Published 2008-02-22 · Federal Register document E8-3069
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727 Airplanes
Publication summary
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Boeing Model 727 airplanes. This AD requires revising the FAA-approved maintenance program by incorporating new airworthiness limitations (AWLs) for fuel tank systems to satisfy Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88 requirements. This AD also requires the initial inspection of a certain repetitive AWL inspection to phase in that inspection, and repair if necessary. This AD results from a design review of the fuel tank systems. We are issuing this AD to prevent the potential for ignition sources inside fuel tanks caused by latent failures, alterations, repairs, or maintenance actions, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:26.953736+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2008-e9cf118935fdae82
- Source row
- results[70]
- Raw source SHA-256
- e9cf118935fdae82a000e2c01764c770bd79679c1dd4c2b00fdcd3b030f92fe5
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2008-04-10
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 2008-03-28
Read 10 complete recorded clauses
Effective Date
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective March 28,
2008.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 11057–11146, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 3362eaea9bac8e681bdd3a54ce3df3a053f7c223bf38d19d9da7db1fe07ae6a7
Affected ADs
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 11146–11175, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 027fbc44617399472b6ac4741da3aee18448654374228bcf4fe3f01df6b1539b
Applicability wording · Applicability
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all Boeing Model 727, 727C, 727-100, 727-
100C, 727-200, and 727-200F series airplanes, certificated in any
category.
Note 1: This AD requires revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new inspections. Compliance with
these inspections is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes
that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in the
areas addressed by these inspections, the operator may not be able
to accomplish the inspections described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must
request approval for an alternative method of compliance (AMOC)
according to paragraph (j) of this AD. The request should include a
description of changes to the required inspections that will ensure
the continued operational safety of the airplane.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 11175–12047, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: f79645562d8627074253d2c1b8087a3b1cdad907722c6668ebaa83e5b5686b97
Unsafe Condition
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a design review of the fuel tank
systems. We are issuing this AD to prevent the potential for
ignition sources inside fuel tanks caused by latent failures,
alterations, repairs, or maintenance
[[Page 9670]]
actions, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could
result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 12047–12442, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: e313a3904c4330c4c336c0559512b8a4c621f34c2b70516882697a2bf572a1c6
Compliance
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 12442–12620, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 64a7a1579f37f56eafecd0aeb3c528e7c89f6292ed0cb53091423917642d5847
Service Information Reference
Service Information Reference
(f) The term ``Document D6-8766-AWL,'' as used in this AD, means
Boeing 727-100/200 Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs), D6-8766-AWL,
dated March 2006.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 12620–12807, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 3d16ed29be4b18c94ce8861deff82987b721713aacd82ca8850b39b4734a1044
Maintenance Program Revision
Maintenance Program Revision
(g) Before December 16, 2008, revise the FAA-approved
maintenance program to incorporate the information in the sections
specified in paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), (g)(3), and (g)(4) of this
AD; except that the initial inspection required by paragraph (h) of
this AD must be done at the applicable compliance time specified in
that paragraph. Accomplishing the revision in accordance with a
later revision of Document D6-8766-AWL is an acceptable method of
compliance if the revision is approved by the Manager, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA.
(1) Section A, ``SCOPE'' of Document D6-8766-AWL.
(2) Section B, ``FUEL SYSTEMS AIRWORTHINESS LIMITATIONS,'' of
Document D6-8766-AWL.
(3) Section C, ``SYSTEM AWL PAGE FORMAT,'' of Document D6-8766-
AWL.
