Published 2009-12-04 · Federal Register document E9-28556
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A320 Series Airplanes
Publication summary
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
Why this record is shown
Source: Federal Register annual FAA metadata. Acquired 2026-09-03T22:23:30.011257+00:00. The title, summary and date are source facts.
- Source revision
- federal_register_ad_metadata_2009-cb57e588bd107238
- Source row
- results[347]
- Raw source SHA-256
- cb57e588bd10723805ef0ea28ddc0685de14711012023c7e7d12178879efaeed
Final-rule publication
Recorded publication clauses
- AD identifier printed in this edition
- 2009-24-19
- Effective date printed in this edition
- 2010-01-08
Read 9 complete recorded clauses
Effective Date
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective January
8, 2010.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 9440–9535, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: f7ae1df5a7ab4a54398ce76560a56e2a407c1644458c05101314a58ea88312da
Affected ADs
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 9535–9564, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 027fbc44617399472b6ac4741da3aee18448654374228bcf4fe3f01df6b1539b
Applicability wording · Applicability
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A320-111, -211, -212, -214,
-231, -232, and -233 series airplanes, certificated in any category,
all certified models, all serial numbers, equipped with Hamilton
Sundstrand (formerly Dowty) Ram Air Turbine (RAT) Ejection Jack,
Model ERPS13EJ, part number (P/N) 114160004A or 114160005, except
those airplanes on which Airbus modification 27189 was done in
production or Airbus Service Bulletin A320-29-1100 was done in
service, and on which Airbus modification 28413 was not done in
production.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 9564–10123, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 21e4d5cfb4d57af08b4d560989789efcbef877e8537bab25cb6300b2fcc8c026
Subject
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 29:
Hydraulic Power.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 10123–10211, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 1cc114f68457896243cd4e1bba31b8aceba38e8df8f320d6db84b9949c44d055
Reason
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
An A320 operator experienced difficulties in extending the RAT
during a deployment testing.
During the trouble shooting, the Ejection Jack of the RAT was
removed and investigated.
The investigation identified excessive wear of the uplock
segments against the inner cylinder of the Ejection Jack, due to an
incorrect blend radius of the inner cylinder. This problem was
determined to be caused during the previous rework of the Ejection
Jack and was possibly due to the incomplete requirements contained
within the Component Maintenance Manual (CMM).
This Ejection Jack failure may prevent the effective deployment
and use of the RAT in emergency conditions.
This AD therefore mandates the replacement of an Ejection Jack
that has been previously reworked in accordance with the incomplete
CMM requirements. This will restore the reliability of the Ejection
Jack of the RAT.
The implementation of this modification was originally managed
by an Airbus monitoring campaign. However, the rate of installation
of the corrective action by operators has not met the predicated
[sic] target. As such and to ensure continued compliance with the
certification requirements, it is considered necessary to require
compliance by means of an AD.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 10211–11567, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: e734b47ec16fb482fdaab357902deb4b4c09cf23df7a3cbe86d3c1636e6987eb
Actions and Compliance
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
(1) Within 12 months after the effective date of this AD,
identify the serial number of the installed ejection jack of the
RAT, in accordance with Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-29-1136, dated February 20, 2007. If the
serial number is included in the affected batch identified in the
service bulletin, before further flight, replace the ejection jack
of the RAT with a modified or reworked ejection jack, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin
A320-29-1136, dated February 20, 2007.
(2) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install a
RAT Ejection Jack Model ERPS13EJ, P/N 114160004A or 114160005, on
any airplane unless the ejection jack has been modified or reworked
in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A320-29-1136, dated
February 20, 2007.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: While the European Aviation Safety Agency AD
2008-0199, dated November 5, 2008, applies to Airbus Model A318,
A319, and A321 series airplanes, this AD does not list these models
for reasons explained in the Comments section of this AD.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 11567–12843, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: f503a15d34fe23bbf34e461c7f7c1a692cff6e20933f05be38c20a18baf45a60
Other FAA AD Provisions
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Tim
Dulin, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-2141; fax (425) 227-1149. Before
using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal
avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 12843–14316, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 1736c9076177bd8a5ee380805409b9779719a7383575efdf285c0ba81d7006b8
Related Information
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2008-0199, dated November 5, 2008; and Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-29-1136, dated February 20, 2007; for related
information.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 14316–14546, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: e36f0679329fab172c68d8074adfbafdf35bdd6f6a618c5e1bbbe0f772830199
Material Incorporated by Reference
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Airbus Service Bulletin A320-29-1136, excluding
Appendix 01, dated February 20, 2007, to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; e-mail:
[email protected]; Internet http://www.airbus.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 425-227-1152.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Exact source excerpt. Text positions 14546–15750, end exclusive, in the original decoded publication. SHA-256: 03d0ae2ef38eaad345db959bf382e6923b27f9a3ea06b27d682cc40f9bc2711a
No replacement link has been established from this edition. The complete historical rule chain and current legal effect remain unknown.
