Published 2007-12-10 · Federal Register document E7-23687
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-81 (MD-81) and DC-9-82 (MD-82) Airplanes
Publication summary
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-81 (MD-81) and DC-9-82 (MD-82) airplanes. This AD requires, for certain airplanes, inspecting for cracking of the fuselage skin at the upper corners of the forward passenger doorjamb, installing or replacing doublers as applicable, and doing applicable repairs. This AD results from reports of fatigue cracking in the fuselage skin at the upper corners of the forward passenger doorjamb. We are issuing this AD to prevent cracking of the fuselage skin at the upper corners of the forward passenger doorjamb, which could lead to loss of overall structural integrity of the airplane.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:23.906952+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2007-daaa03e810180273
- Source row
- results[446]
- Raw source SHA-256
- daaa03e81018027354d93b79e2a5f918dd4e1ce116086c5ab24f0dfd782528aa
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2007-25-16
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 2008-01-14
Read 9 complete recorded clauses
Effective Date
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective January 14,
2008.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 7360–7451, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 2b50bc7df9263c2ee1c2b7dcf90aeb438a4374d03abe8745f86b4ba8fd49f17f
Affected ADs
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 7451–7480, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 027fbc44617399472b6ac4741da3aee18448654374228bcf4fe3f01df6b1539b
Applicability wording · Applicability
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-81 (MD-81)
and DC-9-82 (MD-82) airplanes; certificated in any category; as
identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-53A298, dated
August 1, 2006.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 7480–7709, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 833974c06c445166e6564463a90bd0d15b327d16a950e503cf902acb04091fca
Unsafe Condition
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report of fatigue cracking in the
fuselage skin at the upper corners of the forward passenger
doorjamb. We are issuing this AD to prevent cracking of the fuselage
skin at the upper corners of the forward passenger doorjamb, which
could lead to loss of overall structural integrity of the airplane.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 7709–8061, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: eb3a9be80b4af6701a007f470b926effa4ac5c17a4f54118f750ef6efb03ff1a
Compliance
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 8061–8239, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 64a7a1579f37f56eafecd0aeb3c528e7c89f6292ed0cb53091423917642d5847
Repetitive Inspections and Corrective Actions for Configuration 1, 2, and 3 Airplanes
Repetitive Inspections and Corrective Actions for Configuration 1, 2,
and 3 Airplanes
(f) For airplanes identified as Configuration 1, 2, or 3 in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-53A298, dated August 1, 2006: At
the applicable times specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of
the alert service bulletin, do a low-frequency eddy current (LFEC)
or high-frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection, as applicable, for
cracking of the fuselage skin at the upper corners of the forward
passenger doorjamb; and do all applicable corrective actions
(repetitive inspections, installation of doublers, replacements, and
repairs), except as provided by paragraph (g) of this AD. Do the
actions in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the
alert service bulletin. Where the alert service
[[Page 69593]]
bulletin specifies a compliance time after the date on the service
bulletin, this AD requires compliance within the specified
compliance time after the effective date of this AD.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 8239–9248, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 7e1c3fe11f93b8e0bcacea03054801ca4f043c9a411ea08a5701734020e79bf3
Repair of Certain Conditions
Repair of Certain Conditions
(g) If any crack is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (f) of this AD and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-
53A298, dated August 1, 2006, specifies to contact Boeing for repair
instructions: Before further flight, repair using a method approved
in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this
AD.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 9248–9622, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 036af78d7c808bbc2347bed47aad0e146bbc30ce964f1038dd9381dfea5735e3
Corrective Action for Configuration 4 Airplanes
Corrective Action for Configuration 4 Airplanes
(h) For airplanes identified as Configuration 4 in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin MD80-53A298, dated August 1, 2006: Within 90 days
after the effective date of this AD, repair using a method approved
in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this
AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(i)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Delegation Option Authorization Organization who has been authorized
by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO, to make those findings. For a
repair method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification
basis of the airplane and 14 CFR 25.571, Amendment 45, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 9622–11053, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 563263f564518b912f246f12caed68403fd94a5339d50f6cb6ea7feac218bdd1
Material Incorporated by Reference
Material Incorporated by Reference
(j) You must use the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin MD80-53A298, dated August 1, 2006, to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood
Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data and Service
Management, Dept. C1-L5A (D800-0024).
(3) You may review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or
go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 11053–12097, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: ed3702f208bceb4c51d2ab2dfcf7008693572e25cc5974ad77c1a2f596290284
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2007-25-16 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 6cbc40d9a91881e74997ec061cde3277a809745bd686a3a252f60376b6179776. Source manifest: 61b50f1ada11bbe673ee1539ffe9f64d288d85ec985e584425d583dbe42d2cba.