(4) Section D, ``AIRWORTHINESS LIMITATIONS--FUEL SYSTEMS,'' of
Document D6-8766-AWL.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 12807–13715, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 948065fd3d89ac56c4dd98291cb6d6d5b2a9f165b61f54e73c6d2c3578c32208
Initial Inspection and Repair if Necessary
Initial Inspection and Repair if Necessary
(h) At the later of the compliance times specified in paragraphs
(h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD, do a detailed inspection of the wire
bundles routed over the center fuel tank for damaged clamps, wire
chafing, and wire bundles in contact with the surface of the center
fuel tank, in accordance with AWL No. 28-AWL-01 of Section D of
Document D6-8766-AWL. If any discrepancy is found during the
inspection, repair the discrepancy before further flight in
accordance with AWL No. 28-AWL-01 of Section D of Document D6-8766-
AWL. Accomplishing the actions required by this paragraph in
accordance with a later revision of Document D6-8766-AWL is an
acceptable method of compliance if the revision is approved by the
Manager, Seattle ACO. Accomplishing AWL No. 28-AWL-01 as part of an
FAA-approved maintenance program prior to the applicable compliance
time specified in paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD constitutes
compliance with the requirements of this paragraph.
Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is:
``An intensive examination of a specific item, installation, or
assembly to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available
lighting is normally supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate. Inspection aids such as
mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface cleaning
and elaborate procedures may be required.''
(1) Prior to the accumulation of 36,000 total flight cycles, or
within 120 months since the date of issuance of the original
standard airworthiness certificate or the date of issuance of the
original export certificate of airworthiness, whichever occurs
first.
(2) Within 72 months after the effective date of this AD.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 13715–15520, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 97d794917bc2a9df9b3324ce048a8a1f6ba256aa4ba1c381005af493a3437a51
No Alternative Inspections, Inspection Intervals, or CDCCLs
No Alternative Inspections, Inspection Intervals, or CDCCLs
(i) After accomplishing the applicable actions specified in
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, no alternative inspections,
inspection intervals, or CDCCLs may be used unless the inspections,
intervals, or CDCCLs are part of a later revision of Document D6-
8766-AWL that is approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA; or unless the inspections,
intervals, or CDCCLs are approved as an AMOC in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(j)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 15520–16636, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 4784fef3780e9fa85ae26a07c330d91ffc311aa18be93f068b655d26f4f401b9
Material Incorporated by Reference
Material Incorporated by Reference
(k) You must use Boeing 727-100/200 Airworthiness Limitations
(AWLs), D6-8766-AWL, dated March 2006, to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington
98124-2207.
(3) You may review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or
go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 16636–17568, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 93de8ffbb08206b8fbb33c93441ea30bda2a11ee7f6a1a5c31afdfe501210296
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2008-04-10 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 57c2448316675aafe6a59ef9114685a0ba70667b4a33d548921966579beb6927. Source manifest: d5abaccc40639bb9539ecb168784d212aac13faf05c527adbb3a785401ba8b32.
Official source · 2008-02-22
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 36 (Friday, February 22, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9668-9670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-3069]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2007-28382; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-179-AD;
Amendment 39-15382; AD 2008-04-10]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Boeing Model 727 airplanes. This AD requires revising the FAA-approved
maintenance program by incorporating new airworthiness limitations
(AWLs) for fuel tank systems to satisfy Special Federal Aviation
Regulation No. 88 requirements. This AD also requires the initial
inspection of a certain repetitive AWL inspection to phase in that
inspection, and repair if necessary. This AD results from a design
review of the fuel tank systems. We are issuing this AD to prevent the
potential for ignition sources inside fuel tanks caused by latent
failures, alterations, repairs, or maintenance actions, which, in
combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank
explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.
DATES: This AD is effective March 28, 2008.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of March 28,
2008.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-
2207.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is the Document Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathrine Rask, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 917-6505; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to
all Boeing Model 727 airplanes. That NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on July 6, 2007 (72 FR 36901). That NPRM proposed to require
revising the FAA-approved maintenance program by incorporating new
airworthiness limitations (AWLs) for fuel tank systems to satisfy
Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88 requirements. That NPRM also
proposed to require the initial inspection of a certain repetitive AWL
inspection to phase in that inspection, and repair if necessary.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received from the one commenter.
