Published 2009-07-21 · Federal Register document E9-16937
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A319, A320, and A321 Series Airplanes
Publication summary
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:30.011257+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2009-cb57e588bd107238
- Source row
- results[200]
- Raw source SHA-256
- cb57e588bd10723805ef0ea28ddc0685de14711012023c7e7d12178879efaeed
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2009-15-07
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 2009-08-25
Read 9 complete recorded clauses
Effective Date
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective August
25, 2009.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 10020–10115, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 97d61a435098b453a629ac8651332896248880d1568a23ec40f9221236fd4d22
Affected ADs
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 10115–10144, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 027fbc44617399472b6ac4741da3aee18448654374228bcf4fe3f01df6b1539b
Applicability wording · Applicability
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114,
-115, -131, -132, and -133; A320-111, -211, -212, -214, -231, -232,
and -233; and A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232
series airplanes; certificated in any category; equipped with one
conventional pre-Enhanced Manufacture and Maintainability (pre-EMM)
Braking and Steering Control Unit (BSCU), having the part numbers
specified in paragraph (c)(1), (c)(2), or (c)(3) of this AD.
(1) C20216332292C (standard 7) installed by Airbus Modification
24449 in production, or by Airbus Service Bulletin A320-32-1124 in
service.
(2) C202163372D32 (standard 9) installed by Airbus Modification
31106 in production, or by Airbus Service Bulletin A320-32-1227 or
A320-32-1232 in service.
(3) C202163382D32 (standard 9.1) installed by Airbus
Modification 32500 in production, or by Airbus Service Bulletin
A320-32-1254 in service.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 10144–11088, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 76248e39e43609941c5d391a18223f9a339a3c9696865374642d9974ca4fa71a
Subject
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32: Landing
gear.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 11088–11173, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 5f6d50d573cb51c3b4a69db921bc9b2f123d135f6f9d4779616be95a4ded342b
Reason
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
In 2005 a lateral runway excursion occurred on an A320 aircraft.
Such excursions are classified as hazardous, with a large reduction
in safety margins. Investigation has shown that the aircraft landed
with the nose wheels rotated nearly 20 degrees from center. During
subsequent tests on the removed BSCU [Braking and Steering Control
Unit], a BSCU hardware failure was found, affecting the monitoring
function, including the system reconfiguration management, and
leading to a runaway of [the] Nose Wheel Steering [uncommanded
steering].
DGAC [Direction G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'Aviation Civile]
Airworthiness Directive (AD) F-1992-117-025(B), Revision 1 [which
corresponds to FAA AD 94-24-07], mandated the BSCU upgrade in order
to improve the steering logic, but this modification has shown not
to be sufficient to address the identified failure mechanism.
A software modification is now implemented in BSCU standard 10
which improves the system reconfiguration management when this
failure mechanism is detected.
BSCU standard 10 also includes other improvements--as detailed
in the associated Service Bulletin.
This AD therefore mandates the modification or replacement of
the BSCU standard 7, 9 or 9.1, by the BSCU standard 10.
The unsafe condition is an uncommanded steering condition during
takeoff or landing, which could result in departure of the airplane
from the runway. The corrective action also includes replacement of
certain DUNLOP tires that are not compatible with BSCU standard 10.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 11173–12807, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: e91bec3efebc18f0103e0be5bdf8d646348ce95b043e8b9eeec17626465f13cb
Actions and Compliance
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
(1) Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD: Modify
or replace the BSCU in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A320-32-1336,
Revision 01, dated January 10, 2008; and inspect the airplane to
determine if DUNLOP tires 46x16-20 having part number (P/N) 11659 T
or 11661 T are installed. If those tires are installed, before
further flight, replace with acceptable tires using a method
approved by either the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) (or its delegated agent). Accomplishment of the
applicable requirements in this paragraph terminates the
requirements of AD 94-24-07, amendment 39-9080.
(2) Previous accomplishment of the modification or replacement
of the BSCU before the effective date of this AD in accordance with
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A320-32-1336, dated September 19,
2007, meets the requirements of paragraph (f)(1) of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: Although the MCAI and service information do
not provide procedures for replacing the tires as specified in
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, this AD requires that you replace the
tires using a method approved by either the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, FAA, or the EASA (or its delegated agent).