Find all recorded historical references to AD 2009-24-19 · 0 printed reference observations in this pinned collection.
These are observations from one dated publication. Current legal status is unknown; aircraft applicability, installed configuration, compliance and burden require separate evidence. Missing or unparsed conditions remain unknown.
Why these observations are shown
They were extracted offline from the same immutable official HTML source as the complete recorded text. The dated source wording, original text coordinates and exact quote digests are retained. PDF/text agreement and current regulatory effect have not been qualified.
Observation revision: whole-ad-publication-clause-observations-1.0.1. Text SHA-256: 6dafb8c6ff21d19f87892c2c18430adfc399e592e8203245ce2803a7b2bc56d4. Source manifest: 006cd0b28fa801fb0a8c64144df8610430601f6592523da95981a9720fcb03c9.
Official source · 2009-12-04
Publication text
This is the complete recorded text of this dated publication.
Current legal effect is unknown. Aircraft applicability, installed configuration and compliance require separate evidence. PDF/text agreement has not been evaluated.
Read the complete official publication text
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 232 (Friday, December 4, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63585-63587]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-28556]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2009-0379; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-220-AD;
Amendment 39-16113; AD 2009-24-19]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A320 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
An A320 operator experienced difficulties in extending the RAT
[ram air turbine] during a deployment testing.
During the trouble shooting, the Ejection Jack of the RAT was
removed and investigated.
The investigation identified excessive wear of the uplock
segments against the inner cylinder of the Ejection Jack, due to an
incorrect blend radius of the inner cylinder. * * *
This Ejection Jack failure may prevent the effective deployment
and use of the RAT in emergency conditions.
* * * * *
We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective January 8, 2010.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of January 8,
2010.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Dulin, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-2141; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 63586]]
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on April 29, 2009 (74
FR 19462). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
An A320 operator experienced difficulties in extending the RAT
[ram air turbine] during a deployment testing.
During the trouble shooting, the Ejection Jack of the RAT was
removed and investigated.
The investigation identified excessive wear of the uplock
segments against the inner cylinder of the Ejection Jack, due to an
incorrect blend radius of the inner cylinder. This problem was
determined to be caused during the previous rework of the Ejection
Jack and was possible due to the incomplete requirements contained
within the Component Maintenance Manual (CMM).
This Ejection Jack failure may prevent the effective deployment
and use of the RAT in emergency conditions.
This AD therefore mandates the replacement of an Ejection Jack
that has been previously reworked in accordance with the incomplete
CMM requirements. This will restore the reliability of the Ejection
Jack of the RAT.
The implementation of this modification was originally managed
by an Airbus monitoring campaign. However, the rate of installation
of the corrective action by operators has not met the predicated
[sic] target. As such and to ensure continued compliance with the
certification requirements, it is considered necessary to require
compliance by means of an AD.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received.
Request for Inclusion of Airbus Model A320 Only
Both Airbus and Virgin America request that we revise the
applicability section (paragraph (c)) of the NPRM to state that only
Airbus Model A320 airplanes are affected. The commenters note that
Airbus Model A318, A319, and A321 series airplanes are equipped with
Sundstrand RATs as part of the basic type design per Airbus
modification 22803 and that there is no option to install Hamilton
Sundstrand (formerly Dowty) RATs, which is the subject of this AD.