Changes Made to This AD
For standardization purposes, we have revised this AD in the
following ways:
<bullet> We have added a new paragraph (i) to specify that no
alternative inspections, inspection intervals, or critical design
configuration control limitation (CDCCLs) may be used unless they are
part of a later approved revision of the Boeing 727-100/200
Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs), D6-8766-AWL, dated March 2006
(hereafter referred to as ``Document D6-8766-AWL''), or unless they are
approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC). Inclusion of
this paragraph in an AD is intended to ensure that the AD-mandated
airworthiness limitations changes are treated the same as the
airworthiness limitations issued with the original type certificate.
<bullet> We have simplified the language in Note 1 of this AD to
clarify that an operator must request approval for an AMOC if an
operator cannot accomplish the required inspections because an airplane
has been previously modified, altered, or repaired in the areas
addressed by the required inspections.
Change to the Compliance Time
We have revised paragraph (h)(1) of this AD to change the
compliance time from units of flight hours to flight cycles, as
specified in Document D6-8766-AWL.
Credit for Prior Accomplishment of AWL No. 28-AWL-01
We have added a statement to paragraph (h) of this AD specifying
that accomplishment of AWL No. 28-AWL-01 as part of an FAA-approved
maintenance program prior to the applicable compliance time specified
in paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD constitutes compliance with
the requirements of paragraph (h).
Request To Revise Note 1
Boeing requests that we revise Note 1 of the NPRM to clarify the
need for an AMOC. Boeing states that the current wording is difficult
to follow, and that the note is meant to inform operators that an AMOC
to the AWLs document may be required if an operator has previously
modified, altered, or repaired in the areas addressed by limitations.
Boeing requests that we revise Note 1 as follows:
[[Page 9669]]
<bullet> Add the words ``according to paragraph (g)'' at the end of
the first sentence.
<bullet> Replace the words ``revision to'' with ``deviation from''
in the last sentence.
<bullet> Delete the words ``(g) or'' and ``as applicable'' from the
last sentence.
As stated previously, we have simplified the language in Note 1 of
this AD for standardization with other similar ADs. The language the
commenter requests we change does not appear in the revised note;
therefore, no additional change to this AD is necessary in this regard.
Request To Add an Additional Reference to Appendix 1
Boeing requests that we revise Appendix 1 of the NPRM to add an
additional Air Transport Association (ATA) section for AWL No. 28-AWL-
02. Boeing states that page block 401 of chapter 53-20-11 of the Boeing
727 Airplane Maintenance Manual, Passenger Cabin Floor Panel Removal/
Installation, should be included.
We disagree with adding the additional reference, since we have
deleted Appendix 1 from this AD. The purpose of Appendix 1 was to
assist operators in identifying the maintenance manual tasks that could
affect compliance with a CDCCL. However, we have also received several
similar comments regarding the appendixes in other NPRMs that address
the same unsafe condition on other Boeing airplanes. Those comments
indicate that including non-required information in those NPRMs has
caused confusion. Further, Document D6-8766-AWL contains most of the
information that is listed in Appendix 1 of the NPRM. Therefore, we
have removed Appendix 1 from this AD.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously. We also determined that
these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 530 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The following table provides the estimated costs, at
an average labor rate of $80 per hour, for U.S. operators to comply
with this AD.
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of U.S.-
Action Work Parts Cost per registered Fleet cost
hours airplane airplanes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maintenance program revision.... 8 None............... $640 272 $174,080
Inspection...................... 8 None............... 640 272 174,080
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2008-04-10 Boeing: Amendment 39-15382. Docket No. FAA-2007-28382;
Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-179-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective March 28,
2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all Boeing Model 727, 727C, 727-100, 727-
100C, 727-200, and 727-200F series airplanes, certificated in any
category.