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 12807–14322, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 0e5612385ee0c56c8d093d7cd90273a7804d33e671c50467106bee895593a2c2
Other FAA AD Provisions
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for
this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Tim Dulin, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 227-2141; fax (425) 227-1149. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 14322–15704, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: e22de6349e1b6dab5212dbf366f3e392fe9b88ef74b34874557337fc5d1b8822
Related Information
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 2008-0048, dated
February 28, 2008; and Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A320-32-
1336, Revision 01, dated January 10, 2008; for related information.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 15704–15929, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 864e451bde5b97eb8fae3d6e9a4ac7d7ee659b202519a05f6fe8b40cd81d3b03
Material Incorporated by Reference
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A320-32-1336,
Revision 01, dated January 10, 2008, to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5
61 93 44 51; e-mail: [email protected]; Internet
http://www.airbus.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 425-227-1152.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
[[Page 35777]]
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 15929–17179, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 5c480b3c79d4a88f4e64513e664833dbea96a1101bfa0b76b82c9f7193e482d7
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2009-15-07 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: f9c7c50d4825252ea59a1fcd61183327e184e35b5079e7c740efc9723ed2f10c. Source manifest: 0632cc07d65a47a4a2e12804b8efd66ab4c741dba176e995403234a96f087978.
Official source · 2009-07-21
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 138 (Tuesday, July 21, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35774-35777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16937]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-1365; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-076-AD;
Amendment 39-15970; AD 2009-15-07]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A319, A320, and A321
Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
In 2005 a lateral runway excursion occurred on an A320 aircraft.
Such excursions are classified as hazardous, with a large reduction
in safety margins. Investigation has shown that the aircraft landed
with the nose wheels rotated nearly 20 degrees from center. During
subsequent tests on the removed BSCU [Braking and Steering Control
Unit], a BSCU hardware failure was found, affecting the monitoring
function, including the system reconfiguration management, and
leading to a runaway of [the] Nose Wheel Steering [uncommanded
steering].
* * * * *
The unsafe condition is an uncommanded steering condition during
takeoff or landing, which could result in departure of the airplane
from the runway. We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct
the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective August 25, 2009.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of August 25,
2009.
[[Page 35775]]
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Dulin, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-2141; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on January 7, 2009 (74
FR 664). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
In 2005 a lateral runway excursion occurred on an A320 aircraft.
Such excursions are classified as hazardous, with a large reduction
in safety margins. Investigation has shown that the aircraft landed
with the nose wheels rotated nearly 20 degrees from center. During
subsequent tests on the removed BSCU [Braking and Steering Control
Unit], a BSCU hardware failure was found, affecting the monitoring
function, including the system reconfiguration management, and
leading to a runaway of [the] Nose Wheel Steering [uncommanded
steering].
DGAC [Direction G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'Aviation Civile]
Airworthiness Directive (AD) F-1992-117-025(B), Revision 1 [which
corresponds to FAA AD 94-24-07], mandated the BSCU upgrade in order
to improve the steering logic, but this modification has shown not
to be sufficient to address the identified failure mechanism.
A software modification is now implemented in BSCU standard 10
which improves the system reconfiguration management when this
failure mechanism is detected.
BSCU standard 10 also includes other improvements--as detailed
in the associated Service Bulletin.
This AD therefore mandates the modification or replacement of
the BSCU standard 7, 9 or 9.1, by the BSCU standard 10.
The unsafe condition is an uncommanded steering condition during
takeoff or landing, which could result in departure of the airplane
from the runway. The corrective action also includes replacement of
certain DUNLOP tires that are not compatible with BSCU standard 10. You
may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received.
Support for the AD
JetBlue Airways Corporation supports the actions specified in the
NPRM.
Request To Relocate Certain Language
Airbus suggests that we relocate the following sentence in the
Reason section: ``An uncommanded steering condition during takeoff or
landing could result in departure of the airplane from the runway.''
Airbus states that relocating that sentence away from the previous
sentence, which addresses replacing tires, would avoid
misinterpretation by association.
We acknowledge the Airbus comment and we have relocated the subject
sentence and clarified that it is the statement of the unsafe condition
in both the Discussion and Reason sections of this AD.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data, including the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the change described previously. We determined that this
change will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 591 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 3 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $80 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $0 per product.
