued AD 98-
25-11, amendment 39-10937 (63 FR 68172, December 10, 1998), which is 
applicable to all McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 series airplanes. That 
AD requires a one-time inspection to detect discrepancies at certain 
areas around the entry light connector of the sliding ceiling panel 
above the forward passenger doors, and repair, if necessary. That 
action was prompted by a report indicating that damaged electrical 
wires were found above the forward passenger doors due to flapper 
panels moving inboard and chafing the electrical wire assemblies of 
this area. The actions required by that AD are intended to prevent such 
chafing, which could result in an electrical fire in the passenger 
compartment.
    Since the issuance of AD 98-25-11, the FAA has reviewed some of the 
wording of that AD and finds that clarification is necessary. The FAA's 
intent in paragraph (a) of the AD was that operators perform a visual 
inspection ``of the aircraft wiring'' to detect discrepancies of the 
subject area. This action revises paragraph (a) of the AD to clarify 
this point.
    The FAA has determined that the area specified in paragraph (a)(1) 
of that AD is not clear in the way that it is currently worded, and 
that operators may misinterpret what area needs to be inspected. The 
FAA finds that the wording of paragraph (a)(1) must be revised to 
specify that a visual inspection must be accomplished ``at the area of 
the forward drop ceiling just outboard of mod block S3-735, and forward 
and inboard of the light ballast for the entry light on the sliding 
ceiling panel above the forward left passenger door (1L) at station 
location x = 24.75, y = 435, and z = 64.5.'' In addition, this action 
includes a new NOTE 2 following paragraph (a)(1) of the AD to specify 
that the clarified area is the same area that was identified in AD 98-
25-11.
    In addition, the manufacturer has informed the FAA that bracket 
``part number 4225419-1,'' as specified in paragraph (a)(2) of AD 98-
25-11, does not exist. In addition, the FAA finds that the word 
``bracket'' does not clearly describe the area in which the required 
inspection should be conducted. Therefore, this action revises 
paragraph (a)(2) of the AD to read, ``* * * in the area of the ramp 
deflector assembly, part number 4223570-501.''
    The manufacturer also has informed the FAA that the latest revision 
of Chapter 20, Standard Wiring Practices of the MD-11 Wiring Diagram 
Manual is dated April 1, 1998. The procedures described in the revision 
dated April 1, 1998, are essentially identical to those described in 
the revision dated January 1, 1998, which was referenced in AD 98-25-11 
as the appropriate source of service information for accomplishment of 
the repair requirement. Therefore, this action revises paragraph (b) of 
the AD to include Chapter 20, Standard Wiring Practices of the MD-11 
Wiring Diagram Manual, dated April 1, 1998, as an additional source of 
service information.
    Action is taken herein to clarify and correct these requirements of 
AD 95-25-11 and to correctly add the AD as an amendment to section 
39.13 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 39.13).
    The final rule is being reprinted in its entirety for the 
convenience of affected operators. The effective date remains December 
23, 1998.

[[Page 1503]]

    Since this action only clarifies and corrects a current 
requirement, it has no adverse economic impact and imposes no 
additional burden on any person. Therefore, notice and public 
procedures hereon are unnecessary.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

Adoption of the Correction

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec. 39.13  [Amended]

    2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-10937 (63 FR 
68172, December 10, 1998), and by adding a new airworthiness directive 
(AD), amendment 39-10988, to read as follows:

98-25-11 R1  McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39-10988. Docket 98-NM-
348-AD. Revises AD 98-25-11, Amendment 39-10937.

    Applicability: All Model MD-11 series airplanes, certificated in 
any category.

    Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) of 
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
address it.

    Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
previously.
    To prevent chafing of certain electrical wires above the forward 
passenger doors, which could result in an electrical fire in the 
passenger compartment, accomplish the following:
    (a) Within 10 days after the effective date of this AD, perform 
a visual inspection of the aircraft wiring to detect discrepancies 
that include but are not limited to frayed, chafed, or nicked wires 
and wire insulation in the areas specified in paragraphs (a)(1) and 
(a)(2) of this AD.
    (1) At the area of the forward drop ceiling just outboard of mod 
block S3-735, and forward and inboard of the light ballast for the 
entry light on the sliding ceiling panel above the forward left 
passenger door (1L) at station location x = 24.75, y = 435, and z = 
64.5.

    Note 2: The area specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this AD is the 
same area that was identified in AD 98-25-11.

    (2) At the area above the forward right passenger door (1R) at 
station location x = -30, y = 430, and z = 70 in the ramp deflector 
assembly part number 4223570-501.
    (b) If any discrepancy is detected during the visual inspection 
required by paragraph (a) of this AD, prior to further flight, 
repair in accordance with Chapter 20, Standard Wiring Practices of 
the MD-11 Wiring Diagram Manual, dated January 1, 1998, or April 1, 
1998.
    (c) Within 10 days after accomplishing the visual inspection 
required by paragraph (a) of this AD, submit a report of the 
inspection results (both positive and negative findings) to the 
Manager, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Los Angeles Aircraft 
Certification Office (ACO), 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, 
California 90712; telephone (562) 627-5350; fax (562) 627-5210. 
Information collection requirements contained in this regulation 
have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and have been assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.
    (d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification 
Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall 
submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal 
Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
Manager, Los Angeles ACO.

    Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.

    (e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    (f) The effective date of this amendment remains December 28, 
1998.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 31, 1998.
Darrell M. Pederson,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 99-480 Filed 1-8-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Why this text is shown

The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T04:54:20.195762+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.

Open the captured official edition

Source SHA-256
283a60956ecfc5ec17cc8ad0f9bf002c839a670a9802fcc6d259364a518a9b5b
Text SHA-256
64aa9d4c125e5227c34dbd6d45a76c09707c3da6be9b9cdcff6e1cd1e71c802c

Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence

Coverage and limits

These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.

The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.