Note 1: This AD requires revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new inspections. Compliance with
these inspections is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes
that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in the
areas addressed by these inspections, the operator may not be able
to accomplish the inspections described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must
request approval for an alternative method of compliance (AMOC)
according to paragraph (j) of this AD. The request should include a
description of changes to the required inspections that will ensure
the continued operational safety of the airplane.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a design review of the fuel tank
systems. We are issuing this AD to prevent the potential for
ignition sources inside fuel tanks caused by latent failures,
alterations, repairs, or maintenance
[[Page 9670]]
actions, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could
result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Service Information Reference
(f) The term ``Document D6-8766-AWL,'' as used in this AD, means
Boeing 727-100/200 Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs), D6-8766-AWL,
dated March 2006.
Maintenance Program Revision
(g) Before December 16, 2008, revise the FAA-approved
maintenance program to incorporate the information in the sections
specified in paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), (g)(3), and (g)(4) of this
AD; except that the initial inspection required by paragraph (h) of
this AD must be done at the applicable compliance time specified in
that paragraph. Accomplishing the revision in accordance with a
later revision of Document D6-8766-AWL is an acceptable method of
compliance if the revision is approved by the Manager, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA.
(1) Section A, ``SCOPE'' of Document D6-8766-AWL.
(2) Section B, ``FUEL SYSTEMS AIRWORTHINESS LIMITATIONS,'' of
Document D6-8766-AWL.
(3) Section C, ``SYSTEM AWL PAGE FORMAT,'' of Document D6-8766-
AWL.
(4) Section D, ``AIRWORTHINESS LIMITATIONS--FUEL SYSTEMS,'' of
Document D6-8766-AWL.
Initial Inspection and Repair if Necessary
(h) At the later of the compliance times specified in paragraphs
(h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD, do a detailed inspection of the wire
bundles routed over the center fuel tank for damaged clamps, wire
chafing, and wire bundles in contact with the surface of the center
fuel tank, in accordance with AWL No. 28-AWL-01 of Section D of
Document D6-8766-AWL. If any discrepancy is found during the
inspection, repair the discrepancy before further flight in
accordance with AWL No. 28-AWL-01 of Section D of Document D6-8766-
AWL. Accomplishing the actions required by this paragraph in
accordance with a later revision of Document D6-8766-AWL is an
acceptable method of compliance if the revision is approved by the
Manager, Seattle ACO. Accomplishing AWL No. 28-AWL-01 as part of an
FAA-approved maintenance program prior to the applicable compliance
time specified in paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD constitutes
compliance with the requirements of this paragraph.
Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is:
``An intensive examination of a specific item, installation, or
assembly to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available
lighting is normally supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate. Inspection aids such as
mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface cleaning
and elaborate procedures may be required.''
(1) Prior to the accumulation of 36,000 total flight cycles, or
within 120 months since the date of issuance of the original
standard airworthiness certificate or the date of issuance of the
original export certificate of airworthiness, whichever occurs
first.
(2) Within 72 months after the effective date of this AD.
No Alternative Inspections, Inspection Intervals, or CDCCLs
(i) After accomplishing the applicable actions specified in
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, no alternative inspections,
inspection intervals, or CDCCLs may be used unless the inspections,
intervals, or CDCCLs are part of a later revision of Document D6-
8766-AWL that is approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA; or unless the inspections,
intervals, or CDCCLs are approved as an AMOC in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(j)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(k) You must use Boeing 727-100/200 Airworthiness Limitations
(AWLs), D6-8766-AWL, dated March 2006, to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington
98124-2207.
(3) You may review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or
go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 13, 2008.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Assistant Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8-3069 Filed 2-21-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T03:32:53.780811+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- 02b2dd8fc91ca4edd3f318af55f97ba80a58c4f95680313578ee79b7aef7ee0a
- Text SHA-256
- 57c2448316675aafe6a59ef9114685a0ba70667b4a33d548921966579beb6927
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.