Where the service information lists required parts costs that are
covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge
for these parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected
parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based
on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the U.S. operators
to be $141,840, or $240 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
[[Page 35776]]
(800) 647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available
in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2009-15-07 Airbus: Amendment 39-15970. Docket No. FAA-2008-1365;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-076-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective August
25, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114,
-115, -131, -132, and -133; A320-111, -211, -212, -214, -231, -232,
and -233; and A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232
series airplanes; certificated in any category; equipped with one
conventional pre-Enhanced Manufacture and Maintainability (pre-EMM)
Braking and Steering Control Unit (BSCU), having the part numbers
specified in paragraph (c)(1), (c)(2), or (c)(3) of this AD.
(1) C20216332292C (standard 7) installed by Airbus Modification
24449 in production, or by Airbus Service Bulletin A320-32-1124 in
service.
(2) C202163372D32 (standard 9) installed by Airbus Modification
31106 in production, or by Airbus Service Bulletin A320-32-1227 or
A320-32-1232 in service.
(3) C202163382D32 (standard 9.1) installed by Airbus
Modification 32500 in production, or by Airbus Service Bulletin
A320-32-1254 in service.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32: Landing
gear.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
In 2005 a lateral runway excursion occurred on an A320 aircraft.
Such excursions are classified as hazardous, with a large reduction
in safety margins. Investigation has shown that the aircraft landed
with the nose wheels rotated nearly 20 degrees from center. During
subsequent tests on the removed BSCU [Braking and Steering Control
Unit], a BSCU hardware failure was found, affecting the monitoring
function, including the system reconfiguration management, and
leading to a runaway of [the] Nose Wheel Steering [uncommanded
steering].
DGAC [Direction G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'Aviation Civile]
Airworthiness Directive (AD) F-1992-117-025(B), Revision 1 [which
corresponds to FAA AD 94-24-07], mandated the BSCU upgrade in order
to improve the steering logic, but this modification has shown not
to be sufficient to address the identified failure mechanism.
A software modification is now implemented in BSCU standard 10
which improves the system reconfiguration management when this
failure mechanism is detected.
BSCU standard 10 also includes other improvements--as detailed
in the associated Service Bulletin.
This AD therefore mandates the modification or replacement of
the BSCU standard 7, 9 or 9.1, by the BSCU standard 10.
The unsafe condition is an uncommanded steering condition during
takeoff or landing, which could result in departure of the airplane
from the runway. The corrective action also includes replacement of
certain DUNLOP tires that are not compatible with BSCU standard 10.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
(1) Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD: Modify
or replace the BSCU in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A320-32-1336,
Revision 01, dated January 10, 2008; and inspect the airplane to
determine if DUNLOP tires 46x16-20 having part number (P/N) 11659 T
or 11661 T are installed. If those tires are installed, before
further flight, replace with acceptable tires using a method
approved by either the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) (or its delegated agent). Accomplishment of the
applicable requirements in this paragraph terminates the
requirements of AD 94-24-07, amendment 39-9080.
(2) Previous accomplishment of the modification or replacement
of the BSCU before the effective date of this AD in accordance with
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A320-32-1336, dated September 19,
2007, meets the requirements of paragraph (f)(1) of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: Although the MCAI and service information do
not provide procedures for replacing the tires as specified in
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, this AD requires that you replace the
tires using a method approved by either the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, FAA, or the EASA (or its delegated agent).
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for
this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Tim Dulin, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 227-2141; fax (425) 227-1149. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 2008-0048, dated
February 28, 2008; and Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A320-32-
1336, Revision 01, dated January 10, 2008; for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A320-32-1336,
Revision 01, dated January 10, 2008, to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5
61 93 44 51; e-mail: [email protected]; Internet
http://www.airbus.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 425-227-1152.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
[[Page 35777]]
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 2, 2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-16937 Filed 7-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T03:21:30.318609+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- 2f3240acf2650e010839c58853086c58c5f19c8e9424f1ababc2242e4070d386
- Text SHA-256
- f9c7c50d4825252ea59a1fcd61183327e184e35b5079e7c740efc9723ed2f10c
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.