Published 2006-09-06 · Federal Register document E6-14687
Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Model EMB-135 Airplanes and Model EMB-145, -145ER, -145MR, -145LR, -145XR, -145MP, and -145EP Airplanes
Publication summary
The FAA is correcting a typographical error in an existing airworthiness directive (AD) that was published in the Federal Register on December 5, 2005 (70 FR 72363). The error resulted in the citation of incorrect part numbers. This AD applies to certain EMBRAER Model EMB-135 airplanes and Model EMB-145, -145ER, -145MR, -145LR, -145XR, - 145MP, and -145EP airplanes. This AD requires repetitive inspections of the spring cartridges of the elevator gust lock system to determine if the lock washer projection correctly fits the slots in the cartridge flange, and corrective action if necessary, for certain airplanes. This AD also requires final terminating action for all affected airplanes.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:20.745856+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2006-8d787f8b35bc8016
- Source row
- results[322]
- Raw source SHA-256
- 8d787f8b35bc80165a417cea66de09cd32a1700face13759db364c607e405963
Correction notice · separate source edition
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2005-24-11
- Effective date printed in this edition
- Unknown
This correction is a separate source edition; it is not counted as a new adopted rule.
No adopted-clause structure was recorded for this source edition. Read the complete text; no applicability conclusion has been inferred.
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2005-24-11 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: f2479ca28ccce8e43ddc4fffdcbf45fed7da4a4d79be583f5bc47ab8306d528a. Source manifest: e887760a7d4d7778064a6eb0d103c4cf5538343065c81106e974ce1c31167b9c.
Official source · 2006-09-06
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 6, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52415-52416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-14687]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2005-22033; Directorate Identifier 2004-NM-218-AD;
Amendment 39-14391; AD 2005-24-11]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model EMB-135 Airplanes and Model EMB-145, -145ER, -145MR, -
145LR, -145XR, -145MP, and -145EP Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting a typographical error in an existing
airworthiness directive (AD) that was published in the Federal Register
on December 5, 2005 (70 FR 72363). The error resulted in the citation
of incorrect part numbers. This AD applies to certain EMBRAER Model
EMB-135 airplanes and Model EMB-145, -145ER, -145MR, -145LR, -145XR, -
145MP, and -145EP airplanes. This AD requires repetitive inspections of
the spring cartridges of the elevator gust lock system to determine if
the lock washer projection correctly fits the slots in the cartridge
flange, and corrective action if necessary, for certain airplanes. This
AD also requires final terminating action for all affected airplanes.
DATES: Effective January 9, 2006.
ADDRESSES: The AD docket contains the proposed AD, comments, and any
final disposition. You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at
http://dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility
office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647-
5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at the U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Room PL-401,
Washington, DC. This docket number is FAA-2005-22033; the directorate
identifier for this docket is 2004-NM-218-AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1175; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 18, 2005, the FAA issued AD
2005-24-11, amendment 39-14391 (70 FR 72363, December 5, 2005), for
certain EMBRAER Model EMB-135BJ, -135ER, -135KE, -135KL, and -135LR
airplanes; and Model EMB-145, -145ER, -145MR, -145LR, -145XR, -145MP,
and -145EP airplanes. That AD requires repetitive inspections of the
spring cartridges of the elevator gust lock system to determine if the
lock washer projection correctly fits the slots in the cartridge
flange, and corrective action if necessary. That AD also requires final
terminating action for all affected airplanes.
On December 23, 2005, we issued a correction to AD 2005-24-11, (71
FR 231, January 4, 2006), which corrected the reference to the
effective date of Brazilian airworthiness directive 2003-01-03R1.
As published, AD 2005-24-11 incorrectly cited the part numbers (P/
Ns) of the spring cartridges in several places as P/N KDP2611 and P/N
KDP4235. Those P/Ns do not exist. The correct P/Ns should be KPD2611
and KPD4235.
No other part of the regulatory information has been changed;
therefore, the final rule is not republished in the Federal Register.
The effective date of this AD remains January 9, 2006.
Sec. 39.13 [Corrected]
0
In the Federal Register of December 5, 2005, on page 72365, paragraph
(f) in the first column, paragraph (g) in the
[[Page 52416]]
second column, and paragraph (h) in the third column of AD 2005-24-11
are corrected to read as follows:
* * * * *
(f) For Model EMB-135BJ airplanes: Within 30 days after May 14,
2003 (the effective date of AD 2003-09-03), perform a general visual
inspection of each spring cartridge of the elevator gust lock system to
determine if the lock washer projection correctly fits the slots in the
cartridge flange, in accordance with EMBRAER Service Bulletin 145LEG-
27-0006, dated December 9, 2002; Revision 01, dated June 3, 2003; or
Revision 02, dated April 12, 2004. Before further flight, replace any
discrepant spring cartridge with a new part having the same part
number, in accordance with the service bulletin; or replace the spring
cartridge, part number (P/N) KPD2611, with a new, improved spring
cartridge, P/N KPD4235, as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD. * * *
* * * * *
(g) For airplanes not identified in paragraph (f) of this AD: At
the applicable time specified in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD,
perform a general visual inspection of each spring cartridge of the
elevator gust lock system to determine if the lock washer projection
correctly fits the slots in the cartridge flange, in accordance with
EMBRAER Service Bulletin 145-27-0098, dated December 9, 2002; Change
01, dated June 3, 2003; or Revision 02, dated April 12, 2004. Repeat
the inspection at intervals not to exceed 800 flight hours after the
initial inspection until the replacement of the spring cartridge, P/N
KPD2611, with a new, improved spring cartridge, P/N KPD4235, is done as
specified in paragraph (h) of this AD. * * *
* * * * *
New Requirements of This AD
Replacement of Spring Cartridge
(h) Within 5,500 flight hours or 36 months after the effective date
of this AD, whichever comes first, replace the spring cartridge, P/N
KPD2611, with a new, improved spring cartridge, P/N KPD4235, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of EMBRAER Service
Bulletin 145LEG-27-0012, Revision 01, dated April 12, 2004 (for Model
EMB-135BJ airplanes); or EMBRAER Service Bulletin 145-27-0102, Revision
02, dated January 20, 2005 (for Model EMB-135ER, -135KE, -135KL, -
135LR, -145, -145ER, -145MR, -145LR, -145XR, -145MP, and -145EP
airplanes); as applicable. * * *
* * * * *
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 18, 2006.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E6-14687 Filed 9-5-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T03:43:59.299340+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- de18b68a6eea197157d65b5e0002b07c5907201833bdf88fd35eda8e9e9c0e40
- Text SHA-256
- f2479ca28ccce8e43ddc4fffdcbf45fed7da4a4d79be583f5bc47ab8306d528a
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.