We agree, for the reason stated above, and have removed Airbus
Model A318, A319, and A321 airplanes from the applicability statement
of this AD. We also noted this change as a difference between European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Airworthiness Directive 2008-0199, dated
November 5, 2008, and the FAA AD in Note 1 of this AD. We coordinated
with European Aviation Safety Agency on this issue.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data, including the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the change described previously. We determined that this
change will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a Note within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 187 products of U.S. registry. We
also estimate that it takes about 2 work-hours per product to comply
with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate is $80
per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD
to the U.S. operators to be $29,920, or $160 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2009-24-19 Airbus: Amendment 39-16113. Docket No. FAA-2009-0379;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-220-AD.
[[Page 63587]]
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective January
8, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A320-111, -211, -212, -214,
-231, -232, and -233 series airplanes, certificated in any category,
all certified models, all serial numbers, equipped with Hamilton
Sundstrand (formerly Dowty) Ram Air Turbine (RAT) Ejection Jack,
Model ERPS13EJ, part number (P/N) 114160004A or 114160005, except
those airplanes on which Airbus modification 27189 was done in
production or Airbus Service Bulletin A320-29-1100 was done in
service, and on which Airbus modification 28413 was not done in
production.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 29:
Hydraulic Power.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
An A320 operator experienced difficulties in extending the RAT
during a deployment testing.
During the trouble shooting, the Ejection Jack of the RAT was
removed and investigated.
The investigation identified excessive wear of the uplock
segments against the inner cylinder of the Ejection Jack, due to an
incorrect blend radius of the inner cylinder. This problem was
determined to be caused during the previous rework of the Ejection
Jack and was possibly due to the incomplete requirements contained
within the Component Maintenance Manual (CMM).
This Ejection Jack failure may prevent the effective deployment
and use of the RAT in emergency conditions.
This AD therefore mandates the replacement of an Ejection Jack
that has been previously reworked in accordance with the incomplete
CMM requirements. This will restore the reliability of the Ejection
Jack of the RAT.
The implementation of this modification was originally managed
by an Airbus monitoring campaign. However, the rate of installation
of the corrective action by operators has not met the predicated
[sic] target. As such and to ensure continued compliance with the
certification requirements, it is considered necessary to require
compliance by means of an AD.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
(1) Within 12 months after the effective date of this AD,
identify the serial number of the installed ejection jack of the
RAT, in accordance with Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-29-1136, dated February 20, 2007. If the
serial number is included in the affected batch identified in the
service bulletin, before further flight, replace the ejection jack
of the RAT with a modified or reworked ejection jack, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin
A320-29-1136, dated February 20, 2007.
(2) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install a
RAT Ejection Jack Model ERPS13EJ, P/N 114160004A or 114160005, on
any airplane unless the ejection jack has been modified or reworked
in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A320-29-1136, dated
February 20, 2007.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: While the European Aviation Safety Agency AD
2008-0199, dated November 5, 2008, applies to Airbus Model A318,
A319, and A321 series airplanes, this AD does not list these models
for reasons explained in the Comments section of this AD.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Tim
Dulin, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-2141; fax (425) 227-1149. Before
using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal
avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2008-0199, dated November 5, 2008; and Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-29-1136, dated February 20, 2007; for related
information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Airbus Service Bulletin A320-29-1136, excluding
Appendix 01, dated February 20, 2007, to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; e-mail:
[email protected]; Internet http://www.airbus.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 425-227-1152.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 19, 2009.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-28556 Filed 12-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Why this text is shown
The complete text was extracted from the official GovInfo HTML edition for this publication. Acquired 2026-10-09T03:19:07.263696+00:00. Text extraction preserves the recorded source wording; it does not determine current requirements.
Open the captured official edition
- Source SHA-256
- cc171d4fcf6681608b42e47a4de1f5c59e27768fb79416dd653f8a396e88b22f
- Text SHA-256
- 6dafb8c6ff21d19f87892c2c18430adfc399e592e8203245ce2803a7b2bc56d4
Return to the full metadata catalog · Search complete publication text · Explore retained publication text and evidence
Coverage and limits
These are dated publication metadata, recorded clauses and literal source observations. Word, model-label, header and reference matches do not establish current legal effect, manufacturer/model identity, aircraft applicability, installed configuration or compliance.
The collection uses 33 explicit annual source snapshots. Source captures and operative-text qualifications have separate states. Missing information remains unknown.