Published 2007-10-16 · Federal Register document E7-20137
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes
Publication summary
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:23.906952+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2007-daaa03e810180273
- Source row
- results[371]
- Raw source SHA-256
- daaa03e81018027354d93b79e2a5f918dd4e1ce116086c5ab24f0dfd782528aa
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2007-21-07
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 2007-11-20
Read 9 complete recorded clauses
Effective Date
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective November
20, 2007.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 9520–9617, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 3c12ba770576165dbad784c08e616f08d4970cbe96150266ae3b360c19ac12c9
Affected ADs
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 9617–9646, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 027fbc44617399472b6ac4741da3aee18448654374228bcf4fe3f01df6b1539b
Applicability wording · Applicability
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A310 series airplanes,
certificated in any category, except airplanes on which Airbus
Service Bulletin A310-32-2133, Revision 02, dated February 26, 2007,
has been embodied in service.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 9646–9890, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 85e8b397e63ec05718a80457ae42e7e25d1d128b92587c8c6fd49bda9c37979a
Subject
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32: Landing
gear.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 9890–9975, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 5f6d50d573cb51c3b4a69db921bc9b2f123d135f6f9d4779616be95a4ded342b
Reason
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
An incident occurred on one A300-600 aircraft at parking brake
application. Both engines were running, the aircraft started moving
again despite parking brake application. Captain tried to stop the
aircraft via the pedals but, as the parking brake selector valve was
selected, the aircraft could not be stopped (as per design,
activation of the parking brake inhibits the other braking modes,
and consequently prevents the recovery of the normal braking through
the pedals). As part of the investigation, the pressure limiter was
removed and examined. The expertise revealed a metallic wire aimed
at reducing the section of one port of this equipment was found
broken. A part of this wire partially obstructed the hole receiving
this wire, thus delaying the build up of parking brake pressure. In
order to avoid recurrence of the failure mode described above, EASA
(European Aviation Safety Agency), issued Airworthiness Directive
(AD) 2006-0178 to require the replacement of the parking brake
pressure limiter (FIN 323292).
During embodiment of SB (Service Bulletin) 32-2133 on an A310 as
per AD 2006-0178 [EASA AD 2006-0178 corresponds to FAA AD 2007-02-
21, amendment 39-14908], an operator reported that the modified
pressure limiter could not be fitted. Subsequent investigation
concluded that A310 installation being slightly different from A300-
600 aircraft, the approved solution was not directly adaptable to
A310 aircraft.
* * * This new AD, dealing with the same subject, requires the
replacement of the brake
[[Page 58491]]
pressure limiter by accomplishment of Airbus SB A310-32-2133, which
has been revised to include the adaptation kit for A310 aircraft.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 9975–11765, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: b395a2eff8848ae1f145b398ad46b1920d9f9cb3356476c5f9faea7fd00635c7
Actions and Compliance
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
(1) Within 10 months after the effective date of this AD,
replace the parking brake pressure limiter (FIN 323292), in
accordance with the instructions given in Airbus Service Bulletin
A310-32-2133, Revision 02, dated February 26, 2007.
(2) [Reserved]
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No difference.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 11765–12223, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 53ef8aa060dfffd92c7a3f431561df88f6ecc6926aa87ea89edb6187fbe0cdaf
Other FAA AD Provisions
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Tom
Stafford, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1622; fax (425) 227-1149.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 12223–13649, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 5d89b49656ce74c6277bcee660c1d2138c6cbdd9e911b66ae0fc16f43cb8614e
Related Information
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 2007-0151, dated
May 22, 2007; Airbus Service Bulletin A310-32-2133, Revision 02,
dated February 26, 2007; and Messier-Bugatti Service Bulletin
C24264-32-848, dated February 15, 2006, for related information.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 13649–13934, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 33761cefd9d2e7db4db015ee547e0b314040510154ad348bc0b05e85d1df73db
Material Incorporated by Reference
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Airbus Service Bulletin A310-32-2133, Revision
02, dated February 26, 2007, to do the actions required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030,
or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 13934–14772, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 6c48b2912825430701e2fcef65bf7a02f9e663f055caeb6f928ba7233160f44e
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2007-21-07 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 492a6cf197a0ef724c053c4621f48266fa52c77e3bc7e3869b9f0d938e9caac4. Source manifest: 334e768ec829a54ce9230bdccf76b3e76ed66138c502cf7fbcea48b64afe6eeb.
Official source · 2007-10-16
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 16, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58489-58491]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-20137]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2007-28922; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-132-AD;
Amendment 39-15225; AD 2007-21-07]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
An incident occurred on one A300-600 aircraft at parking brake
application. Both engines were running, the aircraft started moving
again despite parking brake application. Captain tried to stop the
aircraft via the pedals but, as the parking brake selector valve was
selected, the aircraft could not be stopped (as per design,
activation of the parking brake inhibits the other braking modes,
and consequently prevents the recovery of the normal braking through
the pedals). As part of the investigation, the pressure limiter was
removed and examined. The expertise revealed a metallic wire aimed
at reducing the section of one port of this equipment was found
broken. A part of this wire partially obstructed the hole receiving
this wire, thus delaying the build up of parking brake pressure.