Official source · 2007-12-10
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 236 (Monday, December 10, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 69591-69593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-23687]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2007-29226; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-256-AD;
Amendment 39-15298; AD 2007-25-16]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-81 (MD-81)
and DC-9-82 (MD-82) Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-81 (MD-81) and DC-9-82 (MD-82) airplanes.
This AD requires, for certain airplanes, inspecting for cracking of the
fuselage skin at the upper corners of the forward passenger doorjamb,
installing or replacing doublers as applicable, and doing applicable
repairs. This AD results from reports of fatigue cracking in the
fuselage skin at the upper corners of the forward passenger doorjamb.
We are issuing this AD to prevent cracking of the fuselage skin at the
upper corners of the forward passenger doorjamb, which could lead to
loss of overall structural integrity of the airplane.
DATES: This AD is effective January 14, 2008.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of January 14,
2008.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood
Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data and Service
Management, Dept. C1-L5A (D800-0024).
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is the Document Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
[[Page 69592]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roger Durbin, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712-4137;
telephone (562) 627-5233; fax (562) 627-5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to
certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-81 (MD-81) and DC-9-82 (MD-82)
airplanes. That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on September
19, 2007 (72 FR 53495). That NPRM proposed to require, for certain
airplanes, inspecting for cracking of the fuselage skin at the upper
corners of the forward passenger doorjamb, installing or replacing
doublers as applicable, and doing applicable repairs.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 76 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. This AD affects about 46 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The following table provides the estimated costs for U.S. operators to
comply with this AD, at an average labor rate of $80 per work hour. The
actions vary depending upon the airplane configuration.
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Work
Action hours Parts Cost per airplane Fleet cost
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Low frequency eddy current 1 None needed.......... $80, per inspection Up to $3,680, per
inspection. cycle. inspection cycle.
High frequency eddy current 1 None needed.......... $80, per inspection Up to $3,680, per
inspection. cycle. inspection cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2007-25-16 McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39-15298. Docket No. FAA-
2007-29226; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-256-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective January 14,
2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-81 (MD-81)
and DC-9-82 (MD-82) airplanes; certificated in any category; as
identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-53A298, dated
August 1, 2006.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report of fatigue cracking in the
fuselage skin at the upper corners of the forward passenger
doorjamb. We are issuing this AD to prevent cracking of the fuselage
skin at the upper corners of the forward passenger doorjamb, which
could lead to loss of overall structural integrity of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Repetitive Inspections and Corrective Actions for Configuration 1, 2,
and 3 Airplanes
(f) For airplanes identified as Configuration 1, 2, or 3 in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-53A298, dated August 1, 2006: At
the applicable times specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of
the alert service bulletin, do a low-frequency eddy current (LFEC)
or high-frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection, as applicable, for
cracking of the fuselage skin at the upper corners of the forward
passenger doorjamb; and do all applicable corrective actions
(repetitive inspections, installation of doublers, replacements, and
repairs), except as provided by paragraph (g) of this AD. Do the
actions in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the
alert service bulletin. Where the alert service
[[Page 69593]]
bulletin specifies a compliance time after the date on the service
bulletin, this AD requires compliance within the specified
compliance time after the effective date of this AD.
Repair of Certain Conditions
(g) If any crack is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (f) of this AD and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-
53A298, dated August 1, 2006, specifies to contact Boeing for repair
instructions: Before further flight, repair using a method approved
in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this
AD.
Corrective Action for Configuration 4 Airplanes
(h) For airplanes identified as Configuration 4 in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin MD80-53A298, dated August 1, 2006: Within 90 days
after the effective date of this AD, repair using a method approved
in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this
AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(i)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Delegation Option Authorization Organization who has been authorized
by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO, to make those findings. For a
repair method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification
basis of the airplane and 14 CFR 25.571, Amendment 45, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(j) You must use the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin MD80-53A298, dated August 1, 2006, to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood
Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data and Service
Management, Dept. C1-L5A (D800-0024).
(3) You may review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or
go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 29, 2007.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Assistant Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7-23687 Filed 12-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T03:34:20.936124+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- 9058f7242a5737804f63173bf9e6882dd1a9407d6e50d758695b0313dc0c531e
- Text SHA-256
- 6cbc40d9a91881e74997ec061cde3277a809745bd686a3a252f60376b6179776
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.