We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective November 20, 2007.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of November 20,
2007.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Stafford, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1622; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on August 16, 2007 (72
FR 45976). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
An incident occurred on one A300-600 aircraft at parking brake
application. Both engines were running, the aircraft started moving
again despite parking brake application. Captain tried to stop the
aircraft via the pedals but, as the parking brake selector valve was
selected, the aircraft could not be stopped (as per design,
activation of the parking brake inhibits the other braking modes,
and consequently prevents the recovery of the normal braking through
the pedals). As part of the investigation, the pressure limiter was
removed and examined. The expertise revealed a metallic wire aimed
at reducing the section of one port of this equipment was found
broken. A part of this wire partially obstructed the hole receiving
this wire, thus delaying the build up of parking brake pressure. In
order to avoid recurrence of the failure mode described above, EASA
issued Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2006-0178 to require the
replacement of the parking brake pressure limiter (FIN 323292).
During embodiment of SB (Service Bulletin) 32-2133 on an A310 as
per AD 2006-0178 (EASA AD 2006-0178 corresponds to FAA AD 2007-02-
21, amendment 39-14908), an operator reported that the modified
pressure limiter could not be fitted. Subsequent investigation
concluded that A310 installation being slightly different from A300-
600 aircraft, the approved solution was not directly adaptable to
A310 aircraft.
[[Page 58490]]
* * * This new AD, dealing with the same subject, requires the
replacement of the brake pressure limiter by accomplishment of
Airbus SB A310-32-2133, which has been revised to include the
adaptation kit for A310 aircraft.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 68 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 6 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $80 per work-hour. Labor costs may be covered under warranty as
described in the service information. Required parts will cost about $0
per product. Where the service information lists required parts costs
that are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no
charge for these parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for
affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated
here. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the
U.S. operators to be $32,640, or $480 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2007-21-07 Airbus: Amendment 39-15225. Docket No. FAA-2007-28922;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-132-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective November
20, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A310 series airplanes,
certificated in any category, except airplanes on which Airbus
Service Bulletin A310-32-2133, Revision 02, dated February 26, 2007,
has been embodied in service.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32: Landing
gear.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
An incident occurred on one A300-600 aircraft at parking brake
application. Both engines were running, the aircraft started moving
again despite parking brake application. Captain tried to stop the
aircraft via the pedals but, as the parking brake selector valve was
selected, the aircraft could not be stopped (as per design,
activation of the parking brake inhibits the other braking modes,
and consequently prevents the recovery of the normal braking through
the pedals). As part of the investigation, the pressure limiter was
removed and examined. The expertise revealed a metallic wire aimed
at reducing the section of one port of this equipment was found
broken. A part of this wire partially obstructed the hole receiving
this wire, thus delaying the build up of parking brake pressure. In
order to avoid recurrence of the failure mode described above, EASA
(European Aviation Safety Agency), issued Airworthiness Directive
(AD) 2006-0178 to require the replacement of the parking brake
pressure limiter (FIN 323292).
During embodiment of SB (Service Bulletin) 32-2133 on an A310 as
per AD 2006-0178 [EASA AD 2006-0178 corresponds to FAA AD 2007-02-
21, amendment 39-14908], an operator reported that the modified
pressure limiter could not be fitted. Subsequent investigation
concluded that A310 installation being slightly different from A300-
600 aircraft, the approved solution was not directly adaptable to
A310 aircraft.
* * * This new AD, dealing with the same subject, requires the
replacement of the brake
[[Page 58491]]
pressure limiter by accomplishment of Airbus SB A310-32-2133, which
has been revised to include the adaptation kit for A310 aircraft.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
(1) Within 10 months after the effective date of this AD,
replace the parking brake pressure limiter (FIN 323292), in
accordance with the instructions given in Airbus Service Bulletin
A310-32-2133, Revision 02, dated February 26, 2007.
(2) [Reserved]
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No difference.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Tom
Stafford, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1622; fax (425) 227-1149.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 2007-0151, dated
May 22, 2007; Airbus Service Bulletin A310-32-2133, Revision 02,
dated February 26, 2007; and Messier-Bugatti Service Bulletin
C24264-32-848, dated February 15, 2006, for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Airbus Service Bulletin A310-32-2133, Revision
02, dated February 26, 2007, to do the actions required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030,
or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 3, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E7-20137 Filed 10-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T03:35:35.308244+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- f2290ef0318b487dc86e8850dff97e209673bc056ed5ad1298568f1862c05dfa
- Text SHA-256
- 492a6cf197a0ef724c053c4621f48266fa52c77e3bc7e3869b9f0d938e9caac4
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.